Open Access

Has Economic Growth in Balkan Countries Been Pro-Poor in the 2012–2017 period?


Cite

Araar, A., Duclos, J-Y., Audet, M., & Makdissi, P. (2009). Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(4), 853–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x AraarA. DuclosJ-Y. AudetM. MakdissiP. 2009 Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico Review of Income and Wealth 55 4 853 881 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00357.x Search in Google Scholar

Ashley, R. (2007). Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay result. International Review of Economics and Finance, 17, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001 AshleyR. 2007 Growth may be good for the poor, but decline is disastrous: On the non-robustness of the Dollar – Kraay result International Review of Economics and Finance 17 333 338 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001 10.1016/j.iref.2007.09.001 Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. B. (1987). On the measurement of poverty. Econometrica, 55(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911028 AtkinsonA. B. 1987 On the measurement of poverty Econometrica 55 4 749 764 https://doi.org/10.2307/1911028 10.2307/1911028 Search in Google Scholar

Bibi, S., Duclos, J.-Y., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2012). Assessing absolute and relative pro-poor growth, with an application to selected African countries. Economics: The Open-Access Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6, 20–127. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7 BibiS. DuclosJ.-Y. Verdier-ChouchaneA. 2012 Assessing absolute and relative pro-poor growth, with an application to selected African countries Economics: The Open-Access Open-Assessment E-Journal 6 20 127 https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-7 Search in Google Scholar

Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000 DollarD. KraayA. 2002 Growth is good for the poor Journal of Economic Growth 7 3 195 225 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020139631000 10.1093/0199268657.003.0002 Search in Google Scholar

Duclos, J. Y. (2009). What is pro-poor? Social Choice and Welfare, 32(1), 37–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x DuclosJ. Y. 2009 What is pro-poor? Social Choice and Welfare 32 1 37 58 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x 10.1007/s00355-008-0308-x Search in Google Scholar

Essama-Nssah, B., & Lambert, P. J. (2009). Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 752–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.x Essama-NssahB. LambertP. J. 2009 Measuring pro-poorness: A unifying approach with new results Review of Income and Wealth 55 3 752 778 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.x 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00335.x Search in Google Scholar

Foster, J. E., & Shorrocks, A. F. (1988). Poverty orderings. Econometrica, 56(1), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911846 FosterJ. E. ShorrocksA. F. 1988 Poverty orderings Econometrica 56 1 173 177 https://doi.org/10.2307/1911846 10.2307/1911846 Search in Google Scholar

Grimm, M. (2007). Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growth. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-4 GrimmM. 2007 Removing the anonymity axiom in assessing pro-poor growth Journal of Economic Inequality 5 2 179 197 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-006-9038-4 10.1007/s10888-006-9038-4 Search in Google Scholar

Grosse, M., Harttgen, K., & Klasen, S. (2008). Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensions. World Development, 36(3), 1021–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009 GrosseM. HarttgenK. KlasenS. 2008 Measuring pro-poor growth in nonincome dimensions World Development 36 3 1021 1047 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.009 Search in Google Scholar

Harmáček, J., Syrovátka, M., & Dušková L. (2017), Pro-poor growth in East Africa. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64(C), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002 HarmáčekJ. SyrovátkaM. DuškováL. 2017 Pro-poor growth in East Africa The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 64 C 82 93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002 10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.002 Search in Google Scholar

Kakwani, N., Khandker, S., & Son, H. H. (2004). Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies. Working paper; New York: United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 KakwaniN. KhandkerS. SonH. H. 2004 Pro-Poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies Working paper; New York United Nations Development Programme https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 Search in Google Scholar

Kakwani, N., & Pernia, E. M. (2000). What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review, 18(1), 1–16. KakwaniN. PerniaE. M. 2000 What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review 18 1 1 16 10.1142/S0116110500000014 Search in Google Scholar

Kakwani, N., & Son H. (2004). Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies. The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 KakwaniN. SonH. 2004 Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies The Pakistan Development Review 42 4 417 444 https://doi.org/10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 10.30541/v42i4Ipp.417-444 Search in Google Scholar

Kakwani, N., & Son, H. H. (2008). Poverty equivalent growth rate Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.x KakwaniN. SonH. H. 2008 Poverty equivalent growth rate Review of Income and Wealth 54 4 643 655 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.x 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00293.x Search in Google Scholar

Kakwani, N., & Subbarao, K. (1990). Rural poverty and its alleviation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 25(13), A2–A16. KakwaniN. SubbaraoK. 1990 Rural poverty and its alleviation in India Economic and Political Weekly 25 13 A2 A16 Search in Google Scholar

Klasen, S. (2008). Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicators. World Development, 36(3), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008 KlasenS. 2008 Economic growth and poverty reduction: Measurement issues using income and non-income indicators World Development 36 3 420 445 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.03.008 Search in Google Scholar

Kośny, M., & Yalonetzky, G. (2015). Relative income change and pro-poor growth. Economia Politica, 32(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-8 KośnyM. YalonetzkyG. 2015 Relative income change and pro-poor growth Economia Politica 32 3 311 327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-015-0017-8 10.1007/s40888-015-0017-8 Search in Google Scholar

Kraay, A. (2006). When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics, 80(1), 198–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004 KraayA. 2006 When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries Journal of Development Economics 80 1 198 227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004 Search in Google Scholar

Layard, R., Mayraz, G., & Nickell, S. (2010). Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, J. Lelliewell (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being (pp. 139–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006 LayardR. MayrazG. NickellS. 2010 Does relative income matter? Are the critics right? In DienerE. KahnemanD. LelliewellJ. (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being 139 165 Oxford Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732739.003.0006 Search in Google Scholar

Lo Bue, M., & Palmisano, F. (2019). The individual poverty incidence of growth. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(6), 1295–1321. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12362 Lo BueM. PalmisanoF. 2019 The individual poverty incidence of growth Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 82 6 1295 1321 https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12362 10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2019/675-3 Search in Google Scholar

Lopez, H. (2006). Did Growth Become Less Pro-Poor in the 1990s? Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3931 LopezH. 2006 Did Growth Become Less Pro-Poor in the 1990s? Washington, DC World Bank https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3931 10.1596/1813-9450-3931 Search in Google Scholar

Moyes, P. (1999). Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curve., In J. Silber (Ed.), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement. Boston: Kluwer, 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7 MoyesP. 1999 Stochastic dominance and the Lorenz curve In SilberJ. (Ed.), Handbook on Income Inequality Measurement Boston Kluwer 199 225 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7 10.1007/978-94-011-4413-1_7 Search in Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors. Paris: OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2007 DAC Guidelines and Reference Series Promoting Pro-Poor Growth: Policy Guidance for Donors Paris OECD Search in Google Scholar

Panek, T. (2011). Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality. Theory and Measurement Practice. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish]. PanekT. 2011 Poverty, Social Exclusion and Inequality. Theory and Measurement Practice Warsaw Warsaw School of Economics Press [in Polish] Search in Google Scholar

Panek, T., Zwierzchowski, J. (2021). Economic Growth, Poverty, Inequality, and Social Transfers in the European Union, Warsaw: SGH Publishing House. PanekT. ZwierzchowskiJ. 2021 Economic Growth, Poverty, Inequality, and Social Transfers in the European Union Warsaw SGH Publishing House Search in Google Scholar

Pen, J. (1971). Income Distribution. New York: Praeger. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230231 PenJ. 1971 Income Distribution New York Praeger https://doi.org/10.2307/2230231 10.2307/2230231 Search in Google Scholar

Ravallion, M. (1994). Poverty Comparisons. Chur: Harwood Academic. RavallionM. 1994 Poverty Comparisons Chur Harwood Academic Search in Google Scholar

Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2003). Measuring pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 78(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-7 RavallionM. ChenS. 2003 Measuring pro-poor growth Economics Letters 78 1 93 99 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00205-7 10.1596/1813-9450-2666 Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2009). Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004. El Trimestre Economico, 76(301), 67–100. Ruiz-CastilloJ. 2009 Absolute and relative poverty: The case of Mexico, 1992–2004 El Trimestre Economico 76 301 67 100 10.20430/ete.v76i301.475 Search in Google Scholar

Son, H. H. (2004), A note on pro-poor growth. Economics Letters, 82(3), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003 SonH. H. 2004 A note on pro-poor growth Economics Letters 82 3 307 314 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.08.003 Search in Google Scholar

Son, H. H., & Kakwani, N. (2008). Global estimates of pro-poor growth. World Development, 36(6), 1048–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002 SonH. H. KakwaniN. 2008 Global estimates of pro-poor growth World Development 36 6 1048 1066 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.002 Search in Google Scholar

Subramanian, S. (2004). Indicators on Inequality and Poverty. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University. SubramanianS. 2004 Indicators on Inequality and Poverty Helsinki World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University Search in Google Scholar

Tebaldi, E., & Kim, J (2015). Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis. Eastern Economic Journal, 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.14 TebaldiE. KimJ 2015 Is income growth in the United States pro-poor? A state-level analysis Eastern Economic Journal 41 2 251 272 https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2014.14 10.1057/eej.2014.14 Search in Google Scholar

Zeman, K., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth. Social Indicators Research, 41(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9 ZemanK. ShamsuddinS. 2017 Linear and non-linear relationships between growth, inequality, and poverty in a panel of Latin America and the Caribbean countries: A new evidence of pro-poor growth Social Indicators Research 41 2 251 272 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9 10.1007/s11205-017-1581-9 Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, B., (1997). Aggregate poverty measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(2), 123–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00028 ZhengB. 1997 Aggregate poverty measures Journal of Economic Surveys 11 2 123 162 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00028 10.1111/1467-6419.00028 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2543-6821
Language:
English