[Akesson T.R., Raveling D.G. (1982). Behaviors associated with seasonal reproduction and longterm monogamy in Canada Geese. Condor, 84: 188-196.]Search in Google Scholar
[Angelier F., Shaffer S.A., Weimerskirch H., Chastal O. (2006). Effect of age, breeding experience and senescence on corticosterone and prolactin levels inalong-lived seabirds: the wandering albatross. Gen. Comp. Endocr., 149: 1-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bednarczyk M., Rosiński A. (1999). Comparison of egg hatchability and in vitro survival of goose embryos of various origins. Poult. Sci., 78: 579-585.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bilcik B., Estevez I. (2005). Impact of male-male competition and morphological traits on mating strategies and reproductive success in broiler breeders. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 92: 307-323.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bilcik B., Estevez I., Russek - Cohen E. (2005). Reproductive success of broiler breeders in natural mating systems: The effect of male-male competitions, sperm quality, and morphological characteristics. Poult. Sci., 84: 1453-1462.]Search in Google Scholar
[Birkhead T.R., Martinez J.G., Burke T., Froman D.P. (1999). Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 266: 1759-1764.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bluhm C.K., Gowaty P.A. (2004). Social constraints on female mate preferences in mallards, Anas platyrhynchos, decrease offspring viability and mother productivity. Anim. Behav., 68: 977-983.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brun J-M., Delaunay I., Sellier N., Alletru B., Rouvier R., Tixier - Boichard M. (2003). Analysis of laying traits in first cycle geese in two production systems. Anim. Res., 52: 125-140.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchholz R. (1995). Female choice, parasite load and male ornamentation in wild turkeys. Anim. Behav. 50: 929-943.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng K.M., Burns J.T. (1988). Dominance relationship and mating behavior of domestic cocks - a model to study mate-guarding and sperm competition in birds. Condor, 90: 697-704.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chung K.M., Smith M.O., Kattesh H.G. (2011). The influence of double interspiking on production and behavior in broiler breeder flocks in elevated temperature conditions. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 21: 63-69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denk A.G., Holzmann A., Peters A., Vermeirssen E.L.M., Kempenaers B. (2005). Paternity in mallards: effects of sperm quality and female sperm selection for inbreeding avoidance. Behav. Ecol., 16: 823-833.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duncan I.J.H. (2009). Mating Behaviour and Fertility. In: Biology of breeding poultry, Hocking P. (ed.). Poultry Sci. Symp. Series 29, CAB Int., pp. 109-111.10.1079/9781845933753.0111]Search in Google Scholar
[Du Val E.H., Goymann W. (2011). Hormonal correlates of social status and courtship display in the cooperatively lekking lance-tailed manakin. Horm. Behav., 59: 44-50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elminowska - Wenda G., Rosiński A. (1993). Effects of day length on the reproductive performance of White Italian geese (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 20: 339-351.]Search in Google Scholar
[Froman D.P., Pizzari T., Feltmann A. J., Castillo - Juarez H., Birkhead T.R. (2002). Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B., 269: 607-612.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fusani L. (2008). Testosterone control of male courtship in birds. Horm. Behav., 54: 227-233.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garamszegi L.Z., Eens M., Hurtrez- Boussès S., Møller A.P. (2005). Testosterone, testes size, and mating success in birds:acomparative. Horm. Behav., 47: 389-409.]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia - Gonzalez F. (2004). Infertile mating and sperm competition: The effect of “nonsperm representation“ on intraspecific variation in sperm precedence patterns. Am. Nat., 164: 457-472.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gumułka M., Rozenboim I. (2013). Mating activity of domestic geese ganders (Anser anser f. domesticus) during breeding period in relation to age, testosterone and thyroid hormones. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 142: 83-90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gumułka M., Rozenboim I. (2014). Breeding period-associated changes in semen quality, concentrations of LH, PRL, gonadal steroid and thyroid hormones in domestic goose ganders (Anser anser f. domesticus). Anim. Reprod. Sci., 154: 166-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gumułka M., Rozenboim I. (2015). Mating activity and sperm penetration assay in prediction of the reproduction potential of domestic goose ganders inaharem system. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 161: 138-145.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirschenhauser K., Mo E., Bernard A., John W., Kurt D. (2000). Endocrine and behavioural responses of male greylag geese Anser anser to pairbond challenges during the reproductive season. Ethology, 106: 63-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hocking P.M., Bernard R.(2000). Effects of the age of male and female broiler breeders on sexual behaviour, fertility and hatchability of eggs. Br. Poult. Sci., 41: 370-376.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnsen T.S., Zuk M., Fessler E.A. (2001). Social dominance, male behaviour and mating in mixed-sex flocks of red jungle fowl. Behaviour, 138: 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones M.E., Mench J.A. (1991). Behavioral correlates of male mating success inamultisire flock as determined by DNAfingerprinting. Poult. Sci., 70: 1493-1498.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim T., Zuk M. (2000). The effects of age and previous experience on social rank in female red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Anim. Behav., 60: 239-244.]Search in Google Scholar
[King L.M., Kirby J.D., Froman D.P., Sonstegard T.S., Harry D.E., Darden J.R., Marini P.J., Walker R.M., Rhoads M.L., Donoghue A.M. (2000). Efficacy of sperm mobility assessment on commercial flocks and the relationships of sperm mobility and insemination dose with fertility in turkeys. Poult. Sci., 79: 1797-1802.]Search in Google Scholar
[Łukaszewicz E. (2002). Cryopreservation of gander Anser anser L. semen (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. AR Wrocław, 440: 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mc Gary - Brougher S., Estevez I., Ottinger M.A. (2005). Can testosterone and corticosterone predict the rate of display of male sexual behavior, development of secondary sexual characters and fertility potential in primary broiler breeders? Brit. Poultry Sci., 46: 621-625.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mc Gary S., Estevez I., Bakst M.R., Pollock D.L. (2002). Phenotypic traits as reliable indicators of fertility in male broiler breeder. Poultry Sci., 81: 102-111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mc Gary S., Estevez I., Russek - Cohen E. (2003 a). Reproductive and aggressive behavior in male broiler breeders with varying fertility levels. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 82: 29-44.10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00038-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Mc Gary S., Estevez I., Bakst M.R. (2003 b). Potential relationships between physical traits and male broiler breeder fertility. Poultry Sci., 82: 328-337.10.1093/ps/82.2.32812619812]Search in Google Scholar
[Parker T.H, Ligon J.D. (2002). Dominant male red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) test the dominance status of other males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 53: 20-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters A., Astheimer L.B., Cockburn A. (2001). The annual testosterone profile in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus, reflects their extreme infidelity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 50: 519-527.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pizzari T., Birkhead T. R. (2000). Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature., 405: 787-789.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poisbleau M., Fritz H., Valeix M., Perroi P-Y., Dalloyau S., Lambrechts M. (2006). Social dominance correlates and family status in wintering dark-bellied brent geese, Branta bernicla bernicla. Anim. Behav., 71: 1351-1358.]Search in Google Scholar
[Puchajda - Skowrońska H. (2012). Breeding and husbandry in geese (in Polish). In: Breeding and Husbandry of Poultry. PWRi L, pp. 355-377.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosiński A. (1986). Research on sexual behavior of geese (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot., 13: 43-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryder T.B., Horton B.M., Moore I.T. (2011). Understanding testosterone variation inatropical lek-breeding bird. Biol. Lett., 7: 506-509.]Search in Google Scholar
[Webb J.N., Székely T., Houston A.I., Mc Namara J.M. (2002). Atheoretical analysis of the energetic costs and consequences of parental care decisions. Philos. T. R. Soc. B., 357: 331-340.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wingfield J.C., Hegner R.E., Dufty J.A.M., Ball G.F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”. Theoretical implications for pattern of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. Am. Nat., 136: 829-846.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wingfield J.C., Lynn S.E., Soma K.K. (2001). Avoiding the “costs” of testosterone: ecological bases of hormone-behavior interactions. Brain. Behav. Evol., 57: 239-251.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zuk M., Johnsen T.S., Mac Larty T. (1995). Endocrine- immune interactions, ornaments, and mate choice in red jungle fowl. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B., 260: 205-210.]Search in Google Scholar
