1. bookVolume 9 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-8285
First Published
31 Dec 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Potentials of Administrative Procedures as a Participatory Tool within Governance Models in Central and Eastern Europe

Published Online: 26 Jan 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2018) - Issue 4 (December 2018)
Page range: 227 - 244
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-8285
First Published
31 Dec 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Good public governance requires participative networking to tackle the worst societal problems. Redefined administrative procedure as an instrument that should ensure efficient public policies is one of the key approaches in this respect. The objective of this article is to show, based on qualitative research methods, that in modern public administration, procedure is attributed a much different role than under the traditional Rechtsstaat doctrine. It has been evolving towards becoming a dialogue tool for the state and the citizens, increasingly recognised in Neo-Weberian and good governance models, also in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Administrative procedure’s modernised codification in CEE countries, grounded in public administration theory, EU and case law, is in this article seen as of the utmost importance to apply in the region to develop its governance capacity. The article addresses said issues and provides a specific outline as to how to systematically and proportionally codify administrative procedural law in this sense on a national scale. The author proposes a concrete, holistic outline to redefine respective codification within contemporary public governance models. This outline incorporates minimum joint fundamental principles, e.g. the right to be heard. Following the principle of proportionality, in addition a more detailed codification is suggested by more formalised proceedings in the case of the collision of legally protected interests. The principles, such as participation, would apply for any administrative acts, resulting from legislative policy-making or single-case decision-making, and judicial reviews thereof alike. Such an approach should ensure a balanced recognition and effective protection of parties and public interest.

Keywords

Auby, J.-B. (ed.) (2014). Codification of Administrative Procedure. Brussels: Bruylant.Search in Google Scholar

Bevir, M. (ed.) (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Los Angeles, etc.: SAGE. Council of Europe. Retrieved November 7, 2018, from http://www.coe.int/10.4135/9781446200964Search in Google Scholar

Dunlop, C. A., Radaelli, C. M. (2016). Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2016). Resolution of 9 June 2016 for an open, efficient and independent European Union administration (2016/2610(RSP)). Retrieved November 2, 2018, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2016-0279+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN.Search in Google Scholar

Galetta, U.-D., Hofmann, H. C. H., Puigpelat, O. M., Ziller, J. (2015). The General Principles of EU Administrative Procedural Law. Brussels: European Parliament.Search in Google Scholar

Galligan, D., Langan R. H. II, Nicandrou, C. S. (1998). Administrative Justice in the New European Democracies: Case Studies of Administrative Law and Process in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Ukraine. Oxford: Open Society Institute, Constitutional and Legislative Policy Institute, the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Harlow, C., Rawlings, R. (1997). Law and Administration. London, Edinburgh, Dublin: Butterworths.Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, H. C. H., Mihaescu, B. C. (2013). The Relation between the Charter’s Fundamental Rights and the Unwritten General Principles of EU Law: Good Administration as the Test Case. European Constitutional Law Review, 2013(9), 73–101.10.1017/S1574019612001046Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, H. C. H., Schneider, J.-P., Ziller, J. (eds.) (2014). The ReNEUAL Model Rules. ReNEUAL. Retrieved November 7, 2018, from www.reneual.eu.Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, P. (2016). The requirements and limits of the codification of administrative procedures in Slovenia according to European trends. Review of central and east European law, 41(3/4), 427–461.10.1163/15730352-04103007Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, P. (2011). Modernizing administrative procedural law in Slovenia as a driving force of efficient and good administration. The NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy, 4(2), 39–66.10.2478/v10110-011-0004-6Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, P., Bileišis, M. (eds.) (2017). Public Administration Reforms in the Eastern European Union MS: Post-Accession Convergences and Divergences. Mykolas Romeris University, Faculty of Administration, Vilnius, Ljubljana, https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-GOZLT0QL/dc9c67f3-b6ef-4ddb-8f03-28ef0dd1deb2/PDF.Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, P., Rakar I., Remic, M. (2012). Upravno-procesne dileme pri rabi ZUP 2 [Administrative-procedural Dilemmas in Use of the APA, 2]. Ljubljana: Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, I., Ðulabić, V. (eds.) (2009). Modernizacija općeg upravnog postupka i javne uprave u Hrvatskoj [Modernisation of General Administrative Procedure and Public Administration in Croatia]. Zagreb: Institute of Public Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, I. (2005). Administrative Procedures on the Territory of Former Yugoslavia, Regional Workshop on Public Administration Reform and EU Integration, Budva. Retrieved November 1, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/20/36366473.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Künnecke, M. (2007). Tradition and Change in Administrative Law: an Anglo-German Comparison. Berlin, New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Meuwese, A., Schuurmans, Y., Voermans,W. (2009). Towards a European Administrative Procedure Act. Review of European Administrative Law, 2(2), 16–22.10.7590/REAL_2009_02_02Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2017). Principles of Public Administration. Paris: OECD. Retrieved December 5, 2018, from http://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/principles-public-administration.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Ongaro, E., van Thiel, S. (eds.). 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3Search in Google Scholar

Pavčnik, M. (2007). Teorija prava [Theory of Law]. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba.Search in Google Scholar

Perrou, K. (2014). Taxpayer Participation in Tax Treaty Dispute Resolution. Amsterdam: IBFD.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, B. G., Pierre, J. (eds.) (2005). Handbook of Public Administration. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G., Randma-Liiv, T., Drechsler, W. (eds.) (2008/2009). The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. Special Issue: A Distinctive European Model? The Neo-Weberian State 1(2).Search in Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P. L. (eds.) (2010). Comparative Administrative Law. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781849808101Search in Google Scholar

Rusch, W. (2014). Citizens First: Modernisation of the System of Administrative Procedures in South-Eastern Europe. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 14(1), 189–228.Search in Google Scholar

Sever, T., Rakar I., Kovač, P. (2013). Protecting human rights through fundamental principles of administrative procedures in Eastern Europe. Danube: Law and Economics Review, 5(4), 249–275.10.2478/danb-2014-0014Search in Google Scholar

Schuppert, G. F. (2000). Verwaltungswissenschaft (Verwaltung, Verwaltungsrecht, Verwaltungslehre). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Search in Google Scholar

Statskontoret. (2005). Principles of Good Administration in the Member States of the European Union. Stockholm: Statskontoret.Search in Google Scholar

Venice Commission – European Commission for Democracy through Law, 2011. Stocktaking on the Notions of »Good Governance« and »Good Administration«, Study no. 470/2008, CDL-AD(2001)009.Search in Google Scholar

Vigoda, E. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.10.1111/1540-6210.00235Search in Google Scholar

Vintar, M., Rosenbaum, A., Jenei, G., Drechsler, W. (eds.) (2013). The Past, Present and the Future of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo