1. bookVolume 13 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Independence despite Political Appointment ? The Curious Case of the Austrian Ombudsman Board

Published Online: 10 Dec 2020
Page range: 181 - 210
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper addresses the politicization of public institutions through the case of national ombudspersons. While there is an established literature on the politicization of top public officials, we lack research on the politicization and / or de-facto independence of supreme or supervisory bodies, including ombuds institutions. In this paper, we combine the insights of three bodies of literature in order to build a framework for the empirical study of national ombuds institutions: Literature (1) on the independence of public institutions, in particular ombuds and regulatory agencies, (2) on politicization and party patronage in state institutions, and (3) on career patterns and selection criteria of top public officials and the administrative elite. We then discuss these issues on the basis of an empirical field study of the Austrian om-buds institution: First, drawing on a socio-demographic analysis of ombudspersons we identify common features of their profiles and career paths. We find that overall the ombudspersons represent a relatively homogenous group, but the political party represents an explanatory variable for some of the ombudspersons’ characteristics. The second set of empirical results, drawing primarily on qualitative interviews with case-handling staff, demonstrates that despite the institution’s public efforts and many interviewees’ reassurances that the AOB is independent and acts as such, there are several areas in which party-related positions become visible in the AOB’s work. These results are integrated into a typology on the effects of political appointment modes of ombudspersons, which should enable further research in this field.

Keywords

Alexander, J A., L. L. Morlock and B. D. Gifford. 1988. “The Effects of Corporate Restructuring on Hospital Policymaking.” Health Services Research 23, 311 – 337.Search in Google Scholar

Alexander, Jeffrey A. and Bryan J. Weiner. 1998. “The Adoption of the Corporate Governance Model by Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 8, 223 – 242.Search in Google Scholar

Almond, Paul and Mike Esbester. 2018. “Regulatory Inspection and the Changing Legitimacy of Health and Safety: Regulatory Inspection and Legitimacy.” Regulation & Governance 12, 46 – 63.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, Tobias and Sylvia Veit. 2017. “The Determinants of Promotion to High Public Office in Germany: Partisan Loyalty, Political Craft, or Managerial Competencies ?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28, 254 – 269.Search in Google Scholar

Blondel, Jean. 2002. “Party Government, Patronage, and Party Decline in Western Europe.” In Richard Gunther, José Ramón Montero and Juan J. Linz (eds). Political Parties. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 233 – 256.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Kelly H. 2003. Appointing Central Bankers: The Politics of Monetary Policy in the United States and the European Monetary Union. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510526Search in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Peter Munk, Birgitta Niklasson and Patrik Öhberg. 2016. “Does Politics Crowd out Professional Competence ? The Organisation of Ministerial Advice in Denmark and Sweden.” West European Politics 39, 1230 – 1250.Search in Google Scholar

Corder, Kevin. 2003. “Structural Choice and Political Control of Bureaucracy: Updating Federal Credit Programs.” In George Krause and Kenneth Meier (eds). Politics, Policy, and Organizations: Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 233 – 258.Search in Google Scholar

Creutzfeldt, Naomi. 2016. “What Do we Expect from an Ombudsman ? Narratives of Everyday Engagement with the Informal Justice System in Germany and the UK.” International Journal of Law in Context 12, 437 – 452.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlström, Carl and Birgitta Niklasson. 2013. “The Politics of Politization in Sweden.” Public Administration 91, 891 – 907.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlvik, Julia. 2018. Inside Asylum Bureaucracy: Organizing Refugee Status Determination in Austria. Vienna: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-63306-0Search in Google Scholar

Dahlvik, Julia and Axel Pohn-Weidinger. 2018. “Administering Access to the Public Ombuds Institution: A Case Study on the Austrian Ombudsman Board.” In Marc Hertog and Richard Kirkham (eds). Research Handbook on the Ombudsman. UK: Edward Elgar, 394 – 414.Search in Google Scholar

Derlien, Hans-Ulrich. 2008. “Die politische und die administrative Elite der Bundesrepublik.” In Werner Jann and Klaus König (eds). Regieren zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 291 – 328.Search in Google Scholar

Ebinger, Falk, Nicolas Lux, Christoph Kintzinger and Benjamin Garske. 2018. “Die Deutsche Verwaltungselite der Regierungen Brandt bis Merkel II: Herkunft, Zusammensetzung und Politisierung der Führungskräfte in den Bundesministerien.” Der Moderne Staat: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 11, 1 – 23.Search in Google Scholar

Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz. 2015. “Credibility Versus Control: Agency Independence and Partisan Influence in the Regulatory State.” Comparative Political Studies 48, 823 – 853.Search in Google Scholar

Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz. 2016. “The Politicization of Regulatory Agencies: Between Partisan Influence and Formal Independence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26, 507 – 518.Search in Google Scholar

Eymeri-Douzans, Jean-Michel. 2003. “Frontière ou marches ? De la contribution de la haute administration à la production du politique.” In Jacques Lagroye (ed.). La politisation. Paris: Belin, 47 – 77.Search in Google Scholar

Falaschetti, Dino. 2002. “Does Partisan Heritage Matter ? The Case of the Federal Reserve.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 249864 (Microeconomics 18), 488 – 510.Search in Google Scholar

Farrell, Nora. 2013. The Canadian Ombuds / Man / Person: Impartial and Independent Aspirational, Achievable or Impossible ? Ph.D. dissertation, York University.Search in Google Scholar

Figueiredo, Jr., Rui J. P. de and Richard G. Vanden Bergh. 2004. “The Political Economy of State-Level Administrative Procedure Acts.” The Journal of Law and Economics 47, 569 – 588.Search in Google Scholar

Gerber, Brian J., Cherie Maestas and Nelson C. Dometrius. 2005. “State Legislative Influence over Agency Rulemaking: The Utility of Ex Ante Review.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, 24 – 46.Search in Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2008. Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Gilardi, Fabrizio and M. Maggeti. 2011. “The Independence of Regulatory Authorities.” In David Levi-Faur (ed.). Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 201 – 214.Search in Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 2010. Grounded Theory: Strategien Qualitativer Forschung. 3rd edn. Bern: Hans Huber.Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, Klaus H. 1999. “Senior Officials in the German Federal Administration: Institutional Change and Positional Differentiation.” In Edward Page and Vincent Wright (eds). Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 147 – 177.Search in Google Scholar

Gottherer, Dean M. 2009. “Fundamental Elements of an Effective Ombudsman Institution.” Paper presented at the 9th IOI World Conference, 2009, in Stockholm, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar

Hanretty, Chris and Christel Koop. 2012. “Measuring the Formal Independence of Regulatory Agencies.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, 198 – 216.Search in Google Scholar

Hertogh, Marc. 2013. “Why the Ombudsman does not Promote Public Trust in Government: Lessons from the Low Countries.” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 35, 245 – 258.Search in Google Scholar

Hoppmann, Joern, Florian Naegele and Bastien Girod. 2019. “Boards as a Source of Inertia: Examining the Internal Challenges and Dynamics of Boards of Directors in Times of Environmental Discontinuities.” Academy of Management Journal 62, 437 – 468.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, John D. and Charles R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion ?: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804915Search in Google Scholar

Hustedt, Thurid and Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen. 2014. “Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Politicization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureaucracies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(4), 746 – 765.Search in Google Scholar

Innes, Robert and Arnab Mitra. 2015. “Parties, Politics, and Regulation: Evidence from Clean Air Act Enforcement.” Economic Inquiry 53, 522 – 539.Search in Google Scholar

Jann, Werner and Sylvia Veit. 2010. “Politicisation of Administration or Bureaucratisation of Politics ? The Case of Germany.” Potsdamer Diskussionspapiere zur Verwaltungswissenschaft 6.Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, Robert A. 1994. “Regulatory Enforcement.” In David H. Rosenbloom and Richard D. Schwartz (eds). Handbook of Regulation and Administrative Law. New York: Marcel Dekker, 383 – 422.Search in Google Scholar

Koo, Jeong-Woo and Francisco O. Ramirez. 2009. “National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966 – 2004.” Social Forces 87, 1321 – 1353.10.1353/sof.0.0167Search in Google Scholar

Kopecký, Petr, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova (eds). 2012. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599370.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kucsko-Stadlmayer, Gabriele. 2008. European Ombudsman-Institutions: A Comparative Legal Analysis regarding the Multifaceted Realisation of an Idea. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-211-72882-6Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David E. 2007. “Testing Pendleton’s Premise: Do Political Appointees Make Worse Bureaucrats ?” Journal of Politics 69, 1073 – 1088.Search in Google Scholar

Liegl, Barbara and Wolfgang C. Müller. 1999. “Senior Officials in Austria.” In Edward Page and Vincent Wright (eds). Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. New York: Oxford University Press, 90 – 120.Search in Google Scholar

Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th-anniversary expanded edn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Maggetti, Martino. 2007. “De Facto Independence after Delegation: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis.” Regulation & Governance 1, 271 – 294.Search in Google Scholar

Maggetti, Martino, Karin Ingold and Frédéric Varone. 2013. “Having your Cake and Eating it, too: Can Regulatory Agencies Be Both Independent and Accountable ?” Swiss Political Science Review 19, 1 – 25.Search in Google Scholar

Mcallister, Lesley K. 2009. “Dimensions of Enforcement Style: Factoring in Regulatory Autonomy and Capacity.” Law & Policy, November.10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00308.xSearch in Google Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew D., Roger G. Noll and Barry R. Weingast. 1989. “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.” Virginia Law Review 75, 431.Search in Google Scholar

May, Peter J. and Robert S. Wood. 2003. “At the Regulatory Front Lines: Inspectors Enforcement Styles and Regulatory Compliance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13, 139.Search in Google Scholar

Moe, Terry. 1985. “Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the US NLRB.” American Political Science Review 79, 1116.Search in Google Scholar

Moe, Terry. 1990. “The Politics of Structural Choice.” In Oliver E. Williamson (ed.). Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 116 – 153.Search in Google Scholar

Molano León, Ricardo. 2011. “The Roles of the Board of Directors: The Unresolved Riddle.” Vniversitas 60, 602.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang C. 2007. “The Changing Role of the Austrian Civil Service: The Impact of Politicisation, Public Sector Reform, and Europeanisation.” In Edward Page and Vincent Wright (ed.). From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations. Transforming Government. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 38 – 62.Search in Google Scholar

Nölle, Genia. 2010. “Frauen in Führungspositionen des öffentlichen Sektors: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit.” In Andreas Gourmelon and Michael Mroß (eds). Führung im Öffentlichen Sektor. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 147 – 155.Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, Manfred and Hannes Tretter. 2007. “Vorschläge zur Errichtung einer nationalen Menschenrechtsinstitution in Österreich.” Journal Für Rechtspolitik 15, 1 – 10.Search in Google Scholar

O’Flynn, Patrick Eamon and Tim A. Mau. 2014. “A Demographic and Career Profile of Municipal CAOs in Canada: Implications for Local Governance: Municipal CAOs in Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 57, 154 – 170.Search in Google Scholar

Oosting, Martin. 2001. “Protecting the Integrity and Independence of the Ombudsman Institution: The Global Perspective.” In International Ombudsman Institute (ed.). The International Ombudsman Yearbook. Alphen aan den Riijn: Kluwer Law International, 7 – 24.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Lee David. 2007. “Internal Governance in the Nonprofit Boardroom: A Participant Observer Study.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, 923 – 934.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, B. Guy. 2013. “Politicisation: What is tt and Why should we Care ?” In Christine Neuhold, Sophie Vanhoonacker and Luc Verhey (eds). Civil Servants and Politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 12 – 24.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre. 2004. “Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences.” In B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (eds). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. New York: Routledge, 1 – 13.Search in Google Scholar

Pohn-Weidinger, Axel and Julia Dahlvik. forthcoming. “Ombudsinstitutionen als Ressource für strategische Rechtsmobilisierung für kollektive Zwecke.” Zeitschrift für Kultur- und Kollektivwissenschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Poggione, Sarah J. and Christopher Reenock. 2009. “Political Insulation and Legislative Interventions: The Impact of Rule Review.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 9, 456 – 485.Search in Google Scholar

Potoski, Matthew. 2002. “Designing Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Administrative Procedures and Agency Choice in State Environmental Policy.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2, 1 – 23.Search in Google Scholar

Reenock, C. M. and B. J. Gerber. 2007. “Political Insulation, Information Exchange, and Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18, 415 – 440.Search in Google Scholar

Reif, Linda C. 2004. The Ombudsman, Good Governance, and the International Human Rights System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-5932-8Search in Google Scholar

Roy, Gregory and Philip James Giddings. 2000. “The Ombudsman Institution: Growth and Development.” In Philip James Giddings and Gregory Roy (eds). Righting Wrongs: The Ombudsman in Six Continents. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1 – 18.Search in Google Scholar

Schönherr, Fritz. 1977. Volksanwaltschaft: Das Bundesgesetz vom 24. 2. 1977 über die Volksanwaltschaft, erläutert aus den Materialien, samt früheren Entwürfen und Erläuterungen sowie einer kritischen Würdigung der Verwirklichung des Ombudsmann-Gedankens in Österreich. Wien: Manz.Search in Google Scholar

Short, Jodi L. 2019. “The Politics of Regulatory Enforcement and Compliance: Theorizing and Operationalizing Political Influences.” Regulation & Governance.https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12291.10.1111/rego.12291Search in Google Scholar

Tomic, Slobodan. 2018. “Legal Independence vs. Leaders’ Reputation: Exploring Drivers of Ethics Commissions’ Conduct in New Democracies.” Public Administration 96, 544 – 560.Search in Google Scholar

Treib, Oliver. 2012. “Party Patronage in Austria: From Reward to Control.” In Petr Kopecký, Peter Mair and Maria Spirova (eds). Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford University Press, 31 – 51.Search in Google Scholar

Ugyel, Lhawang. 2016. “Ideal Types in Public Administration.” In Lhawang Ugyel (ed.). Paradigms and Public Sector Reform. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 53 – 72.Search in Google Scholar

Veit, Sylvia and Simon Scholz. 2016. “Linking Administrative Career Patterns and Politicization: Signalling Effects in the Careers of Top Civil Servants in Germany.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82, 516 – 535.Search in Google Scholar

Verhoest, Koen, B. Guy Peters, Geert Bouckaert and Bram Verschuere. 2004. “The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual Review.” Public Administration and Development 24, 101 – 118.Search in Google Scholar

Volksanwaltschaft. 2019. Bericht der Volksanwaltschaft an den Nationalrat und an den Bundesrat 2018. Wien: Volksanwaltschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, James P. and James K. Seward. 1990. “On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms.” Academy of Management Review 15, 421 – 458.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo