1. bookVolume 25 (2017): Issue 4 (October 2017)
Journal Details
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Effects of low-molecular weight alcohols on bacterial viability

Published Online: 07 Nov 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 25 (2017) - Issue 4 (October 2017)
Page range: 335 - 343
Received: 22 Mar 2017
Accepted: 12 Jun 2017
Journal Details
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Alcohol based solutions are among the most convenient and wide spread aid in the prevention of nosocomial infections. The current study followed the efficacy of several types and isomers of alcohols on different bacterial species. Seven alcohols (ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, n-butyl, iso-butyl, tert-butyl alcohol, and ethylene glycol) were used to evaluate their minimal inhibitory and bactericidal effects by microdilution method on bacteria that express many phenotypical characteristics: different cell-wall structure (Gram positive/negative bacteria), capsule production (Klebsiella pneumoniae), antibiotic resistance (MRSA vs MSSA) or high environmental adaptability (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Results: The best inhibitory effect was noticed for n-propyl, followed by iso-propyl, n-butyl, and iso-butyl alcohols with equal values. Ethylene glycol was the most inefficient alcohol on all bacteria. In K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, the bactericidal concentrations were higher than the inhibitory one, and to a level similar to that encountered for most of the Gram-positive bacteria. Among Gram-positive cocci, E. faecalis presented the lowest susceptibility to alcohols. Conclusions: All alcohols presented good effect on bacteria, even in low concentrations. Compared to ethanol as standard, there are better alternatives that can be used as antimicrobials, namely longer-chain alcohols such as propyl or butyric alcohols and their iso- isomers. Ethylene glycol should be avoided, due to its toxicity hazard and low antimicrobial efficacy. Bacterial phenotype (highly adaptable bacteria, biofilm formation) and structure (cell wall structure, presence of capsule) may drastically affect the responsiveness to the antimicrobial activity of alcohols, leading to higher bactericidal than inhibitory concentrations.


1. Kampf G, Löffler H, Gastmeier P. Hand Hygiene forSearch in Google Scholar

the Prevention of Nosocomial Infections. Dtsch ÄrzteblSearch in Google Scholar

Int. 2009 Oct;106(40):649-55.10.1002/piuz.200990036Search in Google Scholar

2. Mathur P. Hand hygiene: Back to the basics of infectionSearch in Google Scholar

control. Indian J Med Res. 2011 Nov;134(5):611-20. DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.9098510.4103/0971-5916.90985324995822199099Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. AFE14 - 148to158.pdf [Internet]. Available from: http://Search in Google Scholar

www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/26953706Search in Google Scholar

148to158.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

4. Tutelcă A, Licker M, Dan L, Orb C, Moldovan R. NosocomialSearch in Google Scholar

infections caused by two strains of KlebsiellaSearch in Google Scholar

pneumoniae with different colonial morphotypes and11749761Search in Google Scholar

resistance phenotypes isolated from the same sample.Search in Google Scholar

Rev Romana Med Lab. 2006;2(1):19-31.Search in Google Scholar

5. Shin J-H, Yue Y, Duan D. Recombinant adeno-associatedSearch in Google Scholar

viral vector production and purification. MethodsSearch in Google Scholar

Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2012;798:267-84. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-343-1_1510.1007/978-1-61779-343-1_15329869022130842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Pfäfflin F, Tufa TB, Getachew M, Nigussie T, SchönfeldSearch in Google Scholar

A, Häussinger D, et al. Implementation of the WHOSearch in Google Scholar

multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy inSearch in Google Scholar

a University Hospital in Central Ethiopia. AntimicrobSearch in Google Scholar

Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:3. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-10.1186/s13756Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

016-0165-9Search in Google Scholar

7. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance. Clin MicrobiolSearch in Google Scholar

Rev. 1999 Jan;12(1):147-79.Search in Google Scholar

8. Girou E, Loyeau S, Legrand P, Oppein F, Brun-BuissonSearch in Google Scholar

C. Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol basedSearch in Google Scholar

solution versus standard handwashing with antisepticSearch in Google Scholar

soap: randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2002 AugSearch in Google Scholar

17;325(7360):362. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7360.36210.1136/bmj.325.7360.36211788512183307Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Kampf G, Ostermeyer C. Small volumes of n-propanolSearch in Google Scholar

(60%) applied for 3 minutes may be ineffective for surgicalSearch in Google Scholar

hand disinfection. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control.Search in Google Scholar

2014 Apr 24;3:15. DOI: 10.1186/2047-2994-3-1510.1186/2047-2994-3-15401723624822090Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Masaadeh HA, Jaran AS. Determination of the AntibacterialSearch in Google Scholar

Efficacy of Common Chemical Agents in CleaningSearch in Google Scholar

and Disinfection in Hospitals of North Jordan. AmSearch in Google Scholar

J Appl Sci. 2009 May 31;6(5):811-5. DOI: 10.3844/Search in Google Scholar

ajassp.2009.811.815Search in Google Scholar

11. Mazzola PG, Jozala AF, Novaes LC de L, MorielSearch in Google Scholar

P, Penna TCV. Minimal inhibitory concentrationSearch in Google Scholar

(MIC) determination of disinfectant and/or sterilizingSearch in Google Scholar

agents. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2009 Jun;45(2):241-8. DOI: 10.1590/S1984-8250200900020000810.1590/S1984-82502009000200008Search in Google Scholar

12. Lorian V. Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine. LippincottSearch in Google Scholar

Williams & Wilkins; 2005. 922 p.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ingólfsson HI, Andersen OS. Alcohol’s Effects on LipidSearch in Google Scholar

Bilayer Properties. Biophys J. 2011 Aug 17;101(4):847-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.01310.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.013317508721843475Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Chatterjee I, Somerville GA, Heilmann C, Sahl H-G, Maurer HH, Herrmann M. Very low ethanol concentrationsSearch in Google Scholar

affect the viability and growth recovery inSearch in Google Scholar

post-stationary-phase Staphylococcus aureus populations.16597967Search in Google Scholar

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Apr;72(4):2627-36.DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2627-2636.200610.1128/AEM.72.4.2627-2636.2006144907216597967Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Huffer S, Clark ME, Ning JC, Blanch HW, Clark DS.Search in Google Scholar

Role of Alcohols in Growth, Lipid Composition, andSearch in Google Scholar

Membrane Fluidity of Yeasts, Bacteria, and Archaea.Search in Google Scholar

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep;77(18):6400-8. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00694-1110.1128/AEM.00694-11318715021784917Search in Google Scholar

16. Brown L, Wolf JM, Prados-Rosales R, Casadevall A.Search in Google Scholar

Through the wall: extracellular vesicles in Gram-positiveSearch in Google Scholar

bacteria, mycobacteria and fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol.Search in Google Scholar

2015 Oct 1;13(10):620-30. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro348010.1038/nrmicro3480486027926324094Search in Google Scholar

17. Xu J, Yue R-Q, Liu J, Ho H-M, Yi T, Chen H-B, et al.Search in Google Scholar

Structural diversity requires individual optimizationSearch in Google Scholar

of ethanol concentration in polysaccharide precipitation.Search in Google Scholar

Int J Biol Macromol. 2014 Jun;67:205-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.03610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.03624680808Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Schembri MA, Blom J, Krogfelt KA, Klemm P. CapsuleSearch in Google Scholar

and Fimbria Interaction in Klebsiella pneumoSearch in Google Scholar

niae. Infect Immun. 2005 Aug;73(8):4626-33. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4626-4633.200510.1128/IAI.73.8.4626-4633.2005120123416040975Search in Google Scholar

19. Hilliam Y, Moore MP, Lamont IL, Bilton D, HaworthSearch in Google Scholar

CS, Foweraker J, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adaptationSearch in Google Scholar

and diversification in the non-cystic fibrosisSearch in Google Scholar

bronchiectasis lung. Eur Respir J. 2017 Apr;49(4). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02108-201610.1183/13993003.02108-2016589893328446558Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Toth-Manikowski SM, Menn-Josephy H, Bhatia J.Search in Google Scholar

A Case of Chronic Ethylene Glycol Intoxication Presenting25215251Search in Google Scholar

without Classic Metabolic Derangements. CaseSearch in Google Scholar

Rep Nephrol. 2014 Aug 21;2014:e128145.Search in Google Scholar

21. Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Collins JJ. How antibioticsSearch in Google Scholar

kill bacteria: from targets to networks. Nat Rev Microbiol.20440275Search in Google Scholar

2010 Jun;8(6):423-35. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro233310.1038/nrmicro2333289638420440275Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Munita JM, Arias CA. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance.Search in Google Scholar

Microbiol Spectr [Internet]. 2016 Apr;4(2).Search in Google Scholar

Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/12519941Search in Google Scholar

articles/PMC4888801/ DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.10.1128/microbiolspecOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

VMBF-0016-2015Search in Google Scholar

23. Maillard J-Y. Antimicrobial biocides in the healthcareSearch in Google Scholar

environment: efficacy, usage, policies, and perceivedSearch in Google Scholar

problems. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005 Dec;1(4):307-20.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo