[
Ableitinger, C., Anger, A., & Dorner, C. (2022). Using students’ selection of significant events in mathematics lessons to deduce their underlying predispositions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(4), 787–806. Adorno, T. W. (1993). Theory of pseudo-culture (1959) (D. Cook, Trans.). Telos, 95, 15–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson, L. W., Krathwol, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., & Mayer, R. E. (2014). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s. Harlow: Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Atlay, C., Tieben, N., Hillmert, S., & Fauth, B. (2019). Instructional quality and achievement inequality: How effective is teaching in closing the social achievement gap? Learning and Instruction, 63, 101211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. Journal of Personality, 66(6), 1081–1124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biesta, G. (2023). Outline of a theory of teaching: What teaching is, what it is for, how it works, and why it requires artistry. In A.-K. Praetorius & C. Y. Charalambous (Eds.), Theorizing Teaching: Current Status and Open Issues (pp. 253–280). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breidenstein, G. (2006). Teilnahme am Unterricht: Ethnographische Studien zum Schülerjob. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breidenstein, G. (2007). The meaning of boredom in school lessons. Participant observation in the seventh and eighth form. Ethnography and Education, 2(1), 93–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284-290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colognesi, S., & Gouin, J.-A. (2022). A typology of learner profiles to anticipate and guide differentiation in primary classes. Research Papers in Education, 37(4), 479–495.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: A step-by-step approach. New Jersey: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cramer, P. (2006). Protecting the self. Defense mechanisms in action. New York: The Guilford Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crouzevialle, M., & Darnon, C. (2019). On the academic disadvantage of low social class individuals: Pursuing performance goals fosters the emergence of the achievement gap. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1261–1272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, P., & Florian, L. (2004). Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: A Scoping Study (Department for Education and Skills, Ed.). Norwich: Queen’s Printer. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6059/1/RR516.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Boer, A., & Kuijper, S. (2021). Students’ voices about the extra educational support they receive in regular education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(4), 625–641.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation Practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Di Giuseppe, M., & Perry, J. C. (2021). The hierarchy of defense mechanisms: Assessing defensive functioning with the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Q-Sort. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 4728.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ebenbeck, N., Rieser, J., Jungjohann, J., & Gebhardt, M. (2022). How the existence of special schools affects the placement of students with special needs in inclusive primary schools. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 22(3), 274–287.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eubanks, C. F., Lubitz, J., Muran, J. C., & Safran, J. D. (2019). Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS): Development and validation. Psychotherapy Research, 29(3), 306–319.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, J., Morgan, C., & Tsatsaroni, A. (2006). Discursive positioning and emotion in school mathematics practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 209–226. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25472123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Everitt, J. G. (2017). Lesson plans. The institutional demands of becoming teacher. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. https://lccn.loc.gov/2017016359
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faircloth, B. S. (2012). “Wearing a mask” vs. Connecting identity with learning. Identity Formation in Educational Settings, 37(3), 186–194.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fend, H. (1980). Theorie der Schule. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fields, B. A. (1999). The impact of class heterogeneity on students with learning disabilities. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4(2), 11–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleischmann, M., Hübner, N., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2023). The dark side of detracking: Mixed-ability classrooms negatively affect the academic self-concept of students with low academic achievement. Learning and Instruction, 86, 101753.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fletcher-Campbell, F. (2005). Moderate learning difficulties. In A. Lewis, & N. Brahm (Eds.), Special Teaching For Special Children? Pedagogies for Inclusion (pp. 180–191). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garner, R., & Hancock, B. H. (2021). Changing Theories: New Directions in Sociology. University of Toronto Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldan, J., Nusser, L., & Gebel, M. (2022). School-related subjective well-being of children with and without special educational needs in inclusive classrooms. Child Indicators Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green, J. L., Brock, C., Baker, W. D., & Harris, P. (2020). Positioning theory and discourse analysis. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pea, & M. M. de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the Cultural Foundations of Learning (pp. 119–140). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gruschka, A. (2019). A new way of understanding teaching: A German perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 45(5), 673–689.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in Classrooms (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press. Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2012). Identity formation in educational settings: A critical focus for education in the 21st century. Identity Formation in Educational Settings, 37(3), 171–175.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayi-Aydar, H., & Miller, E. R. (2018). Positioning in classroom discourse studies: A state-of-the-art review. Classroom Discourse, 9(2), 79–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klafki, W. (1995). Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction (Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kocaj, A., Kuhl, P., Jansen, M., Pant, H. A., & Stanat, P. (2018). Educational placement and achievement motivation of students with special educational needs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 63–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köller, O. (2000). Goal orientations: Their impact on academic learning and their development during early adolescence. Motivational Psychology of Human Development: Developing Motivation and Motivating Development., 129–142.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kölm, J., Mahler, N., & Gresch, C. (2020). Die Bedeutung der Klassenzusammensetzung für das Vorliegen einer Diagnose eines sonderpädagogischen Förderbedarfs Lernen bei Schüler*innen mit Zuwanderungshintergrund. In C. Gresch, P. Kuhl, M. Grosche, C. Sälzer, & P. Stanat (Eds.), Schüler*innen mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf in Schulleistungserhebungen: Einblicke und Entwicklungen (pp. 263–291). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koßmann, R. (2019). Schule und ‘Lernbehinderung’: Wechselseitige Erschließungen. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koßmann, R. (2020). Der sonderpädagogische Förderbedarf im Bereich des Lernens im Spiegel einer deutschlandweiten Ländervergleichsstudie. Behindertenpädagogik, 59(1), 47–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koßmann, R. (2022a). Edutainment – als Muster für Binnendifferenzierung? Rekonstruktion einer Doppelstunde inklusiven Geschichtsunterrichts [Edutainment – as a way of differentiated instruction? Reconstruction of an inclusive history lesson]. Zeitschrift Für Interpretative Schul- Und Unterrichtsforschung, 11, 35–48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koßmann, R. (2022b). Pupils’ self-report on positioning towards lessons’ content-based requirements (1.0). Zenodo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koßmann, R. (in preparation). Vom Zweisatz zum Dreisatz? Rekonstruktion einer Stunde inklusiven Mathematikunterrichts. In G. Wilm, R. Koßmann, S. Böse, M. Fabel-Lamla, & C. Meyer-Jain (Eds.), Videographische Forschung zu inklusivem Unterricht: Erziehungswissenschaftliche und fachdidaktische Perspektiven. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krämer, S., Möller, J., & Zimmermann, F. (2021). Inclusive education of students with general learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 432–478.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kultusministerkonferenz (2022). Sonderpädagogische Förderung in allgemeinen Schulen (ohne Förderschulen) 2021/2022. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Statistik/Dokumentationen/Aus_SoPae_Int_2021.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Labhart, D., Pool Maag, S., & Moser Opitz, E. (2018). Differenzieren im selektiven Schulsystem. Der Widerspruch zwischen den gesellschaftlichen Funktionen der Schule und der Forderung nach individueller Förderung. Sonderpädagogische Förderung Heute, 63(1), 71–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Letzel-Alt, V., & Pozas, M. (Eds.). (2023). Differentiated Instruction Around the World. A Global Inclusive Insight. Münster & New York: Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindner, K.-T., Alnahdi, G. H., Wahl, S., & Schwab, S. (2019). Perceived differentiation and personalization teaching approaches in inclusive classrooms: Perspectives of students and teachers. Frontiers in Education, 4, 58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mähler, C., & Grube, D. (2018). Lernschwierigkeiten. In D. H. Rost, J. R. Sparfeldt, & S. Buch (Eds.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (5th ed., pp. 456–466). Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maiwald, K.-O., & Suerig, I. (2020). Microsociology: A tool kit for interaction analysis. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martens, M., & Asbrand, B. (2021). „Schülerjob“ revisited: Zur Passung von Lehrund Lernhabitus im Unterricht [’Student’s job’ revisited: Complementary relations of teaching and learning habitus in the classroom]. Zeitschrift Für Bildungsforschung, 11(1), 55–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maulana, R., Smale-Jacobse, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., Chun, S., & Lee, O. (2020). Measuring differentiated instruction in The Netherlands and South Korea: Factor structure equivalence, correlates, and complexity level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(4), 881–909.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:-de:0168-ssoar-395173
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mugon, J., Danckert, J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2019). The costs and benefits of boredom in the classroom. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning (pp. 490–514). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norwich, B., & Lewis, A. (2007). How specialized is teaching children with disabilities and difficulties? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 127–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norwich, B., Ylonen, A., & Gwernan-Jones, R. (2014). Moderate learning difficulties: Searching for clarity and understanding. Research Papers in Education, 29(1), 1–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oevermann, U., Allert, W. T., Konau, E., & Krambeck, J. (1987). Structures of meaning and objective hermeneutics. In V. Meja, D. Misgeld, & N. Stehr (Eds.), Modern German Sociology (pp. 436–448). New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Socially desirable responding on self-reports. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–5). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollmanns, M. (2019). Unterrichten und Aneignen: Eine pädagogische Rekonstruktion von Unterricht. Opladen: Budrich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., Lindner, K.-T., & Schwab, S. (2021). DI (Differentiated Instruction) does matter! The effects of DI on secondary school students’ well-Being, social inclusion and academic self-concept. Frontiers in Education, 6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pozas, M., Palacios Tovar, J. A., Pozas Guerra, L., Rivera Armendariz, L. R., & Lomelí Zubiría, A. S. (2023). ‘From my perspective’. Differentiated instruction in mathematics according to lower secondary Mexican students. In V. Letzel-Alt & M. Pozas (Eds.), Differentiated Instruction Around the World. A Global Inclusive Insight (pp. 209–224). Münster: Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pozas, M., & Schneider, C. (2019). Shedding light on the convoluted terrain of differentiated instruction (DI): Proposal of a DI taxonomy for the heterogeneous classroom. Open Education Studies, 1, 73–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rieser, S., & Decristan, J. (2023). Kognitive Aktivierung in Befragungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern [Cognitive activation in student questionnaires – Distinguishing between the potential for cognitive activation and individual cognitive activation]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roy, A., Guay, F., & Valois, P. (2015). The big-fish–little-pond effect on academic self-concept: The moderating role of differentiated instruction and individual achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 110–116.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scharenberg, K. (2012). Leistungsheterogenität und Kompetenzentwicklung: Zur Relevanz klassenbezogener Kompositionsmerkmale im Rahmen der KESS-Studie. Münster: Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmitz, L., & Simon, T. (2021). Awareness of heterogeneity. Empirical findings on how prospective schoolteachers perceive heterogeneity in the classroom. Interculture Journal: Online-Zeitschrift Für Interkulturelle Studien, 20(34), 35–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwab, S., & Hessels, M. G. P. (2015). Achievement goals, school achievement, self-estimations of school achievement, and calibration in students with and without special education needs in inclusive education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 461–477.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sedlmeier, P., & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Forschungsmethoden und Statistik für Psycho-logen und Sozialwissenschaftler (3rd ed.). München: Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Senko, C., & Tropiano, K. L. (2016). Comparing three models of achievement goals: Goal orientations, goal standards, and goal complexes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1178–1192.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silvermann, J., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2023). Coping and defense mechanisms: A scoping review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, (Advance online publication), 1–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simonsmeier, B. A., Flaig, M., Deiglmayr, A., Schalk, L., & Schneider, M. (2022). Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 31–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V. G., & Eilks, I. (2017). Use of the concept of Bil-dung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 165–192.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skinner, E. A., Pitzer, J., & Steele, J. (2013). Coping as part of motivational resilience in school: A multidimensional measure of families, allocations, and profiles of academic coping. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(5), 803–835.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Skinner, E. A., & Saxton, E. A. (2020). The development of academic coping across late elementary and early middle school: Do patterns differ for students with differing motivational resources? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(4), 339–353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2366.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sohn-Rethel, A. (2019). The formal characteristics of second nature (1974) (D. Spaulding, Trans.). Selva: A Journal of the History of Art. http://3yq9op84wc1hzwsk2mokc215-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wpcontent/uploads/2020/03/Sohn_Rethel_Formal_Characteristics.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stäbler, F., Dumont, H., Becker, M., & Baumert, J. (2017). What happens to the fish’s achievement in a little pond? A simultaneous analysis of class-average achievement effects on achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 191–207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinmetz, S., Wrase, M., Helbig, M., & Döttinger, I. (2021). Die Umsetzung schulischer Inklusion nach der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention in den deutschen Bundesländern. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Straehler-Pohl, H., & Pais, A. (2014). Learning to fail and learning from failure – ideology at work in a mathematics classroom. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(1), 79–96. Sullivan, J. R. (2010). Preliminary psychometric data for the Academic Coping Strategies Scale. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(2), 114–127.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Urdan, T., & Kaplan, A. (2020). The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wernet, A. (2013). Hermeneutics and objective hermeneutics. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 234–246). Los Angeles: SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wirthwein, L., Sparfeldt, J. R., Pinquart, M., Wegerer, J., & Steinmayr, R. (2013). Achievement goals and academic achievement: A closer look at moderating factors. Educational Research Review, 10, 66–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
