Assessments of Biodiversity and Habitat Services in Cities – Exemplified by Dresden (Germany) and Liberec (Czech Republic)

Albrecht, J., Schumacher, J. & Wende W. (2014). The German impact-mitigation regulation – A model for the EU’s no-net-loss strategy and biodiversity offsets? Environmental Policy and Law, 44(3), 317−332.Search in Google Scholar

AOPK (2011). Data about area of protected territories.http://www.nature.cz/publik_syst2/files/udaje_o_rozloze_biotopu_cr.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Bastian, O. (1998). Landscape-ecological goals as guiding principles to maintain biodiversity at different planning scales. Ekológia, Bratislava, 17(1), 49−61.Search in Google Scholar

Bastian, O. (2013). The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecological Indicators, 24, 13−22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016.10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016Search in Google Scholar

Bastian, O. & Schreiber K.-F. (Eds.) (1999). Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft. Heidelberg, Berlin: Spektrum Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Bastian, O. & Xiao N. (2018). The role of biodiversity in a city. In K. Grunewald, J. Li, G. Xie & L. Kümper-Schlake (Eds.), Towards green cities. Urban biodiversity and ecosystem services in China and Germany (pp. 49−55). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58223-8.10.1007/978-3-319-58223-8Search in Google Scholar

Blume, H.-P. & Sukopp H. (1976). Ökologische Bedeutung anthropogener Bodenveränderungen. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, 10, 75−89.Search in Google Scholar

Botzat, A., Fischer, L.K. & Kowarik I. (2016). Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 220−233. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008Search in Google Scholar

Chevassus-au-Louis, B., Salles, J.-M., Bielsa, S., Richard, D., Martin, G. & Pujol J.-L. (2009). Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes. Paris: Rapport du CAS.Search in Google Scholar

City plan Liberec (2019). City plan of the statutory city of Liberec. https://www.liberec.cz/cz/radnice/strategie-projekty/uzemni-plan/uzemni-planovani/uzemni-plany-obci/liberec/platny-uzemni-plan/Search in Google Scholar

COM (2011). Final communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

Cudlín, P., Prokopová, M., Francírková, T., Burešová, R., Smrž, T. & Boucníková E. (2005). System NATURA 2000 utilization for purposes of biotope valuation. Ekológia (Bratislava), 24(Suppl. 1), 52−68.Search in Google Scholar

de Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. & Willemen L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260−272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Diviaková, A., Kočická, E., Belčáková, I. & Beláňová E. (2018). Evaluation of the significance of linear non-forest woody vegetation in the development of an ecological network. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 16(2), 1221−1241. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1602_12211241.10.15666/aeer/1602_12211241Search in Google Scholar

EEC (2007). Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC 2007.http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/guidance/pdf/guidance_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Fischer, L.K. & Kowarik I. (2018). Urbane Artenvielfalt ist beliebt! Gesellschaftliche Unterstützung für eine vielfältige Natur im besiedelten Bereich. GIT Labor-Fachzeitschrift, 12, 24−27.Search in Google Scholar

Gantioler, S., Rayment, M., Bassi, S., Kettunen, M., McConville, A., Landgrebe, R., Gerdes, H. & ten Brink P. (2010). Costs and socio-economic benefits associated with the Natura 2000 network. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Institute for European Environmental Policy/GHK/Ecologic, Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

Geißler, M. (2017). Bilanzierung der Landschaftspflege im urbanen Raum am Beispiel der Städte Chemnitz, Dresden und Leipzig. Unpubl. Master thesis, Technical University, Dresden.Search in Google Scholar

Grunewald, K. & Syrbe R.-U. (2013). Bilanzierung von ausgewählten Leistungen und Anforderungen der Landschaftspflege in Sachsen aus landesweiter Sicht. Dresden: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie.Search in Google Scholar

Grunewald, K., Syrbe, R.-U. & Bastian O. (2014). Landscape management accounting as a tool for indicating the need of action for ecosystem maintenance and restoration – exemplified for Saxony. Ecological Indicators, 37(A), 241−251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.014.10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.014Search in Google Scholar

Grunewald, K. & Bastian O. (2017). Maintaining ecosystem services to support urban needs. Sustainability, 9(1647), 9. DOI:10.3390/su909164710.3390/su9091647Search in Google Scholar

Haaren, C.V. & Albert C. (2011). The concepts of ecosystem services and environmental planning: An assessment of the scope for synergies. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(3), 150−167. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2011.616534.10.1080/21513732.2011.616534Search in Google Scholar

Haber, W. (1998). Das Konzept der differenzierten Landnutzung – Grundlage für Naturschutz und nachhaltige Naturnutzung. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Ed.), Ziele des Naturschutzes und einer nachhaltigen Naturnutzung in Deutschland (pp. 57−64). Bonn: BMU.Search in Google Scholar

Haines-Young, R. & Potschin M.B. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, M., Westermann, J.R., Kowarik, I. & Van der Meer E. (2012). Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 303−312. DOI: 10.1016/j. ufug.2012.04.001.10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001Search in Google Scholar

IEEP (ten Brink, P., Monkhouse, C. & Richartz S.) (2002). Promoting the socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000. Background Report, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), European Conference, Brussels, November 28-29, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

IÖR (2019). The BIDELIN project.http://bidelin.ioer.eu/en/Search in Google Scholar

Kettunen, M., Bassi, S., Gantioler, S. & ten Brink P. (2009). Assessing socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000 – a toolkit for practitioners. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).Search in Google Scholar

Kowarik, I. & Körner S. (2005). Wild urban woodlands. New perspectives for urban forestry. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/b138211Search in Google Scholar

Landschaftsplan Dresden (2018). The landscape plan of the capital city of Dresden.http://www.dresden.de/de/stadtraum/umwelt/umwelt/landschaftsplan/geltender_landschaftsplan.phpSearch in Google Scholar

Laurila-Pant, M., Lehikoinen, A., Uusitalo, L. & Venesjärvi R. (2015). How to valuate biodiversity in environmental management? Ecological Indicators, 55, 1−11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.20153.02.034.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.034Search in Google Scholar

MA (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mace, G.M., Norris, K. & Fitter A.H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol., 27(1), 19−26. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.00621943703Search in Google Scholar

Matzdorf, B., Hansjürgens, B., Lienhoop, N., Schröter, B., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Stöcker, U., Suntken, S. & Szallies I. (2019). Erkenntnisse aus dem TEEB-Deutschland-Prozess für die Politikgestaltung in ländlichen Räumen nutzen. Handlungsempfehlungen am Beispiel dreier Politikfelder. Natur und Landschaft, 94(1), 21−27. DOI: 10.17433/1.2019.50153657.21-27.10.17433/1.2019.50153657.21-27Search in Google Scholar

Mertz, O., Ravnborg, H.M., Lövei, G.L., Nielsen, I. & Konijnendijk C.C. (2007). Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries. Biodivers. Conserv., 16(10), 2729−2737. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9216-010.1007/s10531-007-9216-0Search in Google Scholar

Moyzeová, M. (2018). Inclusion of the public in the natural capital, ecosystem services and green infrastructure assessments (Results of structured interviews with stakeholders of commune Liptovská Teplička). Ekológia (Bratislava), 37(1), 42–56. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2018-0005.10.2478/eko-2018-0005Search in Google Scholar

Müller, N. & Abendroth S. (2007). Empfehlungen für die Nationale Strategie zur Biologischen Vielfalt in Deutschland. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 39, 114−118.Search in Google Scholar

Pechanec, V., Machar, I., Štěrbová, L., Prokopova, M., Kilianova, H., Chobot, K. & Cudlín P. (2017). Monetary valuation of natural forest habitats in protected areas. Forests, 8, 427. DOI: 10.3390/f8110427.10.3390/f8110427Search in Google Scholar

Riedel, W., Lange, H., Jedicke, E. & Reinke M. (Eds.) (2016). Landschaftsplanung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Spektrum.10.1007/978-3-642-39855-1Search in Google Scholar

Ring, I., Hansjürgens, B., Elmqvist, T., Wittmer, H. & Sukhdev P. (2010). Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Current Opinion of Environmental Sustainability, 2(1−2), 15−26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005.10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Ring, I. & Schröter-Schlaack C. (Eds.) (2011). Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. POLICYMIX Report, No. 2/2011. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ. http://policymix.nina.noSearch in Google Scholar

Schlüter, H. (1982). Geobotanische Kennzeichnung und vegetationsökologische Bewertung von Naturraumeinheiten. Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftforschung, 22, 69−77.10.1515/9783112519226-002Search in Google Scholar

Schutzgebiete Dresden (2018). Schutzgebiete in Dresden.http://www.dresden.de/de/stadtraum/umwelt/umwelt/naturschutz/Schutzgebiete_nach_Naturschutzrecht.phpSearch in Google Scholar

Schweppe-Kraft, B. (2009). Natural capital in Germany – State and valuation; with special reference to biodiversity. In R. Döring (Ed.), Sustainability, natural capital and nature conservation (pp. 193−216). Beiträge zur Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit, Vol. 3. Marburg: Metropolis.Search in Google Scholar

Seják, J., Dejmal, I., Petříček, V., Cudlín, P., Míchal, I., Černý, K., Kučera, T., Vyskot, I., Strejček, J., Cudlínová, E., Cabrnoch, J., Šindlar, M., Prokopová, M., Kovář, J., Kupka, M., Sčasný, M., Šafařík, M., Roušarová, Š., Stejskal, V. & Zapletal J. (2003). Monetary valuation of the habitats of the Czech Republic. Prague: Czech Ecological Institute, Ministry of Life Environment of the Czech Republic.Search in Google Scholar

Seják, J. & Cudlín P. (2010). On measuring the natural and environmental resource value and damages. Studia Ecologica, 4(2), 53−68.Search in Google Scholar

Spangenberg, J.H. & Settele J. (2010). Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 327−337. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007.10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007Search in Google Scholar

TEEB (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. London: Earthscan.Search in Google Scholar

TEEB (2011). TEEB manual for cities: Ecosystem services in urban management. London: Earthscan.Search in Google Scholar

Tüxen, R. (1956). Die heutige potentielle natürliche Vegetation als Gegenstand der Vegetationskartierung. Angewandte Pflanzensoziologie, 13, 5−42.Search in Google Scholar

UNEP (1992). The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity.Search in Google Scholar

User’s Manual for CBI (2012): http://www.cbd.int/authorities/doc/User%27s%20Manual-for-the-City-Biodiversity-Index18April2012.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Werner, P. & Zahner R. (2009). Biological diversity and cities. A review and bibliography. BfN-Skripten, 245.Search in Google Scholar

Werner, P. (2016). Biologische Vielfalt im urbanen Raum. Zusammenhang, Entwicklung und Einflussfaktoren auf Flora und Fauna. Natur und Landschaft, 91(7), 314−321. DOI: 10.17433/7.2016.50153400.10.17433/7.2016.50153400.314-321Search in Google Scholar