Open Access

Analysis of Energy Retrofit Assessment Methodologies in Buildings by European Research Projects


Cite

[1] Gupta J., Chakraborty M. Energy efficiency in buildings. In Sustainable Fuel Technologies Handbook 2021:457– 480. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822989-7.00016-010.1016/B978-0-12-822989-7.00016-0 Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Commission. Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings. Search in Google Scholar

[3] European Commission. Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC. Search in Google Scholar

[4] European Commission. Directive (EU) 2018/844 of the European Parliament and ofthe Council of 30 may 2018 amending directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gonzalez-Caceres A., Lassen A. K., Nielsen T. R. Barriers and challenges of the recommendation list of measures under the EPBD scheme: A critical review. Energy and Buildings 2020:223:110065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11006510.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110065 Search in Google Scholar

[6] European Commission and Directorate-General for Energy. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2019/786 of 8 May 2019 on building renovation. Official Journal of European Union 2019: L 127/1 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Geissler S. et al. Identifying and rating deep renovation opportunities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2019:323(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/01217410.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012174 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Medjelekh D., Kenai A., Claude S., Ginestet S., Escadeillas G. Multi-technique characterization of ancient materials as part of an eco-renovation of historic centres, case of Cahors centre in France. Construction and Building Materials 2020:250:118894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11889410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118894 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Egusquiza A., Izkara J. L., Gandini A. Energy efficiency improvement in historic urban environments: From decision support systems to co-creation strategies. 3rd International Conference Energy Efficiency in Historical Buildings. Search in Google Scholar

[10] ALDREN project’s webpage. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.03.2021]. https://aldren.eu/ Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sesana M. M., Salvalai G. A review on Building Renovation Passport: Potentialities and barriers on current initiatives. Energy and Buildings 2018:173:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.02710.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.027 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gómez Oñate V. REFURB project’s presentation in Covenan of Mayors for Climate & Energy, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Pomianowski M., Antonov Y. I., Heiselberg P. Development of energy renovation packages for the Danish residential sector. Energy Procedia 2019:158:2847–2852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.04810.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.048 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Vavallo M. et al. Accelerating Energy Renovation Solution for Zero Energy Buildings and Neighbourhoods. The Experience of the RenoZEB Project. Proceedings of Sustainable Places 2019:20(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings201902000110.3390/proceedings2019020001 Search in Google Scholar

[15] ReValue project. The value of energy efficiency. 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 10.02.2021]. Available: https://revalue-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Final-Report-.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[16] mPower project. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://municipalpower.org/ Search in Google Scholar

[17] Villamor E. et al. European cities in the energy transition: A preliminary analysis of 27 cities. Energies 2020:16(3):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061315.10.3390/en13061315 Search in Google Scholar

[18] REPLICATE project. Report on indicators for monitoring at city level, 2017. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5afee0522&appId=PPGMS Search in Google Scholar

[19] REPLICATE project. Report on indicators for monitoring at project level, 2017. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5afede3ba&appId=PPGMS Search in Google Scholar

[20] GrowSmarter project. Final Report on Results of Technical and Social Validation. 2019. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://grow-smarter.eu/fileadmin/editor-upload/Reports/GrowSmarter_Validation.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[21] RemoUrban project, Retrofit Social Housing Report– Better Homes Improve Lives, 2020. [Online]. [Accessed: 12.02.2021]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/418439-retrofit-social-housing-better-homes-improve-lives Search in Google Scholar

[22] Freeman R., Yearworth M. Climate change and cities: problem structuring methods and critical perspectives on low-carbon districts. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 2017:25:48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.00910.1016/j.erss.2016.11.009 Search in Google Scholar

[23] STEEP project. Guidelines for prioritising interventions, 2014. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.03.2021]. Available: https://smartcities-infosystem.eu/sites/www.smartcitiesinfosystem.eu/files/steep_guidelines_for_prioritising_interventions.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[24] Costa G., Sicilia Á., Oregi X., Pedrero J., Mabe L. A catalogue of energy conservation measures (ECM) and a tool for their application in energy simulation models. Journal of Building Engineering 2020:29:101102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10110210.1016/j.jobe.2019.101102 Search in Google Scholar

[25] García-Fuentes M., Álvarez S., Serna V., Pousse M., Meiss A. Integration of prioritisation criteria in the design of energy efficient retrofitting projects at district scale: A case study. Sustainability 2019:11(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1114386110.3390/su11143861 Search in Google Scholar

[26] D’Appolonia S.p.A., EASEE project Final Report. 2016. [Online]. [Accessed: 02.03.2021]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/results/285/285540/final1-easee-final-report-public-attachment.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[27] Salvalai G., Sesana M. M., Iannaccone G. Deep renovation of multi-storey multi-owner existing residential buildings: A pilot case study in Italy. Energy and Buildings 2017:148:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.01110.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.011 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kamari A., Kirkegaard P. H., Leslie Schultz C. P. PARADIS – A process integrating tool for rapid generation and evaluation of holistic renovation scenarios. Journal of Building Engineering 2021:34:101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10194410.1016/j.jobe.2020.101944 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kamari A., Corrao R., Kirkegaard P. H. Sustainability focused decision-making in building renovation, Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ., 2017:6(2):330–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.00110.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.001 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Madrazo L., Sicilia A., Massetti M., Plazas F. L., Ortet E. Enhancing energy performance certificates with energy related data to support decision making for building retrofitting. Therm. Sci. 2018:22(S3):957–969. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI171005028M10.2298/TSCI171005028M Search in Google Scholar

[31] Alokabide, Plan Zero CO2 – Rehabilitación Energética y Accesbilidad del Parque Público de Alquiler. (Alokabide, Zero CO2 Plan - Energy Rehabilitation and Accessibility of the Public Rental Park). 2020. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.03.2021]. Available: https://www.alokabide.euskadi.eus/plan-de-ciencia-tecnologia-e-innovacion-plan-zero-plana/. Search in Google Scholar

[32] EU Cordis webpage – Agree project. [Online]. [Accessed 28.03.2021]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/847068 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Agree project’s webpage. [Online]. [Accessed 28.03.2021]. Available: https://agree-basquecountry.eu/es/proyecto-agree/ Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ruiz-Pérez M. R., Alba-Rodríguez M. D., Castaño-Rosa R., Solís-Guzmán J., Marrero M. HEREVEA tool for economic and environmental impact evaluation for sustainable planning policy in housing renovation. Sustainability 2019:11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1110285210.3390/su11102852 Search in Google Scholar

[35] RemoUrban project’s webpage. [Online]. [Accessed 28.03.2021]. Available: http://www.remourban.eu/ Search in Google Scholar

[36] European Commission. Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and ofthe Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings. Search in Google Scholar

[37] European Commission. Directive (EU) 2018/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Mistretta M., Guarino F., Cellura M. Energy and environmental assessment of heritage building retrofit. In: Bevilacqua C., Calabrò F., Della Spina L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_13010.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_130 Search in Google Scholar

[39] ISO 14040:2006, Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. p. 20. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Wackernagel M., Rees W. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

[41] EN 16627:2015. Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of economic performance of buildings – Calculation methods. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Oregi X., Hernández R. J., Hernandez P. Environmental and economic prioritization of building energy refurbishment strategies with life-cycle approach. Sustainability 2020:12(9):3914. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1209391410.3390/su12093914 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Foster V., Tre J.-P., Wodon Q., Bank W. Energy prices, energy efficiency, and fuel poverty. [Online]. [Accessed: 21.02.2021]. Available: http://www.mediaterre.org/docactu,bWF4aW0vZG9jcy9wZTE=,1.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[44] Perez-Bezos S., Grijalba O., Irulegi O. Proposal for Prioritizing the Retrofitting of Residential Buildings in Energy Poverty Circumstances. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):66–79. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-008610.2478/rtuect-2020-0086 Search in Google Scholar

[45] Tommasi L. De, Ridouane H., Giannakis G., Katsigarakis K., Lilis G. N., Rovas D. Model-based comparative evaluation of building and district control-oriented energy retrofit scenarios. Buildings 2018:8(7):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings807009110.3390/buildings8070091 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Etxebarria M., Oregi X., Grijalba O., Hernández R. J. Relationship Between Energy Demand, Indoor Thermal Behaviour and Temperature-Related Health Risk Concerning Passive Energy Refurbishment Interventions. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(2):348–363. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-007810.2478/rtuect-2020-0078 Search in Google Scholar

[47] ISO 7730:2006. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Search in Google Scholar

[48] ISO-7726:2002. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Instruments for measuring physical quantities. Search in Google Scholar

[49] EN 15251:2008 Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. Search in Google Scholar

[50] Monzón M., López-Mesa B. Buildings performance indicators to prioritise multi-family housing renovations. Sustainable Cities and Society 2017:38:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.02410.1016/j.scs.2017.12.024 Search in Google Scholar

[51] Egusquiza-Ortega A. Multiscale Information Management for Historic Districts′ Energy Retrofitting, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[52] Li Y., Kubicki S., Guerriero A., Rezgui Y. Review of building energy performance certification schemes towards future improvement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019:113:109244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.10924410.1016/j.rser.2019.109244 Search in Google Scholar

[53] Jimenez-Bescos C., Oregi X. Implementing User Behaviour on Dynamic Building Simulations for Energy Consumption. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2019:23(3):308–318. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2019-009710.2478/rtuect-2019-0097 Search in Google Scholar

[54] Vilches A., Garcia-Martinez A., Sanchez-Montañes B. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings 2017:135:286–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.04210.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042 Search in Google Scholar

[55] STEEP project, Guidelines for monitoring impacts, 2014. [Online]. [Accessed: 15.03.2021]. Available: https://smartcities-infosystem.eu/sites/default/files/steep_guidelines_for_monitoring_impacts.pdf Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8837
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other