[
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 373–415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, Mark & Ruth Kramer. 2014. Rethinking Amharic prepositions as case markers inserted at PF. Lingua 145. 141–172.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baunaz, Lena & Eric Lander. 2018. Nanosyntax: The basics. In Lena Baunaz, Karen De Clerq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander (eds.), Exploring Nanosyntax 4–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernstein, Judy. 1993. The syntactic role of word markers in null nominal constructions. Probus 5. 5–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhatt, Rajesh & Rouyana Pancheva. 2017. Implicit arguments. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 1–35. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives and the structure of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonet, Eulàlia & Daniel Harbour. 2012. Contextual allomorphy. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 195–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buell, Leston, Mariame Sy & Harold Torrence. 2014. The syntax of mirror principle violations in Wolof. In Carson T. Schütze & Linnaea Stockall (eds.), Connectedness papers by and for Sarah VanWagenen, UCLA working papers in linguistics 18, 71–101. http://phonetics.linguistics.ucla.edu/wpl/issues/wpl18/papers/buellsytorr.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caha, Pavel. 2013. Explaining the structure of case paradigms by the mechanisms of Nanosyntax: The classical Armenian nominal declension. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31. 1015–1066.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caha, Pavel. 2020. Nanosyntax: Some key features. Ms., Masaryk University, Brno.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calabrese, Andrea. 2015. Irregular morphology and athematic verbs in Italo-Romance. Isogloss [Special issue]. 69–102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cardinaletti, Anna & Ur Shlonsky. 2004. Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 519–557.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carstens, Vicki. 1991. The morphology and syntax of determiner phrases in Kiswahili. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carstens, Vicki. 1993. On nominal morphology and DP structure. In Sam A. Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI, Stanford University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Choi, Jaehoon & Heidi Harley. 2019. Locality domains and morphological rules. Language and Linguistic Theory 37. 1319–1365.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language. New York: Prager.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), Step by step, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 315–332.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2015. Again on tense, aspect, mood morpheme order and the “mirror principle”. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Functional structure from top to toe, 232–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris. 2006. A Note on derivational morphology. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris. 2007. Home sweet home. In Lisa Levinson & Oana Savescu-Ciucivara (eds.), NYU working papers in linguistics 1. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001967.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris. 2017. Merge(X,Y) = {X,Y}. In Leah Bauke, Andreas Blümel & Erich Groat (eds.), Labels and roots, 47–68. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris. 2018. The logic of contextual allomorphy. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris. 2022. A merge-based approach to argument structure. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris & Francisco Ordóñez. 2021. Spanish usted as an imposter. Probus 33. 249–269.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris & Paul Postal. 2012. Imposters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, Chris & Edward Stabler. 2016. A formalization of minimalist syntax. Syntax 19. 43–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Craenenbroeck, Jereon van & Jason Merchant. 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 701–745. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobashi, Yoshihito. 2020. Externalization: Phonological interpretations of syntactic objects. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Embick, David. 2015. The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emonds, Joseph E. 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 613–632.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erschler, David. 2018. Suspended affixation as morpheme ellipsis: Evidence for Ossetic alternative questions. Glossa 3(1). 12, 1–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fabb, Nigel. 1988. English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 527–539.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fábregas, Antonio. 2012. Evidence for multidominance in Spanish agentive nominalizations. In Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds.), Ways of structure building, 66–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gotah, Selikem & Soo-Hwan Lee. 2022. Negation in Ewe (Tongugbe) agent nominalization. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds.), Papers on phonology and morphology, MIT working papers in linguistics 21, 275–288. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harley, Heidi. 2008. When is syncretism more than a syncretism? In Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susan Béjar (eds.), Phi-theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces, 251–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, James. 1998. Spanish imperatives: Syntax meets morphology. Journal of Linguistics 34. 27–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 2015. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Audrey
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 533–564.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Null subject parameters. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Julien, Marit. 2007. On the relation between morphology and syntax. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 209–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2006. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation. In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 289–299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (reprinted in Kayne 2010b).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2008. Antisymmetry and the lexicon. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Johan Rooryck (eds.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8, 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (also in Anna Maria di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds.). 2011. The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty, 329–353. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) (reprinted in Kayne 2010b).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2010a. Toward a syntactic reinterpretation of Harris and Halle (2005). In Reineke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Bart Hollebrandse (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2008: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen 2008, 145–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (reprinted in Kayne 2010b).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2010b. Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2016. The silence of heads. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37. 1–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2017. Antisymmetry and morphology: Prefixes vs. suffixes. In Clemens Mayr & Edwin Williams (eds.), Festschrift für Martin Prinzhorn, Wiener Linguistische Gazette 82, 145–161. https://wlg.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_wlg/822017/Kayne_wlg.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2018. Toward an understanding of apparent suppletion in Romance pronominal possessives. Probus 30. 251–276.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2019a. What is suppletion? On *goed and on went in Modern English. Transactions of the Philological Society 117. 434–454.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2019b. The place of linear order in the language faculty. Linguistic Analysis 42. 441–472.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2020. A note on the silent GO that underlies an instance of apparent suppletion in Spanish. Isogloss 6/4. 1–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. 2022. Antisymmetry and externalization. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 43. 1–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard. To appear. On a more demanding approach to suppletion. In Giuliano Bocci, Daniele Botteri, Claudia Manetti & Vincenzo Moscati (eds.), Issues in comparative morpho-syntax and language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard & Andrea Moro. To appear. A note on zero and silent negation. Koopman, Hilda. 2000. The syntax of specifiers and heads. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koopman, Hilda. 2005. Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 601–633.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koopman, Hilda. 2017. A note on Huave morpheme ordering: Local dislocation or generalized U20? In Gautam Sengupta, Shruti Sircar, Madhavi Gayathri Raman & Rahul Balusu(eds.), Perspectives on the architecture and the acquisition of syntax, 23–47. Singapore: Springer Nature.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koopman, Hilda & Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kramer, Ruth. 2016a. A split analysis of plurality: Number in Amharic. Linguistic Inquiry 47. 527–559.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kramer, Ruth. 2016b. The location of gender features in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10. 661–677.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lees, Robert B. 1963. The grammar of English nominalizations. Bloomington: Indiana University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levi, Judith N. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liao, Wei-Wen Roger. 2014. Morphology. In C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 3–25. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGinnis, Martha. 2017. Distributed morphology. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muriungi, Peter Kinyua. 2014. Phrasal movement in the Bantu verbal complex: Deriving affix scope and order in Kî îtharaka. Syntax 17. 21–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nevins, Andrew. 2010. Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Ntelitheos, Dimitrios. 2012. Deriving nominals: A syntactic account of Malagasy nominalizations, vol. 3. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ordóñez, Francisco. 2002. Some clitic combinations in the syntax of Romance. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1. 201–224.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Picallo, M. Carme. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio 1. 47–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Punske, Jeffrey & Scott R. Jackson. 2017. The bifurcated nature of plural: Reconsidering evidence from English compounds. In Julia Nee, Margaret Cychosz, Dmetri Hayes, Tyler Lau & Emily Remirez (eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the BLS, 261–283. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 501–557.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Săvescu-Ciucivara, Oana. 2009. A syntactic analysis of pronominal clitic clusters in Romance: The view from Romanian. New York: New York University dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shlonsky, Ur. To appear. Rescaffolding the bundle in Afroasiatic inflection: Tamazight and Hebrew. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terzi, Arhonto. 1999. Clitic combinations, their hosts, and their ordering. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 85–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido. 2018. The feature structure of pronouns: A probe into multidimensional paradigms. In Lena Baunaz, Karen De Clerq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander (eds.), Exploring Nanosyntax, 277–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yip, Po-Ching & Don Rimmington. 2004. Chinese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zyman, Erik & Nick Kalivoda. 2020. XP- and X0-movement in the Latin verb: Evidence from mirroring and anti-mirroring. Glossa 5(1): 20. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1049.
]Search in Google Scholar
