[[1] Bartholomeeussen, T. (2001). Spoločná věc (rozvoj - partnerstvo a medziobecná spolupráca). Bratislava: Phare 9808-04-01/007, Open Society Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Bel, G., Fageda, X., Mur, M. (2013). Why do municipalities cooperate to provide local public services? An empirical analysis. Local Government Studies, 39(3), 435-454. Doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.781024.10.1080/03003930.2013.781024]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Bel, G., Warner, M. E. (2015). Inter-municipal cooperation and costs: Expectations and evidence. Public Administration, 93(1), 52-67. Doi: 10.1111/padm.12104.10.1111/padm.12104]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Bennett, R. (1993). Local Government in the New Europe. London: Belhaven.]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Bennett, R. (1997). Local Government in post-socialist cities. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Binek, J. et al. (2011). Synergie ve venkovském prostoru - Paradoxy rozvoje venkova. Brno: GaREP.]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Blažek, B. (2004). Venkovy: anamnéza, diagnóza, terapie. Brno: Era.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Denters, B. et al. (2016). Inter-municipal cooperation: a democratic deficit? Available at: https://www.utwente.nl/en/bms/pa/staff/boogers/publications/denters-klok-ipsa-2016- final.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Dušek, J. (2010). Faktory regionálního růstu a rozvoje (se zaměřením na spolupráci měst a obcí v Jihočeském kraji). České Budějovice: Vysoká škola evropských a regionálních studií.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Dušek, J. (2013). European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation as a Way of Cross-Border Regional Cooperation Within the European Union. In Klímová, V. & Žítek, V., eds., 16th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences (pp. 329-336). Brno: Masaryk University. Doi: 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-6257-2013-40.10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-6257-2013-40]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Frick, H. J. & Hokkeler, M. (2008). Interkommunale Zusammenarbeit - Handreichung für die Kommunalpolitik. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung KommunalAkademie.]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Galvasová, I. et al. (2007). Spolupráce obcí jako faktor rozvoje. Brno: Georgetown.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Gillette, C. P. & Skeelb, D. A., Jr. (2016). Governance reform and the judicial role in municipal bankruptcy. Yale Law Journal 125(5), 1150-1237.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Halachmi, A. & Boorsma, P. B. (2013). Inter and Intra Government Arrangements for Productivity: An Agency Approach. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Hazakis, K. & Ioannidis, P. G. (2014). The Impact of the Local Government Institutional Framework on the Distribution of Intergovern-mental Grants: Greek Republic as a Case Study. European Journal of Spatial Development, 55, 1-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Holeček, J. et al. (2009). Obec a její rozvoj v širších souvislostech. Brno: GaREP.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Huber, T. (2014). Interkommunale Zusammenarbeit im Rahmen der (Teil-)Flächennutzungsplanung Windkraft: als Konsequenz der Änderung des badenwürttembergischen Landesplanungsgesetzes. Kehl: Hochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung.]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Hulst, R. & van Montfort, A. (2007). Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer. Doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5379-7.10.1007/1-4020-5379-7]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Keating, M. (1995). Size, Efficiency and Democracy: Consolidation, Fragmentation and Public Choice. In Judge, D., Stoker, G., Wollman, H., eds., Theories of Urban Politics. London: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Klein, B. (2012). Kommunale Kooperationen zwischen innerstaatlichem Organisationsakt und Markt: ein Beitrag zur Bestimmung der Reichweite des europäischen Vergaberechts dargelegt am Beispiel der Vergabekoordinierungsrichtlinie, des Vergabeprimärrechts und des deutschen Kartellvergaberechts. Göttingen: V&R Unipress GmbH.]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Klimovský, D., Mejere, O., Mikolaityte, J., Pinterič, U. & Saparniene, D. (2014). Intermunicipal cooperation in Lithuania and Slovakia: Does size structure matter? Lex Localis 12(3), 643-658. Doi: 10.4335/12.3.643-658(2014).10.4335/12.3.643-658(2014)]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Lacerda, N. & Ribeiro, S. (2014). Limits of metropolitan management and barriers to intermunicipal cooperative governance in Brazil. Eure 40(121), 171-201. Doi: 10.4067/S0250-71612014000300009.10.4067/S0250-71612014000300009]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Leemans, A. F. (1970). Changing patterns of local government. The Hague: International Union of Local Authorities.]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] Lidström, A. (1998). The Comparative Study of Local Government Systems - A Research Agenda. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 1(1), 97-115. Doi: 10.1080/13876989808412617.10.1080/13876989808412617]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Nelles, J. (2013). Cooperation and capacity? Exploring the sources and limits of city-region governance partnerships. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4), 1349-1367. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01112.x.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01112.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Perlín, R. (1999). Venkov, typologie venkovského prostoru. In Malý, F. & Viktoriová, B., eds., Česká etnoekologie. Praha: Cargo.]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] Rakar, I., Tičar, B. & Klun, M. (2015). Inter-municipal cooperation: Challenges in Europe and in Slovenia. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 45, 185-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] Richter, M. (2013). Regionalisierung und interkommunale Zusammenarbeit: Wirtschaftsregionen als Instrumente kommunaler Wirtschaftsförderung. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[[29] Rose, J. (2010). L'aménagement du territoire, la coordination intermunicipale et les relations centrales-locales en contexte métropolitain. Québec: Université du Québec - École nationale d'administration publique.]Search in Google Scholar
[[30] Ryšavý, I. (2006). Společenství obcí ještě vzbudí diskusi, ale pro venkov je jednou ze šancí. Available at: http://moderniobec.ihned.cz/c1-17516690-spolecenstvi-obci-jeste-vzbudidiskusi-ale-pro-venkov-je-jednou-ze-sanci.]Search in Google Scholar
[[31] Sager, F. (2005). Metropolitan institutions and policy coordination: The integration of land use and transport policies in Swiss urban areas. Governance, 18(2), 227-256. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00274.x.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00274.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[32] Sciandra, L. (2011). Partecipazioni comunali e intrecci economico-finanziari: criticità e misurazione. Politica Economica, 27(3), 375-412. Doi: 10.1429/36594.]Search in Google Scholar
[[33] Schnabel, F. (2012). Formy meziobecní a regionální spolupráce v Německu. Available at: http://moderniobec.cz/formy-meziobecni-a-regionalni-spoluprace-v-nemecku.]Search in Google Scholar
[[34] Schulitz, A. & Knoblauch, B. (2011). Interkommunale Kooperation schrumpfender Kleinstädte: Analyse der Chancen und Grenzen für schrumpfende Kleinstädte im ländlichen Raum. München: AVM - Akademische Verlagsgemeinschaft München.]Search in Google Scholar
[[35] Sørensen, R. J. (2007). Does Dispersed Public Ownership Impair Efficiency? The Case of Refuse Collection in Norway. In Public Administration, 85(4), 1045-1058. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00681.X.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00681.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[36] Swianiewicz, P., ed., (2002). Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Budapest: Open Society Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[[37] Teles, F. (2016a). Local governance and intermunicipal cooperation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Doi: 10.1057/9781137445742.10.1057/9781137445742]Search in Google Scholar
[[38] Teles, F. (2016b). Local government and the bailout: Reform singularities in Portugal. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 455-467. Doi: 10.1177/0969776413517249.10.1177/0969776413517249]Search in Google Scholar
[[39] Urbanová, M. (2015). Malá města Středočeského kraje jako aktéři meziobecní spolupráce. Acta Politologica, 7(1), 79-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[[40] Vajdová, Z., Čermák, D. & Illner, M. (2006). Autonomie a spolupráce: důsledky ustavení obecního zřízení v roce 1990. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.]Search in Google Scholar
[[41] Wiberg, U. & Limani, I. (2015). Intermunicipal collaboration - a smart alternative for small municipalities? Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 19(1), 63-82.10.58235/sjpa.v19i1.15634]Search in Google Scholar
[[42] Wokoun, R. et al. (2008). Regionální rozvoj (Východisko regionálního rozvoje, regionální politika, teorie, strategie a programování). Praha: Linde.]Search in Google Scholar
[[43] Žárska, E. (2007). Komunálna ekonomika a politika. Bratislava: Ekonóm.]Search in Google Scholar
[[44] Czech Statistical Office. (2013a). Počet obcí podle krajů (stav k 1.1.). Available at: http://www.czso.cz/cz/cr_1989_ts/0201.xls.]Search in Google Scholar
[[45] Czech Statistical Office. (2013b). Počet obcí a obyvatel v jednotlivých velikostních skupinách obcí podle výsledků sčítání lidu v letech 1921-2001. Available at: http://www.czso.cz/csu/2012edicniplan.nsf/t/B5001FC4FC/$File/4032120114.xls.]Search in Google Scholar
[[46] Czech Statistical Office. (2015a). Vývoj počtu obcí v České republice podle krajů (stav k 1.1.). Available at: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/20551237/32018115_0201.xlsx/cfdeb0ee-b8ff-4fa4-8c7d-649944f31460?version=1.0.]Search in Google Scholar
[[47] Czech Statistical Office. (2015b). Počet obyvatel v obcích České republiky k 1.1.2015. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/20556287/1300721503.xlsx/75b39cc7-7aa3-4f31-a6e3-018bb06a5f83?version=1.1.]Search in Google Scholar