1. bookVolume 10 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-1563
First Published
16 Sep 2010
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Changing reading paths in a digital age: What are the consequences for meaning-making?

Published Online: 30 Dec 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2019) - Issue 2 (December 2019)
Page range: 65 - 85
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-1563
First Published
16 Sep 2010
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English

Alexander, P. A., & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259-280.10.1080/00461520.2012.722511Search in Google Scholar

Baricco, A. (2006). I Barbari. Saggio della mutazione. Rome: Fandango libri.Search in Google Scholar

Baron, N. (2015). Words onscreen. The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barzillai, M., Thompson, J., Schroeder, S., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.). (2018) Learning to read in a digital world. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/swll.17Search in Google Scholar

Bauerlein, M. (2008). The dumbest generation: How the digital age stupefies young americans and jeopardizes our future. New Yourk: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin. Bearne, E. (2009). Multimodality, literacy and texts: Developing a discourse. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 156-187.Search in Google Scholar

Birkets, S. (2007). Reading life. Books for the ages. Minnesota: Graywolf Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bohn, R. E., & Short, J. E. (2009). How much information? 2009 report on American consumers. Global Information Industry Center: UC San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://hmi.ucsd.edu/howmuchinfo.phpSearch in Google Scholar

Brockmeier, J., & Olson, D. R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In D. R. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy (pp. 3-21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carr, N. (2010). Shallows. What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Cole, M., & Cole, J. (2006). Rethinking the goody myth. In D. Olson, & J. Cole (Eds.), Technology, literacy, and the evolution of society. Implications of the work of Jack Goody (pp. 305-324). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38.10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1962). Opera Aperta: forma e indetermninazione nelle poetiche contemporare. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar

Erstad, O., Flewitt, R.S., Kümmerling-Meibauer, B. & Pereira, Í S. P. (Eds). (2019). The Routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203730638Search in Google Scholar

Fišerová, M. (2015a). Kybernetické imaginárno. Rozhovor s Pierrem Lévym. In M. Fišerová (Ed.), Obraz a moc. Rozhovory s francouzskými mysliteli (pp. 134-140). Praha: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

Fišerová, M. (2015b). Politika obrazu ve francouzském myšlení 20. a 21. století. In M. Fišerová (Ed.), Obraz a moc. Rozhovory s francouzskými mysliteli (pp. 10-84). Praha: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

Flusser, V. (1993). Lob der Oberflächlichkeit. In S. Bollman, & E. Flusser (Eds.), Schriften (volume 1) (pp. 9-59). Düsseldorf: Bollman Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Flusser, V. (2011). Does writing have a future? Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816670222.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2008). This is not a pipe. Los Angeles: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greenfield, S. (2015). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus. A brief history of tomorrow. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Hassett, D. D. (2006). Signs of the times: the governance of alphabetic print over “appropriate” and “natural” reading development. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 61(1), 77-103.10.1177/1468798406062176Search in Google Scholar

Havelock, E. (1982). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hesse, C. (1996). Books in time. In G. Numberg (Ed.), The Future of the Book (pp. 21-33). Berkley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hootsuite, & We Are Social (2019). Digital 2019 global digital overview. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-digital-overview.Search in Google Scholar

Jeník, L. (2010). Svet filozofického románu ako laboratórium filozofie. Romboid, 45(3), 24-37.Search in Google Scholar

Jeník, L. (2012). Náčrt Goodmanovho chápania úlohy metafory v jeho teórii referencie. Studia Aloisiana, 3(2), 17-36.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C. (2005) Multimodality, “reading”, and “writing” for the 21st Century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315-331.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241-267.10.3102/0091732X07310586Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138-149.10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G., & Van Leeuven, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5-22.10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Landow, G. P. (1994). Hyper/text/theory. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lanham, R. A. (1993). The electronic word: Democracy, technology and the arts. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226469126.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lanham, R. A. (2001). What’s next for text? Education Communication and Information, 1(1), 15-36.10.1080/14636310120048038Search in Google Scholar

Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: Haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 404-419.10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00380.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mangen, A., & van der Weel, A. (2016). The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: An integrative framework for reading research. Literacy, 50(3), 116-124.10.1111/lit.12086Search in Google Scholar

Mangen, A., (2017). Textual reading on paper and screens: Implications for design. In A. Black, P. Luna, O. Lund, & S. Walker (Eds.), Information design research and practice (pp. 275–290). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (2005). Understanding Media. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Miall, D. S., & Dobson. T. (2001). Reading hypertext and the experience of literature. Journal of Digital Information, 2(1).Search in Google Scholar

Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “Digital turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246-271.10.3102/0034654310364401Search in Google Scholar

Ong, J. W. (2002). Orality and literacy. The technologizing of he word. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Postman, N. (1986). Amusing ourselves to death. Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Postman, N. (1995). The end of education. Redefining the value of the school. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Prior, P. (2005). Moving multimodality beyond the binaries: A response to Gunther Kress’ “Gains and losses”. Computers and Composition, 22, 23-30.10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.007Search in Google Scholar

Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87, 1007-1041.10.3102/0034654317722961Search in Google Scholar

Spitzer, M. (2012). Digitale Demenz. Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen. München: Droemersche Verlagsanstalt.Search in Google Scholar

Tolchinsky, L. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410607195Search in Google Scholar

Tolva, J. (1996). Ut pictura hyperpoesis: Spatial form, visuality, and the digital word. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on hypertext, Washinghton, DC, March 16 – 22 (pp. 66-73). New York: ACM Press.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO (2015). Education 2030 Incheon Declaration – Framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

van der Weel, A. (2011). Changing our textual mind. Manchester, New York: Manchester University Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, S., Black, A., Bassemans, A., Bormans, K., Renckens, M., & Barratt, M. (2018). Designing digital texts for beginner readers: Performance, practice and process. In M. Barzillai, J. Thompson, S. Scroeder, & van den Broek, P. (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 31-55). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company,10.1075/swll.17.02walSearch in Google Scholar

Waller, R. (2012). Graphic literacies for a digital age: The survival of layout. The Information Society: An International Journal, 28(4), 236-252.10.1080/01972243.2012.689609Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211-239.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, O. (2007). Comparability of computer-based and paper- and-pencil testing in K–12 reading assessments: A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 5-24.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, M. (2016). Tales of literacy for the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Educational Leadership, 6, 32-37.Search in Google Scholar

Wysocki, A. (2004). The multiple media of texts: How on screen and paper texts in-corporate words, images, and other media. In Ch. Bazerman, & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 123-163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo