1. bookVolume 10 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2029-0454
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Role of Judicial Ethics in Court Administration: From Setting the Objectives to Practical Implementation

Published Online: 25 Oct 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2017) - Issue 1 (June 2017)
Page range: 90 - 123
Received: 05 Jan 2017
Accepted: 16 Jun 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2029-0454
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

A court administration striving to guarantee the independence and professionalism of the court and judges requires attention to judicial ethics. Judicial ethics as a system of professional values and as an institutional instrument of judiciary is an integral part of court administration which is based on the principle of self-regulation. The importance of court administration requires a scientific approach to its elements. Therefore, this article begins by providing analysis of the main objectives of judicial ethics and a comparative study on the European practices establishing judicial ethics. It also provides a systematic list of the basic principles of the conduct of judges that are established in different international standards and legal systems of different European countries. By analysing documents of different international institutions and codes of ethics of European countries, the author identifies a systematic structure and the fundamental starting point of modern judicial ethics. The methods of descriptive comparative analysis and observation of recent developments are dominant in this study. Reacting to the scientific problems and current needs of legal communities with regard to the enforcement of judicial ethics, the article presents approaches that could lead to increased effectiveness of ethics in the judiciary, as well as to the development of methods of enforcement of judicial ethics. The purpose of this article is not just to disclose the main international standards and regulations on judicial ethics in Europe, but also to make it practically valuable for developers of judicial ethics, taking into consideration the fact that recently many countries have been trying to reform and improve ethical systems in the judiciary. Given the limited scope of this article, other important elements of court administration and developing a comparative study of the content of judicial ethics and the jurisprudence of its implementation will be presented in future publications.

Keywords

1. Cárdenas, Emilio J., and Héctor M. Chayer. “Corruption, accountability and the discipline of judges in Latin America.” Global Corruption Report (2007): 44–48 // http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan045153.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Maitrepierre, Eric J. “Ethics, Deontology, Discipline of Judges and Prosecutors in France” // http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No80/No80_29VE_Maitrepierre.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

3. Mayne, Greg. “Judicial integrity: the accountability gap and the Bangalore Principles.” Global Corruption Report (2007): 40–44 // http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan045153.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

4. Schultz, Jessica. “The UNCAC and judicial corruption: Requirements and avenues for reform.” Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (2009) // http://www.u4.no/publications/the-uncac-and-judicial-corruption-requirements-and-avenues-for-reform/.Search in Google Scholar

5. Terhechte, Jörg Philipp. “Judicial Ethics for a Global Judiciary – How Judicial Networks create their own codes of conduct.” German Law Journal 10 (2009): 501–514 // http://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PERSONALPAGES/_st/terhechte_joerg-philipp/files/Judicial_Ethics_for_a_Global_Judiciary_-_How_Judicial_Networks_Create_their_own_-_PDF_Vol_10_No_04_501-514_SI_Articles_Terhechte.pdf.10.1017/S2071832200001188Search in Google Scholar

6. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press 1995, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

1. Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (2002) // http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bologna and Milan Global Code of Judicial Ethics (2015) // http://www.jiwp.org/#!global-code-of-judicial-ethics/c1dnr.Search in Google Scholar

3. Code of Ethics for Members of the Judiciary in Malta. The Commission for the administration of Justice (2004) // www.judiciarymalta.gov.mt/code-of-ethics.Search in Google Scholar

4. Code of Ethics of Judges of the Republic of Lithuania. The General meeting of the Lithuanian judges (2006) // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/Code_lituanie.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

5. Code of Judicial Ethics of International Criminal Court. ICC-BD/02-01-05 // https://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/A62EBC0F-D534-438F-A128-D3AC4CFDD644/140141/ICCBD020105_En.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

6. Code of Judicial Ethics of the Republic of Croatia. The Council of presidents of all councils of Judges of the Republic of Croatia (2006) // http://pak.hr/cke/propisi,%20zakoni/en/CodeofJudicalEthics/EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

7. Code of Judicial Ethics. Adopted in 1995 by the Conference of Judges of the Republic of Latvia // http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TquFvYQa1V0J:at.gov.lv/files/uploads/files/archive/department1/tiesnesu_etikas_kodekss_eng.doc+&cd=1&hl=lt&ct=clnk&gl=lt.Search in Google Scholar

8. Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (September 2007) // https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/publications_unodc_commentary-e.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

9. Delcourt v. Belgium. European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), January 17, 1970 // http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["2689/65"],"itemid":["001-57467"]}.Search in Google Scholar

10. Deontological Code for Judges and Prosecutors. Superior Council of Magistracy of Romania (2005) // www.csm1909.ro/csm/linkuri/15_11_2005__2048_en.doc.Search in Google Scholar

11. Estonian Judges’ Code of Ethics. The Court en banc (2004) // http://www.nc.ee/?id=682.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ethical Principles for Judges. The Association of Danish Judges (2014) // http://dommerforeningen.dk/english/ethical-principles-for-judges/.Search in Google Scholar

13. Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges. The Norwegian Association of Judges (2010) // http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/CCJE/cooperation/Ethical%20_principles_Norwegian_judges.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

14. Good Judicial Practice. Principles and Issues. Swedish association of judges and Courts of Sweden (2013) // http://www.domstol.se/Publikationer/Rapporter/god_domarsed-grundsatser_och_fragor_eng.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

15. Guide for Magistrates, Principles, Values and Qualities. Published in 2012 by the Belgian High Council of Justice // http://www.csj.be/sites/default/files/press_publications/o0023f.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

16. Guide to Judicial Conduct. The Judges’ Council of England and Wales (2013) // https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Guidance/judicial_conduct_2013.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

17. Judges Ethics Code. Adopted in 2012 by Association of Georgian Judges // http://www.supremecourt.ge/eng/judges-self-governance/judges-ethics-code/.Search in Google Scholar

18. Judicial Ethics Report 2009-2010. ENCJ Working Group // http://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/ethics/judicialethicsdeontologiefinal.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

19. NVvR Guide to Judicial Conduct of the Dutch Judges Association: 87–125. In: Matters of Principle. Codes on the Independence and Impartiality of the Judiciary. The Dutch Foundation ‘Judges for Judges’ // https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Matters-of-principle.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

20. Opinion no. 3 of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the principles and rules governing judges’ professional conduct, in particular ethics, incompatible behaviour and impartiality. Strasbourg (November 19, 2002) // https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=1046405&Site=COE&direct=true.Search in Google Scholar

21. Organic Law of Georgia on Common Courts // https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/download/90676/13/en/pdf.Search in Google Scholar

22. Resolution on Judicial ethics adopted by the European Court of Human Rights (Plenary Court) (June 23, 2008) // http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Resolution_Judicial_Ethics_ENG.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

23. The Code of Conduct for Judicial Personnel: 81–85. In: Matters of Principle. Codes on the Independence and Impartiality of the Judiciary. The Dutch Foundation ‘Judges for Judges’ // https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Matters-of-principle.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

24. The Code of Judicial Ethics in Italy. Adopted in 1994 by the National Association of Judges // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/CODE_ITALIEN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

25. The Code of Judicial Ethics of Slovenia. The Association of Judges of the Republic of Slovenia (2001) // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/SLOVENIA-CODEOFJUDICIALETHICS.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

26. The Ethical Code of Judicial Conduct. The Judicial Council of the Slovak Republic (2010) // http://www.sudcovia.sk/sk/dokumenty/legislativa/39-english-categories/documents/archive/401-theet-codeofju-cond.Search in Google Scholar

27. The Statement of Principles of Judicial ethics for the Scottish Judiciary (2010) // http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/Upload/Documents/StatementofPriciplesofJudicialEthicsfortheScottishJudiciary.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo