Open Access

Identifying Key Criteria for Quality Assessment of Landscape Architecture Projects


Cite

1. Dale, V. H., Kline, K. L., Parish, E. S., Eichler, S. E. Engaging stake-holders to assess landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 34, 2019, pp. 1199–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00848-110.1007/s10980-019-00848-1 Search in Google Scholar

2. Rasmussen, L. V., Bierbaum, R., Oldekop, J. A., Agrawal, A. Bridging the Practitioner–Researcher Divide: Indicators to Track Environmental, Economic, and Sociocultural Sustainability of Agricultural Commodity Production. Glob Environ Chang., Vol. 42, 2017, pp. 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.00110.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.001 Search in Google Scholar

3. Musacchio L. R. Key concepts and research priorities for landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 995–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9909-610.1007/s10980-013-9909-6 Search in Google Scholar

4. Wu, J. Landscape Sustainability Science: Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being in Changing Landscapes. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 999–1023.10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9 Search in Google Scholar

5. Gardner, L., Rogers, S., Sipes, J. L. Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Sustainable Landscapes Initiative 2020. U.S. Department of Energy: Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2172/112895410.2172/1128954 Search in Google Scholar

6. Thome, A. M. T., Ceryno, P. S., Scavarda, A., Remmen, A. Sustainable infrastructure: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 184, 2016, pp. 143–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.08010.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.080 Search in Google Scholar

7. Wang, B., Liu, Zh., Mei, Yu., Li, W. Assessment of Ecosystem Service Quality and Its Correlation with Landscape Patterns in Haidian District, Beijing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, 2019, p. 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1607124810.3390/ijerph16071248 Search in Google Scholar

8. Moldan, B., Janouškova, S., Hak, T. How to Understand and Measure Environmental Sustainability: Indicators and Targets. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 17, 2012, pp. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.03310.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033 Search in Google Scholar

9. Wang, Zh., Yang, B. Li, Sh., Binder, Ch. Economic Benefits: Metrics and Methods for Landscape Performance Assessment. Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 424, 2016, pp. 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050424.10.3390/su8050424 Search in Google Scholar

10. Wen, B., Burley, J. B. Expert Opinion Dimensions of Rural Landscape Quality in Xiangxi, Hunan, China: Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis. Sustainability, Vol. 12, 2020, p. 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1204131610.3390/su12041316 Search in Google Scholar

11. Mahdiraji, H. A., Arzaghi, S., Stauskis, G., Zavadskas, E. K. A hybrid fuzzy BWM-COPRAS method for analyzing key factors of sustainable architecture // Sustainability. Basel: MDPI AG. eISSN 2071-1050. Vol. 10, Issue 5, art. No. 1626, 2018. pp. 1‒26. (Special Issue: Sustainability in Construction Engineering). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051626.10.3390/su10051626 Search in Google Scholar

12. Yang, B., Li, Sh., Binder, Ch. 2016. A Research Frontier in Landscape Architecture: Landscape Performance and Assessment of Social Benefits. Landscape Research, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2015. pp. 314‒329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.107794410.1080/01426397.2015.1077944 Search in Google Scholar

13. Deveikienė, V. Methodological guidelines for optimizing the interaction between landscape architecture and urban planning. Landscape Architecture and Art, Vol. 12, No. 12, 2018, pp. 7‒21. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2018.12.01.10.22616/j.landarchart.2018.12.01 Search in Google Scholar

14. Kuiper, J. A Checklist Approach to Evaluate the Contribution of Organic Farms to Landscape Quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, No. 77. 2000. pp. 143–156. PII: S0167-8809(99)00099-7. Search in Google Scholar

15. Bengtsson, A., Hägerhäll, C., Englund, J.-E., Grahn, P. Outdoor Environments at Three Nursing Homes: Semantic Environmental Descriptions. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, Vol. 29, No. 1‒2, 2015, pp. 53‒76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2014.98786310.1080/02763893.2014.987863 Search in Google Scholar

16. Yu, S., Yu, B., Song, W., Wu, B., Zhou, J., Huang, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, F., Mao, W. View-based Greenery: A Three-dimensional Assessment of City Buildings’ Green Visibility Using Floor Green View Index. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 152, 2016. pp. 13–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.00410.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.004 Search in Google Scholar

17. Karaşah, B. A Visual Landscape Assessment of Forest Roads: Case of Kafkasör-Mersivan Route, Artvin. Kastamonu University. Journal of Forestry Faculty, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2017, pp. 404‒413. IFS 2016, Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.285686.10.17475/kastorman.285686 Search in Google Scholar

18. Montero-Parejo, M. J., Garcia-Moruno, L., Reyes-Rodriguez, A. M., Hernandez-Blanco, J., Garrido-Velarde, J. Analysis of Façade Color and Cost to Improve Visual Integration of Buildings in the Rural Environment. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3840, 2020, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093840.10.3390/su12093840 Search in Google Scholar

19. Kavaliauskas, P. Kraštovaizdžio samprata ir planavimas. Mokomoji knyga. Vilniaus universitetas. 2011, pp. 72‒73, 129‒130. ISBN 978-609-459-004-7. Search in Google Scholar

20. Solehin Fitry Rosley, M., Lamit, H., Rahman, S.R.A. Perceiving the Aesthetic Value of the Rural Landscape through Valid Indicators. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 85, 2013, pp. 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.36210.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.362 Search in Google Scholar

21. Kuster, C., Hippolyte, J.-L., Rezgui, Y. The UDSA ontology: An Ontology to Support Real Time Urban Sustainability Assessment. Advances in Engineering Software. Vol. 140, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.10273110.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.102731 Search in Google Scholar

22. Bassuk, N., Trowbridge, P. Creating the Urban Eden: Sustainable Landscape Establishment in Theory and Practice. Sustainability and Horticultural Education. Vol. 20 No. 3. 2010. pp. 485‒486. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.20.3.48510.21273/HORTTECH.20.3.485 Search in Google Scholar

23. American Society of Landscape Architects ASLA. Sustainable Sites Initiative. The Case for Sustainable Landscapes. 2009. 54 p. [online]. Sustainable Sites [cited 27.07.2020]. www.sustainablesites.org Search in Google Scholar

24. Noralizawati, M., Noriah, O., Mohd, H. A. Value of Nature in Life: Landscape Visual Quality Assessment at Rainforest Trail, Penang. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 50, 2012, pp. 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.06910.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.069 Search in Google Scholar

25. Reformatų skveras, 2019 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. http://reformatuskveras.lt/ Search in Google Scholar

26. Lukiškių aikštė. Gedimino pr. Naujamiestis, Vilnius, 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://citify.eu/lukiskiu-aikste/ Search in Google Scholar

27. E. Balsio skvero rekonstrukcijos projektas: su vardiniais suoliukais ir scena kultūros renginiams, 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://vilnius.lt/lt/2020/02/13/e-balsio-skvero-rekonstrukcijos-projektas-su-vardiniais-suoliukais-ir-scena-kulturos-renginiams/ Search in Google Scholar

28. Vilniaus Šiaurinės gatvės projektą žada pagaliau išjudinti: statybos – galbūt dar šiemet. 2020 [online, cited 31.07.2020]. https://www.15min.lt/gazas/naujiena/gatve/vilniaus-siaurines-gatves-projekta-zada-pagaliau-isjudinti-statybas-jau-vasara-221-1264078#_ Search in Google Scholar

29. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., Brown, T. Environmental Preference. A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors. Environment and Behaviour. Vol. 21, No. 5, 1989, pp. 509‒530. SAGE Social Science Collections. SAGE Publications Inc.10.1177/0013916589215001 Search in Google Scholar

30. Maslow, A. H. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review. Vol. 50, 1943, pp. 370‒396.10.1037/h0054346 Search in Google Scholar

31. The Reformation Garden conservation project. 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://s1.15min.lt/images/photos/2018/08/09/original/vilniaus-savivaldybes-parengto-reformatu-skvero-plano-aptarimas-su-jo-kurejais-5b6c65f034d08.jpg Search in Google Scholar

32. Lukiškių plaza project in Vilnius City. 2018 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://www.lrt.lt/img/2016/05/12/125399-306040-756x425.jpg Search in Google Scholar

33. Eduardo Balsio square project in Vilnius City. 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://vilnius.lt/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Eduard_Balsio_skver2.jpg Search in Google Scholar

34. The Northern Street project in Vilnius City. 2018 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://s2.15min.lt/static/cache/OTI1eDYxMCw0Nz-V4NDEyLDYxNjMwNCxvcmlnaW5hbCwsaWQ9Mzc2NDM-4NiZkYXRlPTIwMTglMkYwMyUyRjE5LDMyMzY5MDk-0MzY=/29343227_1220876294715369_7949022276257579008_n-5aafab1ee0297.jpg Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8764
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Architecture and Design, Architecture, Urbanism, other