[
Abakumov, E., Trubetskoj, O., Demin, D., Celi, L., Cerli, C., Trubetskaya, O., 2010. Humic acid characteristics in podzol soil chronosequence. Chemistry and Ecology, 26 (S2): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2010.497758t
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aleksandrovskiy, A.L., 2002. Razvitiye pochv Vostochnoy Yevropy v golotsene. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora geograficheskikh nauk [The development of Eastern European soils in the Holocene. Dr. Sci. Geogr. thesis abstract]. Moscow: Institute of Georgaphy. 48 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Androkhanov, V., Kulyapina, E., Kurachev, V., 2004. Soils of technogenic landscapes: genesis and evolution. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of the SB RAS. 149 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Archegova, I., 2007. Thermal regime of tundra soils under reclamation and restoration of natural vegetation. Eurasian Soil Science, 40 (8): 854–859. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422930708007810.1134/S1064229307080078
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Archegova, I.B., 1992. About humus in connection with an unconventional understanding of the soil. Pochvovedenie, 1: 58–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Archegova, I.B., 2009. Soil formation during the regenerative succession of forest ecosystems in the North. Sibirskiĭ Ekologicheskiĭ Zhurnal, 1: 91–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chertov, O.G., 1983. Mathematical model of the ecosystem of a single plant. Zhurnal Obshcheĭ Biologii, 44: 406–414.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clements, F.E., 1916. Plant succession: An analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, No. 242. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington. 512 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5623410.5962/bhl.title.56234
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dokuchaev, V.V., 1949. Izbrannyye trudy [Selected essays]. Moskow: Selkhozgiz. 647 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Egli, M., Fitze, P., Mirabella, A., 2001. Weathering and evolution of soils formed on granitic, glacial deposits: Results from chronosequences of Swiss alpine environments. Catena, 45 (1): 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00138-210.1016/S0341-8162(01)00138-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Egorov, A. A., Koptseva, E. M., Sumina, O. I., Fatianova, E. V., Kirillov, P. S., Ivanov, S. A., Trofimuk, L. P., 2019. Long-term biodiversity monitoring of the spontaneous successions for the assessment of the artificial restoration progress on the quarries in Russian Arctic. Earth and Environmental Science, 263: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/263/1/01200210.1088/1755-1315/263/1/012002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Emmer, I. M., 1995. Humus form and soil development during a primary succession of monoculture Pinus sylvestris forests on poor sandy substrates. PhD thesis. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. 135 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ewald, E.O., 1972. O vzaimootnoshenii issledovaniĭ v oblasti genezisa i ekologii pochv (na primere izucheniya organicheskogo veshchestva [About relationship in investigation in field of genesis and ecology of soils (on example of soil organic matter)]. Soviet Soil Science, 2: 22–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FAO, 2019. Soil erosion: the greatest challenge to sustainable soil management. Rome. 100 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frouz, J. (eds), 2013. Soil biota and ecosystem development in post mining sites. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 316 р. https://doi.org/10.1201/b1550210.1201/b15502
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furyev, V., 1996. Rol’ pozharov v protsesse lesoobrazovaniya [The role of fires in the process of forest formation]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 248 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gadzhiev, I.M., Kurachev, V.M., Androkhanov, V.A., 2001. Strategiya i perspektivy resheniya problem rekul’tivatsii narushennykh zemel [Strategy and prospects for solving the problems of disturbed land restoration]. Novosibirsk: TsERIS. 37 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ganjegunte, G., Wick, A., Stahl, P., Vance, G., 2009. Accumulation and composition of total organic carbon in reclaimed coal mine lands. Land Degradation & Development, 20 (2): 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.88910.1002/ldr.889
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gennadiev, A.N., 1990. Pochvy i vremya: modeli razvitiya [Soils and time: formation models]. Moscow: Izd–vo Moskovskogo universiteta. 232 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gorbunova, A.O., Sumina, O.I., 2021. Dinamika mikorizoobrazovaniya u nekotorykh vidov rasteniy v khode vosstanovitel’noy suktsessii na peschanykh kar’yerakh (Leningradskaya oblast’) [Dynamics of mycorrhizal formation in some plant species during recovery succession in sand quarries (Leningrad region)]. Botanicheskiĭ Zhurnal, 1 (106): 22–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goryachkin, S.V., Mergelov, N.S., Targulian, V.O., 2019. Extreme pedology: elements of theory and methodological approaches. Eurasian Soil Science, 52 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931901004610.1134/S1064229319010046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ivanov, I.V.A., Alexandrovskiy A.L., 1987. Metody izucheniya evolyutsii pochv [Methods for studying the evolution of soils]. Pochvovedenie, 1: 112–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapelkina, L., Sumina, O., Lavrinenko, I., Lavrineneko, O., Tikhmenev, E., Mironova, S., 2014. Samozarastaniye narushennykh zemel’ Severa [Natural revegetation on disturbed lands of the North]. St. Petersburg: VVM Press. 204 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khitrov, N., 2008. An approach for a retrospective assessment of soil changes. Eurasian Soil Science, 41 (8): 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422930808001210.1134/S1064229308080012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Komarov, A.S., 2009. Models of plant succession and soil dynamics at climate changes. Computer Research and Modeling, 1 (4): 405–413. https://doi.org/10.20537/2076-7633-2009-1-4-405-41310.20537/2076-7633-2009-1-4-405-413
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kostychev P.A., 1937. Pochvy chernozomnoy oblasti Rossii: ikh proiskhozhdeniye, sostav i svoystva [Soils of the chernozem region of Russia: their origin, composition and properties]. Moskow: Selkhozgiz. 240 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koptseva, E.M., 2012. Vegetation cover of sand dunes at the mouth of the Voronya River (Murmansk coast of the Barents Sea). Izvestiya Samarskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra RAN, 14 (1(5)): 1276–1280.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kovda, V.A., 1973. Osnovy ucheniya o pochvakh. Obshchaya teoriya pochvoobrazovatel’nogo protsessa [Fundamentals of the doctrine of soils. General theory of the soil-forming process]. Moskva: Nauka. 447 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levchenko, V. F., Skorobogatov, Y.I., 2014. Succession changes and ecosystem evolution (some questions of evolutionary ecology). Russkiĭ Ornitologicheskiĭ Zhurnal, 1068: 3533–3550.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Makhonina, G. I., 2004. Nachal’nyye protsessy pochvoobrazovaniya v tekhnogennykh ekosistemakh Urala. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora biologicheskikh nauk [Initial processes of soil formation in technogenic ecosystems of the Urals. Dr. Sci. Biol. thesis abstract]. Tomsk: Ural State University, Ekaterinburg. 38 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matchavariani, L., 2019. soil-forming factors. The Soils of Georgia. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18509-1_310.1007/978-3-030-18509-1_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehdiyev, H.G., 2021. Mineralogical and microbiological diagnostics of primary soil formation in the conditions of gray-earth soils of the semidesert zone of the middle part of the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic. Problemy Nauki, 5(64): 29–-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mokma, D.L., Yli–Halla, M., Lindqvist, K., 2004. Podzol formation in sandy soils of Finland. Geoderma, 120 (3–4): 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.00810.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyberg, G., Bargués Tobella, A., Kinyangi, J., Ilstedt, U., 2012. Soil property changes over a 120-yr chronosequence from forest to agriculture in western Kenya. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16 (7): 2085–2094. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2085-201210.5194/hess-16-2085-2012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ponomareva, V., Plotnikova, T., 1980. Gumus i pochvoobrazovaniye [Humus and soil formation]. Leningrad: Nauka. 222 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popov, A.I., 2012. The soil – plant trophosystem is the basis for the functioning of the ecosystem. Ekosistemy, ikh Optimizatsiya i Okhrana, 7: 251–260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rabotnov, T., 1978. Fitotsenologiya [Phytocoenology]. Moskva: Izd-vo MGU. 384 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Razumovskiy, S. M., 1981. Zakonomernosti dinamiki biotsenozov [Patterns of the dynamics of biocenoses]. Moskow: Nauka. 231 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Razumovskiy, S.M., 1999. Izbrannyye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow: KMK. 560 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reyntam, L.Y., 2001. Humus state in primary soils under the forest on the quarry dumps of the shale industry. Pochvovedenie, 10: 1207–1216.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robichaud, P.R., Ashmun, L.E., Sims, B.D., 2010. Post-fire treatment effectiveness for hillslope stabilization. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-240. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 62 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-24010.2737/RMRS-GTR-240
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rode, A.A., 1984. Genezis pochv i sovremennyye protsessy pochvoobrazovaniya [Soil genesis and modern factors of soil formation]. Moskva: Nauka. 254 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rozanov B.G., 2004. Morfologiya pochv [Soil morphology]. Moscow: Akademicheskiĭ Proyekt. 432 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rusanov, A.M., 2012. The current stage of the evolution of agro-landscapes of steppe and forest-steppe zones (on the example of the Orenburg region). Vestnik OGU, 6: 128–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Severtsov, A.C., 1990. Intraspecific diversity as a cause of evolutionary stability. Zhurnal Obshcheĭ Biologii, 51 (5): 579–589.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shishov, L.L., Tonkonogov, V.D., Lebedeva, I.I., Gerasimova, M.I., 2004. Klassifikatsiya i diagnostika pochv Rossii [Classification and diagnostics of soils in Russia]. Smolensk: Oykumena. 341 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shrestha, R.K., Lal, R., 2010. Carbon and nitrogen pools in reclaimed land under forest and pasture ecosystems in Ohio, USA. Geoderma, 157 (3–4): 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.01310.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smagin, A.V., 2010. Biogeofizicheskiye mekhanizmy samoorganizatsii dolinnykh lesnykh ekosistem na pochvakh legkogo granulometricheskogo sostava [Biogeophysical mechanisms of self-organization of valley forest ecosystems on soils of light granulometric composition]. Ekologicheskiĭ Vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza, 6 (4): 17–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sokolov, I.A., 1997. Pochvoobrazovaniye i ekzogenez [Soil formation and exogenesis]. Moscow: Pochv. in-t im. V.V. Dokuchayeva. 239 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sumina, O. I., Koptseva, E. M., 2019. Seed distribution drivers at an early stage of vegetation development in a sand quarry. Tomsk State University. Journal of Biology, 46: 48–63. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988591/46/310.17223/19988591/46/3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, J., Bolstad, P.V., Martin, J. G., 2009. Soil carbon fluxes and stocks in a Great Lakes forest chronosequence. Global Change Biology, 15 (1): 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01741.x10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01741.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Targulian, V., Goryachkin, S. (eds), 2008. Pamyat’ pochv: Pochva kak pamyat’ biosferno-geosferno-antroposfernykh vzaimodeĭstviĭ [Soil memory: soil as a memory of biosphere-geosphere-anthroposphere interaction]. Moscow: Inst. Geogr., Russian Acad. Sci. 692 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Targulian, V.O., 1985. Planetarnyye ekzogennyye protsessy i pochvoobrazovaniye [Planetary exogenous processes and soil formation]. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Biologicheskaya, 6: 51–59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tolchelnikov, Y.S., 1985. O sushchnosti ponyatiya “Pochva” [About the essence of the concept of “Soil”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 17 (3): 52–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trofimov, S.S., Titlyanova, A.A., Klevenskaya, I.A., 1979. Sistemnyy podkhod k izucheniyu protsessov pochvoobrazovaniya v tekhnogennykh landshaftakh [A systematic approach to the study of soil formation processes in technogenic landscapes]. In Trofimov, S.S. (ed.). Pochvoobrazovaniye v tekhnogennykh landshaftakh. Novosibirsk: Nauka, p. 3–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsibart, A. S., Gennadiev, A.N., 2009. The trend of changes in forest soils of the Amur region under the influence of the pyrogenic factor. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya, 3: 66–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wanner, M., Dunger, W., 2002. Primary immigration and succession of soil organisms on reclaimed opencast coal mining areas in eastern Germany. European Journal of Soil Biology, 38 (2): 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(02)01135-410.1016/S1164-5563(02)01135-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zakharov, S.A., 1945. Evolyutsiya pochvoobrazovaniya v svyazi s istoriyeĭ zemnoĭ kory [Evolution of soil formation in connection with the history of the Earth’s crust]. Pochvovedeniye, 1: 54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zavarzina, A. G., Zavarzin, A.A., 2013. Gumus v rannikh nazemnykh ekosistemakh [Humus in early terrestrial ecosystems]. Priroda, 9: 49–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Working Group WRB, 2015. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports, No. 106. Rome: FAO. 192 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
