1. bookVolume 10 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Social Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, a Sustainable Practice for Social and Economic Cohesion in Rural Areas: The Case of the Czech Republic

Published Online: 16 Oct 2018
Page range: 377 - 397
Received: 17 Jan 2018
Accepted: 18 May 2018
Journal Details
First Published
24 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

This article pursues an innovative dimension of social entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector that keeps rural areas viable, so-called social farming. Social entrepreneurship appears as an essential driver in the European economy and it heads toward new opportunities mainly through its impact on social integration, economic sustainability, and fair society. Social farming and social farms can successfully respond to the challenge of social exclusion and lack of social services provision and other opportunities in rural areas through alternative therapeutic activities, sheltered working places or integrative educational activities in a farm environment. From this perspective, a social farm should correspond to the definition of a social enterprise. By introducing the basic frames of social entrepreneurship and social farming in general and in the Czech Republic, and by concentrating on fifteen Czech social farms, this paper presents an insight into this retro-innovative practice of social integration systems in the countryside. It mainly answers the question, whether social farming complies fully with social entrepreneurship stream, and it explores the role of the social farm in rural development by using semi-structured and in-depth interviews.


[1] Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit Organizations. Theory, Management, Policy. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Beck, S. E. & Manuel, K. (2008). Practical research methods for librarians and information professionals. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bock, B. B. & Oosting, S. J. (2010). A classification of green care arrangements in Europe. In Dessein, J. & Bock, B. B., eds., The Economics of Green Care in Agriculture (pp. 15–26). Loughborough University.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bohátová, Z., Schwarcz, P., Schwarczová, L., Bandlerová, A. & Tľčik, A. (2016). Multifunctionality – Interactions and Implications: The Case of the Podkylava Village (Western Slovakia). European Countryside 8(2), 147–159. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0012.10.1515/euco-2016-0012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Coffey, A. & Atkinson, P. (1996). Narratives and stories. In Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies (pp. 54–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Dees, J. G., Emerson, J. et al. (2001). Enterprising Nonprofits. A Toolkit for Social Entrepreneurs. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Defourny, J. (2001). From the Third Sector to Social Enterprise. In Borzaga, C. & Defourny, J. The Emergence of Social Enterprise (pp. 17–31). London and New York. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Defourny, J. & Nyssens, M. (2014). The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective. In Defourny, J., Hulgård, L & Pestoff, V., eds. Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 42–65). London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Defourny, J. (2014). From Third Sector to Social Enterprise. A European Research Trajectory. In Defourny, J., Hulgård, L. & Pestoff, V., eds. Social Enterprise and the Third Sector: Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 17–41). London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Di Iacovo, F. & O’Connor, D., eds. (2009). Supporting Policies for Social Farming in Europe. Progressing Multifunctionality in Responsive Rural Areas. ARSIA: Firenze.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dohnalová, M., Deverová, L., Legnerová, K. & Pospíšilová, T. (2015). Lidské zdroje v sociálních podnicích. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, ČR, a.s.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dohnalová, M. & Průša, L. (2011). Sociální ekonomika. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, a.s.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Etzioni, A. (1995). Morální dimenze ekonomiky. Praha: Victoria Publishing, a.s.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Gordon, M. (2015). A Typology of Social Enterprise ‘Traditions’ [ICSEM Working Papers, No. 18]. University of Liege.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. The Yale Law Journal 89(5), 835– 901. DOI: 10.2307/796089.10.2307/796089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Hassing, J., Hulsing, W. & Grin, J. (2014). Farming with Care: the evolution of care farming in the Netherlands. NJASWageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 68, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2013. DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Hassink, J. & van Dijk, M., eds. (2006). Farming for Health: Green Care-farming across Europe and the United States of America. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-4541-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] Haubenhofer, D., Enzenhofer, K., Kleber, S., Pflugl, S., Plitzka, E. & Holzapfel, I. (2013). Zahradní terapie. Teorie – věda – praxe. Brno: Lipka.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hine, R., Peacock, J. & Pretty, J. (2008b). Care Farming in the UK: Contexts, benefits and links with therapeutic communities. Therapeutic Communities. 29(3), 245–260.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hudcová, E. (2016a). Tematizace a konceptualizace sociálního zemědělství ve vztahu k sociálnímu podnikání, multifunkčnímu zemědělství a přístupům „green care” v České republice. FÓRUM sociální politiky. 10(5), 20–23.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hulgård, L. (2007). Differences between American and European Conceptions of Social Entrepreneurship. In Defourny, J., Hulgård, L. & Pestoff, V., eds. (2014). Social Enterprise and the third sector. Changing European Landscapes in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 66–84). New York, Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chovanec, T., Hudcová, E. & Moudrý, J. (2015). Sociální zemědělství, představení konceptu. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství ČR.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature – a psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Lafranchi, M., Giannetto, C., Abbate, T. & Dimitrova, V. (2015). Agriculture and the social farm: Expression of the multifunctional model of agriculture as a solution to the economic crisis in rural areas. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(4), 711–718.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Laville, J.-L., Young, D. R. & Eynaud, P. (2015). Civil society, the Third sector and Social Enterprise. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315795317Search in Google Scholar

[26] Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 23(4), 1102–1118. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7.10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Ploeg, J. D. & Roep, D. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. In Huylenbroeck, G. van & Gilbert, D. Multifunctional Agriculture; A new paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development (pp. 37–53). Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Polanyi, K. (2002). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, 2nd ed. Boston: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Randall, A. (2002). Valuing the outputs of multifunctional agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 29(3), 289–307. DOI: 10.1093/eurrag/ DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Sempik, J., Hine, R. & Wilcox, D., eds. (2010). Green Care: A Conceptual Framework. Loughborough University.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Los Angeles, London, New York, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Enquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interests, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Soukup, M. (2014). Terénní výzkum v sociální a kulturní antropologii. Praha: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Taylor, R., ed. (2010). Third Sector Research. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer Sicence+Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4419-5707-8Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ujj, A., ed. (2017). Social farming Best Practice Collection in Visegrad Countries. Gödöllő: Szent István Egyetem.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Ulrich, E. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Altman, I. & Wohlwill, J. F., eds. (1983). Behaviour and the natural environment (pp. 85–125), Boston, MA: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4.10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[37] Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Non-profit Sector in a Three-sector Economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. The human bond with other species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674045231Search in Google Scholar

[39] Wilson, G. A. (2007). Multifunctional agriculture: A transition theory perspective. Cambridge, MA: CABI. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00580.x.10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00580.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Young, D. R. (1981). Entrepreneurship and the behaviour of nonprofit organisations: Elements of a theory. In White, M., ed., Nonprofit firms in a three-sector economy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Act no 108/2006 Coll., on social services.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Act no. 252/1997 Coll., on agriculture.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Act no. 90/2012 Coll., on corporations.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Borzaga, C. & Galera, G. (2004). Social Economy in Transition Economies: Realities and Perspectives [unpublished discussion paper presented at the First Meeting of the Scientific Group on Social Economy and Social Innovation of the OECD Centre for Local Development. Trento, Italy.Search in Google Scholar

[46] EESC (2012). Social farming: green care and social and health policies: Brussels: EESC.Search in Google Scholar

[47] FAO (2015). „The Implications of Social Farming for Rural Poverty Reduction”. Technical Workshop. Final Report, Rome. Gordon, M. (2015). „A Typology of Social Enterprise ‘Traditions’”. ICSEM Working Papers, No. 18. Liege: The International Comparative Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Hine, R., Peacock, J. & Pretty, J. (2008a). „Care Farming in the UK: a Scoping Study”. Report for the National Care Farming Initiative. University of Essex, Colchester.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Hudcová, E. (2016b). Social entrepreneurship in agriculture and its implications for new subject matters in educational curriculum. In Valenčík, R., ed., Human Capital and Investment in Education, (pp. 43–51). Praha: University of Finance and Adminitration.Search in Google Scholar

[50] OECD (2010). Regional Typology. 2010. Dostupné z: http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/42392595.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[51] TESSEA Network (2011). Definice a principy sociálního podniku. Retrieved 2017-12-11 from: http://www.tessea.cz/tessea-o-nas/definice-a-principy-socialniho-podnikani.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Vyhodnocení dotazníkového šetření sociálních podniků v ČR, 2015 (2015). Retrieved 2017-12-10 from http://www.ceske-socialni-podnikani.cz/images/pdf/Socialni_podniky_setreni_2015.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo