1. bookVolume 9 (2017): Issue 47 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2182-2875
First Published
16 Apr 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

What is the Problem with Model-based Explanation in Economics?

Published Online: 16 Oct 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2017) - Issue 47 (December 2017)
Page range: 603 - 630
Received: 05 Sep 2017
Accepted: 02 Nov 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2182-2875
First Published
16 Apr 2017
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The question of whether the idealized models of theoretical economics are explanatory has been the subject of intense philosophical debate. It is sometimes presupposed that either a model provides the actual explanation or it does not provide an explanation at all. Yet, two sets of issues are relevant to the evaluation of model-based explanation: what conditions should a model satisfy in order to count as explanatory and does the model satisfy those conditions. My aim in this paper is to unpack this distinction and show that separating the first set of issues from the second is crucial to an accurate diagnosis of the distinctive challenges that economic models pose. Along the way I sketch a view of model-based explanation in economics that focuses on the role that non-empirical and empirical strategies play in increasing confidence in the adequacy of a given model-based explanation.

Keywords

Alexandrova, Anna. 2008. Making models count. Philosophy of Science 75: 383–404.10.1086/592952Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Alexandrova, Anna; and Northcott, Robert. 2013. It’s just a feeling: why economic models do not explain. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(3): 262–8.10.1080/1350178X.2013.828873Search in Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Aydinonat, Emrah. 2008. The Invisible Hand in Economics: How Economists Explain Unintended Consequences. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger. 2007. Representation in economics. In Measurement in Economics: A Handbook. Ed. by M. Boumans. Elsevier: 135–52.Search in Google Scholar

Basso, Alessandra; Chiara Lisciandra; and Caterina Marchionni. 2017. Hypothetical models in social science. In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, ed. by Magnani and Bertolotti. Springer: 413–33.Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich, Alisa. 2014. How the tiger bush got its stripes: ‘how possibly’ vs. ‘how actually’ model explanations. The Monist 97(3): 321–38.10.5840/monist201497321Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bokulich, Alisa. 2009. Explanatory fictions. In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, ed. by M. Suárez. London: Routledge, 91–109.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, W.A.V. 1991. Residential preferences and neighbourhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography 28 (1): 1–19.10.2307/20613332015937Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The vanity of rigour in economics: theoretical models and Galileian experiments. In The ‘Experiment’ in the History of Economics, ed. by P. Fontaine and R. Leonard. Routledge, 135–53.Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 2002. The limits of casual order, from economics to physics. In Fact and Fiction in Economics, ed. by U. Mäki. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–51.Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 2009. If no capacities then no credible worlds. But can models reveal capacities? Erkenntnis 70: 45–58.10.1007/s10670-008-9136-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fumagalli, Roberto. 2016. Why we cannot learn from minimal models. Erkenntnis 81 (3): 433–55.10.1007/s10670-015-9749-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Alan. 1981. Forms of Explanation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2009. Learning from minimal economic models. Erkenntnis 70: 81–99.10.1007/s10670-008-9138-6Search in Google Scholar

Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2013. Appraising models nonrepresentationally. Philosophy of Science 80: 1–12.10.1086/673893Search in Google Scholar

Hands, Wade. 2016. Derivational robustness analysis, credible substitute systems and mathematical economic models: the case of stability analysis in Walrasian general equilibrium theory. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6(1): 31–53.10.1007/s13194-015-0130-0Search in Google Scholar

Hausman, Dan. 2013. Paradox postponed. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(3): 250–4.10.1080/1350178X.2013.828868Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hindriks, Frank. 2006. Tractability assumptions and the Musgrave-Mäki typology. Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 401–23.10.1080/13501780601048733Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Charles; Johnson, Cathleen; and Schmidtz, David. 2015. Prisoner’s Dilemma experiments. In The Prisoner’s Dilemma, ed. by M. Peterson. Cambridge University Press: 243–64.Search in Google Scholar

Kirkham, Richard L. 1992. Theories of Truth. A Critical Introduction. The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuorikoski, Jaakko; Lehtinen, Aki; and Marchionni, Caterina. 2010. Economic modelling as robustness analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 541–67.10.1093/bjps/axp049Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kuorikoski, Jaakko; Lehtinen, Aki; and Marchionni, Caterina. 2012. Robustness analysis disclaimer: please read the manual before use. Biology and Philosophy 27 (6): 891–902.10.1007/s10539-012-9329-zSearch in Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank; and Pettit, Philip. 1990. Program explanation: a general perspective. Analysis 50: 107–17.10.1093/analys/50.2.107Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lehtinen, Aki. 2016. Allocating confirmation with derivational robustness. Philosophical Studies 173 (9): 2487–509.10.1007/s11098-016-0625-3Search in Google Scholar

Ledyard, John. 1995. Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. by J. Kagel and A. Roth.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 111–94.Search in Google Scholar

Levins, Richard. 1966. The strategy of model building in population biology. In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology (1st ed.), ed. by E. Sober. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 18–27.Search in Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. 2010. Confirmation and robustness of climate models. Philosophy of Science 77(5): 971–84.10.1086/657427Search in Google Scholar

Mäki, Uskali. 2009. MISSing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis 70: 29–43.10.1007/s10670-008-9135-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mäki, Uskali. 2013. On a paradox of truth, or how not to obscure the issue of whether explanatory models can be true. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(3): 268–79.10.1080/1350178X.2013.828869Search in Google Scholar

Marchionni, Caterina. 2008. Explanatory pluralism and complementarity: from autonomy to integration. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38: 314–33.10.1177/0048393108319399Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Marchionni, Caterina. 2013. Playing with networks: How economists explain. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3(3): 331–52.10.1007/s13194-013-0070-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Northcott, Robert. 2013. Degree of explanation. Synthese 190 (15): 3087–105.10.1007/s11229-012-0124-9Search in Google Scholar

Northcott, Robert; and Alexandrova, Anna. 2015. Prisoner’s Dilemma doesn’t explain much. In The Prisoner’s Dilemma, ed. by M. Peterson. Cambridge University Press, 64–84.Search in Google Scholar

Norton, J. 2011. Analogy. Unpublished draft, University of Pittsburg. http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Analogy.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Odenbaugh, Jay; and Alexandrova, Anna. 2011. Buyer beware: robustness analyses in economics and biology. Biology and Philosophy 26: 757–71.10.1007/s10539-011-9278-ySearch in Google Scholar

Reiss, Julian. 2012. The explanation paradox. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1): 43–62.10.1080/1350178X.2012.661069Search in Google Scholar

Rohwer Yasha. and Rice Collin. 2016. How are models and explanations related? Erkenntnis 81 (5): 1127–48.10.1007/s10670-015-9788-0Search in Google Scholar

Rice, Collin. 2015. Moving beyond causes: optimality models and scientific explanation. Noûs 49(3): 589–615.10.1111/nous.12042Search in Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 2015. Economics Rules. Why Economics Works, When It Fails, and How To Tell The Difference. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reutlinger, Alexander; Hangleiter, Dominik; and Hartmann, Stephan. 2017. Understanding with (toy) models. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx00510.1093/bjps/axx005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. London: W.W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Steel, Daniel. 2013. Mechanisms and extrapolation in the abortion-crime controversy. In Mechanisms and Causality in Biology and Economics, ed. by H-K Chao, S-T Chen and R. Millstein. Springer, New York: 185–206.Search in Google Scholar

Sugden, Robert. 2000. Credible worlds: the status of theoretical models in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 1–31.10.1080/135017800362220Search in Google Scholar

Tsvetkova, Milena; Nilsson, Olof; Öhman, Camilla; Sumpter, Lovisa; and Sumpter, David. 2016. An experimental study of segregation mechanisms. EPJ Data Science 5: 4 DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0065-5.10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0065-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Michael. 2006. Forty years of “The Strategy”: Levins on model building and idealization. Biology and Philosophy 21(5): 623–45.10.1007/s10539-006-9051-9Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Michael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wimsatt, William. 1981. Robustness, reliability, and overdetermination. In Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, ed. by M. Brewer and B. Collins. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 124–63.Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195155270.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, James. 2006. Some varieties of robustness. Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 219–40.10.1080/13501780600733376Search in Google Scholar

Ylikoski, Petri; and Aydinonat, Emrah. 2014. Understanding with theoretical models. Journal of Economic Methodology 21(1): 19–36.10.1080/1350178X.2014.886470Search in Google Scholar

Ylikoski, Petri; and Kuorikoski, Jaakko. 2010. Dissecting explanatory power. Philosophical Studies 148 (2): 201–219.10.1007/s11098-008-9324-zSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo