[
Abbas, J., Raza, S., Nurunnabi, M., Minai, M. S., & Bano, S. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurial business networks on firms’ performance through a mediating role of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 11(11). http://doi.org/10.3390/su11113006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahmad, S., Omar R., & Quoquab F. (2019). Corporate sustainable longevity: Scale development and validation. SAGE Open, 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822379
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arief, A., Wahab, I. H., & Muhammad, M. (2021). Barriers and challenges of e-government services: A systematic literature review and meta-analyses. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 1125(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1125/1/012027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arvanitis, S., Lokshin, B., Mohnen, P., & Woerter, M. (2015). Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation: A comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data. Review of Industrial Organization, 46(4), 359–382. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2206201
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borchardt, M., Pereira, G., Milan, G., Scavarda, A., Nogueira, E., & Poltosi, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 beyond technology: An analysis through the lens of business and operations management literature. Organizacija, 55(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2022-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y-C., & Hsieh, T-C. (2014). Big data for digital government: Opportunities, challenges, and strategies. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 1(1), 1–14. doi:10.4018/ijpada.2014010101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrisanty, F. N., Gunawan, M. S., Wijayanti, R. W., & Soetjipto, B. W. (2021). The role of transformational entrepreneurship, readiness to change and counterproductive work behavior in enhancing employee performance. Organizacija, 54(1), 63–81. http://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cousin, P. D., Handfield, R. B., Lawson, B., & Petersen, K. J. (2006). Creating supply chain relation capital: The impact of formal and informal socialization processes. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.08.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge. How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dhaundiyal, M., & Coughlan, J. (2020). The impact of alliance justice capability on the performance of strategic alliances in the Indian IT sector: The mediating role of inter-firm commitment. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1719587. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1719587
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fey, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management, 31(4), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272346
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frederico, G. F. (2021). From Supply Chain 4.0 to Supply Chain 5.0: Findings from a systematic literature review and research directions. Logistics, 5(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5030049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furnival, J., Boaden, R., & Walshe, K. (2019). A dynamic capabilities view of improvement capability. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 33(7/8), 821–823. http://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2018-0342
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galeazzo, A., Furlan, A., & Vinelli, A. (2016). The organizational infrastructure of continuous improvement – an empirical analysis. Operations Management Research, 10, 33–46. http://dpoi.org/10.1007/s12063-016-0112-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glaister, K. W., & Buckley, P. J. (1998). Measures of performance in UK international alliances. Organization Studies, 19(1), 89–118. http://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
González-Pérez, L. I., and Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. http://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th Ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haapanen. L., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Puumalainen, K. (2020). When Strategic consensus matters: dynamic managerial capabilities and firm internalization as seen by TMT. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. 27(3), 285-315 Emerald Publishing Limited. http://doi.org10.1108/CCSM-09-2018-0134
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hijal-Moghrabi, I., Sabharwal, M., & Ramanathan, K. (2020). Innovation in public organizations: Do government reforms matter? The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6), 731–749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-04-2020-0106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lavie, D. (2006). Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379629
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lenart-Gansiniec R. (2016). Relational capital and open innovation in search of interdependency. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.495
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Y., & Wu, L-Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matysiak, L., Rugman, A. M., & Bausch, A. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises: The dominant logics behind sensing, seizing, and transforming matter! Management International Review, 58(2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-017-0337-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKinsey (2023). The State of Organizations. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-live/webinars/the-state-of-organizations
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morrison, M., & Mezentseff, L. (1997). Learning alliances – a new dimension of strategic alliances. Management Decision, 35(5), 351–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749710173715
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nguyen, P. T. M, Mai, K. N, & Nguyen, P. N. D. (2021). Alliance management practices for higher trust, commitment and inter-organizational relationship performance: Evidence from travel companies in Vietnam. Sustainability, 13, 9102. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169102
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortiz, B., Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2018). Inter-organizational social capital as an antecedent of a firm’s knowledge identification capability and external knowledge acquisition. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6), 1332–1357. http://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2017-0131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osterberg, R. (1993). A new kind of company with a new kind of thinking. In M. Ray and A. Rinzler (Eds), The new paradigm in business. New York: Putnam.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pereira, A. C., & Romero, F. (2017). A review of the meaning and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1206–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popa, I., Dobrin, C., Popescu, D., & Draghici, M. (2011). Competitive advantage in the public sector. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 6(4), 60–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rashidirad, M., & Salimian, H. (2020). SMEs’ dynamic capabilities and value creation: The mediating role of competitive strategy. European Business Review, 32(4), 591–613. http://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-06-2019-0113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rupčić, N. (2020). Guest editorial. The Learning Organization, 27(4), 277–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/TLO-05-2020-254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savino, T., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Albino, V. (2017). Search and recombination process to innovate: A review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12081
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Dumitrescu, R., Kruger, A., & ten Hompel, M. (2020). Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index. Managing the digital transformation of companies. Update 2020. Acatech – National Academy of Science and Engineering. Available at: https://en.acatech.de/publication/industrie-4-0-maturity-index-update-2020/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Senge, P. (1992). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Canberra: Random House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shan, L., Dan, L., & Qiu, Y. (2018). Study of the impact mechanism of inter-organizational learning on alliance performance–with relationship capital as the mediator. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3783-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sindhwani, R., Afridi, S., Kumar, A., Banaitis, A., Luthra, S., & Singh, P. L. (2022). Can Industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers. Technology in Society, 68, 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101887
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/3088148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yue, Q., Hua, X., & Quan, M. (2018). Structural equation model analysis of information systems in cooperative organizations: Focusing the role of cooperative experience and information process mechanism, Inf Syst E-Bus Manage, 18, 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-018-0387-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yoshino, M., & Rangan, S. (1995). Strategic alliances: An entrepreneurial approach to globalization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561. http://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.830
]Search in Google Scholar
