1. bookVolume 11 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1803-8417
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Leaders in Rural Development Structures (Case Study on the Territory of the Lag Dolní Morava, Moravia)

Published Online: 07 Oct 2019
Page range: 404 - 416
Received: 28 Feb 2019
Accepted: 25 Jun 2019
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1803-8417
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper is focused on local actors who are actively involved in the development of their villages. The area of rural development involves stakeholders of different levels and various positions. However, their roles differ, as do their positions in networks collaborating in the development of the rural community. In order to carry out this research, active citizens in member municipalities of the Dolní Morava Local Action Group (covering the territory of the South Moravian Region in the Czech Republic) were selected. Several techniques were used for their identification (analysis of local media, questionnaire survey, semi-structured interview). In this manner, it was possible to acquire a number of local actors from the public, private and non-profit sectors. Firstly, leaders in municipal development, whose position was examined by employing several approaches (positional, reputational and problem), were detected, and then social networks were analysed. The content transmitted within the networks, with an emphasis on social capital – a theme closely related to this issue – was also observed.

Keywords

[1] Ambrosio-Albalá, M. & Bastiaensen, J. (2010). The new territorial paradigm of rural development: Theoretical foundations from systems and institutional theories. University of Antwerp: Institute of development policy and management.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent Report.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bernard, J. (2012). Individuální charakteristiky kandidátů ve volbách do zastupitelstev obcí a jejich vliv na volební výsledky. Sociologický časopis 48(4), 613–640.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Beugelsdijk, S. & Schaik, T. (2005). Differences in social capital between 54 Western European regions. Regional Studies 39(8), 1053–1064. DOI: 10.1080/00343400500328040.10.1080/00343400500328040Search in Google Scholar

[5] Binek, J. & Chabičovská, K. (2006). Význam spolupráce ve veřejné správě. Zdokonalování veřejné správy a samosprávy ČR. Brno: Konvoj.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Binek, J. et al. (2009). Synergie ve venkovském prostoru. Aktéři a nástroje rozvoje venkova. Brno: GaREP Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bonjean, Ch. M. & Olson, D. M. (1964). Community leadership: directions of research. Administrative Science Quarterly 9(3), 278–300. DOI: 10.2307/2391442.10.2307/2391442Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Buštíková, L. (1999). Analýza sociálních sítí. Sociologický časopis 35(2), 193–206.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Callois, J. M. & Aubert, F. (2007). Towards indicators of social capital for regional development issues: The case of French rural areas. Regional Studies 41(6), 809–821. DOI: 10.1080/00343400601142720.10.1080/00343400601142720Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Cannarella, C. & Piccioni, V. (2008). Innovation diffusion and architecture and dynamics of local territorial network. Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 12(2), 215–237. DOI: 10.3176/tr.2008.2.06.10.3176/tr.2008.2.06Search in Google Scholar

[11] Constandse, A. K. & Hofstee, E. W. (1964). Rural Sociology in Action. [FAO Agricultural Development Paper]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Čepelka, O. (2001). Iniciativa Evropské unie LEADER pro rozvoj venkova. Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR. Praha.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Čermák, D. & Vobecká, J. (2011). Spolupráce, partnerství a participace v místní veřejné správě: Význam, praxe, příslib. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).Search in Google Scholar

[14] Degenne, A. & Forsé, M. (1994). Les réseaux sociaux. Une analyse structurale en sociologie. Paris: Armand Colin.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemberton, S. & Woods, M. (2001). Partnerships, power, and scale in rural governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19(2), 289–310. DOI: 10.1068/c12m.10.1068/c12mOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Faltová Leitmanová, I. (2012). Venkov jako místo pro žití. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (2004). Innovative Milieu and Social Capital – Complementary or Redundant Concepts of Collaboration-based Regional Development? European Planning Studies 12(6), 747–765. DOI: 10.1080/0965431042000251846.10.1080/0965431042000251846Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Fukuyama, F. (1999). Social Capital and Civil Society [IMF working paper]. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N. & Zielińska, M. (2010). Area-based partnerships in rural Poland: The post-accession experience. Journal of Rural Studies 26(1), 52–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strenght of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 786), 1360–1380.10.1086/225469Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chromý, P., Jančák, V., Marada, M. & Havlíček, T. (2011). Venkov – žitý prostor: Regionální diferenciace percepce venkova představiteli venkovských obcí v Česku. Geografie 116(1), 23–45.10.37040/geografie2011116010023Search in Google Scholar

[23] Illner, M. (1996). K otázce reprezentativnosti místních zastupitelstev. In: Hampl, M., Geografická organizace společnosti a transformační procesy v České republice (pp. 343–351). Praha: Univerzita Karlova.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Izquierdo, L. R. & Hanneman, R. A. (2006). Introduction to the Formal Analysis of Social Networks Using Mathematica. Published in digital form at http://www.luis.izquierdo.name. University of Búrgos.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Jančák, V., Chromý, P., Marada, M., Havlíček, T. & Vondráčková, P. (2010). Social capital as a factor in the development of peripheral areas: an analysis of selected components of social capital in Czechia’s typologically different peripheries. Geografie 115(2), 207–222.10.37040/geografie2010115020207Search in Google Scholar

[26] Knickel, K. & Renting, H. (2000). Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 512–528. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00164.10.1111/1467-9523.00164Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Konopásek, Z. (1996). Sociologie jako power play. Sociológia 28(2), 99–125.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Maurel, M.-C. (2008). Local development stakeholders and the European model: Learning the LEADER approach in the new member states. Czech Sociological Review 44, 511–529.10.13060/00380288.2008.44.3.04Search in Google Scholar

[29] McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly 51(4), 895–918.10.1177/106591299805100403Search in Google Scholar

[30] Pělucha, M. et al. (2012). Venkov na prahu 21. století: venkov a jeho rozvoj na přelomu milénia, územní dopady znalostní ekonomiky na venkov, souvislosti vztahů města a venkova v globalizované ekonomice. Praha: Alfa nakladatelství.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Perlín, R. (2000). Představitelé veřejné správy jako aktéři lokálního rozvoje. In: Kubeš, J., ed., Problémy stabilizace venkovského osídlení ČR (pp. 133–151). České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. J. & Nanetti, J. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Ray, Ch. (1997). Towards a theory of the dialectic of local rural development within the European Union. Sociologia Ruralis 37(3), 345–362. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1997.tb00055.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.1997.tb00055.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[34] Ray, Ch. (1999). Towards a meta-framework of endogenous development: repertoires, paths, democracy and rights. Sociologia Ruralis. 39(4), 521–537. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00122.10.1111/1467-9523.00122Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Ray, Ch. (2001). Transnational co-operation between rural areas: elements of political economy of EU rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 41(3), 279–295. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00183.10.1111/1467-9523.00183Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Stachová, J. (2008). Občanská společnost v regionech České republiky. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Stachová, J., Bernard, J. & Čermák, D. (2009). Sociální kapitál v České republice a v mezinárodním srovnání. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Strauss, A. & Corbinová, J. (1999). Základy kvalitativního výzkumu. Brno: Sdružení podané ruce.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Šafr, J. & Sedláčková, M. (2006). Sociální kapitál: koncepty, teorie a metody měření. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Vajdová, Z. (2010). Starostovo a starostčino dilema aneb sociální kapitál na vsi a na městečku. In Kostelecký, J., Lebeda, T., Maříková, H. & Škodová, M., eds., Jaká je naše společnost? Otázky, které si často klademe (pp. 261–273). Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).Search in Google Scholar

[42] Vajdová, Z., Bernard, J., Stachová, J. & Čermák, D. (2010). Síť institucionálních aktérů rozvoje malého města. Sociologický časopis 46(2), 281–299.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Večerník, J. (1998). Občan a tržní ekonomika: příjmy, nerovnost a politické postoje v české společnosti. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The Community in rural America. Westport: Greenwood Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

[45] LAG Dolní Morava o.s. (2014). Integrovaná strategie komunitně vedeného místního rozvoje (SCLLD) na období 20142020.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo