Comparison of the thermal effects of Coblation and Radiofrequency waves in a porcine turbinate model

1. Hol MK, Huizing EH. Treatment of inferior turbinate pathology: a review and critical evaluation of the different techniques. Rhinology. 2000;38(4):157-66.Search in Google Scholar

2. Passali D, Loglisci M, Politi L, Passali GC, Kern E. Managing turbinate hypertrophy: coblation vs. radiofrequency treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(6):1449-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3759-6. Epub 2015 Aug 31.10.1007/s00405-015-3759-6.Epub2015Aug31Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Vogt K, Enache R. Radiofrequency turbinotomy: basic, practice and statistics. Romanian Journal of Rhinology. 2012;2(7):133-8.Search in Google Scholar

4. Cukurova I, Demirhan E, Cetinkaya EA, Yigitbasi OG. Long-term clinical results of radiofrequency tissue volume reduction for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(11):1148-51. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215111001976. Epub 2011 Aug 26.10.1017/S0022215111001976.Epub2011Aug26Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. Clinical effectiveness of coblation inferior turbinate reduction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(4):365-71.10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00634-XSearch in Google Scholar

6. Shah AN, Brewster D, Mitzen K, Mullin D. Radiofrequency coblation versus intramural bipolar cautery for the treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(9):691-7. DOI: 10.1177/0003489415578709. Epub 2015 Mar 31.10.1177/0003489415578709.Epub201531Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Bran GM, Hünnebeck S, Herr RM, Hörmann K, Stuck BA. Bipolar radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction of inferior turbinates: evaluation of short-term efficacy in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(2):595-601. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2088-2. Epub 2012 Jun 28.10.1007/s00405-012-2088-2.Epub2012Jun28Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Woloszko J, Stalder KR, Brown IG. Plasma characteristics of repetitively-pulsed electrical discharges in saline solutions used for surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 2002;30(3):1376-83. DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2002.801612. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1158301/.10.1109/TPS.2002.801612Search in Google Scholar

9. Maness W, Roeber FW, Clark RE, Cataldo E, Riis D, Haddad AW. Histologic evaluation of electrosurgery with varying frequency and waveform. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40(3):304-8.27967410.1016/0022-3913(78)90037-9Search in Google Scholar

10. Mühlfay G, Horvath KU, Mocan SL, Budu VA, Ilyes IA, Doros CI, et al. A study on the type of lesions achieved by three electrosurgical methods and their way of healing. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2015;56(4):1383-8.Search in Google Scholar

11. Cavaliere M, Mottola G, Iemma M. Monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation of inferior turbinates: 20-month follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(2):256-63.10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.001Search in Google Scholar

12. Burton MJ, Doree C. Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillecstomy. Cochrane Databse Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD004619.10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub2Search in Google Scholar

13. Lowe D, van der Meulen J; National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit. Tonsillectomy technique as a risk factor for postoperative haemorrhage. Lancet. 2004;364(9435):697-702.10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16896-7Search in Google Scholar

14. Temple RH, Timms MS. Paediatric coblation tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;61(3):195-8.10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00553-5Search in Google Scholar

15. Magdy EA, Elwany S, el-Daly AS, Abdel-Hadi M, Morshedy MA. Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection-ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies. J Laryngol Otol. 2008;122(3):282-90. Epub 2007 Nov 26.10.1017/S002221510700093X18036277Search in Google Scholar

16. Banhiran W, Assanasen P, Tantilipikorn P, Nujchanart N, Voraprayoon S, Bunnag C. Randomized study of temperature-controlled versus bipolar radiofrequency for inferior turbinate reduction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(10):2877-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3410-y. Epub 2014 Nov 29.10.1007/s00405-014-3410-y25432641Search in Google Scholar

17. Sahin-Yilmaz A, Oysu Ç, Devecioglu I, Demir K, Corey JP. Prediction of outcome of radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinates. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(6):470-4. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21303. Epub 2014 Feb 14.10.1002/alr.2130324532568Search in Google Scholar

18. Demir U, Durgut O, Saradaydoglu G, Onart S, Ocakoglu G. efficacy of radiofrequency turbinate reduction: evaluation by computed tomography and acoustic rhinometry. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;41(4):274-81.Search in Google Scholar

19. Civelek S, Ozçelik M, Emre IE, Cakir BO, Turgut S. Comparison of radiofrequency applied to the total inferior choncha with application to its anterior third. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010;37(5):589-93.10.1016/j.anl.2009.12.00520189328Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Hofmann TK, Schuler PJ, Bankfalvi A, Greve J, Heusgen L, Lang S, et al. Comparative analysis of resection tools suited for transoral robot-assisted surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(5):1207-13. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2615-9.10.1007/s00405-013-2615-923846665Open DOISearch in Google Scholar