[
Ankom Technology (2017): ADF method. Method 12. Acid Detergent Fiber in Feeds - Filter Bag Technique (for A2000 and A2000I).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ankom Technology (2017a): NDF method. Method 13. Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds - Filter Bag Technique (for A2000 and A2000I).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ankom Technology (2020): Method 8 – determining Acid Detergent Lignin in beakers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AOAC Official Method 2001.11: Protein (Crude) in Animal Feed, Forage (Plant Tissue), Grain, and Oilseeds.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold W. (2020): Review: Seasonal differences in the physiology of wild northern ruminants. Animal, 14(1): s124-s132.10.1017/S175173111900324032024577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold W., Giroud S.,Valencak T.G., Ruf T. (2015): Ecophysiology of omega fatty acids: a lid for every jar. Physiology, 30: 232-240.10.1152/physiol.00047.201425933823
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold W. (2013): Jahreszeitliche Anpassung bei Wildwiederkäuern: wo steht das Rehwild? Hege und Bejagung des Rehwildes. Feldkirchen, 20: 13-21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bauer J. & Schwarz H. (2017): Notzeit Es liegt in unseren Händen. Jagd in Bayern, 16–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beuković M. & Popović Z. (2014): Lovstvo. Poljoprivredni fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bubenik A. & Lochman J. (1956): Futterverbrauch und Tagesrhythmus der Futteraufnahme bei Reh- und Rotwild. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 2: 112-118.10.1007/BF01916158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornelis J., Casaer, J., Hermy M. (1999): Impact of season, habitat and research techniques on diet composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): A review. Journal of Zoology, 248: 195-207.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01196.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dissen J. & Hartfiel W. (1985): Beobachtungen zum Äsungsverhalten sowie Untersuchungen zur Nährstoffverdaulichkeit von Rehwild. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft, 31. 83-91.10.1007/BF02246116
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freschi P., Fascetti S., Riga F, Rizzardini G, Musto M, Cosentino C. (2021): Feeding Preferences of the Italian Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus italicus Festa, 1925) in a Coastal Mediterranean Environment. Animals, 11: 308.10.3390/ani11020308791230033530361
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hofmann R. R. (1989): Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia, 78: 443-457.10.1007/BF0037873328312172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Imperio S., Focardi S., Santini G., Provenzale A. (2012): Population dynamics in a guild of four Mediterranean ungulates: Density dependence, environmental effects and inter-specific interactions. Oikos, 12: 1613-1626.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20085.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kamler J. & Homolka M. (2005): Fecal nitrogen: a potential indicator of red and roe deer diet quality in forest habitats. Folia Zoologica, 54(1-2): 89-98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
König A., Hudler M., Dahl S.A., Bolduan C., Brugger D., Windisch W. (2020): Response of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) to seasonal and local changes in dietary energy content and quality, Animal Production Science, 60: 1315-1325.10.1071/AN19375
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kossak S. (1983): Trophic relations of Roe deer in a fresh deciduous forest. Acta theriologica, 28: 83-127.10.4098/AT.arch.83-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lathman J., Staines B.W., Gorman M.L. (1999): Comparative feeding ecology of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Scottish plantation forests. Journal of Zoology, 247: 409-418.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01003.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maizeret C. (1988): Stratigies alimentaires des chevreuils les fondements icologiques d’une diversification du regime. Acta Oecologica, 9: 191-211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcon A., Battocchio D., Apollonio M., Grignolio S. (2019): Assessing precision and requirements of three methods to estimate roe deer density. PLoS ONE, 14(10): e022234910.1371/journal.pone.0222349678658831600228
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Militko R., Kowalik B., Majewska P.M., Kędzierska A., McEwan R. N., Bełżecki G. (2020): The effect of Protozoa on the bacterial composition and hydrolytic activity of the roe deer rumen. Animals, 10(3): 467.10.3390/ani10030467714263632168784
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Popović Z., Đorđević N., Đorđević M., Grubić G., Stojanović B. (2009): Procena kvaliteta ishrane srne na osnovu hemijske analize buražnog sadržaja. Acta Veterinaria, 59(5-6): 653-663.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shipley L.A., Forbey J.S., Moore B.D. (2009): Revisiting the dietary niche: When is a mammalian herbivore a specialist. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 49: 274-290.10.1093/icb/icp05121665820
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Srebočan E., Crnić A.P., Kabalin A.E., Lazarus M., Tomljanović K., Perović S., Čož-Rakovac R. (2011): Cadmium, lead, and mercury concentrations in tissues of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) and wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) from lowland Croatia. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 29(6): 624-633.10.17221/249/2010-CJFS
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statistica software 13.5.0.17, TIBCO Software, USA
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tixier H. & Duncan P. (1996): Are European roe deer browsers? A review of variations in the composition of their diets. Revue d’Ecologie, Terre et Vie, Société nationale de protection de la nature, 51(1): 3-17.10.3406/revec.1996.2189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watanabe T. & Takatsuki S. (1993): Comparison of nitrogen and fiber concentrations in rumen and fecal contents of sika deer. The Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan, 18(1): 43-48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weiner J. (1977): Energy metabolism of the roe deer. Acta Theriologica, 22: 3-24. doi:10.4098/AT.arch.77-110.4098/AT.arch.77-1
]Search in Google Scholar
