1. bookVolume 9 (2019): Issue 1 (June 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Parliamentary Questions: Expressions of Opposition(s) within the European Parliament?

Published Online: 30 Jul 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2019) - Issue 1 (June 2019)
Page range: 33 - 56
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Parliamentary questions are a direct form of parliamentary scrutiny of other EU institutions and bodies, traditionally being an important tool for the opposition. This study examines how parliamentary questions are used in the European Parliament. We ascertain whether political groups representing opposition differ in their use of parliamentary questions from those who are represented in the European Commission. The article presents two main findings. First, such a difference does exist in all types of questions at the aggregated level. Groups not represented in the European Commission pose more questions than those who are represented. Secondly, it appears that the type of parliamentary question determines the groups’ behaviour. The article thus contributes to our understanding of how opposition functions in the European Parliament.

Keywords

Akbaba, S. (2014), ‘A critical assessment of a Eurosceptic party group on European integration: A case study of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–118. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-000610.2478/bjes-2014-0006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brack, N. (2012), ‘Eurosceptics in the European Parliament: exit or voice?’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 34, pp. 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.64108710.1080/07036337.2012.641087Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brack, N. (2015), ‘The roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and their implications for the EU,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251211557159010.1177/0192512115571590Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bressanelli, E. (2012), ‘National parties and group membership in the European Parliament: ideology or pragmatism?’ Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.64679010.1080/13501763.2011.646790Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bressanelli, E. (2013), ‘Competitive and coherent? Profiling the Europarties in the 2009 European Parliament elections,’ Journal of European Integration, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.71182410.1080/07036337.2012.711824Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union (2007), OJ C 115, 9.5.2008.Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, R.; Jacobs, F. & Shackleton, M. (2011), The European Parliament, 8th ed., London: John Harper Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Crespy, A. & Gajewska, K. (2010), ‘New parliament, new cleavages after the eastern enlargement? The conflict over the services directive as an opposition between the liberals and the regulators,’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dahl, R. A. (1966), Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Demker, M. (2014), ‘Sailing along new cleavages: understanding the electoral success of the Swedish Pirate Party in the European Parliament election 2009,’ Government and Opposition, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.2410.1017/gov.2013.24Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Field, A. P. (2009), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: (And Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll), 3rd ed., London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Finke, D. (2014), ‘Domestic-level parliamentary scrutiny and voting behaviour in the European Parliament,’ Government and Opposition, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.2710.1017/gov.2013.27Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Finke, D. (2015), ‘Why do European political groups call the roll?’ Party Politics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406881350951110.1177/1354068813509511Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gostyńska, A. (2014), ‘The European Parliament and European Commission after the May elections,’ The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 83–95.Search in Google Scholar

Helms, L. (2008), ‘Parliamentary opposition and its alternatives in a transnational regime: the European Union in perspective,’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 14, nos. 1–2, pp. 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233080192120810.1080/13572330801921208Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hobolt, S. B. (2015), ‘The 2014 European Parliament elections: divided in unity?’ Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 53, pp. 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.1226410.1111/jcms.12264Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jensen, C. B.; Proksch, S.-O. & Slapin, J. B. (2013), ‘Parliamentary questions, oversight, and national opposition status in the European Parliament,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.1201310.1111/lsq.12013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Judge, D. & Earnshaw, D. (2008), The European Parliament, 2nd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07775-210.1007/978-1-137-07775-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kubát, M. (2010), Politická opozice v teorii a středoevropské praxi: (vybrané otázky) [Political Opposition in Theory and Central European Practices: (Selected Questions)], Praha: Dokořán.Search in Google Scholar

Leconte, C. (2010), Understanding Euroscepticism, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05633-710.1007/978-1-137-05633-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Meijer, E. (2001), Written question E-2808/01 by Erik Meijer (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. 46,05% structural exceeding of deadlines for replies to non-priority written questions, Parliamentary Questions, OJ C 115 E, 16.05.2002, p. 164.Search in Google Scholar

Navarro, J. (2010), Questions in the European Parliament: What for? Preliminary Findings, Sciences Po Bordeaux: Spirit.Search in Google Scholar

Raunio, T. (1996), ‘Parliamentary questions in the European parliament: Representation, information and control,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 356–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233960842049210.1080/13572339608420492Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rozenberg, O. & Martin, S. (2011), ‘Questioning parliamentary questions,’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.59513210.1080/13572334.2011.595132Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Russo, F. & Wiberg, M. (2010), ‘Parliamentary questioning in 17 European Parliaments: some steps towards comparison,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233100374011510.1080/13572331003740115Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sánchez de Dios, M. & Wiberg, M. (2011), ‘Questioning in European Parliaments,’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.59512910.1080/13572334.2011.595129Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sozzi, F. (2016), ‘Electoral foundations of parliamentary questions: evidence from the European Parliament,’ Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2016.120265010.1080/13572334.2016.1202650Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Švecová, V. (2010), European Parliament and its Supervisory Powers over the European Commission—An Excursion into Parliament’s Task to Ensure Democratic Control over the Executive (Advanced Procedure), PhD thesis, Brno: Masaryk University.Search in Google Scholar

Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (1951), ECSC Treaty, 18.4.1951.Search in Google Scholar

Volacu, A. (2012), ‘Cooperation and competition in the European Parliament: a game theoretical interpretation,’ Romanian Journal of European Affairs, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–60.Search in Google Scholar

Westlake, M. (1994), A Modern Guide to the European Parliament, London: Pinter Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Wiberg, M. (1994), Parliamentary Control in the Nordic Countries: Forms of Questioning and Behavioural Trends, Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo