Open Access

Naïve Realism and the Conception of Hallucination as Non-Sensory Phenomena

   | Mar 06, 2018

Cite

Allen, Keith. 2014. Hallucination and imagination. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93(2): 287-302.10.1080/00048402.2014.984312Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Sara. 2016. Grounding is not causation. Philosophical Perspectives 30(1): 21-38.10.1111/phpe.12074Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, John. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199243816.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Céspedes, Esteban. 2016. Causal Overdetermination and Contextualism. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-33801-9Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 2006. Perception and the fall from Eden. In Perceptual Experience, ed. by Tamar S. Gendler and John Hawthorne, 49-125. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Conduct, M. D. 2011. Naïve realism and extreme disjunctivism. Philosophical Explorations 13(3): 201-221.10.1080/13869795.2010.501900Search in Google Scholar

Conduct, M. D. 2012. Naïve realism without disjunctivism about experience. Consciousness and Cognition 21(2): 727-736.10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dokic, Jérôme, and Martin, Jean-Rémy. 2012. Disjunctivism, hallucination and metacognition. WIREs Cognitive Science 3: 533-543.Search in Google Scholar

Dokic, Jérôme. and Martin, Jean-Rémy. 2017. Felt reality and the opacity of perception. Topoi 36(2): 299-309.10.1007/s11245-015-9327-2Search in Google Scholar

Dowe, Phil. 2008. Causal processes. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta, Fall 2008. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/causation-process/.Search in Google Scholar

Fish, William. 2008. Disjunctivism, indistinguishability, and the nature of hallucination. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, ed. by Adrian Haddock and Fiona Macpherson. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Fish, William. 2009. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381344.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fish, William. 2013. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion: reply to my critics. Philosophical Studies 163(1): 57-66.10.1007/s11098-012-0072-8Search in Google Scholar

French, Craig. 2014. Naive realist perspectives on seeing blurrily. Ratio 27(4): 393-413.10.1111/rati.12079Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ganis, Giorgio; Thompson, William L.; and Kosslyn, Stephen M. 2004. Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 20(2): 226-241.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hellie, Benj. 2013. The multidisjunctive conception of hallucination. In Hallucination, ed. by Fiona Mapherson. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019200.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Mark. 2004. The obscure object of hallucination. Philosophical Studies 120(1-3): 113-183.10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033753.64202.21Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Mark. 2006. Better than mere knowledge? The function of sensory awareness. In Perceptual Experience, ed. by T. S. Gendler and John Hawthorne. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Mark. 2011. On a neglected epistemic virtue. Philosophical Issues 21(1): 165-218.10.1111/j.1533-6077.2011.00201.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Matthew. 2009. Heirs of nothing: the implications of transparency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79(3): 574-604.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00294.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Logue, Heather. 2010. Getting acquainted with naïve realism: critical notice of Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Philosophical Books 51(1): 22-38.10.1111/j.1468-0149.2010.00499.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Logue, Heather. 2012a. What should the naïve realist say about total hallucinations? Philosophical Perspectives 26(1): 173-199.10.1111/phpe.12012Search in Google Scholar

Logue, Heather. 2012b. Why naive realism? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112(2pt2): 211-237.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00332.xSearch in Google Scholar

Martin, Michael G. F. 2002. The transparency of experience. Mind and Language 4(4): 376-425.10.1111/1468-0017.00205Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Martin, Michael G. F. 2004. The limits of self-awareness. Philosophical Studies 120(1-3): 37-89.10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033751.66949.97Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Michael G. F. 2006. On being alienated. In Perceptual Experience, ed. by Tamar S. Gendler and John Hawthorne. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Michael G. F. 2013. Shibboleth: some comments on William Fish’s Perception, Hallucination and Illusion. Philosophical Studies 163(1): 37-48.10.1007/s11098-012-0075-5Search in Google Scholar

Nanay, Bence. 2016. Hallucination as mental imagery. Journal of Consciousness Studies 23(7-8): 65-81.Search in Google Scholar

Niikawa, Takuya. 2016. Naïve realism and the explanatory role of visual phenomenology [Special Issue]. Argumenta-Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1(2): 219-231.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Stephen E. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. 1st edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pautz, Adam. 2010. Why explain visual experience in terms of content? In Perceiving the World, ed. by Bence Nanay. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195386196.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Pautz, Adam . 2013. Do the benefits of naïve realism outweigh the costs? Comments on Fish, Perception, Hallucination and Illusion. Philosophical Studies 163(1): 25-36.10.1007/s11098-012-0080-8Search in Google Scholar

Raleigh, Thomas. 2011. Visual experience and demonstrative thought. Disputatio 4(30): 69-91.10.2478/disp-2011-0005Search in Google Scholar

Ratcliffe, Matthew. 2009. Belonging to the world through the feeling body. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 16(2): 205-11.Search in Google Scholar

Reiss, Julian. 2013. Contextualising causation part II. Philosophy Compass 8(11): 1076-1090.10.1111/phc3.12073Search in Google Scholar

Silins, Nicholas. 2012. Judgment as a guide to belief. In Introspection and Consciousness, ed.by Declan Smithies and Daniel Stoljar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Smith, A. D. 2008. Disjunctivism and discriminability. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, ed. by Adrian Haddock and Fiona Macpherson, 181-204. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Smithies, Declan. 2012. A simple theory of introspection. In Introspection and Consciousness, ed. by Declan Smithies and Daniel Stoljar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Soteriou, Matthew. 2016. Disjunctivism. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315636832Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Aaron. 2012. Introspection, explanation, and perceptual experience: resisting metaphysical. In Introspection and Consciousness, ed. by Declan Smithies and Daniel Stoljar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
0873-626X
Languages:
English, Portuguese
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Philosophy, Selected Philosophical Movements, Analytical Philosophy