1. bookVolume 8 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-7547
First Published
14 Jun 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Design Criteria for Visual Cues Used in Disruptive Learning Interventions Within Sustainability Education

Published Online: 11 Jan 2018
Page range: 5 - 16
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2255-7547
First Published
14 Jun 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper presents the design criteria for Visual Cues – visual stimuli that are used in combination with other pedagogical processes and tools in Disruptive Learning interventions in sustainability education – to disrupt learners’ existing frames of mind and help re-orient learners’ mind-sets towards sustainability. The theory of Disruptive Learning rests on the premise that if learners’ frames of mind or frames of reference can be disrupted (in other words, challenged), then learners’ mind-sets can be re-oriented towards sustainability, and indeed learners can be motivated to engage in change agency for sustainability. The use of Visual Cues thus unsettle or challenge learners’ mind-sets, and in doing so, set them on the pathway towards re-orientation in becoming more sustainability oriented, and/or in motivating engagement in sustainability change agency. The findings form part of a broader research study on ESD conducted in a higher education institution in Ireland within an undergraduate degree of teacher education. Kathy Charmaz’ Constructivist Grounded Theory approach guided the entire study, resulting in the articulation of the theory of, and processes within, Disruptive Learning. This paper presents design criteria for Visual Cues that were articulated through a thematic analysis approach from data emerging from reflective diaries, follow-up interviews, audio recordings and observational notes. The findings from this study in respect of design criteria state that Visual Cues must disrupt rather than disturb; must represent (have impressions of) real life contexts, scenarios, practices or events; must provoke controversy; must contain a visual stimulation; and can have a critical question.

Keywords

Barrett, M.J., Harmin, M., Maracle, B., Patterson, M., Thomson, C., Flowers, M., & Bors, K. (2017). Shifting relations with the more-than-human: six threshold concepts for transformative sustainability learning. Environmental Education Research, 21(1), 131–143, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2015.112137810.1080/13504622.2015.1121378Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Blenkinsop, S., & Morse, M. (2017). Saying yes to life: the search for the rebel teacher. In B. Jickling & S. Sterling (Eds.). Post-sustainability and environmental education: remaking education for the future (pp. 49–62). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa10.1191/1478088706qp063oaOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cao, Y., Vacanti, J. P., Paige, K. T., Upton, J., & Vacanti, C. A. (1997). Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to product tissue-engineered cartilage in the shape of a human ear. Plast Reconstr Surg, 100 (2), 297–302.10.1097/00006534-199708000-00001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, R., Cutting, R., & Summers, D. (2010). If sustainability needs new values, whose values? Initial teacher training and the transition to sustainability. In P. Jones, D. Selby, & S. Sterling (Eds.) Sustainability education: perspectives and practices across higher education (pp. 313–327). London: Earthscan.Search in Google Scholar

Delors, J. (1996). Learning: the treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

De Sousa, R. (1987). The rationality of emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5760.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dirkx, J.M. (2008). The meaning and roles of emotions in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 120, 7–18, doi: 10.1002/ace.910.1002/ace.9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Eén. (2016). Over eten – de weg van een snoepje [Video file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/180163754Search in Google Scholar

Eernstman, N., & Wals, A.E.J. (2013). Locative meaning-making: an arts-based approach to learning for sustainable development. Sustainability, 5, 1645–1660, doi: 10.3390/su504164510.3390/su5041645Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Eilam, E., & Trop, T. (2010). ESD pedagogy: a guide for the perplexed. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(1), 43–64, doi: 10.1080/0095896100367466510.1080/00958961003674665Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ferrante, A., & Sartori, D. (2016). From anthropocentrism to post-humanism in the educational debate. Relations, 4.2 (November), 175–194, doi: 10.7358/rela-2016-002-fesa10.7358/rela-2016-002-fesaOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fundación Telefónica. (2012). May the horse live in me: Tercer Premio VIDA 14.0 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Awz4w22tFHwSearch in Google Scholar

Gregory, M. (2014). Ethics education as philosophical practice: the case from Socratic, critical and contemplative pedagogies. Teaching Ethics, 15(1), 19–34, doi: 10.5840/tej20141017310.5840/tej201410173Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jickling, B. (2017). Education revisited: creating educational experiences that are held, felt, and disruptive. In B. Jickling & S. Sterling (Eds.) Post-sustainability and environmental education: remaking education for the future (pp. 15–30). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Jickling, B., & Sterling, S. (2017). Post-sustainability and environmental education: framing issues. In B. Jickling, & S. Sterling (Eds.) Post-sustainability and environmental education: remaking education for the future (pp. 1–14). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5Search in Google Scholar

Kilaru, A.S., Asch, D.A., Sellers, A., & Merchant, R.M. (2014). Promoting public health through public art in the digital age. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1633–1635.10.2105/AJPH.2014.302088Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: selected papers on group dynamics. Washington, DC: Harper & Brothers.Search in Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, pp. 5–12.10.1002/ace.7401Search in Google Scholar

Moon, J. (2008). Critical thinking: an exploration of theory and practice. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pipere, A. (2016). Envisioning complexity: Towards a new conceptualization of educational research for sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7 (2), 68–91, doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001710.1515/dcse-2016-0017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Shephard, K. (2015). Higher education for sustainable development. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137548412Search in Google Scholar

Tillmanns, T., and Holland, C. (2017). Crafting pedagogical pathways that disrupt and transform anthropocentric mindsets of higher education students. In: W. Leal Filho, L. Brandli, P. Castro and J. Newman (Eds.) Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education – World Sustainability Series (pp. 297–312). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47868-5_1910.1007/978-3-319-47868-5_19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Valk, J., & Tosun, A. (2016). Enhancing religious education through worldview exploration. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 105–117, doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001910.1515/dcse-2016-0019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zygmunt, T. (2016). Philosophy of sustainable development, Polish perspective. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 43–51, doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-001510.1515/dcse-2016-0015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo