1. bookVolume 22 (2018): Issue 3 (November 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2335-0245
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Morphometric Analysis of Greater Palatine Canal via Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Published Online: 29 Oct 2018
Page range: 150 - 156
Received: 16 Nov 2017
Accepted: 25 Jun 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2335-0245
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Summary

Background/Aim: The morphology of the greater palatine canal (GPC) should be determined preoperatively to prevent possible complications in surgical procedures required maxillary nerve block anesthesia and reduction of descending palatine artery bleeding. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the GPC morphology.

Material and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, cone-beam computed tomography images obtained for various causes of 200 patients (females, 55%; males, 45%) age ranged between 18 and 86 (mean age±standard deviation=47±13.6) were examined. The mean length, mean angles of the GPC and anatomic routes of the GPC were evaluated.

Results: The mean length of the GPC was found to be 31.07 mm and 32.01 mm in sagittal and coronal sections, respectively. The mean angle of the GPC was measured as 156.16° and 169.23° in sagittal and coronal sections. The mean angle of the GPC with horizontal plane was measured as 113.76° in the sagittal sections and 92.94° in the coronal sections. The mean GPC length was longer in males than in females.

Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the most common pathway of the GPC was “first inferior, and then anterior-inferior direction” in sagittal plane and “first medial-inferior, then inferior direction” in coronal plane.

Keywords

1. Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Methathrathip D, Sangvichien S, Karuwanarint S. Clinical anatomy of the posterior maxilla pertaining to Le Fort I osteotomy in Thais. Clin Anat, 2005;18:323-329.10.1002/ca.20131Search in Google Scholar

2. Douglas R, Wormald PJ. Pterygopalatine fossa infiltration through the greater palatine foramen: where to bend the needle. Laryngoscope, 2006;116:1255-1257.10.1097/01.mlg.0000226005.43817.a2Search in Google Scholar

3. Lepere AJ. Maxillary nerve block via the greater palatine canal: new look at an old technique. Anesth Pain Control Dent, 1993;2:195-197.Search in Google Scholar

4. Malamed SF, Trieger N. Intraoral maxillary nerve block: an anatomical and clinical study. Anesth Prog, 1983;30:44-48.Search in Google Scholar

5. Methathrathip D, Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Lertsirithong A, Ariyawatkul T, Sangvichien S. Anatomy of greater palatine foramen and canal and pterygopalatine fossa in Thais: considerations for maxillary nerve block. Surg Radiol Anat, 2005;27:511-516.10.1007/s00276-005-0016-5Search in Google Scholar

6. Wong JD, Sved AM. Maxillary nerve block anaesthesia via the greater palatine canal: a modified technique and case reports. Aust Dent J, 1991;36:15-21.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1991.tb00802.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Erdogan N, Unur E, Baykara M. CT anatomy of pterygopalatine fossa and its communications: a pictorial review. Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2003;27:481-487.10.1016/S0895-6111(03)00038-7Search in Google Scholar

8. Norton NS. Netter’s head and neck anatomy for dentistry. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012:65-106 p.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sved AM, Wong JD, Donkor P, Horan J, Rix L, Curtin J, et al. Complications associated with maxillary nerve block anaesthesia via the greater palatine canal. Aust Dent J, 1992;37:340-345.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00758.x1444954Search in Google Scholar

10. Howard-Swirzinski K, Edwards PC, Saini TS, Norton NS. Length and geometric patterns of the greater palatine canal observed in cone beam computed tomography. Int J Dent, 2010 (2010) DOI:10.1155/2010/292753.10.1155/2010/292753294308420871845Search in Google Scholar

11. Rossi M, Ribeiro E, Smith R. Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study. Angle Orthod, 2003;73:381-385.Search in Google Scholar

12. Sheikhi M, Zamaninaser A, Jalalian F. Length and anatomic routes of the greater palatine canal as observed by cone beam computed tomography. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 2003;10:155-161.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hwang SH, Seo JH, Joo YH, Kim BG, Cho JH, Kang JM. An anatomic study using three–dimensional reconstruction for pterygopalatine fossa infiltration via the greater palatine canal. Clin Anat, 2001;24:576-582.10.1002/ca.2113421400608Search in Google Scholar

14. Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůzek J. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio–facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. Homo, 2010;61:16-32.10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.00420152969Search in Google Scholar

15. Orish CN, Didia BC. Micrometric and micrometric study of sexual dimorphism in foramina of middle crania fossa of adult Nigerians. Int J Morphol, 2010;28:519-524.Search in Google Scholar

16. Takegosh H, Kikuchi S. An anatomic study of the horizontal petrous internal carotid artery: Sex and age differences. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2007;34:297-301.10.1016/j.anl.2007.01.00717379462Search in Google Scholar

17. Tomaszewska IM, Kmiotek EK, Pena IZ, Średniawa M, Czyżowska K, Chrzan R, et al. Computed tomography morphometric analysis of the greater palatine canal: a study of 1,500 head CT scans and a systematic review of literature. Anat Sci Int, 2014;90:287-297.10.1007/s12565-014-0263-9454801525467526Search in Google Scholar

18. Das S, Kim D, Cannon TY, Ebert CS Jr, Senior BA. High – resolution computed tomography analysis of the greater palatine canal. Am J Rhinol, 2006;20:603-608.10.2500/ajr.2006.20.294917181102Search in Google Scholar

19. Soto RA, Cáceres F, Vera C. Morphometry of the greater palatal canal in adult skulls. J Craniofac Surg, 2015;26:1697-1699.10.1097/SCS.000000000000160026079119Search in Google Scholar

20. McKinney KA, Stadler ME, Wong YT, Shah RN, Rose AS, Zdanski CJ, et al. Transpalatal greater palatine canal injection: Radioanatomic analysis of where to bend the needle for pediatric sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol, 2010;24:385-388.10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3496307619421244740Search in Google Scholar

21. Wang TM, Kuo KJ, Shih C, Ho LL, Liu JC. Assessment of the relative locations of the greater palatine foramen in adult Chinese skulls. Acta Anat, 1998;132:182-186.10.1159/0001465723414365Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo