1. bookVolume 62 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2668-7763
First Published
13 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Importance of Home Versus 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Assessment of Blood Pressure Variability in Hypertension

Published Online: 20 May 2016
Page range: 239 - 242
Received: 29 Nov 2015
Accepted: 20 Mar 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2668-7763
First Published
13 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Background: A number of studies reveal that home blood pressure variability is associated with cardiovascular risk factors. However, we do not have a consensus regarding the variability index and the frequency of measurements.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess home blood pressure variability for a period of 7 consecutive days and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure variability using the average real variability index and to test whether home blood pressure variability represents a suitable parameter for long-term monitoring of the hypertensive patients.

Material and methods: A number of 31 hypertensive patients were included in the study, 8 male, 23 female, mean age 60.19±7.35 years. At the inclusion ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed, home blood pressure monitoring was carried out for 7 consecutive days with 2 measurements daily. We compared ambulatory blood pressure values, variability using paired t-test. We were looking for correlations between HBP values and cardiovascular risk factors.

Results: Ambulatory versus home blood pressure derived mean blood pressure was 131.38±15.2 versus 131.93±8.25, p=0.81. Ambulatory derived variability was 10.65±2.05 versus home variability 10.56±4.83, p=0.91. Home versus ambulatory pulse pressure was 51.8± 9.06 mmHg vs. 54.9±11.9 mmHg, p=0.046. We found positive correlation between HBPV and home BP values, p=0.027, r2=0.1577, (CI: 0.04967 to 0.6588). Home, as well as ambulatory derived variability were positively correlated to age p=0.043, r2=0.1377 (CI: 0.01234 to 0.6451) versus p<0.0001, CI: 0.3870 to 0.8220, r2=0.4302.

Conclusion: Assessment of home blood pressure monitoring and variability could represent a well-tolerated alternative for long-term follow-up of hypertension management.

Keywords

1. Dorobanţu M, Darabont R, Ghiorghe S, et al. Profile of the Romanian hypertensive patient data from SEPHAR II study. Rom J Intern Med. 2012;50(4):285-96.Search in Google Scholar

2. Hermida RC, Smolensky MH, Ayala DE, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recommendations for the diagnosis of adult hypertension, assessment of cardiovascular and other hypertension-associated risk, and attainment of therapeutic goals. Chronobiol Int 2013;30(3):3.Search in Google Scholar

3. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension Practice Guidelines for home blood pressure monitoring. J of Human Hypertens 2010;24:779–785.10.1038/jhh.2010.5420520631Search in Google Scholar

4. Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, et al. Day-by-day variability of blood pressure and heart rate at home as a novel predictor of prognosis: the Ohasama study. Hypertens 2008;52:1045–1050.10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.10462018981332Search in Google Scholar

5. Ishikura K, Obara T, Kato T, et al. Associations between day-by-day variability in blood pressure measured at home and antihypertensive drugs: the J-HOME-morning study. Clin Exp Hypertens 2012;34(4):297–304.10.3109/10641963.2012.68108722564087Search in Google Scholar

6. Hansen TW, Thijs L, Li Y et al. Prognostic Value of Reading-to-Reading Blood Pressure Variability Over 24 Hours in 8938 Subjects From 11 Populations. Hypertens 2010;55:1049-1057.10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.14079820212270Search in Google Scholar

7. Johansson JK, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, et al. Factors affecting the variability of home-measured blood pressure and heart rate: the Finn-home study. J Hypertens 2010;28(9):1836–184510.1097/HJH.0b013e32833b6c8a20508528Search in Google Scholar

8. Ushigome E, Fukui M, Hamaguchi M, et al. The coefficient variation of home blood pressure is a novel factor associated with macroalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hypertens Res 2011;34:1271–127510.1038/hr.2011.12821814212Search in Google Scholar

9. Parati G, Ochoa JE, Lombardi C et al. Blood pressure variability: Assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target. Curr Hypertens Rep 2015;17-2310.1007/s11906-015-0537-125790801Search in Google Scholar

10. Singh V. Home blood pressure monitoring, practical aspects - second in series. E journal of Cardiology Practice 2015;13:13Search in Google Scholar

11. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2013;31:1281–135710.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc23817082Search in Google Scholar

12. Mena. L, Pintos S, Queipo NV, et al. A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability. J Hypertens 2005;23(3):505–51110.1097/01.hjh.0000160205.81652.5a15716690Search in Google Scholar

13. Asayama K, Kikuya M, Schutte R et al. Home blood pressure variability as cardiovascular risk factor in the population of Ohasama. Hypertens 2013;61:61-6910.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00138360733223172933Search in Google Scholar

14. Fukui M, Ushigome E, Tanaka M et al. Home blood pressure variability on one occasion is a novel factor associate with arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertens Res 2013;36:219-22510.1038/hr.2012.17723096230Search in Google Scholar

15. Matsui Y, Ishikawa J, Eguchi K, et al. Maximum value of home blood pressure: a novel indicator of target organ damage in hypertension. Hypertens 2011;57(6):1087–9310.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.17164521536993Search in Google Scholar

16. Johansson JK, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, Jula AM. Prognostic value of the variability in home-measured blood pressure and heart rate: the Finn-Home Study. Hypertens 2012;59(2):212–21810.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.17865722215704Search in Google Scholar

17. Parati G, Juan EO, Lombardi C, Bilo G. Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:143-15510.1038/nrcardio.2013.123399972Search in Google Scholar

18. Fujita H, Matsuoka S, Awazu M. White-coat andr white-coat effects correlate with 24-h pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variability in children and young adults. Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;37(2):345-35210.1007/s00246-015-1283-526481222Search in Google Scholar

19. Paratia G, Stergiou G, , O’Brien E et al. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens 2014;32:1359–136610.1097/HJH.000000000000022124886823Search in Google Scholar

20. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension Practice Guidelines for home blood pressure monitoring. Journal of Human Hypertension 2010;1–7Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo