1. bookVolume 11 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

The Leader Approach Across The European Union: One Method of Rural Development, Many Forms of Implementation

Published Online: 15 Apr 2019
Page range: 1 - 16
Received: 20 Apr 2018
Accepted: 03 Dec 2018
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

After the accession of the ten new member states to the EU in 2004 and the following membership of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007, the (neo)endogenous development method LEADER has become pan-European. LEADER was implemented in all EU countries in the period 2007–2013, however, its application and potential to impact rural areas differed from country to country. Therefore, the aim of the article is to describe these differences on the basis of support outputs of LEADER under Axis 4 of the Rural Development Programs in 2007–2013. Respecting different path dependencies of the EU states, the article demonstrates the differences in the implementation of this method in two basic territorial units of the EU member states according to the length of the EU membership, as well as the length of experience in implementation of the LEADER method. The scope of LEADER implementation and the potential impact significantly differed between the old and new member states, and the internal heterogeneity of groups is also evident. On the one hand, lack of embeddedness of the method is manifested among the EU12 states (the need for dynamic growth of institutional capacity), on the other hand, socio-economic and political factors modify scope, potential impact and way of implementation of the method in individual countries.


[1] Arabatzis, G., Aggelopoulos, S. & Tsiantikoudis, S. (2010). Rural development and LEADER+ in Greece: evaluation of local action groups. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1), 302–307.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Böcher, M. (2008). Regional Governance and Rural Development in Germany: the Implementation of LEADER+. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(4), 372–388. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Boukalova, K., Kolarova, A. & Lostak, M. (2016). Tracing shift in Czech rural development paradigm (Reflections of Local Action Groups in the media). Agricultural EconomicsCzech, 62(4), 149–159. DOI: 10.17221/102/2015-AGRICECON.10.17221/102/2015-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Buller, H. (2000). Re-Creating Rural Territories: LEADER in France. Rural Sociology, 40(2), 190–199. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00141.10.1111/1467-9523.00141Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Bumbalová, M., Takáč, I., Tvrdoňová, J. & Valach, M. (2016). Are stakeholders in Slovakia ready for community-led local development? Case study findings. European Countryside, 8(2), 160–174. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0013.10.1515/euco-2016-0013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Cañete, J. A., Navarro, F. & Cejudo, E. (2018). Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain). European Planning Studies 26(4), 726–744. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118.10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Chevalier, P., Mačiulyté, J., Razafimahefa, L. & Dedeire, M. (2017). The leader programme as a model of institutional transfer: learning from its local implementation in France and Lithuania. European Countryside 9(2), 317–341. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0020.10.1515/euco-2017-0020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Chevalier, P. & Maurel, M.-C. (2010). Program leader w krajach europy srodkowej. Wieś I Rolnictwo, 149(4), 26–41.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chevalier, P. (2012). What effect does national regulation have on LEADER programming in the EU-27? Wieś I Rolnictwo, 156(3), 9–29.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Convery, I., Soane, I., Dutson, T. & Shaw, H. (2010). Mainstreaming LEADER Delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(4), 372–391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Dax, T. & Oedl-wieser, T. (2016). Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118, 30–37. DOI: 10.7896/j.1535.10.7896/j.1535Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Delin, M. (2012). The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups. Agricultural EconomicsCzech, 58(9), 433–442.10.17221/148/2011-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Fakowski, J. (2013). Political accountability and governance in rural areas: Some evidence from the Pilot Programme LEADER+ in Poland. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 70–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Furmankiewicz, M. (2012). Leader+ territorial governance in Poland: successes and failures as a rational choice effect. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(3), 261–275. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00680.x.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00680.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N. & Zielin, M. (2010). Area-based partnerships in rural Poland: The post-accession experience. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Granberg, L., Andersson, K., Kovách, I. eds. (2015). Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development: Grassroots Experiences of the LEADER Programme. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hudečková, H. & Lošťák, M. (2008). LEADER in the Czech Republic and the farming sector. Agricultural EconomicsCzech, 54(12), 555–565.10.17221/289-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Jančák, V., Chromý, P., Marada, M., Havlíček, T. & Vondráčková, P. (2010). Sociální kapitál jako faktor rozvoje periferních oblastí: Analýza vybraných složek sociálního kapitálu v typově odlišnŷh periferiích Česka. Geografie, 115(2), 207–222.10.37040/geografie2010115020207Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kovách, I. (2000). LEADER, a New Social Order, and the Central- and East-European Countries. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 181–189. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00140.10.1111/1467-9523.00140Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Lošťák, M. & Hudečková, H. (2008). Agriculture and farming related activities: their actors and position in the LEADER approach. Agricultural EconomicsCzech, 54(6), 245–262.10.17221/280-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Lošťák, M., & Hudečková, H. (2010). Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural EconomicsCzech, 56(6), 249–265.10.17221/27/2010-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Lowe, P. (2000). The Challenges for Rural Development in Europe. In: Williams, E., ed., Conference Proceedings: 5th European Conference on Higher Agricultural Education. From Production Agriculture to Rural Development (pp. 19–31). University of Plymouth.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lukić, A. & Obad, O. (2016). New Actors in Rural Development – The LEADER Approach and Projectification in Rural Croatia. Sociologija I Prostor, 54(1), 71–90. DOI: 10.5673/sip. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Macken-Walsh, A. & Curtin, C. (2012). Governance and Rural Development: The Case of the Rural Partnership Programme (RPP) in Post-Socialist Lithuania. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(2), 246–264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00578.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00578.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Majerová, V. (2009). Local Initiatives Functioning as a Condition of Rural Development of the Czech Countryside. Eastern European Countryside, 9(1), 127–149. DOI: 10.2478/v10130-009-0008-2.10.2478/v10130-009-0008-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Margarian, A. (2013). A Constructive Critique of the Endogenous Development. Approach in the European Support of Rural Areas. Growth and Change, 44(1), 1–29. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12000.10.1111/grow.12000Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Marquardt, D., Möllers, J. & Buchenrieder, G. (2012). Social Networks and Rural Development: LEADER in Romania. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(4), 398–431. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00571.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00571.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Masot, A. N. & Alonso, G. C. (2017). 25 years of the leader initiative as European rural development policy: the case of Extremadura (SW Spain). European Countryside 9(2), 302–316. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0019.10.1515/euco-2017-0019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Maurel, M.-C. (2008). Local development stakeholders and the European model: learning the leader approach in the new member states. Sociologicky časopis, 44(3), 511–529.10.13060/00380288.2008.44.3.04Search in Google Scholar

[32] Navarro, F. A., Woods, M. & Cejudo, E. (2015). The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of its own Success. The Decline of the Bottom-Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2), 270–288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.10.1111/soru.12079Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[33] Nevěděl, L. & Horák, M. (2015). Operation of the selected local action group. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 347–352. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010347.10.11118/actaun201563010347Search in Google Scholar

[34] Osti, G. (2000). LEADER and partnerships: the case of Italy. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 172–180. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00139.10.1111/1467-9523.00139Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Papadopoulou, E., Hasanagas, N. & Harvey, D. (2011). Analysis of rural development policy networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? Land Use Policy, 28(4), 663–673. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Perlín, R., Kučerová, S. & Kučera, Z. (2010). Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie, 115(2), 161–187.10.37040/geografie2010115020161Search in Google Scholar

[37] Pisani, E., Franceschetti, G., Secco, L., Christoforou, A., eds. (2017). Social Capital and Local Development: From Theory to Empirics. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5Search in Google Scholar

[38] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2013). Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 115(2), 1–7.10.7896/j.1228Search in Google Scholar

[39] Pospěch, P. (2014). Discursive no man’s land: Analysing the discourse of the rural in the transitional Czech Republic. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 96–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] Ray, C. (2000). The EU LEADER Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 163–171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00138.10.1111/1467-9523.00138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[41] Rizzo, F. (2013). Leader Policy Practices and Landscapes in the Light of the Agency-Structure Debate: Evidence from Leader Local Action Groups in Italy and in Finland. European Countryside 5(3), 232–250. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2013-0015.10.2478/euco-2013-0015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Svobodová, H. (2015). Do the Czech local action groups respect the leader method? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(5), 1769–1777. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051769.10.11118/actaun201563051769Search in Google Scholar

[43] Šťastná, M. & Vaishar, A. (2017). The relationship between public transport and the progressive development of rural areas. Land Use Policy, 67, 107–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[44] Thuesen, A. A. & Nielsen, N. C. (2014). A territorial perspective on EU´s leader approach in Denmark: the added value of community-led local development of rural and coastal areas in a multi-level governance settings. European Countryside 6(4), 307–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2014-0017.10.2478/euco-2014-0017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[45] Volk, A. & Bojnec, Š. (2014). Local action groups and the LEADER co-financing of rural development projects in Slovenia. Agricultural EconomicsCzech, 60(8), 364–375.10.17221/180/2013-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[46] Tulla, A. F., Vera, A., Valldeperas, N. & Guirado, C. (2017). New approaches to sustainable rural development: Social farming as an opportunity in Europe? Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography, 11(1), 2067–2284. DOI: 10.5719/hgeo.2017. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Woods, M. & Mcdonagh, J. (2011). Europe and the world: globalization and rural development (editorial). European Countryside 3(3), 153–163. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0001-z.10.2478/v10091-012-0001-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[48] European Network for Rural Development (2015a). Financial and physical indicators 2007-2013. Available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/policy-in-action/rural-development-policy-infigures/rdp-monitoring-indicator-tables/financial-and-physical-indicators_en. Accessed on 1st March 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[49] European Network for Rural Development (2015b). Output indicators 2007–2013. Available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/policy-in-action/rural-development-policy-in-figures/rdpmonitoring-indicator-tables/output-indicators_en). Accessed on 1st March 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[50] EUROSTAT (2017a). Eurostat regional yearbook2017 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

[51] EUROSTAT (2017b). Statistics – Comparative price levels of consumer goods and services. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Comparative_price_levels_of_consumer_goods_and_services). Accessed on 6th March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[52] EUROSTAT (2018). Territorial typologies. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Territorial_typologies. Accessed on 13th February 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo