1. bookVolume 22 (2018): Issue 3 (November 2018)
Journal Details
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
access type Open Access

Electromyographic Activity Changes of Jaw-Closing Muscles in Patients with Different Occlusion Schemes after Fixed Prosthetic Restoration

Published Online: 29 Oct 2018
Page range: 157 - 162
Received: 28 Sep 2017
Accepted: 12 May 2018
Journal Details
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year

Background/Aim: To investigate the electromyographic (EMG) activity changes of jaw-closing muscles in patients with different occlusion schemes and posterior edentulous span, after the placement of teeth-supported fixed partial denture (FPD).

Material and Methods: The study sample consisted of 20 patients (10 men and 10 women, the mean age being 50 years) with a posterior edentulous area that includes two missing premolars or one premolar and one molar. The participants were divided into two groups with different occlusion schemes: canine-guided occlusion (CGO) and group function occlusion (GFO). The metal-ceramic FPD were fabricated according to the clinic-standardized protocol. EMG activities of masseter and anterior temporalis patients’ muscles were recorded with bipolar surface electrodes during maximal voluntary clenching. EMG evaluation was repeated twice: (T1) before the fabrication of FPD (T2) after eight weeks of FPD cementation and intraoral functioning of restoration. The data were subjected to Analysis of Variance–ANOVA within the methodological framework of the General Linear Models with Repeated Measures. The Bonferroni test was used to compare multiple mean measures. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS ver. 11.5. The level of significance was predefined at a=0.05.

Results: Group 1 with CGO presented significantly higher levels of masseter (mean maximum EMG average before 79.36μV and 139.68μV after) and temporalis (mean maximum EMG average before 79.07μV and 149.37μV after) EMG activity after FPD placement. Group 2 with GFO also showed significantly higher levels of masseter (mean maximum EMG average before 61.57μV and 165.30μV after) and temporalis (mean maximum EMG average before 56.94μV and 133.08μV after) EMG activity after the prosthetic restoration.

Conclusions: It may be concluded that fixed prosthetic restoration, in both patients with canine-guided and group function occlusion, results in increased EMG jaw-muscle activity.


1. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function - a review of the literature. III. Masticatory performance and efficiency. J Oral Rehabil, 1976;3:57-67.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00929.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Bakke M, Michler L, Möller E. Occlusal control of mandibular elevator muscles. Scand J Dent Res, 1992;100:284-91.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01072.xSearch in Google Scholar

3. Ringqvist M. Fiber types in human masticatory muscles. Relation to function. Scand J Dent Res, 1974;82:333-355.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1974.tb00388.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Lavigne G, Kim JS, Valliquette C, Lund JP. Evidence that periodontal pressoreceptors provide positive feedback to jaw closing muscles during mastication. J Neurophysiol, 1987;58:342-358.10.1152/jn.1987.58.2.342Search in Google Scholar

5. Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Kagawa R, Enoki K, Okada T, Yoshida M, Maeda Y. Masticatory performance in older subjects with varying degrees of tooth loss. J Dent, 2012;40:71-76.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.007Search in Google Scholar

6. Castroflorio T, Bracco P, Farina D. Surface electromyography in the assessment of jaw elevator muscles. J Oral Rehabil, 2008;35:638-645.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01864.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Ahlberg K, Savolainen A, Paju S, Hublin C, Partinen M, Könönen M, Ahlberg J. Bruxism and sleep efficiency measured at home with wireless devices. J Oral Rehabil, 2008;35:567-571.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01875.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Dahlström L. Electromyographic studies of craniomandibular disorders: a review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil, 1989;16:1-20.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01312.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Visser A, Kroon GW, Naeije M, Hansson TL. EMG differences between weak and strong myogenous CMD patients and healthy controls. J Oral Rehabil, 1995;22:429-434.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00796.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH. Bite force, endurance and masseter muscle fatigue in healthy edentulous subjects and those with TMD. J Oral Rehabil, 1999;26:321-328.10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00383.xSearch in Google Scholar

11. Basmajian JV. Biofeedback in medical practice. Can Med Assoc J, 1978;119:8-10.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ferrario VF, Tartaglia GM, Galletta A, Grassi GP, Sforza C. The influence of occlusion on jaw and neck muscle activity: a surface EMG study in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil, 2006;33:341-348.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01558.xSearch in Google Scholar

13. Shupe RJ, Mohamed SE, Christensen LV, Finger IM, Weinberg R. Effects of occlusal guidance on jaw muscle activity. J Prosthet Dent, 1984;51:811-818.10.1016/0022-3913(84)90382-2Search in Google Scholar

14. Akören AC, Karaağaçlioğlu L. Comparison of the electromyographic activity of individuals with canine guidance and group function occlusion. J Oral Rehabil, 1995;22:73-77.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00213.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Tartaglia GM, Testori T, Pallavera A, Marelli B, Sforza C. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008;19:1081-1088.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01574.xSearch in Google Scholar

16. Okano N, Baba K, Akishige S, Ohyama T. The influence of altered occlusal guidance on condylar displacement. J Oral Rehabil, 2002;29:1091-1098.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00937.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Belser US, Hannam AG. The influence of altered working-side occlusal guidance on masticatory muscles and related jaw movement. J Prosthet Dent, 198;53:406-413.10.1016/0022-3913(85)90523-2Search in Google Scholar

18. Okano N, Baba K, Igarashi Y. Influence of altered occlusal guidance on masticatory muscle activity during clenching. J Oral Rehabil, 2007;34:679-684.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01762.xSearch in Google Scholar

19. Ferro KJ. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent, 2005;94:10-92.10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013Search in Google Scholar

20. Abduo J, Tennant M. Impact of lateral occlusion schemes: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 2015;114:193-204.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.032Search in Google Scholar

21. Shillingburg HT et al. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th Edition Chichago: Quintessence Publishing, 2012; pp:5-150.Search in Google Scholar

22. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent, 2001;85:363-376.10.1067/mpr.2001.114685Search in Google Scholar

23. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006; pp:209-285.Search in Google Scholar

24. Yemm R. The orderly recruitment of motor units of the masseter and temporal muscles during voluntary isometric contraction in man. J Physiol, 1977;265:163-174.10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011710Search in Google Scholar

25. Roy SH, De Luca CJ, Schneider J. Effects of electrode location on myoelectric conduction velocity and median frequency estimates. J Appl Physiol, 1986;61:1510-1517.10.1152/jappl.1986.61.4.1510Search in Google Scholar

26. Georgiakaki I, Tortopidis D, Garefis P, Kiliaridis S. Ultrasonographic thickness and electromyographic activity of masseter muscle of human females. J Oral Rehabil, 2007;34:121-128.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01677.xSearch in Google Scholar

27. Ferrario VF, Sforza C. Coordinated electromyographic activity of the human masseter and temporalis anterior muscles during mastication. Eur J Oral Sci, 1996;104:511-517.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00134.xSearch in Google Scholar

28. Hugger A, Hugger S, Schindler HJ. Surface electromyography of the masticatory muscles for application in dental practice. Current evidence and future developments. Int J Comput Dent, 2008;11:81-106.Search in Google Scholar

29. Wozniak K, Piatkowska D, Lipski M, Mehr K. Surface electromyography in orthodontics - a literature review. Med Sci Monit, 2013;19:416-423.10.12659/MSM.883927Search in Google Scholar

30. Svensson P, Graven-Nielsen T. Craniofacial muscle pain: review of mechanisms and clinical manifestations. J Orofac Pain, 2001;15:117-145.Search in Google Scholar

31. Suvinen TI, Kemppainen P. Review of clinical EMG studies related to muscle and occlusal factors in healthy and TMD subjects. J Oral Rehabil, 2007;34:631-644.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01769.xSearch in Google Scholar

32. Lund JP, Widmer CG. Evaluation of the use of surface electromyography in the diagnosis, documentation, and treatment of dental patients. J Craniomandib, 1989;3:125-137.Search in Google Scholar

33. Suvinen TI, Malmberg J, Forster C, Kemppainen P. Postural and dynamic masseter and anterior temporalis muscle EMG repeatability in serial assessments. J Oral Rehabil, 2009;36:814-820.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01999.xSearch in Google Scholar

34. Sforza C, Rosati R, De Menezes M, Musto F, Toma M. EMG analysis of trapezius and masticatory muscles: experimental protocol and data reproducibility. J Oral Rehabil, 2011;38:648-654.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02208.xSearch in Google Scholar

35. Walker SM, Schrodt GR. I segment lengths and thin filament periods in skeletal muscle fibres of the Rhesus monkey and human. Anatomical Record, 1973;178:63-82.Search in Google Scholar

36. Manns A, Miralles R, Palazzi C. EMG, bite force, and elongation of the masseter muscle under isometric voluntary contractions and variations of vertical dimension. J Prosthet Dent, 1979;42:674-682.10.1016/0022-3913(79)90200-2Search in Google Scholar

37. Van Eijden TM, Raadsheer MC. Heterogeneity of fiber and sarcomere length in the human masseter muscle. Anat Rec, 1992;232:78-84.10.1002/ar.1092320109Search in Google Scholar

38. Botelho AL, Melchior Mde O, da Silva AM, da Silva MA. Electromyographic evaluation of neuromuscular coordination of subject after orthodontic intervention. Cranio, 2009;27:152-158.10.1179/crn.2009.023Search in Google Scholar

39. Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC, Pain MT. Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil, 2011;38:655-660.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02205.xSearch in Google Scholar

40. Mac Donald JW, Hannam AG. Relationship between occlusal contacts and jaw-closing muscle activity during tooth clenching: Part I. J Prosthet Dent, 1984;52:718-728.10.1016/0022-3913(84)90149-5Search in Google Scholar

41. Ferrario VF, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Caruso E, Sforza C. Relationship between the number of occlusal contacts and masticatory muscle activity in healthy young adults. Cranio, 2002;20:91-98.10.1080/08869634.2002.11746196Search in Google Scholar

42. Bakke M. Mandibular elevator muscles: physiology, action, and effect of dental occlusion. Scand J Dent Res, 1993;101:314-331.10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01127.xSearch in Google Scholar

43. Kerstein RB. Combining technologies: a computerized occlusal analysis system synchronized with a computerized electromyography system. Cranio, 2004;22:96-109.10.1179/crn.2004.013Search in Google Scholar

44. Haraldson T, Carlsson GE, Ingervall B. Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges. Acta Odontol Scand, 1979;37:195-206.10.3109/00016357909027582Search in Google Scholar

45. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Masseter muscle fatigue during sustained clenching in subjects with complete dentures, implant-supported prostheses, and natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent, 1993;69:305-313.10.1016/0022-3913(93)90111-ZSearch in Google Scholar

46. Bersani E, Regalo SC, Siessere S, Santos CM, Chimello DT, De Oliveira RH, Semprini M. Implant-supported prosthesis following Brånemark protocol on electromyography of masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil, 2011;38:668-673.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02201.xSearch in Google Scholar

47. von der Gracht I, Derks A, Haselhuhn K, Wolfart S. EMG correlations of edentulous patients with implant overdentures and fixed dental prostheses compared to conventional complete dentures and dentates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017;28:765-773.10.1111/clr.12874Search in Google Scholar

48. Wood WW, Tobias DL. EMG response to alteration of tooth contacts on occlusal splints during maximal clenching. J Prosthet Dent, 1984;51:394-396.10.1016/0022-3913(84)90229-4Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo