[1. Arestis, George. “Fundamental rights in the EU: three years after Lisbon, the Luxembourg perspective.” Research Paper in Law No. 2/2013 (2012): 1-13 // http://aei.pitt.edu/43293/.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Arnull, Anthony. “The Principle of Effective Judicial Protection in EU Law: An Unruly Horse?” European Law Review No. 36 (2011): 51–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Benvenisti, Eyal, and George Downs. “The Premises, Assumptions, and Implications of Van Gend en Loos: Viewed from the Perspectives of Democracy and Legitimacy of International Institutions.” European Journal of International Law No. 25 (2014): 85–102.10.1093/ejil/cht084]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Broberg, Morten. “Judicial Coherence and the Preliminary Reference Procedure: Article 267 TFEU as a Private Party Remedy for ensuring Judicial Coherence in Europe.” Review of European Administrative Law No. 8 (2015): 9–37.10.7590/187479815X14465419060262]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Broberg, Morten. Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Garth, Bryant, and Mauro Cappelletti. “Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective.” Buffalo Law Review No. 27 (1978): 181–292.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Halberstam, Daniel. “Of Power and Responsibility: The Political Morality of Federal Systems.” Virginia Law Review No. 90 (2004): 732–834.10.2307/3202399]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Kilpatrick, Claire, Tonia Novitz, and Paul Skidmore. The Future of Remedies in Europe. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Klamert, Marcus. The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683123.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Lenaerts, Koen, Ignace Maselis, and Kathleen Gutman. EU Procedural law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Mastroianni, Roberto, and Andrea Pezza. “Access of Individuals to the European Court of Justice of the European Union Under the New Text of Article 263, Para 4, TFEU.” Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico communitario No. 5 (2014): 923–948.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Méndez Pinedo, Elvira. “Access to Justice as Hope in the Dark: In Search for a New Concept in European Law.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science No. 1 (2011): 9–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Micklitz, Hans. “Social Justice and Access Justice in Private Law.” European University Institute Working Paper LAW No. 2011/02 (2011): 1-32 // http://ssrn.com/abstract=1824225.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Schütze, Robert. From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238583.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Tuori, Kaarlo. European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.10.1017/CBO9781316091883]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Alassini and Others. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, Joined Cases C-317/08 to C-320/08.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Aziz Melki and Sélim Abdeli. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, Joined Cases C-188/10 and C-189/10.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Beschluss der 3. Kammer des Zweiten Senats. Bundesverfassungsgericht. The Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2014, 2 BvR 1549/07.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Ireland. The European Court of Human Rights, 2005, no. 45036/98.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Chalkor v. Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, C-386/10 P.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 2010, OJ C83/02.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Comet v Produktschap voor Siergewassen. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1976, Case 45/76.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008, OJ C115.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008, OJ C115/01.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Council of the European Union and Others v Vereniging Milieudefensie and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, Joined Cases C-401/12 P and C-403/12 P.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2010, C-279/09.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Dhahbi v Italy. The European Court of Human Rights, 2014, no. 17120/09.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007, OJ C303/02.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Foto-Frost v Hauptzollamt Lübeck-Ost. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1987, Case 314/85.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Global Starnet Ltd v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Amministrazione Autonoma Monopoli di Stato. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2017, Case C-322/16.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, C-398/13 P.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, C-583/11 P.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Parliament and Council. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, Order in T-18/10.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, T-526/10.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Jégo-Quéré v Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2002, T-177/01.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado Português. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, C-160/14.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Juan Carlos Sánchez Morcillo and María del Carmen Abril García v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2014, C-169/14.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, C-240/09.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1990, C-106/89.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. NV Algemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratis der Belastingen. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1963, Case 26/62.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Opinion 2/13, Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Orizzonte Salute - Studio Infermieristico Associato v Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona San Valentino – Città di Levico Terme and Others. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2015, C-61/14.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Plaumann v Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1963, Case 25/62.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Rewe v Landwirtschaftskammer fuer das Saarland. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 1976, Case 33/76.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Schipani and Others v Italy. The European Court of Human Rights, 2015, no. 38369/09.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. T & L Sugars Ltd and Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, T-279/11.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Telefónica SA v European Commission. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, C-274/12 P.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2007, C-432/05.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2002, C-50/00 P.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department. The Court of Justice of the European Union, 2013, C-300/11.]Search in Google Scholar
