1. bookVolume 36 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)
    Special Issue on Nonresponse
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2001-7367
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Evolution of the Initially Recruited SHARE Panel Sample Over the First Six Waves

Published Online: 24 Jul 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 36 (2020) - Issue 3 (September 2020) - Special Issue on Nonresponse
Page range: 507 - 527
Received: 01 Aug 2020
Accepted: 01 Feb 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2001-7367
First Published
01 Oct 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (9th ed.). AAPOR. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed August 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Banks, J., M. Alastair, and J.P. Smith. 2011. “Attrition and Health in Ageing Studies: Evidence from ELSA and HRS.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 2: 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115.10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115387299924376472Search in Google Scholar

Bergmann, M., T. Kneip, G. De Luca, and A. Scherpenzeel. 2019. Survey Participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Wave 1–7. SHARE Working Paper Series 31-2017. Munich, Germany: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy. Available at: http://www.share-project.org/uploads/tx_sharepublications/WP_Series_41_2019_Bergmann_et_al.pdf (accessed February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2017. “Representativeness in Panel Surveys.” Mathematical Population Studies 24: 126 – 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2016.1271650.10.1080/08898480.2016.1271650Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, A. and S. Biffignandi. 2019. “Social Indicators to Explain Response in Longitudinal Studies.” Social Indicators Research 141: 931–957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1874-7.10.1007/s11205-018-1874-7Search in Google Scholar

Binder, D. 1998. “Longitudinal Surveys: Why Are These Surveys Different from All Other Surveys?” Survey Methodology 24: 101–108. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/12-001-X19980024347 (accessed June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Börsch-Supan, A., M. Brandt, C. Hunkler, T. Kneip, J. Korbmacher, F. Malter, B. Schaan, S. Stuck, and S. Zuber. 2013. “Data Resource Profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).” International Journal of Epidemiology 42: 992–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt088.10.1093/ije/dyt088378099723778574Search in Google Scholar

Börsch-Supan, A. 2017. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 1. Release version: 6.0.0. SHARE-ERIC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w1.600.Search in Google Scholar

Bristle, J., M. Celidoni, C. Dal Bianco, and G. Weber. 2019. “The Contributions of Paradata and Features of Respondents, Interviewers and Survey Agencies to Panel Co-Operation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 182: 3–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12391.10.1111/rssa.12391670606131439985Search in Google Scholar

Buck, N., J. Burton, H. Laurie, P. Lynn, and S.C.N. Uhrig. 2006. Quality Profile: British Household Panel. Survey Version 2.0: Waves 1 to 13: 1991–2003. Colchester, UK: University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research.Search in Google Scholar

De Luca, G., C. Rossetti, and F. Malter. 2013. “Sample Design and Weighting Strategies in SHARE Wave 5.” In SHARE Wave 5: Innovations & Methodology, edited by F. Malter and A. Börsch-Supan, 75–84. Munich, Germany: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2004–2015. Available at: “https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/population-demo-graphy-migration-projections/population-projections-/database (accessed June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J., P. Gottschalk, and R. Moffitt. 1998. “An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics.” The Journal of Human Resources 33: 251–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/146433.10.2307/146433Search in Google Scholar

Leon, D.A. 2011. “Trends in European life expectancy: a salutary view.” International Journal of Epidemiology 40: 271–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr061.10.1093/ije/dyr06121415000Search in Google Scholar

Lepkowski, J.M. and M.P. Couper. 2002. “Nonresponse in the Second Wave of Longitudinal Household Surveys.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R.M. Groves, D.A. Dillman, J.L. Eltinge, and R. J.A. Little, 259–272. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Lugtig, P. 2014. “Panel Attrition.” Sociological Methods & Research 43: 699–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113520305.10.1177/0049124113520305Search in Google Scholar

Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored fieldwork design to increase representative household survey response: an experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176: 169–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lynn, P. 2009. “Methods for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 1–19. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch1Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, P. and P. Lugtig. 2017. “Total Survey Error for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Total Survey Error in Practice, edited by P.P. Biemer, E. De Leeuw, S. Eckman, B. Edwards, F. Kreuter, L.E. Lyberg, N.C. Tucker, and B.T. West, 279–298. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119041702.ch13Search in Google Scholar

Mood, C. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do what We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It.” European Sociological Review 26: 67–82.10.1093/esr/jcp006Search in Google Scholar

Moore, J.C., G.B. Durrant, and P.W. F. Smith. 2016. “Data Set Representativeness during Data Collection in Three UK Social Surveys: Generalizability and the Effects of Auxiliary Covariate Choice.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society): 229–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12256.10.1111/rssa.12256Search in Google Scholar

Myrskylä, M., J.R. Goldstein, and Y.A. Cheng. 2013. “New Cohort Fertility Forecasts for the Developed World: Rises, Falls, and Reversals.” Population and Development Review 39: 31–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.x.10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00572.xSearch in Google Scholar

Olsen, R.J. 2018. “Respondent Attrition Versus Data Attrition and Their Reduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, edited by D.L. Vannette and J.A. Krosnick, 155–158. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_20Search in Google Scholar

RISQ. 2015. Representative Indicators for Survey Quality-Tools. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. Available at: https://www.cmist.manchester.ac.uk/research/-projects/representative-indicators-for-survey-quality/tools/ (accessed August 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, C., C. Vandenplas, and M.E. Stähli. 2014. “Evaluating the Impact of Response Enhancement Methods on the Risk of Nonresponse Bias and Survey Costs.” Survey Research Methods 8: 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2014.v8i2.5459.Search in Google Scholar

Schoeni, R.F., F. Stafford, K.A. McGonagle, and P. Andreski. 2013. “Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 60–87.10.1177/0002716212456363355514023358122Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, Ø. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, Ka. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response through R-Indicators and Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review 80: 382–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 1–24. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/indicators-for-monitoring-and-improving-representativeness-of-response.pdf (accessed May 2020).Search in Google Scholar

SHARE-ERIC. 2018. SHARE Publications: Journal Articles.Available at: http://www.share-project.org/share-publications/journalarticles00.html (accessed August 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Smith, P., P. Lynn, and D. Elliot. 2009. “Sample Design for Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by M. Groves, G. Kalton, J.N. Rao, N. Schwarz, C. Skinner, and P. Lynn, 21–33. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Watson, D. 2003. “Sample Attrition between Waves 1 and 5 in the European Community Household Panel.” European Sociological Review 19: 361–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.4.361.10.1093/esr/19.4.361Search in Google Scholar

Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2009. “Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 157–181. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch10Search in Google Scholar

Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2019. “Chasing Hard-to-Get Cases in Panel Surveys: Is it Worth it?” methods, data, analyses 13: 199–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2018.03.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo