Is there an interlanguage speech credibility benefit?

BENT, T. and BRADLOW, A.R., 2003. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 1600-1610.10.1121/1.1603234Search in Google Scholar

BOERSMA, P. and WEENINK, D., 2015. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.05, [Accessed 8 November 2015] Available at: http://www.praat.org/.Search in Google Scholar

CARGILE, A.C., 1997. Attitudes toward Chinese-accented speech. An investigation in two contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 434-443.10.1177/0261927X970164004Search in Google Scholar

DA SILVA, C.S. and LEACH, A.M., 2013. Detecting deception in second‐language speakers. Legal and Criminological Psychology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 115-127.10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02030.xSearch in Google Scholar

EVANS, J.R. and MICHAEL, S.W., 2014. Detecting deception in non‐native English speakers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 28, no.2, pp. 226-237.10.1002/acp.2990Search in Google Scholar

EVANS, J.R., MICHAEL, S.W., MEISSNER, C.A. and BRANDON, S.E., 2013. Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 33-41.10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.02.002Search in Google Scholar

FERGUSON, M.J. and ZAYAS, V., 2009. Automatic evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 362-366.10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01668.xSearch in Google Scholar

FRUMKIN, L., 2007. Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 317-331.10.1080/10683160600822246Search in Google Scholar

GLUSZEK, A. and DOVIDIO, J.F., 2010. The way they speak: a social psychological perspective on the stigma of non-native accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol 14, no. 2, pp. 214-237.10.1177/1088868309359288Search in Google Scholar

HAYES-HARB, R., SMITH, B.L., BENT, T. and BRADLOW, A.R., 2008. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English wordfinal voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 664-679.10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.002Search in Google Scholar

HONGYAN, W. and van HEUVEN, V.J., 2007. Quantifying the interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes, pp. 1729-1732.Search in Google Scholar

KINZLER, K.D., DUPOUX, E. and SPELKE, E.S., 2007. The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 30, pp. 12577-12580.10.1073/pnas.0705345104Search in Google Scholar

KINZLER, K.D., SHUTTS, K., DEJESUS, J. and SPELKE, E.S., 2009. Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 623-634.10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623Search in Google Scholar

LAMBERT, W.E., HODGSON, R.C., GARDNER, R.C. and FILLENBAUM, S., 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 44-51.10.1037/h0044430Search in Google Scholar

LECUMBERRI, M.L.G., COOKE, M. and CUTLER, A., 2010. Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review. Speech Communication, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 864-886.10.1016/j.specom.2010.08.014Search in Google Scholar

LEV-ARI, S. and KEYSAR, B., 2010. Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1093-1096.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025Search in Google Scholar

MAJOR, R.C., FITZMAURICE, S.F., BUNTA, F. and BALASUBRAMANIAN, C., 2002. The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 173-190.10.2307/3588329Search in Google Scholar

MULAC, A., HANLEY, T.D. and PRIGGE, D.Y., 1974. Effects of phonological speech foreignness upon three dimensions of attitude of selected American listeners. Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 411-420.10.1080/00335637409383250Search in Google Scholar

MUNRO, M.J. and DERWING, T.M., 1995. Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 289-306.10.1177/002383099503800305Search in Google Scholar

MUNRO, M.J. and DERWING, T.M., 1999. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 285-310.10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8Search in Google Scholar

MUNRO, M.J., DERWING, T.M. and MORTON, S.L., 2006. The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 111-131.10.1017/S0272263106060049Search in Google Scholar

PINET, M. and IVERSON, P., 2010. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: Effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 1357-1365.10.1121/1.3466857Search in Google Scholar

PISKE, T., MACKAY, I.R. and FLEGE, J.E., 2001. Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 191-215.10.1006/jpho.2001.0134Search in Google Scholar

REBER, R. and SCHWARZ, N., 1999. Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338-342.10.1006/ccog.1999.0386Search in Google Scholar

ROGERS, C.L., DALBY, J. and NISHI, K., 2004. Effects of noise and proficiency on intelligibility of Chinese-accented English. Language and Speech, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 139-154.10.1177/00238309040470020201Search in Google Scholar

ŠIMÁČKOVÁ, Š. and PODLIPSKÝ, V.J., 2012. Pronunciation skills of an interpreter. In: J. Zehnalová, O. Molnár and M. Kubánek, eds. Teaching translation and interpreting skills in the 21st century. Olomouc: Palacký University Olomouc, pp. 139-149.Search in Google Scholar

SMITH, B.L., HAYES-HARB, R., BRUSS, M. and HARKER, A., 2009. Production and perception of voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 257-275.10.1016/j.wocn.2009.03.001Search in Google Scholar

SMITH, L.E. and RAFIQZAD, K., 1979. English for cross-cultural communication: The question of intelligibility. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 371-380.10.2307/3585884Search in Google Scholar

SONG, J., 2011. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for experienced nonnative listeners: Perception of English lexical stress produced by Korean native speakers. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Hong Kong, pp. 1882-1885.Search in Google Scholar

SOUZA, A.L., 2012. Modality-specific effects of processing fluency on cognitive judgments. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin).Search in Google Scholar

SOUZA, A.L., BYERS-HEINLEIN, K. and POULIN-DUBOIS, D., 2013. Bilingual and monolingual children prefer native-accented speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 4, article no. 953. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00953Search in Google Scholar

STIBBARD, R.M. and LEE, J.I., 2006. Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 433-442. 10.1121/1.2203595Search in Google Scholar

van WIJNGAARDEN, S.J., 2001. Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech. Speech Communication, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 103-113. 10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00098-4Search in Google Scholar

van WIJNGAARDEN, S.J., STEENEKEN, H.J. and HOUTGAST, T., 2002. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1906-1916.10.1121/1.1456928Search in Google Scholar

XIE, X. and FOWLER, C.A., 2013. Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 369-378. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar