Participatory Planning in Post-socialist Cities: A Case Study of Riga

1. Huxley, M. Historicizing Planning, Problematizing Participation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 37, Issue 5, 2013, pp. 1527–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.1204510.1111/1468-2427.12045 Search in Google Scholar

2. McTague, C., Jakubowski, S. Marching to the beat of a silent drum: Wasted consensus-building and failed neighborhood participatory planning. Applied Geography, Vol. 44, 2013, pp. 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.01910.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.019 Search in Google Scholar

3. Brannan, T., John, P., Stoker, G. Active Citizenship and Effective Public Services and Programmes: How Can We Know What Really Works? Urban Studies, Vol. 43, Issue 5–6, 2006, pp. 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098060067662610.1080/00420980600676626 Search in Google Scholar

4. Aitken, M., Haggett, C., Rudolph, D. Practices and rationales of community engagement with wind farms: awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 17, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.121891910.1080/14649357.2016.1218919 Search in Google Scholar

5. Anggraeni, M., Gupta, J., Verrest, H. J. L. M. Cost and value of stake-holders participation: A systematic literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 101, 2019, pp. 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.01210.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.012 Search in Google Scholar

6. Karrasch, L., Klenke, T., Woltjer, J. Linking the ecosystem services approach to social preferences and needs in integrated coastal land use management – A planning approach. Land Use Policy, Vol. 38, 2014, pp. 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.01010.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.010 Search in Google Scholar

7. Conroy, M. M., Jun, H.-J. Planning process influences on sustainability in Ohio township plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 59, Issue 11, 2016, pp. 2007–2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.110370910.1080/09640568.2015.1103709 Search in Google Scholar

8. Geissel, B. Participatory Governance: Hope or Danger for Democracy? A Case Study of Local Agenda 21. Local Government Studies, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 2009, pp. 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300393090299952210.1080/03003930902999522 Search in Google Scholar

9. Legacy, C. Is there a crisis of participatory planning? Planning Theory, Vol. 16, Issue 4, 2017, pp. 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521666743310.1177/1473095216667433 Search in Google Scholar

10. Arnstein, S. R. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 1969, pp. 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436690897722510.1080/01944366908977225 Search in Google Scholar

11. IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, 2018 [online]. IAP2 International Federation [cited 20.08.2020]. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf Search in Google Scholar

12. Tsenkova, S. Planning trajectories in post-socialist cities: patterns of divergence and change. Urban Research & Practice, Vol. 7, Issue 3, 2014, pp. 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2014.96651310.1080/17535069.2014.966513 Search in Google Scholar

13. Auziņš, A. Key trends and aspects influencing changes into spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference “ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT”, 2018, pp. 26–35. http://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2018.06510.22616/ESRD.2018.065 Search in Google Scholar

14. Nedović-Budić, Z. Adjustment of Planning Practice to the New Eastern and Central European Context. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 67, Issue 1, 2001, pp. 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436010897635410.1080/01944360108976354 Search in Google Scholar

15. Tsenkova, S. Reinventing Strategic Planning in Post-socialist Cities: Experiences from Sofia. European Planning Studies, Vol. 15, Issue 3, 2007, pp. 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431060101713310.1080/09654310601017133 Search in Google Scholar

16. Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Urbonas, V. Urban regeneration in the context of post-Soviet transformation: Lithuanian experience. Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 15, Issue 6, 2014, pp. 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.01.00210.1016/j.culher.2014.01.002 Search in Google Scholar

17. Kotus, J. Position of the Polish city on the ladder of public participation: Are we going the right way? The case of Poznań. Cities, Vol. 35, 2013, pp. 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.08.00110.1016/j.cities.2013.08.001 Search in Google Scholar

18. Poljak Istenič, S., Kozina, J. Participatory Planning in a Post-socialist Urban Context: Experience from Five Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Nared, J., Bole, D. (eds.) Participatory Research and Planning in Practice. The Urban book series. Springer, Cham. 2020, pp. 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28014-7_310.1007/978-3-030-28014-7_3 Search in Google Scholar

19. Lorens, P., Kamrowska-Zaluska, D. Spurring the community involvement in planning - lessons from post-socialist cities. 49th ISOCARP Congress : Frontier of planning – evolving and declining models of city planning practice, 2013, pp. 1–6. Search in Google Scholar

20. Guasti, P. Development of citizen participation in Central and Eastern Europe after the EU enlargement and economic crises. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 49, Issue 3, 2016, pp. 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.06.00610.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.06.006 Search in Google Scholar

21. Kotus, J., Sowada, T., Rzeszewski, M., Mańkowska, P. Anatomy of Place-Making in the Context of the Communication Processes: A Story of one Community and one Square in a Post-Socialist City. Quaestiones Geographicae, Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2019, pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-001510.2478/quageo-2019-0015 Search in Google Scholar

22. Prilenska, V., Liias, R. Challenges of Recent Participatory Urban Design Practices in Riga. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 21, 2015, pp. 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00154-910.1016/S2212-5671(15)00154-9 Search in Google Scholar

23. Holvandus, J., Leetmaa, K. The Views of Neighbourhood Associations on Collaborative Urban Governance in Tallinn, Estonia. plaNext - Next Generation Planning, Vol. 3, 2016, pp. 49–66. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.00410.24306/plnxt.2016.03.004 Search in Google Scholar

24. Koroļova, A., Treija, S. Participatory Budgeting in Urban Regeneration: Defining the Gap Between Formal and Informal Citizen Activism. Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 131–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2019-001810.2478/aup-2019-0018 Search in Google Scholar

25. Treija, S., Bratuškins, U. Participatory Planning: The Role of NGOs in Neighbourhood Regeneration in Riga. Spaces of Dialog for Places of Dignity: Fostering the European Dimension of Planning: Lisbon AESOP Annual Congress 2017: Book of Proceedings, 2017, pp. 609–616. Search in Google Scholar

26. Miķelsone, I. The Role of Social Engagement in the Development of Significant Architectural Objects. Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/aup-2017-000110.1515/aup-2017-0001 Search in Google Scholar

27. Gaber, J. Qualitative Analysis for Planning & Policy : Beyond the Numbers. Oxon: Routledge, 2020. 212 p.10.4324/9780429290190 Search in Google Scholar

28. Rīgas attīstības plāns 1995.–2005. gadam. I sējums. Riga: Apgāds Jāņa sēta, 1995. Search in Google Scholar

29. Liepa-Zemeša, M. Jaunā Rīgas teritorijas plānojuma izstrādes metodika. Latvijas architektūra, Vol. 108, 2013, pp. 78–80. Search in Google Scholar

30. Liepa-Zemeša, M. Pilsēttelpas attīstība Rīgā. Riga: Riga Technical University, 2011. 204 p. Search in Google Scholar

31. Dripe, J. Rīgas attīstības plāns – iespējas, problēmas un risinājumi, 2011 [online]. Goethe-Institut Riga [cited 19.09.2019]. https://www.goethe.de/ins/lv/lv/kul/mag/20490788.html Search in Google Scholar

32. Sabiedrības aktivitāte Teritorijas plānojuma izstrādē, 2005. Riga City Council, City Development Department. Search in Google Scholar

33. Pilnveidotās redakcijas publiskās apspriešanas laikā (no 13.03.2019. līdz 10.04.2019.) saņemto priekšlikumu izvērtējums, 2019 [online]. Riga City Council, City Development Department [cited 09.09.2020]. https://www.rdpad.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/4_Zinojuma_pielikums_nr2_RTP2030_Publiskas_apspriesanas_priekslikumi_2019.xlsx Search in Google Scholar

34. Ziņojums par Rīgas teritorijas plānojuma līdz 2030. gadam publiskās apspriešanas norisi, saņemtajiem priekšlikumiem un institūciju atzinumiem, 2018. Riga City Council, City Development Department. Search in Google Scholar

35. Ziņojums par Rīgas teritorijas plānojuma līdz 2030. gadam pilnveidotās redakcijas publisko apspriešanu, 2019 [online]. Riga City Council, City Development Department [cited 09.09.2020]. https://www.rdpad.lv/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Zinojums11022020.pdf Search in Google Scholar

36. Gaugere, K. Pārskats par nevalstisko organizāciju sektoru Latvijā: 2004. gads, 2005 [online, cited 4.09.2020]. http://providus.lv/article_files/1469/original/parskatsNVO2004.pdf?1331652402 Search in Google Scholar

37. Indriksone, A. Nevalstiskās organizācijas - pašvaldību partneri attīstības plānošanā, 2003 [online, cited 4.09.2020]. http://providus.lv/article_files/1446/original/nvopasvpartn_LV.pdf?1331625050 Search in Google Scholar

38. Rīgas iedzīvotāju aptaujas par dažādiem Rīgas domi interesējošiem jautājumiem rezultāti, 2007 [online]. Tirgus un sabiedriskās domas pētījumu centrs SKDS [cited 4.09.2020]. http://www.sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/isaa_atskaite_rd_082007_0.pdf Search in Google Scholar

39. Rīgas iedzīvotāju apmierinātība ar pašvaldības darbību un pilsētā notiekošajiem procesiem, 2019. [online]. Tirgus un sabiedriskās domas pētījumu centrs SKDS [cited 4.09.2020]. http://www.sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/rd_pad_atskaite_2019.pdf Search in Google Scholar

40. Rīgas iedzīvotāju apmierinātība ar pašvaldības darbību un pilsētā notiekošajiem procesiem, 2018. [online]. Tirgus un sabiedriskās domas pētījumu centrs SKDS [cited 4.09.2020]. http://www.sus.lv/sites/default/files/rd_pad_skds_aptaujas_atskaite_2018.pdf Search in Google Scholar