1. bookVolume 12 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Leader as a European Policy for Rural Development in a Multilevel Governance Framework: A Comparison of the Implementation in France, Germany and Italy

Published Online: 09 Jul 2020
Page range: 156 - 178
Received: 19 Sep 2019
Accepted: 23 Apr 2020
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Parts of European rural development policies are meant to empower local decision makers. These policies are implemented in very different multilevel governance contexts in the member states. We question the extent to which the institutional differences at the different levels affect the implementation of LEADER (an approach for Community-led Local Development). This contributes to a better understanding of the causes and consequences of different types of LEADER implementation. The research is based on ten case studies in France, Germany and Italy. First, there is an examination of the three different administration systems and the variations of Rural Development Programmes. Based on analyses of documents and interviews with stakeholders, we analysed institutional differences in the LEADER implementation at local level.


[1] Bache, I. & Flinders, M. (2004): Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press10.1093/0199259259.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[2] Berriet-Solliec, M. & Trouvé, A. (2010): Regionalization in European Agricultural Policy: Institutional Actualities, Issues and prospects. Regional Studies 44(8), 1005–1017. DOI: 10.1080/00343400903365177.10.1080/00343400903365177Search in Google Scholar

[3] Berriet-Solliec, M., Lépicier, D. & Vollet, D. (2017). Analyse croisée de la valeur ajoutée et des coûts de transaction: quel intérêt pour les politiques territoriales? Application au programme Leader 2007–2013 en Auvergne et Bourgogne. Norois 4(241), 15–32.10.4000/norois.5981Search in Google Scholar

[4] Berriet-Solliec, M., Laidin, C., Lépicier, D., Pham, H. V., Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2016). The LEADER process as a European policy for local development: A comparison of the implementation in three European Member States. [Working Paper CESAER N° 2016/1].Search in Google Scholar

[5] Berriet-Solliec, M., Laidin, C., Lepicier, D, Pham, H., Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2018). Governance of policy at a local level LEADER programs analysis: TRUSTEE (Towards Rural Synergies and Trade-offs between Economic Development and Ecosystem Services) [Deliverable 3.3]. Braunschweig; Dijon; Rennes.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J. & Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering Local Action through Neo-Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in England. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3), 427–449. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12089.10.1111/soru.12089Search in Google Scholar

[7] Cotta, M. & Verzichelli, L. (2011): Il sistema politico italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Chevalier, P. & Vollet, D. (2019) LEADER 2007–2013: An innovation dependent on local and national institutional arrangements? Some European illustrations. Regional Science Policy & Practice: 1–16.10.1111/rsp3.12156Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chevalier, P, Dedeire, M. (2014). Application du programme LEADER selon les principes de base du développement rural. Economie rurale, N° 342, pp. 9–26.10.4000/economierurale.4382Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chevalier, P., Mačiulyté, J., Razafimahefa, L. & Dedeire, M. (2017). The Leader Programme as a Model of Institutional Transfer: Learning from Its Local Implementation in France and Lithuania. European Countryside 9(2), 317–341. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0020.10.1515/euco-2017-0020Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cejudo, E. & Navarro, F., eds. (2020). Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-33463-5Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(1), 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425Search in Google Scholar

[13] Doré, G. (2018). Le bouleversement territorial en France: analyse et enjeux. Population Avenir 736, 4–7. DOI: 10.3917/popav.736.0004.10.3917/popav.736.0004Search in Google Scholar

[14] Epstein, R. (2005). Gouverner à distance: quand l’État se retire des territoires, Esprit, 319, 96–111.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Fałkowski, J. (2013). Political accountability and governance in rural areas: Some evidence from the Pilot Programme LEADER+ in Poland. Journal of Rural Studies 32, 70–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013. in Google Scholar

[16] Fargion, V., Morlino, L., Profeti, S. & Roux, C. (2006). Européanisation et représentation territoriales en Italie. Pôle Sud 24, 99–120. DOI: 10.3917/psud.024.0099.10.3917/psud.024.0099Search in Google Scholar

[17] Grieve, J., Lukesch, R., Weinspach, U., Fernandes, P., Brakalova, M., Cristiano, S., Geissendorfer, M., Nemes, G., O’Gready, S., Sepùlveda, R., Pfefferkorn, W., Pollermann, K., Pylkkänen, P., Ricci, C. & Slee, B. (2011). Capturing impacts of LEADER and of measures to improve Quality of Life in rural areas. European Association of Agricultural Economists 122nd Seminar, February 1718, 2011, Ancona, Italy. Wageningen: European Association of Agricultural Economists.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Konečný, O. (2019). The LEADER approach across the European Union: One method of rural development, many forms of implementation. European Countryside 11(1), 1–16. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2019-0001.10.2478/euco-2019-0001Search in Google Scholar

[19] Kuhlmann, S. (2014). Multi-level Governance in Kontinentaleuropa: Mehrebenen- verflechtung und institutionelle Reformfähigkeit im deutsch-französischen Vergleich, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 8(1), 193–210. DOI: 10.1007/s12286-014-0198-5.10.1007/s12286-014-0198-5Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kuhlmann, S, & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kuhlmann, S. & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to comparative public administration. Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lacquement, G. & Raynal, J. C. (2013). Actors and resources of local development in eastern Germany: the rural territory shown through the European programme LEADER projects. Annales de Géographie 692, 393–421. DOI: 10.3917/ag.692.0393.10.3917/ag.692.0393Search in Google Scholar

[23] Laidin, C. (2019). Quand l’Europe promeut le rural: le programme LEADER en France et en Italie [PhD theses]. Rennes: Université Rennes 1.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Laidin, C. & Berriet-Solliec, M. (2016). LEADER pour les campagnes littorales: une analyse critique. Economie Rurale 351, 25–47. DOI: 10.4000/economierurale.4800.10.4000/economierurale.4800Search in Google Scholar

[25] Mantino, F., Bolli, M., Fagiani, P. & Tarangioli, S. (2009). Report on policy delivery systems and their relations with types of governance models: assessing the impact of rural development policies (incl. LEADER). Roma: INEA.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Méasson, L. (2007). L’efficacité territoriale et l’évaluation. Penser le déploiement spatial du politique grâce au programme européen LEADER [PhD theses]. Grenoble: Université Grenoble I – Jouseph Fourier.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Meier, K. J., O’Toole Jr., L. J. & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2004). Multilevel governance and organisational performance: Investigating the political-bureaucratic labyrinth. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(1), 31–47. DOI: 10.1002/pam.10177.10.1002/pam.10177Search in Google Scholar

[28] Navarro, F. A., Woods, M. &, Cejudo, E. (2015). The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of Its Own Success. The Decline of the Bottom-Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2), 270–288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.10.1111/soru.12079Search in Google Scholar

[29] Navarro, F., Labianca, M., Cejudo, E., de Rubertis, S., Salento, A., Maroto, J. C. & Belliggiano, A. (2018). Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period. European Countryside 10(1), 107–126. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0007.10.2478/euco-2018-0007Search in Google Scholar

[30] Oedl-Wieser, T., Strahl, W. & Dax, T. (2010). The LEADER programme 20072013: refocusing towards agriculture-oriented activities as a consequence of ‘mainstreaming’ innovative rural action in Austria [paper presented in the 118th EAAE Seminar “Rural development: governance, policy design and delivery”, Ljubljana (Slovenia)]. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.94622.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Perraud, D. (2001). Les politiques agricoles et rurales dans les régions: une nouvelle organisation des pouvoirs publics en Europe? Economie Rurale 261, 7–22. DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.2001.5215.10.3406/ecoru.2001.5215Search in Google Scholar

[32] Pollermann, K. (2014). Processes of cooperation in rural areas: obstacles, driving forces and options for encouragement. In Kasabov, E., ed., Cooperation in rural, peripheral areas of Europe: challenges and solutions (pp. 210–227). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Pollermann, K. (2016). LEADER 5.0 – Die Versionsgeschichte des LEADER-Ansatzes und Anforderungen an die Evaluierung für eine evidenzbasierte Politikberatung. Dortmunder Beiträge zur Raumplanung 147, 123–138.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Pollermann, K. & Raue, P. (2020). Relations between local institutional settings and governance arrangements in LEADER: looking for differences from different national and federal state related contexts. Berlin: LIT.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2013). Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER. Studies in Agricultural Economics 115, 111–117. DOI: 10.7896/j.1228.10.7896/j.1228Search in Google Scholar

[36] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2014a). Multi-level governance in rural development: analysing experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development [CLLD]. In ERSA 201454th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, St. Petersburg, 2014. Conference Papers. Louvain-la-Neuve: ERSA.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2014b). Opportunities for a participative approach in rural development: Findings from LEADER in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and the requirements for Community Led Local Development. Landbauforschung Appl Agric Forestry Res 64(3/4), 127–138. DOI: 10.3220/LBF_2014_127-138.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Compative Analysis – New Public management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Rivière, D. (2004). L’Italie: des régions à l’Europe. Paris: Armand Colin.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Rizzo, F. (2013). LEADER policy practices and landscapes in the light of the agency-structure debate: evidence from LEADER local action groups in Italy and in Finland. European Countryside, 5(3), 232–250. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2013-0015.10.2478/euco-2013-0015Search in Google Scholar

[41] Teilmann, K. & Thuesen, A. (2014). Important Types of LAG–Municipality Interaction When Collaborating on Rural Development Lessons from Danish LEADER LAGs. International Journal of Rural Management, 10(1), 21–45. DOI: 10.1177/0973005214526501.10.1177/0973005214526501Search in Google Scholar

[42] Thoenig, J.-C. (2005). Territorial administration and political control: decentralization in France. Public administration 83(3), 685–708. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00470.x.10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00470.xSearch in Google Scholar

[43] Thuesen, A. A., Nielsen, N. C. (2014). A Territorial Perspective on EU´s Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings. European Countryside 6(4), 307–326. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0017.10.2478/euco-2014-0017Search in Google Scholar

[44] Tömmel, I. (1998). Transformation of governance: The European Commission’s strategy for creating a ‘Europe of the regions’. Regional & Federal Studies 8(2), 52–80. DOI: 10.1080/13597569808421051.10.1080/13597569808421051Search in Google Scholar

[45] Trouvé, A., Berriet-Solliec, M. & Lépicier, D., eds. (2013). Le développement rural en Europe: quel avenir pour le deuxième pilier de la Politique Agricole Commune? Bruxelles: P.I.E. Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Di Rienzo, M., Di Napoli, R., Masani, L. & Conterio, M. (2012). L’Approccio Leader. Approccio Leader, SpecialeI Gal si presentano al Salone del Gusto.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Metis Gmbh, AEIDL, CEU, 2010. Ex-post evaluation of LEADER+. Vienna.Search in Google Scholar

[48] OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2009) Italy, OECD, Paris, p. 123–124.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Thelen, W. (1999). The Hessen regional programme for rural areas and LEADER, Contribution to the LEADER Seminar in Gesves (Wallonie-B) Internetseite Rural Europe, European LEADER Observatory: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rur/LEADER2/rural-en/plr/mainstream/index.htm#4-2. Citation at 20. 8. 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo