[
[1] M. Lavagna et al. Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock. Build. Environ. 2018:145:260–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.00810.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions On Resource Efficiency Opportunities In The Building Sector. Brussels: European Commission, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Müller H. S., Haist M., Vogel M. Assessment of the sustainability potential of concrete and concrete structures considering their environmental impact, performance and lifetime. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014:67(C):321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Athena Sustainable Materials Institute. A Life Cycle Assessment of Cross-Laminated Timber Produced in Canada. Ottawa: Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] IEA. Global cement production, 2010-2019 – Charts – Data & Statistics - IEA [Online]. [Accessed 30.10.2020]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-cement-production-2010-2019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Wood Based Panel Market Size & Share | Industry Report, 2018-2025 [Online]. [Accessed 09.02.2021]. Available: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/wood-based-panel-market
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Panels & Furniture Asia May/Jun 2020 [Online]. [Accessed: 28.10.2020]. Available: http://www.panelsfurnitureasia.com/ebook/PFA_MayJun2020/index.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Cherry R., et al. Out-of-grade sawn pine: A state-of-the-art review on challenges and new opportunities in cross laminated timber (CLT). Constr. Build. Mater. 2019:211:858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.29310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Hildebrandt J., Hagemann N., Thrän D. The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in europe. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017:34:405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.01310.1016/j.scs.2017.06.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Jayalath A., et al. Life cycle performance of Cross Laminated Timber mid-rise residential buildings in Australia. Energy Build. 2020:223:110091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11009110.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110091
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Hemström K., Mahapatra K., Gustavsson L. Perceptions, attitudes and interest of Swedish architects towards the use of wood frames in multi-storey buildings. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011:55(11):1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.01210.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Cabinet of Ministers. Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 333: Noteikumi par Latvijas būvnormatīvu LBN 201-15 “Būvju ugunsdrošība” (Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 333: Regulations on the Latvian construction standard LBN 201-15 “Fire safety of buildings”). Latvijas Vēstnesis 2015. (in Latvian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] OECD. How’s Life? Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Barboutis I. Kamperidou V. Properties of two different thicknesses 3-ply plywood of tree-of-heaven veneers. Proceedings of the 22nd Int. Sci. Conf. Wood is Good - EU Preaccession Challenges Sect. Proc. 2011:6–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Chen C. X., Pierobon F., Ganguly I. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) produced in Western Washington: The role of logistics and wood species mix. Sustain. 2019:11(5):1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1105127810.3390/su11051278
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Guardigli L., Monari F., Bragadin M. A. Assessing environmental impact of green buildings through LCA methods: A comparison between reinforced concrete and wood structures in the European context. Procedia Eng. 2011:21:1119–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.213110.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Passarelli R. N. Environmental Benefits of Reusable Modular Mass Timber Construction for Residential use in Japan: an LCA Approach. Modul. Offsite Constr. Summit Proc. 2019:2017:157–164. https://doi.org/10.29173/mocs8910.29173/mocs89
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Giels E. Cross laminated timber panels. Oslo: Epd-Norge, No. 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Sathre R., González-García S. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of wood-based building materials. Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Eco-Labelling and Case Studies. Woodhead Publishing, 2014:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.2.31110.1533/9780857097729.2.311
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Tubert-Brohman I., Sherman W., Repasky M., Beuming T. Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013:53(9):1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400128m10.1021/ci400128m23800267
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Ichimura M., et al. Eco-efficiency Indicators: Measuring Resource-use Efficiency and the Impact of Economic Activities on the Environment. Bangkok: United Nations publication, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
