Role of transurethral resection of the prostate in the management of prostate cancer

1. Dae Keun Kim, Sang Jin Kim, Hong Sang Moon, et al. The role of TURP in the detection of prostate cancer in BPH patients with previously negative prostate biopsy. www.kjurology.org DOI:10.4111/kju.2010.51.5.313.10.4111/kju.2010.51.5.313287388420495693Search in Google Scholar

2. S Radhakrishnan, TJ Dorkin, N Sheikh & DR Greene. Role of transition zone sampling by TURP in patients with raised PSA and multiple negative transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 2004:7;338–342.10.1038/sj.pcan.450075615365579Search in Google Scholar

3. Koenraad van Renterghem, Gommert Van Koeveringe, Ruth Achten, Philip van Kerrebroeck. Prospective study of the role of transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and proven bladder outlet obstruction. European urology 2008: 54;1385-1392.10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.06918599187Search in Google Scholar

4. Tristan Dellavedova, Rolando Ponzano, Laura Racca, Federico Minuzzi and Mariana Dominguez. Prostate cancer as incidental finding in transurethral resection. Oncologic Urology Arch. Esp. Urol. 2010:63(10);855-861.10.4321/S0004-06142010001000005Search in Google Scholar

5. Koenraad M.L.E. van Renterghem, Philip E.V.A. van Kerrebroeck and Gommert A. Van Koeveringe. Role and current situation of turp in patients with elevated psa; Special article Arch. Esp. Urol. 2010:63(6);411-419.10.4321/S0004-06142010000600001Search in Google Scholar

6. Paolo Puppo, Carlo Introini, Paolo Calvi, Angelo Naselli. Role of transurethral resection of the prostate and biopsy of the peripheral zone in the same session after repeated negative biopsies in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2006;49(5):873-878.10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.06416439052Search in Google Scholar

7. Djavan B. Prostate Biopsies and the Vienna Nomograms. European Urology. 2006:Suppl5;500–510.10.1016/j.eursup.2006.02.018Search in Google Scholar

8. Werahera PN, Sullivan K, La Rosa FG, at al: Optimization of prostate cancer diagnosis by increasing the number of core biopsies based on gland volume. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2012;5:892-899.Search in Google Scholar

9. Nelson AW, Harvey RC, Parker RA, et al. Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57480.10.1371/journal.pone.0057480358383623460864Search in Google Scholar

10. Van Renterghem K, Van Koeveringe G, Achten R, et al. A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies. International urology and nephrology. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42:29-38.10.1007/s11255-009-9596-z284497219496018Search in Google Scholar