Success of Complete Denture Treatment, Detailed Investigation of Construction Protocols, Occlusal Schemes and Evaluation Questionnaires

1. Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil, 2010;37:143-156.Search in Google Scholar

2. Vahidi F, Pinto-Sinai G. Complications associated with implant-retained removable prostheses. Dent Clin North Am, 2015;59:215-226.10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.001Search in Google Scholar

3. Leles CR, Ferreira NP, Vieira AH, Campos ACV, Silva ET. Factors influencing edentulous patients’ preferences for prosthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil, 2011;38:333-339.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02158.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Heydecke G, Penrod JR, Takanashi Y, Lund JP, Feine JS, Thomason JM. Cost-effectiveness of Mandibular Two-implant Overdentures and Conventional Dentures in the Edentulous Elderly. J Dent Res, 2005;84:794-799.10.1177/154405910508400903Search in Google Scholar

5. Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont, 2004;17:181-186.10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.016Search in Google Scholar

6. McCord JF. Contemporary techniques for denture fabrication. J Prosthodont, 2009;18:106-111.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00439.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Clark RKF, Radford DR, Fenlon MR. The future of teaching of complete denture construction to undergraduates in the UK: is a replacement denture technique the answer? Br Dent J, 2004;196:571-575.Search in Google Scholar

8. Arbree NS, Fleck S, Askinas SW. The results of a brief survey of complete denture prosthodontic techniques in predoctoral programs in North American dental schools. J Prosthodont, 1996;5:219-225.10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00300.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Duncan J, Taylor T. Teaching an abbreviated impression technique for complete dentures in an undergraduate dental curriculum. J Prosthet Dent, 2001;85:121-125.10.1067/mpr.2001.113699Search in Google Scholar

10. Carlsson GE, Örtorp A, Omar R. What is the evidence base for the efficacies of different complete denture impression procedures? A critical review. J Dent, 2013;41:17-23.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.015Search in Google Scholar

11. Nuñez MCO, Silva DC, Barcelos BA, Leles CR. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life after treatment with traditional and simplified protocols for complete denture construction. Gerodontology, 2015;32:247-253.10.1111/ger.12078Search in Google Scholar

12. Vecchia MP Della, Regis RR, Cunha TR, de Andrade IM, da Matta JCS, De Souza RF. A Randomized trial on simplified and conventional methods for complete denture fabrication: Cost analysis. J Prosthodont, 2014;23:182-191.10.1111/jopr.12090Search in Google Scholar

13. Regis RR, Cunha TR, Della Vecchia MP, Ribeiro AB, Silva-Lovato CH, De Souza RF. A randomised trial of a simplified method for complete denture fabrication: Patient perception and quality. J Oral Rehabil, 2013;40:535-545.10.1111/joor.12063Search in Google Scholar

14. Cunha TR, Della Vecchia MP, Regis RR, Ribeiro AB, Muglia VA, Mestriner W Jr. et al. A randomised trial on simplified and conventional methods for complete denture fabrication: Masticatory performance and ability. J Dent, 2013;41:133-142.10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.008Search in Google Scholar

15. Kawai Y, Murakami H, Shariati B, Klemetti E, Blomfield JV, Billette L. et al. Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques? J Dent, 2005;33:659-668.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kawai Y, Murakami H, Takanashi Y, Lund JP, Feine JS. Efficient resource use in simplified complete denture fabrication. J Prosthodont, 2010;19:512-516.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00628.xSearch in Google Scholar

17. Heydecke G, Vogeler M, Wolkewitz M, Türp JC, Strub JR. Simplified versus comprehensive fabrication of complete dentures: patient ratings of denture satisfaction from a randomized crossover trial. Quintessence Int, 2008;39:107-116.Search in Google Scholar

18. Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: Systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent, 2013;109:361-366.10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60318-2Search in Google Scholar

19. Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A. An update on computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review on clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent, 2017;117:478-485.10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.017Search in Google Scholar

20. Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent, 2015;114:818-825.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.001Search in Google Scholar

21. Schwindling FS, Stober T. A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent, 2016;116:756-763.10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.022Search in Google Scholar

22. Müller F. Interventions for edentate elders--what is the evidence? Gerodontology, 2014;31:44-51.Search in Google Scholar

23. Scott BJ, Forgie A. H, Davis DM. A study to compare the oral health impact profile and satisfaction before and after having replacement complete dentures constructed by either the copy or the conventional technique. Gerodontology, 2006;23:79-86.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00112.xSearch in Google Scholar

24. Ellis JS, Pelekis ND, Thomason JM. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. J Prosthodont, 2007;16:37-42.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00152.xSearch in Google Scholar

25. Kamalakidis SN, Anastassiadou V, Sofou A, Pissiotis AL. Comparative Study of Acceptance and Adaptation to New Complete Dentures, Using Two Construction Protocols. J Prosthodont, 2016;25:536-543.10.1111/jopr.12466Search in Google Scholar

26. Abduo J. Occlusal Schemes for Complete Dentures: A Systematic Review. Int J Prosthodont, 2013;26:26-33.10.11607/ijp.3168Search in Google Scholar

27. Carlsson GE. Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res, 2009;53:3-10.10.1016/j.jpor.2008.08.003Search in Google Scholar

28. Zhao K, Mai QQ, Wang XD, Yang W, Zhao L. Occlusal designs on masticatory ability and patient satisfaction with complete denture: A systematic review. J Dent, 2013;41:1036-1042.10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.016Search in Google Scholar

29. Peroz I, Leuenberg A, Haustein I, Lange KP. Comparison between balanced occlusion and canine guidance in complete denture wearers- a clinical, randomized trial. Quintessence Int, 2003;34:607-612.Search in Google Scholar

30. Rehmann P, Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wöstmann B. Influence of the occlusal concept of complete dentures on patient satisfaction in the initial phase after fitting: bilateral balanced occlusion vs canine guidance. Int J Prosthodont, 2008;21:60-61.Search in Google Scholar

31. Farias NA, Mestriner W Jr, Carreiro AA. Masticatory efficiency in denture wearers with bilateral balanced occlusion and canine guidance. Braz Dent J, 2010;21:165-169.10.1590/S0103-64402010000200013Search in Google Scholar

32. Paleari AG, Marra J, Rodriguez LS, de Souza RF, Pero AC, Mollo Fde A Jr. et al. A cross-over randomised clinical trial of eccentric occlusion in complete dentures. J Oral Rehabil, 2012;39:615-622.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02299.xSearch in Google Scholar

33. Schierz O, Reissmann D. Influence of guidance concept in complete dentures on oral health related quality of life – Canine guidance vs. bilateral balanced occlusion. J Prosthodont Res, 2016;60:315-320.10.1016/j.jpor.2016.03.005Search in Google Scholar

34. Sutton AF, Worthington HV, McCord JF. RCT comparing posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Dent Res, 2007;86:651-655.10.1177/154405910708600713Search in Google Scholar

35. Sutton AF, McCord JF. A randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic, lingualized, and zero-degree posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent, 2007;97:292-298.10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.03.003Search in Google Scholar

36. Kimoto S, Kanno K, Kobayashi K. Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Lingualized Occlusion to Bilateral Balanced Occlusion in Complete Dentures: A Pilot Study. Int J Prosthodont, 2006;19:103-109.Search in Google Scholar

37. Matsumaru Y. Influence of mandibular residual ridge resorption on objective masticatory measures of lingualized and fully bilateral balanced denture articulation. J Prosthodont Res, 2010;54:112-118.10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.008Search in Google Scholar

38. Deniz D, Kulak Ozkan Y. The influence of occlusion on masticatory performance and satisfaction in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil, 2013;40:91-98.10.1111/joor.12015Search in Google Scholar

39. Shirani M, Mosharraf R, Shirany M. Comparisons of patient satisfaction levels with complete dentures of different occlusions: a randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont, 2014;23:259-266.10.1111/jopr.12101Search in Google Scholar

40. Niwatcharoenchaikul W, Tumrasvin W, Arksornnukit M. Effect of complete denture occlusal schemes on masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. J Prosthet Dent, 2014;112:1337-1342.10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.06.003Search in Google Scholar

41. Heydecke G, Akkad AS, Wolkewitz M, Vogeler M, Türp JC, Strub JR. Patient ratings of chewing ability from a randomised crossover trial: lingualised vs. first premolar/canine-guided occlusion for complete dentures. Gerodontology, 2007;24:77-86.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00153.xSearch in Google Scholar

42. Kawai Y, Ikeguchi N, Suzuki A, Kuwashima A, Sakamoto R, Matsumaru Y. et al. A double blind randomized clinical trial comparing lingualized and fully bilateral balanced posterior occlusion for conventional complete dentures. J Prosthodont Res, 2017;61:113-122.10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.003Search in Google Scholar

43. Gift H, Redford M. Oral health and the quality of life. Clin Geriatr Med, 1992;8:673-683.10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30471-3Search in Google Scholar

44. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont, 2002;15:446-450.Search in Google Scholar

45. Awad MA, Feine JS. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1998;26:400-405.10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01978.xSearch in Google Scholar

46. Anastassiadou V, Heath MR. The effect of denture quality attributes on satisfaction and eating difficulties. Gerodontology, 2006;23:23-32.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00094.xSearch in Google Scholar

47. Anastassiadou V, Katsouli S, Heath MR, Pissiotis A, Kapari D. Validation of communication between elderly denture wearers and dentists: a questionnaire on satisfaction with complete dentures using semi-structured interviews. Gerodontology, 2004;21:195-200.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00038.xSearch in Google Scholar

48. Anastassiadou V, Naka O, Heath MR, Kapari D. Validation of indices for functional assessment of dentures. Gerodontology, 2002;19:46-52.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00046.xSearch in Google Scholar

49. Anastassiadou V, Heath MR. Food choices and eating difficulty among elderly edentate patients in Greece. Gerodontology, 2002;19:17-24.10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00017.xSearch in Google Scholar

• Three Dimensional Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage at the Adhesive Interface between Different Fissure Sealants and Enamel: Micro-CT Analysis

• Application of Bio-Resorbable Membranes in Preventing Complications of Lower Jaw Surgery