Button mushroom
The most common pathogens in the cultivation of button mushroom are
An important element of crop protection against pathogens in mushroom houses is the “cooking-out” of production halls after each cultivation cycle, using steam to heat the air in the hall to a temperature of 65–70 °C and keeping it for at least 8 hours. This treatment allows to kill all mushroom pathogens and pests even deep inside the substrate and the peat cover (Ekman 2017). However, not all mushroom farms have technical capabilities to carry out this treatment (Ślusarski et al. 2012).
In this case, an alternative is chemical disinfection of the hall, which is a less effective but cheaper and easier method to use. The aim of disinfection is to reduce the pathogen population or to eliminate them completely. However, even a high concentration of biocides operating for a prolonged period cannot completely reduce pathogen populations in mushroom substrate. This treatment can be more effective when it is used on the surface thoroughly cleaned of mushroom debris or any other organic contamination (O’Neill et al. 2015).
Gaseous ozone was granted generally recognized as safe status by the Food and Drug Administration for direct contact with food as a sanitizing agent. Ozone is a very strong oxidant that has long been used to disinfect drinking water and wastewater (Rodríguez et al. 2008). It is also used as a disinfectant in the food industry and for removing unpleasant odors in rooms (Skalska et al. 2006, Krosowiak et al. 2007). In horticulture, it is successfully used in fruit and vegetable storage (Krosowiak et al. 2007) as well as in the disinfection of media in recirculating hydroponic systems (Vanachter et al. 1988). Ozone can also be used in the production of a substrate for cultivated mushrooms (Buntat et al. 2013) and to reduce the occurrence of disease during the course of the cultivation cycle (Toto 2010). Gaseous ozone is also suitable for reduction of microorganisms that can occur on food, including mushrooms, such as
Investigation on the possibility of using ozone to control fungal pathogens occurring in the mushroom cultivation has been undertaken only once so far and concerned only one species. O’Neill et al. (2015) showed the lack of efficiency of ozone gas in mycelium and spores of
The aim of the study was to determine the efficiency of ozone gas for disinfection of empty growing rooms between production cycles in order to reduce the most important fungal diseases occurring in the mushroom cultivation.
Strains of
List of isolates used in this study and their origin
Species | Isolate code | Province | Year of collection |
---|---|---|---|
Th 3.9 | Mazowieckie | 2008 | |
Th.12 | Mazowieckie | 2009 | |
Th 22.07 | Łódzkie | 2005 | |
M9 | Mazowieckie | 2008 | |
M10 | Podkarpackie | 2008 | |
M18 | Łódzkie | 2009 | |
D12A | Wielkopolskie | 2008 | |
D16 | Wielkopolskie | 2008 | |
D30 | Mazowieckie | 2008 | |
V-3 | Mazowieckie | 2005 | |
V-17 | Mazowieckie | 2009 | |
V-31 | Łódzkie | 2010 |
The identification of the isolated fungi was based on morphological characteristics as well as on growth rates and features of the colony on various agar media. To confirm the identification of pathogens, a molecular analysis was conducted (Szczech et al. 2008; Trzewik et al. 2010; Szumigaj-Tarnowska et al. 2014).
Each tested strain was transplanted from stock culture on the PDA plate and kept at 24 °C for 5–7 days. Subsequently, when the diameter of the colony reached a minimum of 1/3 of the plate surface, it was re-transplanted. New plates were maintained at 24 °C for 7–14 days. Suspensions were prepared by adding sterile distilled water to plates and detaching the spores from the surface of the colonies using a glass spreader. Then the suspensions were poured into a sterile flask. The concentration of spores of each strain was adjusted to 106 spores ml11 by dilution and direct counting using a Thoma cell counting chamber.
Suspensions containing spores of individual pathogens were applied to aluminum plates in an amount of 0.1 ml. Each spore suspension was applied to eight plates and allowed to dry in the laminar chamber. Then four plates were covered with petri dishes and moved to the mushroom growing room; the petri dishes were removed and fungal spores were exposed to gaseous ozone. Experiments were carried out in the mushroom hall with a capacity of 130 m3. The relative humidity was maintained at 90%. Gaseous ozone was produced using an ozone generator (DST 50, BLUE PLANET, Poland) with a capacity of 50 g·h−1. Ozone concentration was measured using an ozone concentration sensor (GasHunter, Alter, Poland), which is an online monitoring system. Samples were subjected to ozonation at the temperature 18 ± 0.5 °C for six exposure times – 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 minutes. The gas concentration during the ozonation process is shown in Fig. 1. The maximum level of ozone reached 50 ppm within 6 hours and was maintained at this level during the next 2 hours. After the ozonation process, aluminum surfaces were sampled by placing agar Rodac plates in contact for 10 seconds and then placing them in an incubator at 24 °C for 7 days.
Fig. 1
The gas concentration during the ozonation process at different exposure times

The plates were viewed daily for 7 days. The diameter of pathogen colonies was determined as well as pollution (as a percentage of the plate surface) caused by other fungal species.
The experiments were performed twice in four replications. Efficiency of ozonation was determined on the basis of pathogen growth on the plate in relation to the control combination and the means were compared using Student's t-test at the level of significance of p = 0.05.
The comparison of the percentage of isolate growth inhibition in relation to ozone exposure time, within incubation day, was subjected to analysis of variance according to Duncan's multiple range test at the level of significance of p ≤ 0.05 in Statistica version 10 software. To evaluate the relation between the time of ozone exposure and inhibition of growth of the pathogen colony, a regression method was used and Pearson's correlation coefficients (r-values) were calculated.
Green mold caused by
Fig. 2
Effect of ozone exposure duration on the percentage of the colony growth inhibition of tested pathogens

Sensitivity of pathogenic species to ozonation based on the average rate of colonization of the plate area (%) after 5 days of incubation in relation to ozone exposure time
Species | Treatment | Time of exposure | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
Control | 86.2 ± 7.3 a | 78.8 ± 6.9 a | 74.6 ± 5.2 a | 76.7 ± 8.0 a | 77.1 ± 7.6 a | 76.7 ± 8.3 a | |
Ozone | 31.7 ± 8.4 b | 63.1 ± 6.5 a | 59.2 ± 9.7 a | 73.7 ± 5.8 a | 75.0 ± 4.9 a | 73.3 ± 4.4 a | |
Control | 55.0 ± 5.6 a | 52.5 ± 5.9 a | 65.0 ± 4.4 a | 55.8 ± 8.0 a | 55.4 ± 2.8 a | 54.6 ± 6.2 a | |
Ozone | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 44.5 ± 4.5 a | 42.5 ± 6.3 a | 52.9 ± 4.0 a | 52.5 ± 5.5 a | |
Control | 70.4 ± 3.4 a | 60.0 ± 7.9 a | 67.9 ± 5.3 a | 72.1 ± 6.9 a | 70.8 ± 3.9 a | 67.1 ± 3.6 a | |
Ozone | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 22.1 ± 1.4 b | 63.7 ± 4.5 a | 70.4 ± 5.5 a | 69.2 ± 4.3 a | 63.3 ± 5.0 a | |
Control | 23.4 ± 3.1 a | 23.1 ± 2.6 a | 24.7 ± 3.3 a | 26.2 ± 2.1 a | 25.3 ± 2.8 a | 25.8 ± 3.7 a | |
Ozone | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
Means in columns followed by the same letter, for particular pathogen, are not significantly different based on Student's t-test at p = 0.05. Values are means ± standard deviation, n = 24
Sensitivity of
Days | Isolate | Time of exposure | Mean | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h | 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
2 | Th.12 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 58.22 ± 15.6 Aab | 49.56 ± 15.9 Bbc | 38.1 ± 5.2 ABbc | 30.30 ± 11.5A Abc | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ac | 46.03 A |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 74.75 ± 2.2 Aa | 18.82 ± 8.9 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 65.60 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 30.60 ± 10.9 Ba | 11.25 ± 8.5 Ba | 7.67 ± 4.2 Ba | 15.8 ± 6.3 Ba | 5.10 ± 3.3 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ac | 11.74 B | |
3 | Th.12 | 89.89 ± 5.8 Aa | 14.67 ± 5.3 Bb | 10.12 ± 2.7 Bb | 12.54 ± 2.6 Ab | 12.30 ± 4.1 Ab | 5.75 ± 3.3 Ab | 24.21 AB |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 88.25 ± 1.1 Ab | 17.15 ± 5.2 Ab | 5.60 ± 3.1 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 51.83 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 32.82 ± 11.4 Ba | 11.57 ± 2.5 Ba | 15.49 ± 5.7 Ba | 10.92 ± 2.9 Aa | 17.50 ± 3.7 Aa | 7.31 ± 4.4 Aa | 15.93 B | |
4 | Th.12 | 66.95 ± 7.1 ABa | 21.44 ± 9.7 Bab | 12.70 ± 2.2 Ab | 8.01 ± 2.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 18.18 AB |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 49.94 ± 8.9 Ab | 3.50 ± 2.1 Ac | 2.55 ± 1.8 Ac | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ac | 42.67 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 26.52 ± 14.8 Ba | 6.97 ± 2.4 Ba | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 5.58 B | |
5 | Th.12 | 16.81 ± 7.9 Ba | 5.9 ± 1.6 Ba | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 3.78 B |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 27.50 ± 2.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 45.92 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.00 B |
A, B, C – Means in columns followed by the same letter, within days of incubation, are not significantly different according to Duncan's test (P≤ 0.05); Means ± standard deviation. a, b, c – Means in rows followed by the same letter, within days of incubation, are not significantly different according to Duncan's test (P≤ 0.05); Means ± standard deviation
What is more, the results obtained confirm earlier information on the high resistance of green molds to ozone. O’Neill et al. (2015) reported that gaseous ozone is completely ineffective in relation to the spores and mycelium of
Fig. 3
Percentage of the growth inhibition of pathogens after different exposure times to ozonation

Sensitivity of
Days | Isolate | Time of exposure | Mean | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h | 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
2 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 33.33 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 33.33 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 46.30 ± 15.5 Aab | 29.7 ± 5.2 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 29.33 A | |
3 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 20.67 ± 3.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 36.78 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 13.29 ± 2.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 35.55 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 31.88 ± 9.2 Aab | 20.87 ± 8.2 Ab | 5.50 ± 2.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 26.38 A | |
4 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 10.75 ± 5.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 35.12 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 18.39 ± 7.1 Ab | 11.38 ± 4.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 38.30 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 12.92 ± 5.0 Ab | 13.20 ± 6.6 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 21.01 A | |
5 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 9.68 ± 1.7 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 34.95 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 27.5 ± 2.5 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 37.92 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 16.67 B |
Note: See Table 3
Sensitivity of
Days | Isolate | Time of exposure | Mean | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h | 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
4 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 77.4 ± 7.1 Aab | 51.60 ± 17.1 Aab | 25.51 ± 11.7 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 59.08 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 52.81 ± 15.0 Ab | 8.18 ± 5.2 Ab | 5.52 ± 3.7 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 44.42 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 22.58 ± 6.5 Ab | 18.22 ± 9.4 Ab | 14.40 ± 3.8 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 42.53 A | |
5 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 69.39 ± 9.3 Aa | 29.56 ± 9.5 Ab | 8.32 ± 3.2 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 51.2 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 36.38 ± 9.0 Ab | 32.41 ± 11.5 Ab | 5.20 ± 3.1 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 45.7 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 14.5 ± 2.2 Ab | 5.61 ± 4.9 Ab | 5.01 ± 3.2 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 37.5 A | |
6 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 54.84 ± 6.8 Aab | 44.67 ± 15.3 Aab | 6.95 ± 1.7 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 51.08 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 15.47 ± 8.6 Ab | 8.83 ± 3.6 Ab | 5.11 ± 1.3 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 38.24 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 10.82 ± 8.6 Ab | 8.32 ± 3.3 Ab | 6.25 ± 1.3 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 37.57 A | |
7 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 15.45 ± 9.3 Aa | 24.85 ± 8.4 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 40.05 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 7.5 ± 2.9 Aa | 4.49 ± 2.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 35.33 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100 ± 0.0 Aa | 7.25 ± 2.1 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 34.54 A |
Note: See Table 3
The phenomenon of diversity of isolates within one species was also observed by Szumigaj-Tarnowska et al. (2015). The authors showed that individual isolates of
Unfortunately, there are no published scientific data on the effect of ozone on spores of
The
However, the experiments presented by Luković et al. (2018) showed also the high sensitivity of
According to the findings of Antony-Babu and Singleton (2009), gas ozone is more effective in reducing spore germination than in reducing mycelial growth. In our research, fungal spores were exposed to gaseous ozone. Probably, this is the reason why ozonation efficiency was so high in relation to the tested pathogens.
The time of ozone exposure was highly correlated with inhibition of the growth of
Therefore, we conclude that short-term (0.5 hour) ozonation can be suitable for disinfection of growing rooms at the end of the cultivation cycle only for infection caused by
Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Sensitivity of pathogenic species to ozonation based on the average rate of colonization of the plate area (%) after 5 days of incubation in relation to ozone exposure time
Species | Treatment | Time of exposure | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
Control | 86.2 ± 7.3 a | 78.8 ± 6.9 a | 74.6 ± 5.2 a | 76.7 ± 8.0 a | 77.1 ± 7.6 a | 76.7 ± 8.3 a | |
Ozone | 31.7 ± 8.4 b | 63.1 ± 6.5 a | 59.2 ± 9.7 a | 73.7 ± 5.8 a | 75.0 ± 4.9 a | 73.3 ± 4.4 a | |
Control | 55.0 ± 5.6 a | 52.5 ± 5.9 a | 65.0 ± 4.4 a | 55.8 ± 8.0 a | 55.4 ± 2.8 a | 54.6 ± 6.2 a | |
Ozone | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 44.5 ± 4.5 a | 42.5 ± 6.3 a | 52.9 ± 4.0 a | 52.5 ± 5.5 a | |
Control | 70.4 ± 3.4 a | 60.0 ± 7.9 a | 67.9 ± 5.3 a | 72.1 ± 6.9 a | 70.8 ± 3.9 a | 67.1 ± 3.6 a | |
Ozone | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 22.1 ± 1.4 b | 63.7 ± 4.5 a | 70.4 ± 5.5 a | 69.2 ± 4.3 a | 63.3 ± 5.0 a | |
Control | 23.4 ± 3.1 a | 23.1 ± 2.6 a | 24.7 ± 3.3 a | 26.2 ± 2.1 a | 25.3 ± 2.8 a | 25.8 ± 3.7 a | |
Ozone | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 |
Sensitivity of Trichoderma aggressivum isolates to ozonation, based on the percentage of growth inhibition
Days | Isolate | Time of exposure | Mean | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h | 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
2 | Th.12 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 58.22 ± 15.6 Aab | 49.56 ± 15.9 Bbc | 38.1 ± 5.2 ABbc | 30.30 ± 11.5A Abc | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ac | 46.03 A |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 74.75 ± 2.2 Aa | 18.82 ± 8.9 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 65.60 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 30.60 ± 10.9 Ba | 11.25 ± 8.5 Ba | 7.67 ± 4.2 Ba | 15.8 ± 6.3 Ba | 5.10 ± 3.3 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ac | 11.74 B | |
3 | Th.12 | 89.89 ± 5.8 Aa | 14.67 ± 5.3 Bb | 10.12 ± 2.7 Bb | 12.54 ± 2.6 Ab | 12.30 ± 4.1 Ab | 5.75 ± 3.3 Ab | 24.21 AB |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 88.25 ± 1.1 Ab | 17.15 ± 5.2 Ab | 5.60 ± 3.1 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 51.83 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 32.82 ± 11.4 Ba | 11.57 ± 2.5 Ba | 15.49 ± 5.7 Ba | 10.92 ± 2.9 Aa | 17.50 ± 3.7 Aa | 7.31 ± 4.4 Aa | 15.93 B | |
4 | Th.12 | 66.95 ± 7.1 ABa | 21.44 ± 9.7 Bab | 12.70 ± 2.2 Ab | 8.01 ± 2.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 18.18 AB |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 49.94 ± 8.9 Ab | 3.50 ± 2.1 Ac | 2.55 ± 1.8 Ac | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ac | 42.67 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 26.52 ± 14.8 Ba | 6.97 ± 2.4 Ba | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 5.58 B | |
5 | Th.12 | 16.81 ± 7.9 Ba | 5.9 ± 1.6 Ba | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 3.78 B |
Th 3.9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 27.50 ± 2.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 45.92 A | |
Th. 22.07 | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.00 B |
List of isolates used in this study and their origin
Species | Isolate code | Province | Year of collection |
---|---|---|---|
Th 3.9 | Mazowieckie | 2008 | |
Th.12 | Mazowieckie | 2009 | |
Th 22.07 | Łódzkie | 2005 | |
M9 | Mazowieckie | 2008 | |
M10 | Podkarpackie | 2008 | |
M18 | Łódzkie | 2009 | |
D12A | Wielkopolskie | 2008 | |
D16 | Wielkopolskie | 2008 | |
D30 | Mazowieckie | 2008 | |
V-3 | Mazowieckie | 2005 | |
V-17 | Mazowieckie | 2009 | |
V-31 | Łódzkie | 2010 |
Sensitivity of Cladobotryum dendroides isolates to ozonation, based on the percentage of growth inhibition
Days | Isolate | Time of exposure | Mean | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h | 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
2 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 33.33 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 33.33 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 46.30 ± 15.5 Aab | 29.7 ± 5.2 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 29.33 A | |
3 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 20.67 ± 3.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 36.78 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 13.29 ± 2.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 35.55 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 31.88 ± 9.2 Aab | 20.87 ± 8.2 Ab | 5.50 ± 2.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 26.38 A | |
4 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 10.75 ± 5.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 35.12 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 18.39 ± 7.1 Ab | 11.38 ± 4.5 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 38.30 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 12.92 ± 5.0 Ab | 13.20 ± 6.6 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 21.01 A | |
5 | D12A | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 9.68 ± 1.7 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 34.95 A |
D16 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 27.5 ± 2.5 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 37.92 A | |
D30 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 16.67 B |
Sensitivity of Mycogone perniciosa isolates to ozonation, based on the percentage of growth inhibition
Days | Isolate | Time of exposure | Mean | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 h | 6 h | 4 h | 2 h | 1 h | 0.5 h | |||
4 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 77.4 ± 7.1 Aab | 51.60 ± 17.1 Aab | 25.51 ± 11.7 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 59.08 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 52.81 ± 15.0 Ab | 8.18 ± 5.2 Ab | 5.52 ± 3.7 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 44.42 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 22.58 ± 6.5 Ab | 18.22 ± 9.4 Ab | 14.40 ± 3.8 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 42.53 A | |
5 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 69.39 ± 9.3 Aa | 29.56 ± 9.5 Ab | 8.32 ± 3.2 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 51.2 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 36.38 ± 9.0 Ab | 32.41 ± 11.5 Ab | 5.20 ± 3.1 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 45.7 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 14.5 ± 2.2 Ab | 5.61 ± 4.9 Ab | 5.01 ± 3.2 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 37.5 A | |
6 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 54.84 ± 6.8 Aab | 44.67 ± 15.3 Aab | 6.95 ± 1.7 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 51.08 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 15.47 ± 8.6 Ab | 8.83 ± 3.6 Ab | 5.11 ± 1.3 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 38.24 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 10.82 ± 8.6 Ab | 8.32 ± 3.3 Ab | 6.25 ± 1.3 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 37.57 A | |
7 | M9 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 15.45 ± 9.3 Aa | 24.85 ± 8.4 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 40.05 A |
M10 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 7.5 ± 2.9 Aa | 4.49 ± 2.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 0.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 35.33 A | |
M18 | 100.0 ± 0.0 Aa | 100 ± 0.0 Aa | 7.25 ± 2.1 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 0.0 ± 0.0 Ab | 34.54 A |