Clinorotation used to simulate microgravity effects in ground-based experiments is considered as a mild stress factor for plants. We have assumed that it might influence the plant tolerance to other stressful factors. To test this,
Keywords
- Clinorotation
- Stress
- Heat Shock Proteins
- Thermotolerance
Steady growing of plants as an autotrophic link of Life Support Systems is one of the key issues for long-term manned space missions (Ferl et al., 2002; Wheeler, 2010). Their ability to cope with spaceflight environments is thus of critical importance. It has been shown that microgravity, an unusual factor for plants, does not prevent their growth and development but causes changes in structural and functional organization of cells, and is considered as a mild stressor (Medina et al., 2011; Kordyum, 2014). However, its influence on the development of adaptive reaction to other unfavorable factors is not well understood. To study effects of reduced gravity in plants in ground-based experiments, we used clinorotation. This study is focused on how clinorotation might influence a conserved reaction of cells to elevated temperatures, known as the heat shock response. A key component of this response is upregulation of heat shock proteins (HSP) (Vierling, 1991; Sørensen et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004). Functioning as molecular chaperones, they protect and reactivate protein structures affected by stress events.
It has been found that spaceflight factors, including microgravity, activate HSP expression in plant cells (Paul et al., 2005, 2012; Zupanska et al., 2013; Hausmann et al., 2014). In our previous work, some temporary increase in the HSP70 and HSP90 levels in pea seedlings for the first hours of clinorotation was determined (Kozeko and Kordyum, 2007). In addition, seedlings grown under permanent rotation showed a perceptible increase in HSP induction in response to high temperatures, when compared to seedlings grown motionlessly (Kozeko, 2008).
Numerous investigations have confirmed the importance of HSPs in plant tolerance to heat, as well as to a range of other stressful factors (Vierling, 1991; Sørensen et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004). Moreover, their involvement in cross-protection between different types of stress has been examined (Banti et al., 2008; Montero-Barrientos et al., 2010).
In the present work, we have studied the influence of clinorotation on gene expression of HSP70 and HSP90 during the following heat shock treatment, as well as thermotolerance in
Primers of target genes used for RT-qPCR.
AT5G02500 | F: AAACCCTAGCCGCCTTATTC | |
R: GATAGCTGGTCCTTCTCCTTTAC | ||
AT5G02490 | F: AGCTTGTGAGAGAGCAAAGAG | |
R: ACGGGTGATTGGAGAATAGA | ||
AT3G09440 | F: GACATTAGTGGAAACCCGAGAG | |
R: GTCTGAGCCGTAGATGACAAAG | ||
AT3G12580 | F: AGGGCACGAACAAAGGACAACAAC | |
R: TCAGCCGACACATTCAGGATACCA | ||
AT1G16030 | F: GGAGCTATCTCTGGGCTTAATG | |
R: GGCCTTCGTACCCTTCTTATC | ||
AT5G52640 | F: GTTACCCTATCTACCTTTGGACCG | |
R: CTGCTTGTTGATGAGTTCCCAC | ||
AT5G56030 | To detect mRNA of three genes in total: | |
AT5G56010 | F: GCTACCCAATCTCTCTCTGGATT | |
AT5G56000 | R: GTACTCCTCCTTGTTGATCTCCTC | |
AT3G62250 | F: AACCCTTGAGGTTGAATCATCC | |
R: GTCCTTCTTTCTGGTAAACGT |
For seedling survival assay, plates with 12-d-old seedlings, grown as described above, were exposed to 45°C for 45 min. Following the heat treatment, seedlings were returned to the stationary conditions and their survival was recorded for the next 6 d of incubation. The number of viable seedlings that were still green and generated new leaves was quantified to determine the survival rate. This assay was also performed for 5-d-old seedlings.
For analysis of gene expression, 12-d-old seedlings grown, as described above, were exposed at 37°C for 0.5, 1, and 2 h and then frozen at −70°C. Three independent experiments were performed for each experimental condition.
Total RNA was extracted from seedlings using innuPREP Plant RNA Kit (Analytik Jena). 1 μg of each sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis Kit (ThermoSci) with oligo(dT)18 primer. Real-time amplification was performed using the Maxima SYBR Green/Fluorescein qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) and the iQ5 amplifier (Bio-Rad). The following PCR program was employed: 95°C for 2 min, then 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 40 s. UBQ5 was used as the reference gene for all assays. Primer pairs, as outlined in Table 1, were designed using IDT PrimerQuest Tool (
For data analysis, the mean and standard deviation were calculated for each group. A two-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences for the effects of clinostat rotation and high temperature on transcript levels (p < 0.05). For the seedling survival and effect of clinostat rotation on
In order to test whether clinorotation influences the heat shock response, seedlings grown under stationary conditions (control) or clinostat rotation for 12 d were exposed to 37°C for 0.5–2 h. Levels of mRNAs of cytosolic HSP70s and HSP90s in seedlings were quantified using RT-qPCR. We used one set of primers for
Figure 1 shows that exposure to 37°C resulted in rapid induction of HSP genes in control and rotated seedlings, but with differences in magnitudes of their expression. The mRNA level of constitutive
Figure 1
An effect of clinostat rotation on induction of

As illustrated in Figure 2, comparison of the transcript abundance in rotated and control seedlings at 22 ± 1°C (0 h of heat exposure) showed an increase of 2- to 7-fold under clinorotation, with the exception of constitutive HSP90s.
Figure 2
An effect of clinostat rotation on expression of

The heat tolerance of seedlings was evaluated as a function of their survival after an exposure to 45°C for 45 min. This temperature is specified as a standard to detect alterations in
Figure 3
An effect of clinostat rotation on heat shock survival of

Figure 4
An effect of clinostat rotation on heat shock survival of

HSPs/chaperones play a role in protecting cells against multiple stressful conditions (Sørensen et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004). Their upregulation during the heat shock response provides resumption of protein homeostasis and leads to a higher level of thermotolerance (Vierling, 1991). Moreover, an increasing number of studies demonstrate that HSPs contribute to cross-protection between heat stress and other types of stress in plants (Banti et al., 2008; Montero-Barrientos et al., 2010). In this study, we applied heat treatment following clinorotation of seedlings. As previously mentioned, both factors can activate HSP synthesis. The obtained results showed that clinorotation caused the minor increase in transcript abundance of five cytosolic AtHSP70s and AtHSP90-1 under normal temperature, as well as a faster onset and enhancement of their induction during heat shock. Notably, the strongest effect was revealed for inducible
A weak increase in the expression levels of several HSPs in seedlings grown under clinorotation at normal temperature likely reflects adaptation of cells to rotation. It is noteworthy that clinorotation may have multiple impacts on organisms, including not only simulation of the microgravity effects, but also mechanical and electromagnetic influences, etc. However, in our previous work with pea seedlings, comparison of the effects of horizontal and vertical rotation showed small but statistically significant differences in HSP70 and HSP90 levels that could be attributed to simulated microgravity (Kozeko and Kordyum, 2006).
As a whole, the time course of HSP expression during heat exposure was in good agreement with the previous findings by other researchers (Milioni and Hatzopoulos, 1997; Sung et al., 2001). At that, the magnitudes of
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Primers of target genes used for RT-qPCR.
AT5G02500 | F: AAACCCTAGCCGCCTTATTC | |
R: GATAGCTGGTCCTTCTCCTTTAC | ||
AT5G02490 | F: AGCTTGTGAGAGAGCAAAGAG | |
R: ACGGGTGATTGGAGAATAGA | ||
AT3G09440 | F: GACATTAGTGGAAACCCGAGAG | |
R: GTCTGAGCCGTAGATGACAAAG | ||
AT3G12580 | F: AGGGCACGAACAAAGGACAACAAC | |
R: TCAGCCGACACATTCAGGATACCA | ||
AT1G16030 | F: GGAGCTATCTCTGGGCTTAATG | |
R: GGCCTTCGTACCCTTCTTATC | ||
AT5G52640 | F: GTTACCCTATCTACCTTTGGACCG | |
R: CTGCTTGTTGATGAGTTCCCAC | ||
AT5G56030 | To detect mRNA of three genes in total: | |
AT5G56010 | F: GCTACCCAATCTCTCTCTGGATT | |
AT5G56000 | R: GTACTCCTCCTTGTTGATCTCCTC | |
AT3G62250 | F: AACCCTTGAGGTTGAATCATCC | |
R: GTCCTTCTTTCTGGTAAACGT |