[[1] Bányai, T., Döme, G., Kárpáti, L., Nagy, B., Novák, L., Papócsi, L., Székely, E., Tóth, I., Vári, A. & Wayda, I. (2011). Javaslat a mezőgazdasági és vidékfejlesztési szaktanácsadási rendszer egységesítésére, megújítására, a feladat- és felelősségkörök összehangolására. [Working paper], Budapest: (VSZOSZ – Hungarian Organization of Protected Plants).]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Diamond, M. A. (1996). Innovation and Diffusion of Technology: A Human Process. Consulting Psychology Journal 48(4), 221–229. DOI: 10.1037/1061-4087.48.4.221.10.1037/1061-4087.48.4.221]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Dolinska, A. & d’Aquino, P. (2016). Farmers as agents in innovation systems. Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice. Agricultural Systems 142, 122–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.009.10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.009]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Faure, G., Chiffoley, Y., Goulet, F., Ludovic, T. & Touzard, J.-M. (2018). Innovation and development in agricultural and food systems. Versailles: Éditions Quae.10.35690/978-2-7592-2960-4]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Fieldsend, A. & Székely, E. (2013). An assessment of the agricultural knowledge and innovation system in Hungary. In: Chmieliński, P. & Baer-Nawrocka, A., eds., Knowledge as a factor of rural development (pp. 26–43). Warszawa: Institute of Agriculture and Food Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Goda, P. & Kis, M., eds. (2017). Situation Analysis of Agricultural Innovation Services in Europe. Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetemi Kiadó.]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Goda, P., Ujj, A., Jancsovszka, P., Bálint, Cs., Ndue Mutua, K., Mironenko, A. & Skordaki, A. (2018). Transboundary cooperation on regional foods in Visegrad countries. Gödöllő: Szent István University.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Goda, P. (2012). New situation analysis method by system approach to develop the rural areas. Economics of Sustainable Agriculture (1), Szent István University Publishing, 2012, 215–235 pp. ISSN 2062-445X.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Hamza, E., Márkiné Tóth, O., Rácz, K., Szabó, D., Varga, E. & Vásáry, V. (2017). Az agrárszakképzési rendszer kihívásai. Budapest: Agrárgazdasági Kutató Intézet,]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Heichlinger, A., Määttä, S. & Unfried, M. (2005). Mid-Term Review of the Lisbon Strategy: Regional and Local Players Need to Step up Their Involvement. EIPA Scope 2, 47–52.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Kapronczai, I. (2006). Az agrárinnováció az EU tagság tükrében. In: Jávor A. & Borsos, J., eds., Az agrárinnovációtól a társadalmi aszimmetriákig (pp. 129–126). Debreceni Egyetem.]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Kapronczai, I. (2018). A hazai agrárképzés korlátai. Gazdálkodás 62(5), 459–476.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Klerkx, L. & Gildemacher, P. (2012). The Role of Innovation Brokers in Agricultural Innovation Systems. In: Agricultural Innovation Systems. An Investment Sourcebook. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: 10.1787/9789264167445-19-en.10.1787/9789264167445-19-en]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Klerkx, L., Schut, M., Leeuwis, C. & Kilelu, C. (2012). Advances in knowledge brokering in the agricultural sector: Towards innovation system facilitation. IDS Bulletin 43(5), 53–60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00363.x.10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00363.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Klerkx, L., Hall, A. & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(5/6), 409–438.10.1504/IJARGE.2009.032643]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Kozári, J. (2014). AKIS and advisory services in Hungary [research report]. Gödöllö: Szent István University.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Lundahl, M. (1987). ‘Efficient But Poor’–Schultz’ Theory of Traditional Agriculture’, Scandinavian Economic History Review 35(1), 108–129. DOI: 10.1080/03585522.1987.10408083.10.1080/03585522.1987.10408083]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Magda, S., Marselek, S. & Magda, R. (2017). Az agrárgazdaságban foglalkoztatottak képzettsége és a jövő igénye. Gazdálkodás, 62(4), 437–458.]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Nemes, G. & Varga, Á. (2015). A magyar mezőgazdasági tudásrendszer intézményei és változásai. Műhelytanulmányok [Discussion papers. MT-DP-2015/6]. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Parsons, T. (1977). Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. New York: The Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Perez Perdomo, S. A., Klerkx, L. & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Innovation Brokers and Their Roles in Value Chain-network Innovation: Preliminary Findings and a Research Agenda. ISDA 2010, Jun 2010, Montpellier, France. 16 p. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00525268.]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Schut, M., Klerkx, L., Rodenburg, J., Kayeke, J., Hinnou, L. C., Raboanarielina, C. M., Adegbola, P. Y., van Ast, A. & Bastiaans, L. (2015). RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agricultural Systems 132, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.009.10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.009]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Székely, E., Halász, P. (2010). A mezőgazdasági tanácsadás intézményi feltételei és működési tapasztalatai. Budapest: AKI könyvsorozat.]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] Székely, E. (2011). A magyarországi mezőgazdasági szaktanácsadás intézményi jellemzői. Gazdálkodás 55(5), 502–511.]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Teno, G. & Cadilhon, J. J. (2016). Innovation platforms as a tool for improving agricultural production: The case of Yatenga province, northern Burkina Faso. Field Actions Science Report 9, not paged.]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Tiwari, R., Buse, S. & Herstatt, C. (2007). Innovation via Global Route: Proposing a Reference Model for Chances and Challenges of Global Innovation Processes [working paper 49]. Hamburg: University of Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] Tóth-Kaszás, N., Keller, K., Ernszt, I. & Péter, E. (2017). Helyi termék: biztos megélhetés vagy keresetkiegészítés? Gazdálkodás 61(4), 335–354.]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] Ujj, A., Jancsovszka, P. & Bálint, C. (2017). Situation analysis of agricultural innovation services in Hungary. In: Goda, P., Kis, M., eds., Situation Analysis of Agricultural Innovation Services in Europe (pp. 37–82). Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetemi Kiadó.]Search in Google Scholar
[[29] Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203021613.10.4324/9780203021613]Search in Google Scholar
[[30] Wigboldus, S., Klerkx, l., Leeuwis, C., Schut, M., Muilerman, S., Jochemsen, H. (2016). Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 36(3), 46. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-016-0380-z.10.1007/s13593-016-0380-z]Search in Google Scholar
[[31] 73/2015 (XI.6.). Regulation of the Ministry of Agriculture addresses the agricultural and rural advisory activities and lists the qualifications (4. annex) related to the advisory fields (1. annex).]Search in Google Scholar
[[32] Cahill, C. (2013). Global perspectives on agricultural innovation trends and policies [a presentation].]Search in Google Scholar
[[33] European Commission and Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (2013). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems towards 2020 – an orientation paper on linking innovation and research. DOI: 10.2777/3418.]Search in Google Scholar
[[34] IVSZ (2016). Digitális Agrár Stratégia. URL: http://ivsz.hu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ivsz-digitalis-agrar-strategia-2016.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[[35] KPMG (2016). A fiatal gazdák támogatásának nemzetközi összehasonlítása. KPMG Tanácsadó Kft. URL: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/hu/pdf/hu-Fiatal-Gazdak-20161130.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[[36] Nemzeti Agrárgazdasági Kamara (Hungarian Chamber of Agriculture, HCA): http://www.nak.hu/.]Search in Google Scholar
[[37] The European Network for Rural Development (2013). ‘Towards Successful Innovation Brokerage: Insights from the 2007–2013 Rural Development Programmes’, (September). Available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/app_templates/enrd_assets/pdf/research-and-innovation/FG_KTI_Phase_2_report_IB_Web_version_September_2013_Main_Report.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
, 