[
1. Chattopadhyay, A. B., Machining and Machine Tools, 2nd edition, Wiley, India (2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bhattacharya, A., Metal Cutting: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, New Central Book Agency, India, 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Enache, S., Belous, V., Proiectarea sculelor aşchietoare, E.D.P., Bucureşti, (1983).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Enache, S., Minciu, C., Proiectarea asistată a sculelor aşchietoare, Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, (1986).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Lăzărescu, I., Calculul şi construcţia sculelor aşchietoare, Editura Tehnică, Bucureşti, (1962).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Lăzărescu, I., et al., Teoria şi practica sculelor aşchietoare, Editura Universităţii din Sibiu, (1994).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Secară, Ghe., Proiectarea sculelor aşchietoare, E.D.P., Bucureşti, (1979).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Chase, K. W., Gao, J., and Magleby, S. P., General 2-D Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical Assemblies with Small Kinematic Adjustments. J Des Manuf, 5:263–274. (1995).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Dantan, J.-Y., Ballu, A., and Mathieu, L., Geometrical product specifications model for product life cycle, Computer-Aided Design, 40(4):493–501. (2008).10.1016/j.cad.2008.01.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Denkena, B. and Biermann, D., Cutting edge geometries, CIRP Annals, 63(2):631–653, (2014).10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. GAO, J., CHASE, K. W., and MAGLEBY, S. P., Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments, IIE Transactions, 30(4):367–377. (1998).10.1080/07408179808966476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Schleich, B. and Wartzack, S. A Quantitative Comparison of Tolerance Analysis Approaches for Rigid Mechanical Assemblies, Procedia CIRP, 43:172–177. (2016).10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Shen, Z., Ameta, G., Shah, J. J., and Davidson, J. K., A Comparative Study Of Tolerance Analysis Methods, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 5(3):247. (2005).10.1115/1.1979509
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Soner Camuz, Tolerance Analysis Framework for Cutting Tool Interface Design, PhD Thesis, Department of Industrial and Materials Science CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Goteborg, Sweden (2019)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. ISO - 25.100.01 - Cutting tools in general
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. ISO 841:2001(E), Industrial automation systems and integration — Numerical control of machines— Coordinate system and motion nomenclature
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. ISO 2806:1994, Industrial automation systems — Numerical control of machines — Vocabulary
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. ISO 6983-1:1982, Numerical control of machines — Program format and definition of address words — Part 1: Data format for positioning, line motion and contouring control system
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. ISO 3002-1:1982 Basic quantities in cutting and grinding — Part 1: Geometry of the active part of cutting tools — General terms, reference systems, tool and working angles, chip breakers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. ISO 3002-1:1982/Amd 1:1992 Basic quantities in cutting and grinding — Part 1: Geometry of the active part of cutting tools — General terms, reference systems, tool and working angles, chip breakers —Amendment 1 Abstract Preview Adds new clause 8 (Direction of the helix and cutting direction)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. ISO 3002-2:1982 Basic quantities in cutting and grinding - Part 2: Geometry of the active part of cutting tools - General conversion formulae to relate tool and working angles
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. ISO 14405-1:2010 Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Dimensional tolerancing — Part 1: Linear sizes
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. ISO 14405_2_2011, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Dimensional tolerancing – Part 2 Dimensions other than linear sizes
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. External turning (coromant.com)
]Search in Google Scholar
