1. bookVolume 41 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Scaffolded Minds And The Evolution Of Content In Signaling Pathways

Published Online: 24 Jul 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 41 (2015) - Issue 1 (June 2015)
Page range: 89 - 103
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Hutto and Myin (2013) famously argue that basic minds are not contentful and content exists only as far as it is scaffolded with social and linguistic practices. This view, however, rests on a troublesome distinction between basic and scaffolded minds. Since Hutto and Myin have to account for language purely in terms of joint action guidance, there is no reason why simpler communication systems, such as cellular signaling pathways, should not give rise to scaffolded content as well. This conclusion remains valid even if one rejects the view of language as mediated through public symbols and embraces global antirepresentationalism. Content evolves spontaneously in complex regulatory systems, such as human, animal, and cellular communication.

Keywords

Alksnis, N., (forthcoming). A review and reply to Radicalizing Enactivism: How scaffolding fails to solve the hard problem of content. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/2711798/Review_and_reply_to_Radical_Enactivism_by_Hutto_and_MyinSearch in Google Scholar

Barandiaran, X. E., & Egbert, M. D. (2013). Norm-establishing and norm-following in autonomous agency. Artificial Life, 1–33. doi:10.1162/ARTL_a_0009410.1162/ARTL_a_00094Search in Google Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2009). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166(3), 547–591. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9375-x10.1007/s11229-008-9375-xSearch in Google Scholar

Block, N. i Kitcher, P. (2010). Misunderstanding Darwin: Natural selection’s secular critics get it wrong. Boston Review (March-April).Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-MSearch in Google Scholar

Chemero, A. (2000). Anti-representationalism and the dynamical stance. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 625–647. doi:10.1086/39285810.1086/392858Search in Google Scholar

Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, A., & Toribio, J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese, 101(3), 401–431.10.1007/BF01063896Search in Google Scholar

Cowley, S. J. (2011). Distributed language. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.34Search in Google Scholar

Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2014). From participatory sense-making to language: there and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9404-910.1007/s11097-014-9404-9Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (2008). Against Darwinism. Mind Language, 23(1), 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.14 68-0017.2007.00324.xSearch in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17, 304–23.10.1007/BF00485035Search in Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9076-910.1007/s11097-007-9076-9Search in Google Scholar

Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gauker, C. (2011). Words and images: An essay on the origins of ideas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599462.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388.10.2307/2182440Search in Google Scholar

Hockett, Ch. F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 89–97.10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, M. I. (2015). Content in languaging: why radical enactivism is incompatible with representational theories of language. Language Sciences, 48, 90–129. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.00410.1016/j.langsci.2014.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: the socio-cultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press10.7551/mitpress/7525.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Korbak, T. (2015). Radykalny enaktywizm a konserwatywna kognitywistyka. Analiza i Egzystencja, 29, 123–133.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R. (1978). Biology of language: the epistemology of reality. In G. A. Miller & L. Elizabeth (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Millikan, R. G. (1989). Biosemantics. Journal of Philosophy, 86(6), 281–297. doi: 10.2307/202712310.2307/2027123Search in Google Scholar

Milkowski, M. (2015). Satisfaction conditions in anticipatory mechanisms. Biology & Philosophy, (February). doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9481-310.1007/s10539-015-9481-3Search in Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973 [discussion 973–1031].10.1017/S0140525X01000115Search in Google Scholar

Pattee, H. (1969). How does a molecule become a message? Developmental Biology Supplement, 3, 1–16.10.1016/B978-0-12-395541-8.50006-9Search in Google Scholar

Pattee, H. (1985). Universal principles of measurement and language functions in evolving systems. In J. Casti & A. Karlqvist (Eds.), Complexity of language and life: Mathematical approaches (pp. 268–281). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2012). Language as a system of replicable constraints. In H. H. Pattee & J. Raczaszek-Leonardi, Laws, Language and Life: Howard Pattee’s classic papers on the physics of symbols (pp. 295–333). Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Skyrms, B. (2011). Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Solomon, E. P., Martin, D. W., Martin, C., & Berg, L. R. (2014). Biology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 1–34 [discussion 34–86]. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0100391010.1017/S0140525X01003910Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, E., & Stapleton, M. (2009). Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories. Topoi, 28(1), 23–30. doi:10.1007/s11245-008-9043-210.1007/s11245-008-9043-2Search in Google Scholar

Weber, A., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97–125.10.1023/A:1020368120174Search in Google Scholar

Williams, M. (2010). Blind obedience: The structure and content of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo