[
1. Archambault, J. Monotonic and Non-Monotonic Embeddings of Anselm’s Proof. Logica Universalis 11 (1), 2017, pp. 120-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0162-710.1007/s11787-017-0162-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Besnard, P. A Note on Directions for Cumulativity. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 1 (2), 2014, pp. 77-81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Bonaventure of Bagnoregio and Karris R. J. (tr.). Commentary on the Gospel of John, Saint Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute and Saint Bonaventure University, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Franks C. The Realm of the Sacred, Wherein We May Not Draw an Inference From Something Which Itself Has Been Inferred: A Reading of Talmud Bavli Zevachim Folio 50. History and Philosophy of Logic, 33(1), 2012, pp. 69-86.10.1080/01445340.2011.606127
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Gabbay, D. M. Theoretical Foundations for Non-Monotonic Reasoning in Expert Systems. In: K. R. Apt (ed.), Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems (pp. 439-457), Berlin: Springer, 1985.10.1007/978-3-642-82453-1_15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Jamieson, R. B. and Wittman, T. R. Biblical Reasoning: Christological and Trinitarian Rules for Exegesis, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Makinson, D. General Theory of Cumulative Inferences. In: M. Reinfrank, J. Kleer, M. L. Ginsberg, E. Sandewall (eds.), Non-Monotonic Reasoning: 2nd International Workshop, Grassau, FRG, June 1988. Proceedings (pp. 1-18), Berlin: Springer, 1989.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Malinowski, J. Logiki niemonotoniczne. Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa seria 6 (1), 1997, pp. 31-53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Malinowski, J. Rola oczekiwań w rozumowaniach. Ruch Filozoficzny 53 (4), 1996, pp. 757-583.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. McDermott, D. Nonmonotonic Logic II: Nonmonotonic Modal Theories, Journal of the ACM 29 (1), 1982, pp. 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1145/322290.32229310.1145/322290.322293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. McDermott, D. and Doyle, J. Non-Monotonic Logic I. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1-2), 1980, pp. 41-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90012-010.1016/0004-3702(80)90012-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Pogoda, P. Tomasz z Akwinu monotonicznie. Filozofia Nauki 20 (2), 2012, pp. 129-133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Reiter, R. A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1-2), 1980, pp. 81-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-410.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Reiter, R. On Reasoning by Default. In: D. L. Waltz (ed.), TINLAP ’78: Proceedings of the 1978 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (pp. 210-218), Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1978. https://doi.org/10.3115/980262.98029710.3115/980262.980297
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Roszak, P. Between Dialectics and Metaphor. Dynamics of Exegetical Practice of Thomas Aquinas. Angelicum 90 (3), 2013, pp. 507-534.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Schumann, A. Logical Cornestones of Judaic Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 27, 2014, pp. 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9273-810.1007/s10503-012-9273-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Trepczyński, M. Non-Monotonic Logic and the Compatibility of Science and Religion. Logica Universalis 4 (13), 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00230-410.1007/s11787-019-00230-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Trepczyński, M. Tomasz z Akwinu niemonotonicznie. Filozofia Nauki 19 (2), 2011, pp. 115-121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Wójtowicz, A. and Trepczyński, M. Logiki niemonotoniczne jako sposób wnioskowania w niesprzyjających warunkach. Filozofia Nauki 19 (2), 2011, pp. 99-103.
]Search in Google Scholar
