This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Araar, A., Duclos, J-Y., Audet, M., & Makdissi, P. (2009). Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(4), 853–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.xAraarA.DuclosJ-Y.AudetM.MakdissiP.2009Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico554853881https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ashley, R. (2007). Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay result. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001AshleyR.2007Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay result17333338https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.00110.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911028AtkinsonA. B.1987On the measurement of poverty554749764https://doi.org/10.2307/191102810.2307/1911028Search in Google Scholar
Bibi, S., Duclos, J.-Y., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2012). Assessing absolute and relative pro-poor growth, with an application to selected African countries. Economics: The Open-Access Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6, 20–127. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7BibiS.DuclosJ.-Y.Verdier-ChouchaneA.2012Assessing absolute and relative pro-poor growth, with an application to selected African countries620127https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-710.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7Search in Google Scholar
Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000DollarD.KraayA.2002Growth is good for the poor73195225https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102013963100010.1093/0199268657.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Duclos, J. Y. (2009). What is pro-poor? Social Choice and Welfare, 32(1), 37–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-xDuclosJ. Y.2009What is pro-poor?3213758http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x10.1007/s00355-008-0308-xSearch in Google Scholar
Essama-Nssah, B., & Lambert, P. J. (2009). Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 752–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.xEssama-NssahB.LambertP. J.2009Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results553752778https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.x10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.xSearch in Google Scholar
Foster, J. E., & Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Poverty orderings. Econometrica, 56(1), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911846FosterJ. E.ShorrocksA. F.1988Poverty orderings561173177https://doi.org/10.2307/191184610.2307/1911846Search in Google Scholar
Grimm, M. (2007). Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growth. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-4GrimmM.2007Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growth52179197https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-410.1007/s10888-006-9038-4Search in Google Scholar
Grosse, M., Harttgen, K., & Klasen, S. (2008). Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensions. World Development, 36(3), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009GrosseM.HarttgenK.KlasenS.2008Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensions36310211047https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.00910.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009Search in Google Scholar
Harmáček, J., Syrovátka, M., & Dušková L. (2017), Pro-poor growth in East Africa. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64(C), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002HarmáčekJ.SyrovátkaM.DuškováL.2017Pro-poor growth in East Africa64C8293https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.00210.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., Khandker, S., & Son, H. H. (2004). Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies. Working paper; New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444KakwaniN.KhandkerS.SonH. H.2004Working paper;New YorkUnited Nations Development Programmehttps://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-44410.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Pernia, E. M. (2000). What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review, 18(1), 1–16.KakwaniN.PerniaE. M.2000What is pro-poor growth?18111610.1142/S0116110500000014Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Son H. (2004). Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies. The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444KakwaniN.SonH.2004Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies424417444https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-44410.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444Search in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Son, H. H. (2008). Poverty equivalent growth rate Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.xKakwaniN.SonH. H.2008Poverty equivalent growth rate544643655https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.x10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kakwani, N., & Subbarao, K. (1990). Rural poverty and its alleviation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(13), A2–A16.KakwaniN.SubbaraoK.1990Rural poverty and its alleviation in India2513A2A16Search in Google Scholar
Klasen, S. (2008). Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicators. World Development, 36(3), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008KlasenS.2008Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicators363420445https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.00810.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008Search in Google Scholar
Kośny, M., & Yalonetzky, G. (2015). Relative income change and pro-poor growth. Economia Politica, 32(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-8KośnyM.YalonetzkyG.2015Relative income change and pro-poor growth323311327https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-810.1007/s40888-015-0017-8Search in Google Scholar
Kraay, A. (2006). When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics, 80(1), 198–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004KraayA.2006When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries801198227https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.00410.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004Search in Google Scholar
Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, J. Lelliewell (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being (pp. 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006LayardR.MayrazG.NickellS.2010Does relative income matter? Are the critics right?InDienerE.KahnemanD.LelliewellJ.(Eds.),139165OxfordOxford University Presshttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.000610.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Lo Bue, M., & Palmisano, F. (2019). The individual poverty incidence of growth. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(6), 1295–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12362Lo BueM.PalmisanoF.2019The individual poverty incidence of growth82612951321https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.1236210.35188/UNU-WIDER/2019/675-3Search in Google Scholar
Lopez, H. (2006). Did Growth Become Less Pro-Poor in the 1990s? Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3931LopezH.2006Washington, DCWorld Bankhttps://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-393110.1596/1813-9450-3931Search in Google Scholar
Moyes, P. (1999). Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curve., In J. Silber (Ed.), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement. Boston: Kluwer, 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7MoyesP.1999Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curveInSilberJ.(Ed.),BostonKluwer199225https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_710.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7Search in Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors. Paris: OECD.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development2007ParisOECDSearch in Google Scholar
Panek, T. (2011). Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality. Theory and Measurement Practice. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish].PanekT.2011WarsawWarsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish]Search in Google Scholar
Panek, T., Zwierzchowski, J. (2021). Economic Growth, Poverty, Inequality, and Social Transfers in the European Union, Warsaw: SGH Publishing House.PanekT.ZwierzchowskiJ.2021WarsawSGH Publishing HouseSearch in Google Scholar
Pen, J. (1971). Income Distribution. New York: Praeger. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230231PenJ.1971New YorkPraegerhttps://doi.org/10.2307/223023110.2307/2230231Search in Google Scholar
Ravallion, M. (1994). Poverty Comparisons. Chur: Harwood Academic.RavallionM.1994ChurHarwood AcademicSearch in Google Scholar
Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 78(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-7RavallionM.ChenS.2003Measuring pro-poor growth7819399https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-710.1596/1813-9450-2666Search in Google Scholar
Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2009). Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004. El Trimestre Economico, 76(301), 67–100.Ruiz-CastilloJ.2009Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004763016710010.20430/ete.v76i301.475Search in Google Scholar
Son, H. H. (2004), A note on pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 82(3), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003SonH. H.2004A note on pro-poor growth823307314https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.00310.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003Search in Google Scholar
Son, H. H., & Kakwani, N. (2008). Global estimates of pro-poor growth. World Development, 36(6), 1048–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002SonH. H.KakwaniN.2008Global estimates of pro-poor growth36610481066https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.00210.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Subramanian, S. (2004). Indicators on Inequality and Poverty. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University.SubramanianS.2004HelsinkiWorld Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Tebaldi, E., & Kim, J (2015). Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis. Eastern Economic Journal, 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.14TebaldiE.KimJ2015Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis412251272https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.1410.1057/eej.2014.14Search in Google Scholar
Zeman, K., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth. Social Indicators Research, 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9ZemanK.ShamsuddinS.2017Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth412251272https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-910.1007/s11205-017-1581-9Search in Google Scholar
Zheng, B., (1997). Aggregate poverty measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(2), 123–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00028ZhengB.1997Aggregate poverty measures112123162https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.0002810.1111/1467-6419.00028Search in Google Scholar