Open Access

Suggestions and Recommendations on Statistical Analysis and Research Methodology


1. Adrian Man, Cosmin Moldovan, Minodora Dobreanu, Major editorial changes of Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine. Rev Romana Med Lab. 2013;21(4):377-80. DOI: 10.2478/rrlm-2013 0047Search in Google Scholar

2. Romanian Review of Laboratory Medicine/Versita [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 10]. Available from: http:// medicine/Search in Google Scholar

3. Revista română de medicină de laborator [Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 1]. Available from: autori.phpSearch in Google Scholar

4. license_to_publish.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 23]. Available from: to_publish.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

5. Dienes Z. Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: which side are you on? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6:274-290. DOI: 10.1177/174569161140692010.1177/174569161140692026168518Search in Google Scholar

6. Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. DOI: 10.1177/095679761141763210.1177/095679761141763222006061Search in Google Scholar

7. Straus S, Richardson S, Glasziou P, Haynes B. Evidence based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3rd Edition, Elsevier 2005, p.115.Search in Google Scholar

8. http://www.consort-statement.orgSearch in Google Scholar

9. http://www.stard-statement.orgSearch in Google Scholar

10. http://www.strobe-statement.orgSearch in Google Scholar

11. http://www.medicine.uottawa.caSearch in Google Scholar

12. http://www.prisma-statement.orgSearch in Google Scholar

13. Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.100041210.1371/journal.pbio.1000412289395120613859Search in Google Scholar

14. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.002012410.1371/journal.pmed.0020124118232716060722Search in Google Scholar

15. Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, Austin CP, Blumenstein R, Bradley EW et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):187-91. DOI: 10.1038/nature1155610.1038/nature11556351184523060188Search in Google Scholar

16. Sena E, van der Worp HB, Howells D, Macleod M. How can we improve the pre-clinical development of drugs for stroke? Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:433-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.00910.1016/j.tins.2007.06.00917765332Search in Google Scholar

17. Festing MF, Altman DG. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animals. ILAR J. 2002;43(4):244-58. DOI: 10.1093/ ilar.43.4.24410.1093/ilar.43.4.24412391400Search in Google Scholar

18. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 1988.Search in Google Scholar

19. Nakagawa S, Foster TM. The case against retrospective statistical power analyses with an introduction to power analysis. Acta Ethologica. 2004;7(2):103-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10211-004-0095z Search in Google Scholar

Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Human Biology, Microbiology and Virology