This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Andreo P, Cramb J, Fraass BA, Ionescu-Farca F, Izewska J, Levin V, et al. Technical report series No. 430: commissioning and quality assurance of computerised planning system for radiation treatment of cancer. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004.AndreoPCrambJFraassBAIonescu-FarcaFIzewskaJLevinVet alTechnical report series No. 430: commissioning and quality assurance of computerised planning system for radiation treatment of cancerViennaInternational Atomic Energy Agency;2004Search in Google Scholar
Brunckhorst E, Gershkevitsh E, Ibbott G, Korf G, Miller D, Schmidt R, et al. IAEA-TECDOC-1583 Commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: testing for typical external beam treatment techniques. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2008.BrunckhorstEGershkevitshEIbbottGKorfGMillerDSchmidtRet alIAEA-TECDOC-1583 Commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: testing for typical external beam treatment techniquesViennaInternational Atomic Energy Agency;2008Search in Google Scholar
Kry SF, Alvarez P, Molineu A, Amador C, Galvin J, Followill DS, et al. Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the radiological Physics Center’s anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85: 95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.039KrySFAlvarezPMolineuAAmadorCGalvinJFollowillDSet alAlgorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the radiological Physics Center’s anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialingInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2013859510010.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.039352285523237006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
The Netherlands Commission of Radiation Dosimetry. Code of practice for the quality assurance and control for intensity modulated radiotherapy. Delft, Netherlands; 2013.The Netherlands Commission of Radiation Dosimetry. Code of practice for the quality assurance and control for intensity modulated radiotherapyDelft, Netherlands;2013Search in Google Scholar
Smilowitz JB, Das IJ, Feygelman V, Fraass BA, Kry SF, Marshall IR, et al. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations - megavoltage photon and electron beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16: 14-34. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5768SmilowitzJBDasIJFeygelmanVFraassBAKrySFMarshallIRet alAAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations - megavoltage photon and electron beamsJ Appl Clin Med Phys201516143410.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5768569015426699330Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Van Dyk J, Battista J. Has the use of computers in radiation therapy improved the accuracy in radiation dose delivery? J Phys Conf Ser 2014; 489: 012098. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/489/1/012098VanDyk JBattistaJHas the use of computers in radiation therapy improved the accuracy in radiation dose delivery?J Phys Conf Ser201448901209810.1088/1742-6596/489/1/012098Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fogliata A, Cozzi L. Dose calculation algorithm accuracy for small fields in non-homogeneous media: the lung SBRT case. Phys Med 2017; 44: 157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.104FogliataACozziLDose calculation algorithm accuracy for small fields in non-homogeneous media: the lung SBRT casePhys Med2017441576210.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.10427890568Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Reynaert N, Crop F, Sterpin E. On the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systems. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 5: 26-30. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.004ReynaertNCropFSterpinEOn the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systemsPhys Imaging Radiat Oncol201852630201810.1016/j.phro.2018.01.004780755533458365Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Andreo P. Dose to ‘water-like’ media or dose to tissue in MV photons radiotherapy treatment planning: still a matter of debate. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60: 309-37. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/309AndreoPDose to ‘water-like’ media or dose to tissue in MV photons radiotherapy treatment planning: still a matter of debatePhys Med Biol2015603093710.1088/0031-9155/60/1/30925503312Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chetty IJ, Curran B, Cygler JE, DeMarco JJ, Ezzell G, Faddegonet BA, et al. Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys 2007; 34: 4818-53. doi: 10.1118/1.2795842ChettyIJCurranBCyglerJEDeMarcoJJEzzellGFaddegonetBAet alReport of the AAPM Task Group No105: issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys20073448185310.1118/1.279584218196810Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu HH, Keal P. Dm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning. (Point/Counterpoint), Med Phys 2002; 29: 922-4. doi. 10.1118/1.1473137LiuHHKealPDm rather than Dw should be used in Monte Carlo treatment planning(Point/Counterpoint), Med Phys200229922410.1118/1.147313712033589Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ma C-M, Li J, Dose specification for radiation therapy: dose to water or dose to medium? Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 3073-89. doi: 10.1088/00319155/56/10/012MaC-MLiJDose specification for radiation therapy: dose to water or dose to medium?Phys Med Biol20115630738910.1088/00319155/56/10/012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Reynaert N, Van der Marck S, Schaart D, Van der Zee W, Van VlietVroegindeweij C, Tomsej M, et al. Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams. Radiat Phys Chem 2007; 76: 643-86. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.05.015ReynaertNVander Marck SSchaartDVander Zee WVanVlietVroegindeweij CTomsejMet alMonte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beamsRadiat Phys Chem2007766438610.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.05.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dogan N, Siebers JV, Keall PJ. Clinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to water Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 4967-80. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/19/015DoganNSiebersJVKeallPJClinical comparison of head and neck and prostate IMRT plans using absorbed dose to medium and absorbed dose to waterPhys Med Biol20065149678010.1088/0031-9155/51/19/01516985281Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walters BRB, Kramer R, Kawrakow I. Dose to medium versus dose to water as an estimator of dose to sensitive skeletal tissue. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 4535-46. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/S08WaltersBRBKramerRKawrakowIDose to medium versus dose to water as an estimator of dose to sensitive skeletal tissuePhys Med Biol20105545354610.1088/0031-9155/55/16/S0820668336Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sterpin E. Potential pitfalls of the PTV concept in dose-to-medium planning optimization. Phys Med 2016; 32: 1103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.08.009SterpinEPotential pitfalls of the PTV concept in dose-to-medium planning optimizationPhys Med20163211031010.1016/j.ejmp.2016.08.00927546868Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Siebers JV, Keall PJ, Nahum AE. Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations. Phys Med Biol 2000 45: 983-95. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/313SiebersJVKeallPJNahumAEConverting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculationsPhys Med Biol2000459839510.1088/0031-9155/45/4/31310795986Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abratt R, Aguirre F, Andreo P, Coffey M, Drew J, El Gueddari B, et al. IAEA Comprehensive audits of radiotherapy practices: a tool for quality improvement quality assurance team for radiation oncology-QUATRO. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2007.AbrattRAguirreFAndreoPCoffeyMDrewJElGueddari Bet alIAEA Comprehensive audits of radiotherapy practices: a tool for quality improvement quality assurance team for radiation oncology-QUATROViennaInternational Atomic Energy Agency;2007Search in Google Scholar
Ezzell GA, Galvin JM, Low D, Palta J, Rosen I, Sharpe MB, et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee. Med Phys 2003; 30: 2089-115. doi: 10.1118/1.1591194EzzellGAGalvinJMLowDPaltaJRosenISharpeMBet alGuidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committeeMed Phys200330208911510.1118/1.159119412945975Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, et al. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys 2009; 36: 4197-212. doi: 10.1118/1.3190392KleinEEHanleyJBayouthJYinFFSimonWDresserSet alTask Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical acceleratorsMed Phys200936419721210.1118/1.319039219810494Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, LoSasso TJ, Mechalakos JG, Mihailidis D, IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys 2009; 36: 5359-73. doi: 10.1118/1.3238104EzzellGABurmeisterJWDoganNLoSassoTJMechalakosJGMihailidisDIMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119Med Phys20093653597310.1118/1.323810419994544Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Laitano F, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA TRS-398. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2006.AndreoPBurnsDTHohlfeldKHuqMSKanaiTLaitanoFet alAbsorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. IAEA TRS-398ViennaInternational Atomic Energy Agency;2006Search in Google Scholar
Smilović Radojčić Đ, Švabić Kolacio M, Radojčić M, Rajlić D, Casar B, Faj D, et al. Comparison of calculated dose distributions reported as dose-to-water and dose-to-medium for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal cancer patients. Med Dos 2018; 43: 363-9. doi: 10.1016/j. meddos.2017.11.008SmilovićRadojčić ĐŠvabićKolacio MRadojčićMRajlićDCasarBFajDet alComparison of calculated dose distributions reported as dose-to-water and dose-to-medium for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal cancer patientsMed Dos201843363910.1016/j.meddos.2017.11.00829306538Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Palmans H, Andreo P, Huq MS, Christaki K, Alfonso R, Izewska J, et al. Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination. Technical Report Series No. 483. IAEA TRS483. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2017. doi: 10.1002/mp.13208PalmansHAndreoPHuqMSChristakiKAlfonsoRIzewskaJet alDosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination. Technical Report Series No. 483. IAEA TRS483ViennaInternational Atomic Energy Agency;201710.1002/mp.1320830247757Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Casar B, Gershkevitsh E, Mendez I, Jurkovic S, Huq MS. A novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys 2019; 46: 944-63. doi: 10.1002/mp.13318CasarBGershkevitshEMendezIJurkovicSHuqMSA novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beamsMed Phys2019469446310.1002/mp.13318737962930521073Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Casar B, Gershkevitsh E, Mendez I, Jurkovic S, Huq MS. Output correction factors for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams for seven ionization chambers in two orientations - perpendicular and parallel. Med Phys 2020; 47: 242-59. doi: 10.1002/mp.13894CasarBGershkevitshEMendezIJurkovicSHuqMSOutput correction factors for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams for seven ionization chambers in two orientations - perpendicular and parallelMed Phys2020472425910.1002/mp.13894700376331677278Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
