[
[1] Antoniou G. and Van Harmelen F. Web ontology language: Owl. In Handbook on ontologies, pages 67–92. Springer, 2004.10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Bezerra C., Santana F., and Freitas F. Cqchecker: A tool to check ontologies in owl-dl using competency questions written in controlled natural language. Learning and Nonlinear Models, 12:115–129, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] del Carmen Suárez-Figueroa M., de Cea G. A., Buil C., Dellschaft K., Fernández-López M., García A., Gómez-Pérez A., Herrero G., Montiel-Ponsoda E., Sabou M., Villazon-Terrazas B., and Yufei Z. D5.4.1 neon methodology for building contextualized ontology networks, Feb. 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Dwarakanath A., Ramnani R. R., and Sengupta S. Automatic extraction of glossary terms from natural language requirements. In 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2013, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil, July 15-19, 2013, pages 314–319. IEEE Computer Society, 2013.10.1109/RE.2013.6636736
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Fernández-Izquierdo A., Poveda-Villalón M., and García-Castro R. CORAL: A corpus of ontological requirements annotated with lexico-syntactic patterns. In ESWC, 2019.10.1007/978-3-030-21348-0_29
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Fernandez-Lopez M., Gomez-Perez A., and Juristo N. Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the AAAI97 Spring Symposium, pages 33–40, Stanford, USA, March 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Grishman R. Information extraction: Techniques and challenges. In International summer school on information extraction, pages 10–27. Springer, 1997.10.1007/3-540-63438-X_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Gruninger M. Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In IJCAI 1995, 1995.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Huang Z., Xu W., and Yu K. Bidirectional lstm-crf models for sequence tagging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.01991, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Keet C. M., Mahlaza Z., and Antia M.-J. Claro: a data-driven cnl for specifying competency questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07378, 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Lafferty J. D., McCallum A., and Pereira F. C. N. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’01, page 282–289, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2001. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Lawrynowicz A. and Keet C. M. The TDDonto tool for test-driven development of DL knowledge bases. In Lenzerini M. and Peñaloza R., editors, Description Logics, volume 1577 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Lenat D. B. and Guha R. V. Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems; Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., USA, 1st edition, 1989.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Ling X. and Weld D. S. Fine-grained entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI’12, page 94–100. AAAI Press, 2012.10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Malone J., Brown A., Lister A., Ison J., Hull D., Parkinson H., and Stevens R. The software ontology (SWO): A resource for reproducibility in biomedical data analysis, curation and digital preservation. Journal of biomedical semantics, 5:25, 06 2014.10.1186/2041-1480-5-25409895325068035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Miller G. A. WordNet: A lexical database for english. Commun. ACM, 38(11):39–41, 1995.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Ochodek M. and Nawrocki J. R. Automatic transactions identification in use cases. In Meyer B., Nawrocki J. R., and Walter B., editors, Balancing Agility and Formalism in Software Engineering, Second IFIP TC 2 Central and East European Conference on Software Engineering Techniques, CEE-SET 2007, Poznan, Poland, October 10-12, 2007, Revised Selected Papers, volume 5082 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 55–68. Springer, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Park Y., Byrd R. J., and Boguraev B. Automatic glossary extraction: Beyond terminology identification. In 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2002, Howard International House and Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, August 24 - September 1, 2002, 2002.10.3115/1072228.1072370
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Petrucci G., Ghidini C., and Rospocher M. Ontology learning in the deep. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - 20th International Conference, EKAW 2016, Bologna, Italy, November 19-23, 2016, Proceedings, pages 480–495, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Potoniec J., Wisniewski D., Ławrynowicz A., and Keet C. M. Dataset of ontology competency questions to SPARQL-OWL queries translations. Data in Brief, 29, 2020.10.1016/j.dib.2019.105098697134031989008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Ren Y., Parvizi A., Mellish C., Pan J. Z., van Deemter K., and Stevens R. Towards competency question-driven ontology authoring. In Presutti V., d’Amato C., Gandon F., d’Aquin M., Staab S., and Tordai A., editors, The Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges, pages 752–767, Cham, 2014. Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_50
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Suárez-Figueroa M. C., Gómez-Pérez A., and Fernández-López M. The NeOn Methodology for Ontology Engineering, pages 9–34. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Sure Y., Staab S., and Studer R. On-To-Knowledge Methodology (OTKM), pages 117–132. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004.10.1007/978-3-540-24750-0_6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Uschold M. and King M. Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, held in conjunction with IJCAI-95, 1995.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] Wisniewski D. Automatic translation of competency questions into SPARQLOWL queries. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, WWW ’18, page 855–859, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 2018. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.10.1145/3184558.3186575
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] Wisniewski D. et al. Analysis of ontology competency questions and their formalizations in SPARQL-OWL. JWS, 59, 2019.10.1016/j.websem.2019.100534
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Wisniewski D. and Ławrynowicz A. A tagger for glossary of terms extraction from ontology competency questions. In Proc. of ESWC, Satellite Events, pages 181–185. Springer, 2019.10.1007/978-3-030-32327-1_36
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[28] Wisniewski D., Potoniec J., and Lawrynowicz A. BigCQ: A large-scale synthetic dataset of competency question patterns formalized into SPARQL-OWL query templates. CoRR, abs/2105.09574, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
