1. bookVolume 22 (2018): Issue 3 (November 2018)
Journal Details
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
access type Open Access

Success of Complete Denture Treatment, Detailed Investigation of Construction Protocols, Occlusal Schemes and Evaluation Questionnaires

Published Online: 29 Oct 2018
Page range: 115 - 122
Received: 27 Nov 2017
Accepted: 25 May 2018
Journal Details
First Published
06 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
3 times per year

Background/Aim: The successful outcome of conventional complete denture treatment can be defined with the use of both subjective and objective criteria. Denture satisfaction determinants may include denture quality, oral tissue condition, patient-dentist relationship, patient’s attitude toward dentures, patient’s personality and socioeconomic factors. Purpose: The aim of the current review was to identify and analyze the different construction protocols and occlusal schemes that contribute to the success of complete denture rehabilitation through the use of evaluation questionnaires.

Material and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed through electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed) using the appropriate key words (complete denture construction, complete denture fabrication, complete denture occlusion and complete denture occlusal scheme). The related to the subject scientific papers were selected and evaluated for eligibility utilizing a predefined review process (English, full text articles, published from January 2000 up to April 2017).

Results: None of the analyzed studies identified significant differences between dentures constructed with simplified, CAD/CAM and traditional protocols in terms of general satisfaction and Oral Health Related Quality of Life scales. The same condition applied to the studies which compared complete dentures with bilateral balanced, lingualized, monoplane and canine guided occlusion.

Conclusions: Current scientific evidence suggested that patients could adapt comfortably to any type of bilateral balanced occlusal scheme and to complete dentures been fabricated with all types of complete denture construction protocol. Disease-specific questionnaires could be considered valuable tools and should be used to assess the outcome of any treatment modality.


1. Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil, 2010;37:143-156.Search in Google Scholar

2. Vahidi F, Pinto-Sinai G. Complications associated with implant-retained removable prostheses. Dent Clin North Am, 2015;59:215-226.10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.001Search in Google Scholar

3. Leles CR, Ferreira NP, Vieira AH, Campos ACV, Silva ET. Factors influencing edentulous patients’ preferences for prosthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil, 2011;38:333-339.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02158.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Heydecke G, Penrod JR, Takanashi Y, Lund JP, Feine JS, Thomason JM. Cost-effectiveness of Mandibular Two-implant Overdentures and Conventional Dentures in the Edentulous Elderly. J Dent Res, 2005;84:794-799.10.1177/154405910508400903Search in Google Scholar

5. Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont, 2004;17:181-186.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.016Search in Google Scholar

6. McCord JF. Contemporary techniques for denture fabrication. J Prosthodont, 2009;18:106-111.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00439.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Clark RKF, Radford DR, Fenlon MR. The future of teaching of complete denture construction to undergraduates in the UK: is a replacement denture technique the answer? Br Dent J, 2004;196:571-575.Search in Google Scholar

8. Arbree NS, Fleck S, Askinas SW. The results of a brief survey of complete denture prosthodontic techniques in predoctoral programs in North American dental schools. J Prosthodont, 1996;5:219-225.10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00300.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Duncan J, Taylor T. Teaching an abbreviated impression technique for complete dentures in an undergraduate dental curriculum. J Prosthet Dent, 2001;85:121-125.10.1067/mpr.2001.113699Search in Google Scholar

10. Carlsson GE, Örtorp A, Omar R. What is the evidence base for the efficacies of different complete denture impression procedures? A critical review. J Dent, 2013;41:17-23.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.015Search in Google Scholar

11. Nuñez MCO, Silva DC, Barcelos BA, Leles CR. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life after treatment with traditional and simplified protocols for complete denture construction. Gerodontology, 2015;32:247-253.10.1111/ger.12078Search in Google Scholar

12. Vecchia MP Della, Regis RR, Cunha TR, de Andrade IM, da Matta JCS, De Souza RF. A Randomized trial on simplified and conventional methods for complete denture fabrication: Cost analysis. J Prosthodont, 2014;23:182-191.10.1111/jopr.12090Search in Google Scholar

13. Regis RR, Cunha TR, Della Vecchia MP, Ribeiro AB, Silva-Lovato CH, De Souza RF. A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: Patient perception and quality. J Oral Rehabil, 2013;40:535-545.10.1111/joor.12063Search in Google Scholar

14. Cunha TR, Della Vecchia MP, Regis RR, Ribeiro AB, Muglia VA, Mestriner W Jr. et al. A randomised trial on simplified and conventional methods for complete denture fabrication: Masticatory performance and ability. J Dent, 2013;41:133-142.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.008Search in Google Scholar

15. Kawai Y, Murakami H, Shariati B, Klemetti E, Blomfield JV, Billette L. et al. Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques? J Dent, 2005;33:659-668.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kawai Y, Murakami H, Takanashi Y, Lund JP, Feine JS. Efficient resource use in simplified complete denture fabrication. J Prosthodont, 2010;19:512-516.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00628.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Heydecke G, Vogeler M, Wolkewitz M, Türp JC, Strub JR. Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: patient ratings of denture satisfaction from a randomized crossover trial. Quintessence Int, 2008;39:107-116.Search in Google Scholar

18. Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: Systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent, 2013;109:361-366.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60318-2Search in Google Scholar

19. Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A. An update on computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review on clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent, 2017;117:478-485.10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.017Search in Google Scholar

20. Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent, 2015;114:818-825.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.001Search in Google Scholar

21. Schwindling FS, Stober T. A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent, 2016;116:756-763.10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.022Search in Google Scholar

22. Müller F. Interventions for edentate elders--what is the evidence? Gerodontology, 2014;31:44-51.Search in Google Scholar

23. Scott BJ, Forgie A. H, Davis DM. A study to compare the oral health impact profile and satisfaction before and after having replacement complete dentures constructed by either the copy or the conventional technique. Gerodontology, 2006;23:79-86.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00112.xSearch in Google Scholar

24. Ellis JS, Pelekis ND, Thomason JM. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. J Prosthodont, 2007;16:37-42.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00152.xSearch in Google Scholar

25. Kamalakidis SN, Anastassiadou V, Sofou A, Pissiotis AL. Comparative Study of Acceptance and Adaptation to New Complete Dentures, Using Two Construction Protocols. J Prosthodont, 2016;25:536-543.10.1111/jopr.12466Search in Google Scholar

26. Abduo J. Occlusal Schemes for Complete Dentures: A Systematic Review. Int J Prosthodont, 2013;26:26-33.10.11607/ijp.3168Search in Google Scholar

27. Carlsson GE. Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res, 2009;53:3-10.10.1016/j.jpor.2008.08.003Search in Google Scholar

28. Zhao K, Mai QQ, Wang XD, Yang W, Zhao L. Occlusal designs on masticatory ability and patient satisfaction with complete denture: A systematic review. J Dent, 2013;41:1036-1042.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.016Search in Google Scholar

29. Peroz I, Leuenberg A, Haustein I, Lange KP. Comparison between balanced occlusion and canine guidance in complete denture wearers- a clinical, randomized trial. Quintessence Int, 2003;34:607-612.Search in Google Scholar

30. Rehmann P, Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wöstmann B. Influence of the occlusal concept of complete dentures on patient satisfaction in the initial phase after fitting: bilateral balanced occlusion vs canine guidance. Int J Prosthodont, 2008;21:60-61.Search in Google Scholar

31. Farias NA, Mestriner W Jr, Carreiro AA. Masticatory efficiency in denture wearers with bilateral balanced occlusion and canine guidance. Braz Dent J, 2010;21:165-169.10.1590/S0103-64402010000200013Search in Google Scholar

32. Paleari AG, Marra J, Rodriguez LS, de Souza RF, Pero AC, Mollo Fde A Jr. et al. A cross-over randomised clinical trial of eccentric occlusion in complete dentures. J Oral Rehabil, 2012;39:615-622.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02299.xSearch in Google Scholar

33. Schierz O, Reissmann D. Influence of guidance concept in complete dentures on oral health related quality of life – Canine guidance vs. bilateral balanced occlusion. J Prosthodont Res, 2016;60:315-320.10.1016/j.jpor.2016.03.005Search in Google Scholar

34. Sutton AF, Worthington HV, McCord JF. RCT comparing posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Dent Res, 2007;86:651-655.10.1177/154405910708600713Search in Google Scholar

35. Sutton AF, McCord JF. A randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic, lingualized, and zero-degree posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent, 2007;97:292-298.10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.03.003Search in Google Scholar

36. Kimoto S, Kanno K, Kobayashi K. Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Lingualized Occlusion to Bilateral Balanced Occlusion in Complete Dentures: A Pilot Study. Int J Prosthodont, 2006;19:103-109.Search in Google Scholar

37. Matsumaru Y. Influence of mandibular residual ridge resorption on objective masticatory measures of lingualized and fully bilateral balanced denture articulation. J Prosthodont Res, 2010;54:112-118.10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.008Search in Google Scholar

38. Deniz D, Kulak Ozkan Y. The influence of occlusion on masticatory performance and satisfaction in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil, 2013;40:91-98.10.1111/joor.12015Search in Google Scholar

39. Shirani M, Mosharraf R, Shirany M. Comparisons of patient satisfaction levels with complete dentures of different occlusions: a randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont, 2014;23:259-266.10.1111/jopr.12101Search in Google Scholar

40. Niwatcharoenchaikul W, Tumrasvin W, Arksornnukit M. Effect of complete denture occlusal schemes on masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. J Prosthet Dent, 2014;112:1337-1342.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.06.003Search in Google Scholar

41. Heydecke G, Akkad AS, Wolkewitz M, Vogeler M, Türp JC, Strub JR. Patient ratings of chewing ability from a randomised crossover trial: lingualised vs. first premolar/canine-guided occlusion for complete dentures. Gerodontology, 2007;24:77-86.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00153.xSearch in Google Scholar

42. Kawai Y, Ikeguchi N, Suzuki A, Kuwashima A, Sakamoto R, Matsumaru Y. et al. A double blind randomized clinical trial comparing lingualized and fully bilateral balanced posterior occlusion for conventional complete dentures. J Prosthodont Res, 2017;61:113-122.10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.003Search in Google Scholar

43. Gift H, Redford M. Oral health and the quality of life. Clin Geriatr Med, 1992;8:673-683.10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30471-3Search in Google Scholar

44. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont, 2002;15:446-450.Search in Google Scholar

45. Awad MA, Feine JS. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1998;26:400-405.10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01978.xSearch in Google Scholar

46. Anastassiadou V, Heath MR. The effect of denture quality attributes on satisfaction and eating difficulties. Gerodontology, 2006;23:23-32.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00094.xSearch in Google Scholar

47. Anastassiadou V, Katsouli S, Heath MR, Pissiotis A, Kapari D. Validation of communication between elderly denture wearers and dentists: a questionnaire on satisfaction with complete dentures using semi-structured interviews. Gerodontology, 2004;21:195-200.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00038.xSearch in Google Scholar

48. Anastassiadou V, Naka O, Heath MR, Kapari D. Validation of indices for functional assessment of dentures. Gerodontology, 2002;19:46-52.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00046.xSearch in Google Scholar

49. Anastassiadou V, Heath MR. Food choices and eating difficulty among elderly edentate patients in Greece. Gerodontology, 2002;19:17-24.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00017.xSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo