1. bookVolume 11 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)
    Special issue to the Centennial of the Mendel University in Brno
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Landscape 100: How Finland, Estonia and Latvia Used Landscape in Celebrating their Centenary Anniversaries

Published Online: 04 Jul 2019
Page range: 187 - 210
Received: 31 Dec 2018
Accepted: 20 Apr 2019
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

In the aftermath of what was then the Great War several European countries like Finland, Estonia and Latvia gained independence, marking their centenary jubilees 2017–2018. This paper observes how landscapes were used in anniversary celebrations and what historical themes were foregrounded and which omitted, revealing how collective historical commemoration in landscape enacts within national identity framework depending also on how landscape is understood in each respective country.


[1] Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Appleton, J. (1996). The Experience of Landscape. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Baker, A. R. H. (1968). A note on the retrogressive and retrospective approaches in historical geography. Erdkunde – Archive for Scientific Geography 22(3), 244–245. DOI: 10.3112/erdkunde.1968. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Brockmeier, J. (2010). After the archive: remapping memory. Culture & Psychology 16(1), 5–35. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X09353212.10.1177/1354067X09353212Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Bunkše, E. V. (1999). Reality of rural landscape symbolism in the formation of a Post-Soviet, Postmodern Latvian identity. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 53, 121–138. DOI: 10.1080/00291959950136849.10.1080/00291959950136849Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Bunkše, E. V. (2001). The case of the missing sublime in Latvian landscape aesthetics and ethics. Ethics, Place and Environment 4(3), 235–245. DOI: 10.1080/13668790120106343.10.1080/13668790120106343Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Burke, P. (1989). History as social memory. In Butler, T. ed., Memory: History, Culture and the Mind (pp. 97–113). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Cosgrove, D. (1998). Cultural landscapes. In Unwin, T. ed., European Geography (pp. 65–81). London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Cosgrove, D. (2008). Geography & Vision. London: I. B. Tauris.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Daniels, S. (1993). Fields of Vision. Landscape imagery and national identity in England and the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cubitt, G. (1998). Introduction. In Cubitt, G., ed, Imagining Nations. Manchester: Manchester and New York, 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dwyer, O. J. & Alderman, D. H. (2008). Memorial landscapes: analytic questions and metaphors. GeoJournal 73: 165–178. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-008-9201-5.10.1007/s10708-008-9201-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Halbwachs, M. (1950). La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Herb, G. H. (2004). Double vision: territorial strategies in the construction of national identities in Germany, 1949–1979. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94(1), 140–164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401008.x.10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401008.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Häyrynen, M. (2005). Kuvitettu maa. Suomen kansallisen maisemakuvaston rakentuminen. Helsinki: SKS.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Häyrynen, M. (2008). A kaleidoscopic nation. The Finnish national landscape imagery. In Jones, M. & Olwig, K. R., eds., Nordic Landscopes. Region and Belonging on the Northern Edge of Europe (pp. 483–510). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Häyrynen, M. (2014). Lost Landscapes – Degraded Landscapes as Anti-Landscape. In Nye, D. & Elkind, S., eds, The Anti-Landscape. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi, 147–156. Peltonen, Matti (2000). Between landscape and language: The Finnish national self-image in transition. Scandinavian Journal of History 25(4), 265–280.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hooson, D., ed. (1994). Geography and National Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jokela, S. & Linkola, H. (2013). “State idea” in the photographs of geography and tourism in Finland in the 1920s. National Identities 15(3), 257–275. DOI: 10.1080/14608944.2013.779644.10.1080/14608944.2013.779644Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Kaufmann, E. & Zimmer, O. (1998). In search of the authentic nation: landscape and national identity in Canada and Switzerland. Nations and Nationalism 4(4), 483–510. DOI: 10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00483.x.10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00483.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Käyhkö, N., Granö, O. & Häyrynen, M. (2004). Finnish landscape studies – a mixture of traditions and recent trends in the analysis of nature-human interactions. BelGeo 2–3, 245–256. DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.13676.10.4000/belgeo.13676Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Lindhjem, H., Reinvang, R. & Zandersen, M. (2015). Landscape Experiences as a Cultural Ecosystem Service in a Nordic Context. Concepts, Values and Decision-making. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. DOI: 10.6027/TN2015-549.10.6027/TN2015-549Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Lotman, J. (2009). Culture and Explosion. Cobley, P. & Grishakova, M., eds., Clark, W., transl. Semiotics, Communication and Cognition 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Meinig, D. (1979). The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Mels, T. (2003). Landscape unmasked: Kenneth Olwig and the ghostly relations between concepts. Cultural Geographies 10(3), 379–387. DOI: 10.1191/1474474003eu281ra.10.1191/1474474003eu281raOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Mitroiu, S. (2014). Narrative identity and trauma: Sebald’s memory landscape. The European Legacy. Toward New Paradigms 19(7), 883–900. DOI: 10.1080/10848770.2014.965525.10.1080/10848770.2014.965525Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Nogué, J. & Vicente, J. (2004). Landscape and national identity in Catalonia. Political Geography 23(2), 113–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2003. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations 26, 7–24. DOI: 10.2307/2928520.10.2307/2928520Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] Paasi, A. (1996). Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Paasi, A. (2008). Finnish landscape as social practice: mapping identity and scale. In Jones, M. & Olwig, K. R., eds., Nordic Landscopes. Region and Belonging on the Northern Edge of Europe (pp. 511–539). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Konkoly Gyuró, É., Urbanc, M., Skowronek, E. & Woloszyn, W. (2006). The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecology 21(3), 347–357. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-004-4313-x.10.1007/s10980-004-4313-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Palang, H. (2010). Time boundaries and landscape change: collective farms 1947–1994. European Countryside 2(3), 169–181. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-010-0012-6.10.2478/v10091-010-0012-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Palang, H., Alumäe, H., Printsmann, A., Rehema, M., Sepp, K. & Sooväli-Sepping, H. (2011). Social landscape: ten years of planning valuable landscapes in Estonia. Land Use Policy 28(1), 19−25. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Palin, T. (1999). Picturing nation. The Finnish landscape and the Finnish people. In Lehtonen, T. M. S. ed., Europe’s Northern Frontier (pp. 208–235). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Parrot, A. (2002). The Baltic States from 1914 to 1923: The First World War and the Wars of Independence. Baltic Defence Review 8(2), 131–158.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Peil, T., Sooväli, H., Palang, H., Oja, T. & Mander, Ü. (2004). Estonian landscape study: contextual history. BelGeo 2–3, 231–244. DOI: 10.4000/belgeo.13637.10.4000/belgeo.13637Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] Raento, P. & Brunn, S. D. (2008). Picturing a nation: Finland in postage stamps, 1917–2000. National Identities 10(1), 49–75. DOI: 10.1080/14608940701819777.10.1080/14608940701819777Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[41] Raivo, P. (2004). Karelia lost or won – materialization of a landscape of contested and commemorated memory. Fennia 182:1, 61–72.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Renan, Ernest (1992). Qu’est-ce qu’une nation? Paris: Presses-Pocket.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Schama, S. (1996). Landscape and Memory. New York: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Schwartz, K. Z. S. (2006). Nature and national identity after communism: globalizing the ethnoscape. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Skultans, V. (2001). Narratives of landscape in Latvian history and memory. Landscape Review 7(2), 25–39.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Smith, A. D. (1991). National Identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Till, K. E. (2004). Political landscapes. In Duncan, J., Johnson, N. & Schein, R., eds., Companion to Cultural Geography (pp. 347–364). Malden: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Vallius, A. (2013). Kuvien maaseutu: maaseutumaisemakuvaston luomat mielikuvat suomalaisesta maaseutukulttuurista. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Valsiner, J. (2018). Ornamented Lives. Charlotte: IAP.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Vervloet, J. A. J. (1984). Inleiding tot de historische geografie van de Nederlandse cultuurlandschappen. Wageningen: Pudoc.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Zariņa, A. (2010). Path dependency and landscape biographies in Latgale, Latvia: a comparative analysis. European Countryside 2(3), 151–168. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-010-0011-7.10.2478/v10091-010-0011-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[52] Zariņa, A. (2013). Path dependence and landscape: initial conditions, contingency and sequences of events in Latgale, Latvia. Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography 95(4), 355–373. DOI: 10.1111/geob.12030.10.1111/geob.12030Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[53] Zariņa, A. & Krumberga, K. (2016). Territoriality of signs: amber in the State’s semiotics in Latvia. GeoJournal 83(1), 101–118. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-016-9759-2.10.1007/s10708-016-9759-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo