1. bookVolume 11 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)
    Special Issue: Smart European Village
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Information and Communication Infrastructures and New Business Models in Rural Areas: The Case of Molise Region in Italy

Published Online: 30 Dec 2019
Page range: 475 - 496
Received: 28 Feb 2019
Accepted: 25 Sep 2019
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

The paper deals with the role of ICT and the related infrastructures to induce innovations for sustainable rural development. In particular, it focuses on the innovations induced by ICT in farms and in new rural firms, and on how digital infrastructures support and generate social innovation mechanisms, leading to the consolidation of entrepreneurship and dissemination of ICT-based innovation in rural areas. The hypothesis is that the presence of digital infrastructures generates a double effect: overcoming the concept of geographical proximity (relevant for remote rural areas) and promoting social innovation. In particular, this paper examines the role of social innovation to create a new demand for products, services and organisational models for farms and rural enterprises, promoting further innovation. To target the objectives, the work analyses three case studies of new business models (BMs) based on ICT innovation. The analysis focuses on the most important interactions, learning and organisational processes within the new enterprises and among the new farms/enterprises and the other economic and institutional actors, and on how they were shaped and changed by the use of ICT, relating them to a conceptual model. These three cases, although pioneering, are important since they give an original response to some of the main problems and needs of remote and inner rural areas, as for the access to high value segment of food market, the information deliveries about attractiveness of landscape and countryside for foreigners, investors and tourists and the creation of new stable relation with consumers/citizens in the urban areas. The three cases have been analysed with the aim to identify how the ICT, and the related innovations, create an interconnection between four characteristic elements of the BMs (value creation, supply chain, customer interfaces, financial model) and the restructuring of proximity dimensions (cognitive, institutional, social, geographical, organizational). The work shows how these three cases have several communalities, but also different aspects with respect to our objective of analysis: there are different ways in which the four characteristic elements of the BM are constructed and also different in the role that the different dimensions of proximity play in structuring the innovation process in each one of them. More generally, the results of the work also lead to consider a new role for public investments in ICT infrastructures: public administrations should intervene in order to create a coherence within projects of public and private initiatives.


[1] Amendola, M. & Bruno, S. (1990). The Behaviour of the Innovative Firm: Relation to the Environment, Research Policy 19(5), 419–433. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90050-G.10.1016/0048-7333(90)90050-Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Amit, R. & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520. DOI: 10.1002/smj.187.10.1002/smj.187Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Amit, R. & Zott, C. (2015), Business Models. In Wright, J. D., ed., International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed. Vol. 3 (pp. 33–36). Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73040-6Search in Google Scholar

[4] Baumol, W. J. & Willig, R. D. (1981). Fixed Costs, Sunk Costs, Entry Barriers, and Sustainability of Monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 96(3), 405–431. DOI: 10.2307/1882680.10.2307/1882680Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Becattini, G. (1989). Modelli locali di sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Benvenuti, B. (1982). Che cos’è l’ambiente tecnologico amministrativo (TATE) che fissa i compiti ed a cosa serve, in I problemi dell’imprenditorialità nella cooperazione agricola. Rome: AIPA.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Berglund, H. & Sandström, C. (2013). Business model innovation from an open systems perspective: structural challenges and managerial solutions. International Journal of Product Development 18(3/4), 274–285. DOI: 10.1504/IJPD.2013.055011.10.1504/IJPD.2013.055011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Boons, F. & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State of the Art and Steps Towards a Research Agenda, Journal of Cleaner Production 45, 9–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9] Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887.10.1080/0034340052000320887Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Brunori, G., Rossi, A. & Malandrin, V. (2010). Co-producing Transition: Innovation Processes in Farms Adhering to Solidarity-based Purchase Groups (GAS) in Tuscany, Italy. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 18(1), 28–53.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers, Long Range Planning 43, 354–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Cohendet, P. & lerena, P. (1997). Learning, technical change, and public policy: how to create and exploit diversity. In Edquist, C., ed., Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. (pp. 223–241). London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Etgar, M. (2008). A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences 36, 97–108. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0061-1.10.1007/s11747-007-0061-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Ferrie, E. A., van Echtelt, F., Wynstra, F., van Weele, A. J. & Duysters, G. (2008). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: a multiple-case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 25(2), 180–201. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00293.x.10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00293.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Gerritsen, P. R. W. (2002). Diversity at Stake: a farmers’ perspective on biodiversity and conservation in western Mexico, Circle for Rural European Studies, Wageningen University, Wageningen.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Holloway, L., Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E. & Tuomainen, H. (2007). Possible Food Economies: a Methodological Framework for Exploring Food Production–Consumption Relationships, Sociologia Ruralis, 47(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00427.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00427.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Humphreys, A. & Grayson, K. (2008). The Intersecting Roles of Consumer and Producer: A Critical Perspective on Co-production, Co-creation and Prosumption, Sociology compass 2(3): 963–980. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00112.x.10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00112.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Ievoli, C., Basile, R. & Belliggiano, A. (2017). The Spatial Patterns of Dairy Farming in Molise. European Countryside 9(4), 729–745. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0041.10.1515/euco-2017-0041Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Ievoli, C., Belliggiano, A., Marandola, D., Pistacchio, G. & Romagnoli, L. (2019). Network Contracts in the Italian agri-food industry: determinants and spatial patterns. Food Economy, 21(2) in press.10.3280/ECAG2019-002006Search in Google Scholar

[20] Labianca, M., De Rubertis, S. Belliggiano, A. & Salento, A. (2016). Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118(1), 38–46. DOI: 10.7896/j.1531.10.7896/j.1531Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Machaj, M. (2013). Sunk Costs and Contestable Markets, The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 16(4), 479–502.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Marandola, D., Belliggiano, A., Romagnoli, L. & Ievoli, C. (2019). The spread of no-till in conservation agriculture systems in Italy: indications for rural development policy-making. Agricultural and Food Economics 7(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40100-019-0126-8.10.1186/s40100-019-0126-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Marsden, T. (2010). Mobilizing the regional eco-economy: evolving webs of agri-food and rural development in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3(2, 225–244. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsq010.10.1093/cjres/rsq010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Meyer, S. B., Coveney, J., Henderson, J., Ward, P. R. & Taylor, A. W. (2012). Reconnecting Australian consumers and producers: Identifying problems of distrust. Food Policy 37, 634–640. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Milone, P. & Ventura, F., eds. (2010). Networking the rural. The future of green regions in Europe. Assen: Van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2014). The visible hand in building new markets for rural economies. In: Hebinck, P., Schneider, S. & Ploeg, J. D. van der, eds., Rural Development and the Construction of New Markets (pp. 41–60). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2015). Is Multifunctionality the Road to Empowering Farmers? In Milone, P., Ventura, F. & Ye, J.., eds., Constructing a New Framework for Rural Development (pp. 59–88). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2018). Nested markets: aspetti teorici e applicativi. Culture della Sostenibilità 11, 12–33. DOI: 10.7402/CdS. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Milone, P. & Ventura, F. (2019). New generation farmers: Rediscovering the peasantry, Journal of Rural Studies 65, 43–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Morgan, K. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography 4(1), 3–21. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/ DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: National endowment for science, technology and the art.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Navarro, F., Labianca, M., Cejudo, E., de Rubertis, S., Salento, A., Maroto, J. C. & Belliggiano, A. (2018). Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period. European Countryside 10(1), 107–126. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0007.10.2478/euco-2018-0007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[33] Ploeg, J. D. van der (2003). The Virtual Farmer: past, present and future of the Dutch peasantry. Assen: Royal van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ploeg, J. D. van der (2008). The New peasantries. London: Earthscan.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ploeg, J. D. van der (2014). Newly emerging, nested market: a theoretical introduction. In: Hebinck, P., Schneider, S. & Ploeg, J. D. van der, eds., Rural Development and the Construction of New Markets (25 pgs.). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315797519.10.4324/9781315797519Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Long, A. & Banks, J. (2002). Living Countrysides. Rural development processes in Europe: The state of the art. Doetinchem: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Bouma, J., Rip, A., Rijkenberg, F. H. J., Ventura, F. & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2004). On Regimes, Novelties and Co-Production. In: Wiskerke, J. S. C. & Ploeg, J. D. van der, eds., Seeds of Transition (pp. 1–30). Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Broekhuizen, R. van, Brunori, G., Sonnino, R., Knickel, K. & Oostindie, H. (2008). Towards a Framework for Understanding Regional Rural Development. In van der Ploeg, J. D. & Marsden, T., eds., Unfolding webs, (pp. 1–28). Assen: Van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Renting, H. & Ploeg, J. D. van der (2001). Reconnecting Nature, Farming and Society: Environmental Cooperatives in the Netherlands as Institutional Arrangements for Creating Coherence. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3(2), 85–102. Doi: 10.1002/jepp.75.10.1002/jepp.75Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] Roep, D. (2001). Vernieuwend werken; sporen van vermogen en onvermogen (een sociomateriele studie over verniewuing in de landbouw uitgewerkt voor de westelijke veenweidegebieden). Wageningen: Wageningen University.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Rossi, A. & Brunori, G. (2010). Drivers of transformation in the agro-food system. GAS as co-production of Alternative Food Networks. In Darnhofer, I. & Grötzer, M., eds., Building sustainable rural futures. The added value of systems approaches in times of change and uncertainty (pp. 1913–1931), Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Saccani, N., Johansson, P. & Perona, M. (2007). Configuring the after-sales service supply chain: A multiple case study. International Journal of Production Economics 110(1–2), 52–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[43] Saccomandi, V. (1991). Istitituzioni di economia del mercato dei prodotti agricoli. Roma: REDA editore.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Sakellaridis, K. & Stiakakis, E. (2011). Business model change due to ICT integration: an application to the entertainment industry, International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications 3, 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Shaw I., Bell, M., Sinclair, I., Sloper, P., Mitchell, W., Dyson, P., Clayden, J. & Rafferty, J. (2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children’s system. British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 613–626. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp040.10.1093/bjsw/bcp040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[46] Schellberg, J., Hill, M., Gerhards, R., Rothmund, M. & Braun, M. (2008). Precision agriculture on grassland: Applications, perspectives and constraints. European Journal of Agronomy 29, (2–3), 59–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2008. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Tellis, W. M. (1997). Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report 3(2), 1–14.10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2024Search in Google Scholar

[48] Veit, D., Clemons, E., Benlian, A., Buxmann, P., Hess, T., Kundisch, D., Leimeister, J. M., Loos, P. & Spann, M. (2014). Business Models – An Information Systems Research Agenda. Business & Information Systems Engineering 6(1), 45–53. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-013-0308-y.10.1007/s12599-013-0308-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[49] Ventura, F., Schiavelli, A. & Milone, P. (2016). Direct Food Roma: Saggine Donzelli.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study ResearchDesign and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Ziemba, E. & Eisenbardt, M. (2015). Prosumers’ participation in business processes, Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management 3(1), 114–127.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zott, C., Amit, R. & Massa, L. (2011). The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research, Journal of Management 37(4), 1019–1042. DOI: 10.1177/0149206311406265.10.1177/0149206311406265Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[53] White, S., Wastell, D., Broadhurst, K. & Hall, C. (2010). When policy overleaps itself: The ‘tragic tale’ of the Integrated Children’s System. Critical Social Policy 30(3). DOI: 10.1177/0261018310367675.10.1177/0261018310367675Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[54] CELAC (2017). Innovation for Sustainable Rural Development, Santiago de Chile. I7769EN/1/09.17.Search in Google Scholar

[55] DIT (Delivery Innovation Team) and Tech4i2 Ltd (2010). A Benefits Framework for Social Inclusion Initiatives, City of London.Search in Google Scholar

[56] EUROPEAN UNION (2014). Research and Innovation performance in the EU. Luxembourg: European Union.Search in Google Scholar

[57] EUROPEAN UNION (2017). EU Action for Smart Villages, https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-development-2014-2020/looking-ahead/rur-dev-small-villages_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[58] FAO (2016). Innovative markets for sustainable agriculture – How innovations in market institutions encourage sustainable agriculture in developing countries. Roma: FAO/INRA.Search in Google Scholar

[59] OECD (2016), OECD Regional Outlook 2016: Productive Regions for Inclusive Societies, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9789264260245-en.10.1787/9789264260245-enOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo