[
Adebanjo, D., Laosirihongthong, T., Samaranayake, P. (2016), Prioritizing Lean Supply Chain Management Initiatives in Healthcare Service Operations: A Fuzzy AHP Approach, Production Planning & Control, 27(12), 953-966.10.1080/09537287.2016.1164909
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alroaia, Y., and Ardekani, M. (2012). Representing a combination algorithm (AHP and Kano) in order to priority effective factors on customer needs in e-banking: The case of Bank-e-Saderat of Tehran Province. African Journal of Business Management, 6(26), 7727-7735.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amiri, M. P. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6218-6224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bayraktaroglu, G., and Özgen, Ö. (2008). Integrating the Kano Model, AHP and planning matrix: QFD application in library services. Library Management, 29 (4/5), 327-351, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435120810869110.10.1108/01435120810869110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belton V., Stewart T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bellman, R. E., and Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141-164.10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berger, C., Blauth, R., Boger, D., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., Dumouchel, W., Pouliot, F., Richter, R., RubinofF, A., Shen, D., Timko, M. and Walden, D. (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), 1-36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birader, T.G., Öztüren, A. (2019). Motivators and Perceptions of Island Residents towards Medical Tourism in Mainland. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(19): 164-176. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v10i19.9910.29036/jots.v10i19.99
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boender C. G. E., de Graan J. G., Lootsma F. A. (1989). Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29(2), 133-143.10.1016/0165-0114(89)90187-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buckley J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247.10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Büyüközkan, G., Kahraman, C., & Ruan, D. (2004). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection. International Journal of General Systems, 33 (2-3), 259-280, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03081070310001633581.10.1080/03081070310001633581
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, C. H. (2019). A new multi-criteria assessment Model combining GRA techniques with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy based TOPSIS method for sustainable building materials supplier selection. Sustainability, 11, 2265.10.3390/su11082265
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, L. (1995). Quality function deployment: How to make QFD work for you, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kilinç, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8143-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dima, A. & Vasilache, S. (2016).Trends in the internationalization of European higher education in a convergence perspective. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society,11(2) 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2016-0008.10.1515/mmcks-2016-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dinulescu, R., Bugheanu, A.M. (2020). Improving users’ satisfaction by implementing the analytic hierarchy process in the public transportation system. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 29(6), 957-968.10.30638/eemj.2020.090
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobrin, D., Dinulescu, R. (2019). Integrating the Quality Function Deployment to the Romanian Healthcare System as part of a Continuous Improvement Process. Proceedings of the 34th IBIMA Conference, Madrid, Spain.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dos Santos, P.H., Neves, S.M., Sant’anna, D., DE oliveira, C.H., DE Carvalho, H.D., Ornaghi, D., Anna, S. (2019). The analytical hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production, 212(1), 119-138.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dožić, S., Kalić, M. (2018). Aircraft type selection problem: application of different MCDM Methods. Advanced Concepts, Methodologies and Technologies for Transportation and Logistics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 156–175, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_7.10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fong, D. (1996). Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results. Center for Quality of Management Journal, 5(3), 21-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gavurova, B., & Kubak, M. (2021). The importance of evaluating inpatients? satisfaction with emphasis on the aspect of confidence. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(3), 821–848. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.027.10.24136/oc.2021.027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GE, Y., Xiao, M., Yang, Z., Zhang, L., HU, Z., Feng, D. (2017). An integrated logarithmic fuzzy preference programming-based methodology for optimum maintenance strategies selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 60: 591-601, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.021.10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghorbanzadeh, O., Moslem, S., Blaschke, T., Duleba, S. (2019). Sustainable Urban Transport Planning Considering Different Stakeholder Groups by an Interval-AHP Decision Support Model. Sustainability, 11(1), 9-17.10.3390/su11010009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Ebadi Torkayesh, A., Ecer, F., Turskis, Z., & Šaparauskas, J. (2021). International market selection: a MABA based EDAS analysis framework. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.005.10.24136/oc.2021.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hauser, D., Tadikamalla, P. (1996). The analytic hierarchy process in an uncertain environment: A simulation approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 91(1), 27-37.10.1016/0377-2217(95)00002-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heidenberger, K., Stummer, C. (1999). Research and development project selection and resource allocation: A review of quantitative Modeling approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 197-224.10.1111/1468-2370.00012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hejaili, F.F., Assad, L., Shaheen, F.A., Moussa, D.H., Karkar, A., Alrukhaimi, M., Barhamein, M., Kano, N., Seraku, K., Takahaski, F. and Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control), 14(2), 39-48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hemati, M., & Ghorbanian, F. (2011). A hybrid Kano-fuzzy AHP method for measuring customer satisfaction: A case study of transportation system. Management Science Letters, 1, 263-270.10.5267/j.msl.2010.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ho, W., MA, X. (2018). The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399-414.10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsu, Y. L., Hsu, C. C., & Bing, P. C. (2007). Capturing passengers’ voices: The application of Kano’s Model in the airline industry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Logistics, Shipping and Port Management, 1-14, Taiyuan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Janovská, K., Vozňáková, I., Besta, P., & Šafránek, M. (2021). Ecological and economic multicriteria optimization of operating alternative propulsion vehicles within the city of Ostrava in the Czech Republic. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(4), 907–943. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.034.10.24136/eq.2021.034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krejčí, J., Pavlačka, O., Talašová, J. (2017). A fuzzy extension of analytic hierarchy process based on the constrained fuzzy arithmetic, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 16 (1): 89-110.10.1007/s10700-016-9241-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11, 229-241.10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, A., Chen, W., & Chang, C. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 96-107, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022.10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leung, L. C., & Cao, D. (2000). On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1), 102-113.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00118-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liberatore, M. J., Nydick, R.L. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 194-207.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lloyd, R. (2004). Quality Health care: A Guide to Developing and Using Indicators, Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lustigová, Z., Jarolímková, L, Žufan, J. (2021). Evaluation of Tourist Decision-Making Process by Eye-Tracking Method – Focused on Methodology Gap and Cross-National Comparison. Journal of Tourism and Services, 22(12), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.29036/jots.v12i22.25810.29036/jots.v12i22.258
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mark D. (2001). Adaptive AHP: a review of marketing applications with extensions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(7/8), 872-894.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s Model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18(1), 25-38, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00072-2.10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00072-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medjoudj, R., Laifa, A., Aissani, D. (2015). Decision Making on Power Customer Satisfaction and Enterprise Profitability Analysis Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17): 4793-4805.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mikulić, J., and Prebežac, D. (2011). A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano Model. Managing Service Quality, 21(1), 46-66.10.1108/09604521111100243
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Momani, A., Al-hawari, T., AL-Shebami, H., Al-Araidah, O. (2014). Classifying and Ranking Healthcare Quality Attributes Using Integrated Kano-Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Model. Engineering Management Research, 3(1), 68-88.10.5539/emr.v3n1p68
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muerza, V., DE Arcocha, D., Larrode, E., Moreno-jiménez, J.M. (2014). The Multicriteria Selection of Products in Technological Diversification Strategies: An Application to the Spanish Automotive Industry Based on AHP. Production Planning and Control, 25(1): 715-728.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nascimento, V., Leal, J.E. (2020). Performance criteria for Liquid Bulk Storage Terminals (LBST), using AHP. Operations Management for Social Good, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, 421-429.10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_41
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nunes, G.S., Leal, J.E. (2020). Decision-Making Method for Facility Location for Offshore Logistic Operation Based on AHP. Operations Management for Social Good, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, 721-729.10.1007/978-3-030-23816-2_71
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pohekar, S.D., Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, 365-381.10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, C. (2009). Kano on customers. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 32(2), 23-25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2021). Multi-dimensional analysis of regional investment attractiveness in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 103–138. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.004;
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, New York: McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G. (1991). Prediction, Projection and Forecasting, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-015-7952-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salo, A. A., Hämäläinen, R. P. (1995). Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 82(3), 458-475.10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0224-L
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sireli, Y., Kauffmann, P., & Ozan, E. (2007). Integration of Kano’s Model into QFD for Multiple Product Design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), 380-390, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893990.10.1109/TEM.2007.893990
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skvarciany, V., Lapinskaite, I., & Volskyte, G. (2021). Circular economy as assistance for sustainable development in OECD countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.001.10.24136/oc.2021.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tong, L., Pu, Z., Ma, J. (2019). Maintenance supplier evaluation and selection for safe and sustainable production in the chemical industry: A case study. Sustainability, 11, 1533.10.3390/su11061533
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of intelligent systems, 25(6), 529-539.10.1002/int.20418
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vahidnia, M., Alesheikh, A., & Alimohammadi, A. (2009). Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(10), 3048-3056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.010.10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, 1-29.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vavrek, R., & Kovářová, E. (2021). Assessment of the social exclusion at the regional level using multi-criteria approach: evidence from the Czech Republic. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.003.10.24136/eq.2021.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wind, Y., Saaty, T.L. (1980). Marketing applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 26(7), 641-658.10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xie, Q., Ni, J.-Q., SU, Z. (2017). Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of multiple environmental factors for swine building assessment and control. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 340: 463-471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.024.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, Z. S., & Chen, J. (2007). An interactive method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Information Science, 177(1), 248-263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.001.10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yuhua, L., Kai S. (2004). On the comprehensive evaluation of urban public transport based on gray clustering method. Journal of Harbin University, 9(6), 76-82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zaim, S., Turkyilmaz, A., Acar, M.F., AL-turki, U. and Demirel, O.F. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 18(1), 16-29.10.1108/13552511211226166
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zielke, S. (2008). Exploring asymmetric effects in the formation of retail price satisfaction, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(5), 335-347, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.08.005.10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.08.005
]Search in Google Scholar
