1. bookVolume 19 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-1663
First Published
19 Feb 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Use of TOPSIS Method for Assessing of Good Governance in European Union Countries

Published Online: 19 Sep 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 19 (2019) - Issue 3 (September 2019)
Page range: 211 - 231
Received: 29 Mar 2019
Accepted: 16 Aug 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-1663
First Published
19 Feb 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Good Governance presents the contemporary trend of managing public affairs worldwide. This concept is promoting the basic elements of subsidiarity, participation, and democracy in modern public administration. Presented article is focused on the evaluation of Good Governance development in the European Union countries in the long-term, in the period 2007–2017. The evaluation is based on the application of multiple criteria decision-making methods, concrete The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. The original data used in the research were the values of Worldwide Governance Indicators monitored and processed by the World Bank. The article presents a complete assessment of European Union countries according to the level of Good Governance. There are identified countries that have been successful in this area in the long-term, in particular the Nordic countries - Finland, Sweden and Denmark. On the contrary, there are countries that show greater shortcomings in terms of Good Governance as Romania, Bulgaria or Greece. The European Union countries were also grouped into clusters and the overview of rankings of individual countries for the period 2007–2017 was completed.

Keywords

JEL Classification

ABDELATIFF, A.M. (2003). Good Governance and its relationship to democracy and economic development, [online]. 2003 [cit. 2019-07-22]. Available at: ftp://pogar.org/LocalUser/pogarp/governance/aa/goodgov.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

ACEMOGLU, D., ROBINSON, J. (2010). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Power. New York: Crown Business.Search in Google Scholar

AGERE, S. (2000). Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives, Managing the Public Service: Strategies for Improvement, No. 11, [online]. Commonwealth Secretariat, London. 2000 [cit. 2019-06-02]. DOI: 10.14217/9781848597129-en10.14217/9781848597129-enSearch in Google Scholar

ANDREWS, M. (2008). The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory. Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 379–423. DOI: 10.1080/1360081080245512010.1080/13600810802455120Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ARDIELLI, E. (2016). Implementation of Good Governance Concept in the European Union Member Countries. In ICEI 2016. Ostrava: VŠB-TUO, pp. 28-36.Search in Google Scholar

ARDIELLI, E., HALÁSKOVÁ, M. (2015a). Evaluation of Good Governance in EU countries. Acta academica karviniensia. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 5-17. DOI: 10.25142/aak.2015.02710.25142/aak.2015.027Search in Google Scholar

ARDIELLI, E., HALÁSKOVÁ, M. (2015b). Assessment of E-government in EU countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Vol. 22, No. 34, pp. 4-16.Search in Google Scholar

BHUTIA, P. W., PHIPON, R. (2012) Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem, Journal of Engineering, Vol. 2., No. 10, pp. 43-50.Search in Google Scholar

CHARRON, N., DIJKSTRA, L. and V. LAPUENTE. (2015). Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 315-346. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y10.1007/s11205-014-0702-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

CLAGUE, C. et al. (1999). Contract-intensive money: Contract enforcement, property rights, and economic performance. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 185-211. DOI: 10.1023/A:100985440518410.1023/A:1009854405184Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 2007. Recommendation CM/Rec(2007)7 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on good administration. [online]. 2015 [cit. 2019-02-22] Available at: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1155877.Search in Google Scholar

COURT, J., HYDEN, G. (2003). World Governance Survey: a New Approach to Assessing Governance. Global Corruption Report 2003. [online]. 2003. [cit. 2019-02-12]. Available at: http://publication.fsv.cuni.cz/attachments/121_018_Nekola.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

DINCER, S. E. (2011). Multi-Criteria Analysis of Economic Activity for European Union Member States and Candidate Countries: TOPSIS and WSA Applications. European Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 563-572.Search in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2018). A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in EU28 [online]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 [cit. 2019-08-08]. Available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e89d981-48fc-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-enSearch in Google Scholar

EWALDT, J.A.G. 2001. Theories of Governance and New Public Management. [online]. 2001 [cit. 2019-07-06]. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/ASPA/UNPAN000563.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

FIALA, P. (2008). Modely a metody rozhodování. Praha: Oeconomica.Search in Google Scholar

GRINDLE, M.S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and freeform in developing countries. An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, Vol. 17, pp. 525–548. DOI: 10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

GRINDLE, M.S. (2007). Good Enough Governance Revisited. Development Policy Review, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 553-574. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.x10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00385.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

HALDENWANG, C.V. (2004). Electronic government (E-Government) and development. The European Journal of Development Research. Vol.16, pp. 417–432.10.1080/0957881042000220886Search in Google Scholar

JANN, W., RÖBER, M, and H. WOLLMANN. (2006). Public management – Grundlagen, Wirkungen, Kritik. Berlin: Sigma.10.5771/9783845267753Search in Google Scholar

JONES, L.R., KETTL, D.F. (2003). Assessing public financial management reform in international context. International Public Management Review, Vol.4, pp. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar

KAUFMANN, D., KRAAY, A. and M. MASTRUZZI. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues [online]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430, 2010 [cit. 2019-07-06]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130Search in Google Scholar

KEPING, Y. F. (2018). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 11, No.1. pp. 1–8.10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4Search in Google Scholar

KLENK, T., NULLMEIER, F. (2004). Public Governance als Reforms Strategie. Düsseldorf: Edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.Search in Google Scholar

KLIMOVSKÝ, D. (2010). Genéza koncepcie good governance a jej kritické prehodnotenie v teoretickej perspektíve. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics. Vol. 58, No.2, pp. 188-205.Search in Google Scholar

KOOIMAN, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446215012Search in Google Scholar

KUNCOVÁ, M. (2012). Elektronické obchodování - srovnání zemí EU v letech 2008-2009 s využitím metod vícekriteriálního hodnocení variant. In: IRCINGOVÁ, J., TLUČHOŘ, J., Trendy v podnikání 2012. Plzeň: ZČU, pp. 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

LADI, S., RUSO-DRAGOUMIS, E. (2007). Study on Institutional Renewal and Good Governance in BSEC Member States. Athens: International Centre for Black Sea Studies.Search in Google Scholar

MADZOVA, V., SAJNOSKI, K. and L. DAVCEV. (2013). E-Government as an Efficient Tool towards Good Governance. Balkan Social Science Review. Vol. 1, pp. 157-174.Search in Google Scholar

NORTH, C. D. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Search in Google Scholar

POTŮČEK, M. et al. (2007). Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika. Praha: Grada, a.s.Search in Google Scholar

POTĚŠIL, L. (2008). Good Administration in Scope of the Council of Europe. Veřejná správa. Vol. 12, pp. VII - VIII.Search in Google Scholar

PILLAY, P. (2016). The relationship between public administration and good governance: the case of South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 1, pp 18-31.Search in Google Scholar

ROSZKOWSKA, E. (2011). Multi-criteria Decision Making Models by Applying the Topsis Method to Crisp and Interval Data. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Vol. 6, pp. 200-230.Search in Google Scholar

SHIH, H., SHYUR, H. and E.S. LEE. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 45, No. 7-8, pp. 801-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.02310.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

SUNDARAM, J. K. (2018). Does good governance always boost development? [online]. World Economic Forum. 2018. [cit. 2018-08-08]. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/06/does-good-governance-always-boost-development/Search in Google Scholar

ŠUBRT, T. et al. (2015). Ekonomicko-matematické metody. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, s.r.o.Search in Google Scholar

UNPACS. (2018). Data Center - Government Development Index. [online]. 2018. [cit. 2018-10-02]. Available at: http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-Center.Search in Google Scholar

WORLD BANK. (1992). Governance and development (English). Washington, DC : The World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-2094-7Search in Google Scholar

WORLD BANK. (2018). Worldwide Governance Indicators. [online]. 2018. [cit. 2018-18-10]. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#docSearch in Google Scholar

YOON, K. P., HWANG, CH. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. California: Sage.10.4135/9781412985161Search in Google Scholar

ZANGER, S. C. (2000). Good Governance and European Aid the Impact of Political Conditionality. European Union Politics. Vol. 1, No.3, pp. 293-317. DOI: 10.1177/146511650000100300210.1177/1465116500001003002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ŽÁK, M. (2005). Kvalita správy: hodnocení a měření [online]. 2005 [cit. 2018-11-12]. Available at: https://www.vsem.cz/data/data/ces-soubory/working-paper/gf_WPNo13.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo