1. bookVolume 9 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)
Journal Details
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Small business life cycle: statics and dynamics (S&D) model

Published Online: 23 Jan 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2017) - Issue 4 (December 2017)
Page range: 48 - 58
Received: 10 Jun 2017
Accepted: 20 Nov 2017
Journal Details
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

The aim of the paper is the presentation of theoretical foundations and the structure of original, 8-stage statics and dynamics model in the small business life cycle. Based on theoretical considerations, two hypotheses concerning the impact of dynamic and static nature of the life-cycle stages on selected determinants and effects of SMEs’ development were formulated. The hypotheses were verified based on the results of the survey conducted on a sample of 1,741 SMEs from 22 countries of the European Union. The results indicate that companies in the dynamic life-cycle stages are run by more enterprising owners, operate in more promising markets with a higher potential and make greater use of market niches thus limiting the level of competition. At the same time, such companies are characterised by higher levels of flexibility and involvement in innovative activities, which translates into obtaining a significantly higher level of business performance, in the area of quantitative as well as qualitative results.


Adizes, I. (1988). Corporate lifecycles. How and why corporations grow and what to do about it. Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Ahedo, M. (2010). Exploring the innovative potential of SMEs in Spain. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16(2), 197-209. doi: 10.1177/10 24258910364307Search in Google Scholar

Aragón-Sánchez, A., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2005). Strategic orientation, management characteristics, and performance: a study of Spanish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(3), 287-308. doi: 10.1111/ j.1540-627X.2005.00138.xSearch in Google Scholar

Autio, E. (2016). Entrepreneurship support in Europe: Trends and challenges for EU policy. London, England: Imperial College Business School.Search in Google Scholar

Beam, G. (2012). The problem with survey research. New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Belussi, F., & Sedita, S. R. (2009). Life cycle vs. multiple path dependency in industrial districts. European Planning Studies, 17(4), 505-528. doi: 10.1080/09654310802682065Search in Google Scholar

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Churchill, N., & Lewis, V. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30-50.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155Search in Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 391-418.10.1177/0013164404266386Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Edwards, T., Delbridge, R., & Munday, M. (2005). Understanding innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a process manifest. Technovation, 25(10), 1119-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.04.005Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015). User guide to the SME definition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2016). SME Performance Review. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/business-friendly-environment/performancereview-2016_enSearch in Google Scholar

European Union. (2016). Eurostat. Retrieved from: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.euSearch in Google Scholar

Felsenstein, D., & Swartz, D. (1993). Constraints to small business development across the life cycle: Some evidence from peripheral areas in Israel. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Search in Google Scholar

Field, A. (2014). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. London, England: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Floyd, D., & McManus, J. (2005). The role of SMEs in improving the competitive position of the European Union. European Business Review, 17(2), 144-150. doi: 10.1108/09555340510588011Search in Google Scholar

Geletkanycz, M., & Tepper, B. J. (2012). From the editors: Publishing in AMJ - part 6: discussing the implications. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 256-260. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.4002Search in Google Scholar

Granlund, M., & Taipaleenm, J. (2005). Management control and controllership in new economy firms - a life cycle perspective. Management Accounting Research, 16(1), 21-57. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2004.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Griliches, Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 25(4), 501-522.10.2307/1905380Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2016). Entrepreneurship. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, J. H., & Morgan, C. P. (1982). Organization theory. A macro perspective for management. London, England: Prentice Hall. Search in Google Scholar

Jones, N. (2009). SME’s life cycle - steps to failure or success? AU-GSB e-Journal, 2(2), 3-14.Search in Google Scholar

Koh, L., Demirbag, M., Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2007). The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(1), 103-124. doi: 10.1108/02635570710719089Search in Google Scholar

Kushnir, K., Mirmulstein, M. L., & Ramalho, R. (2010). Micro, small, and medium enterprises around the world: how many are there, and what affects the count? Washington, USA: MSME Country Indicators, The World Bank, & International Finance Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Lester, D. L., Parnell, J. A., & Carraher, S. (2003). Organizational life cycle: A five-stage empirical scale. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 339-354. doi: 10.1108/eb028979Search in Google Scholar

Levie, J. D., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2010). A terminal assessment of stages theory: Introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 317-350. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lukács, E. (2005). The economic role of SMEs in world economy, Especially in Europe. European Integration Studies, 4(1), 3-12Search in Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. (1961). Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica, 29(4), 741-766.10.2307/1911817Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Masurel, E., & Van Montfort, K. (2006). Life cycle characteristics of small professional service firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 461-473. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00182.xSearch in Google Scholar

Matejun, M. (2013). Instruments supporting development in the life cycle of small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 2(1), 40-60.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15-23. doi: 10.1016/0148- 2963(95)00159-XSearch in Google Scholar

Nicolescu, O. (2009). Main features of SMEs organisation system. Review of International Comparative Management, 10(3), 405-413. Search in Google Scholar

Phelps, R., Adams, R., & Bessant, J. (2007). Life cycles of growing organizations: A review with implications for knowledge and learning. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 1-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00200.xSearch in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E. (2008). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, USA: Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

Reips, U. D., & Funke, F. (2008). Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in internet-based research: VAS Generator. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 699-704.10.3758/BRM.40.3.69918697664Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Roberts, M., Stevenson, H., Sahlman, W., Marshall, P., & Hamermesh, R. (2006). New business ventures and the entrepreneur. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, S., Spinks, N., & Canhoto, A. I. (2015). Management research: Applying the principles. New York, USA: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Samuel, Y. (2012). Organizational pathology: Life and death of organizations. New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S., & Anusree, M. R. (2014). Business research methods: An applied orientation. London, England: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-319-00539-3Search in Google Scholar

Storey, D. J., & Greene, F. J. (2010). Small business and entrepreneurship. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Swift, L., & Piff, S. (2014). Quantitative methods: for business, management and finance. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-33794-8Search in Google Scholar

Tam, S., & Gray, D. E. (2016). What can we learn from the organizational life cycle theory? A conceptualization for the practice of workplace learning. Journal of Management Research, 8(2), 18-29. doi: 10.5296/jmr. v8i2.9093Search in Google Scholar

Tendai, C. (2013). Networks and performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in different stages of the life cycle: A case study of a small business in the Netherlands. Journal of Communication, 4(2), 89-94.10.1080/0976691X.2013.11884811Search in Google Scholar

The World Bank. (2016). Indicators: Agriculture & Rural Development. The World Bank Data. Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator Search in Google Scholar

Verdú-Jover, A. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & García-Morales, V. J. (2006). Environment-Flexibility coalignment and performance: an analysis in large versus small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 334-349. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00175.xSearch in Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. L., & Abramowitz, S. K. (2015). Statistics using SPSS: An integrative approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo