1. bookVolume 64 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-9471
First Published
15 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Benchmarking the financial performance of local councils in Ireland

Published Online: 30 Apr 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 64 (2016) - Issue 1 (May 2016)
Page range: 1 - 27
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2449-9471
First Published
15 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

It was over a quarter of a century ago that information from the financial statements was used to benchmark the efficiency and effectiveness of local government in the US. With the global adoption of New Public Management ideas, benchmarking practice spread to the public sector and has been employed to drive reforms aimed at improving performance and, ultimately, service delivery and local outcomes. The manner in which local authorities in OECD countries compare and benchmark their performance varies widely. The methodology developed in this paper to rate the relative financial performance of Irish city and county councils is adapted from an earlier assessment tool used to measure the financial condition of small cities in the US. Using our financial performance framework and the financial data in the audited annual financial statements of Irish local councils, we calculate composite scores for each of the thirty-four local authorities for the years 2007–13. This paper contributes composite scores that measure the relative financial performance of local councils in Ireland, as well as a full set of yearly results for a seven-year period in which local governments witnessed significant changes in their financial health. The benchmarking exercise is useful in highlighting those councils that, in relative financial performance terms, are the best/worst performers.

Keywords

Askim, J. (2007). How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73 (3), 453–72.10.1177/0020852307081152Search in Google Scholar

Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63 (5), 586–606.10.1111/1540-6210.00322Search in Google Scholar

Boedker, C., & Chua, W. F. (2013). Accounting as an affective technology: A study of circulation, agency and entrancement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (4), 245–67.10.1016/j.aos.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Bowerman, M., Francis, G., Ball, A., & Fry, J. (2002). The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9 (5), 429–49.10.1108/14635770210451455Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, R. (2000). Performance measurement in local government [CPMR discussion paper 15]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, R. (2014). Public sector reform in Ireland: Views and experiences from senior executives [State of the Public Service Series, research paper no. 13]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, K. W. (1993). The 10-point test of financial condition: Towards an easy-to-use assessment tool for smaller cities. Government Finance Review, 9 (6), 21–6.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, K. W. (1996). Trends in key ratios using the GFOA financial indicators database 1989–1993. Government Finance Review, 12 (6), 30–4.Search in Google Scholar

Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2006). Are citizens significant users of government financial information? Public Money and Management, 26 (4), 205–9.10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00526.xSearch in Google Scholar

Cabaleiro, R., Buch, E., & Vaamonde, A. (2013). Developing a method to assessing the municipal financial health. American Review of Public Administration, 43 (6), 729–51.10.1177/0275074012451523Search in Google Scholar

Carmeli, A. (2002). A conceptual and practical framework of measuring performance of local authorities in financial terms: Analysing the case of Israel. Local Government Studies, 28 (1), 21–36.10.1080/714004135Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, C. (1997). Reflection on a contingent view of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22 (2), 189–205.10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00001-9Search in Google Scholar

County and City Managers’ Association. (2013). Report to the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government. Retrieved from http://www.environ.ie/ [2 March 2016].Search in Google Scholar

Department of Finance. (2010). EU/IMF programme of financial support for Ireland. Retrieved from www.finance.gov.ie/documents/publications/reports/2011/euimfrevised.pdf [1 July 2015].Search in Google Scholar

Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2011). Public service reform. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.Search in Google Scholar

Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2015). Annual progress report on the public service reform plan 2014–16. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.Search in Google Scholar

Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2012). Putting people first: Action programme for effective local government. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (1996). Better local governmentA programme for change. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (2008). Green paper on local government reform: Stonger local democracy – options for change. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Espeland, W. N. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (1), 1–40.10.1086/517897Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (2), 171–86.10.2307/2392467Search in Google Scholar

Francis, G., & Holloway, J. (2007). What have we learned? Themes from the literature on best-practice benchmarking. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9 (3), 171–89.10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00204.xSearch in Google Scholar

Game, C. (2006). Comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55 (6), 466–79.10.1108/17410400610682497Search in Google Scholar

García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Frías-Aceituno, J. V., & Mordan, N. (2012). A new predictor of local financial distress. International Journal of Public Administration, 35 (11), 739–48.10.1080/01900692.2012.679173Search in Google Scholar

Health Information and Quality Authority. (2013). Guidance on developing key performance indicators and minimum data sets to monitor healthcare quality. Dublin: Health Information and Quality Authority.Search in Google Scholar

Hendrick, R. (2004). Assessing and measuring the fiscal heath of local governments. Urban Affairs Review, 40 (1), 78–114.10.1177/1078087404268076Search in Google Scholar

Hong, P., Hong, S. W., Roh, J. J., & Park, K. (2012). Evolving benchmarking practices: A review for research perspectives. Benchmarking, 19 (4), 444–62.10.1108/14635771211257945Search in Google Scholar

Hood, C. (2007). Public service management by numbers: Why does it vary? Where has it come from? What are the gaps and the puzzles? Public Money & Management, 27 (2), 95–102.10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00564.xSearch in Google Scholar

Humphreys, P. (2002). Effective consultation with the external customer [CPMR discussion paper 23]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Hyndman N., & McGeough, F. (2008). NPM and performance measurement: A comparative study of the public sectors in Ireland and the UK. Irish Accounting Review, 15 (2), 29–57.10.52399/001c.26982Search in Google Scholar

Järvinen, J. (2009). Shifting NPM agendas and management accountants’ occupational identities. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22 (8), 1,187–210.10.1108/09513570910999283Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, S., & Messner, M. (2012). Enabling control and the problem of incomplete performance indicators. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37 (7), 544–64.10.1016/j.aos.2012.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Julnes, P. D. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61 (6), 693–708.10.1111/0033-3352.00140Search in Google Scholar

Kleine, R., Kloha, P., & Weissert, C. S. (2003). Monitoring local government fiscal health: Michagan’s new 10-point scale of fiscal distress. Government Finance Review, 19 (3), 18–23.Search in Google Scholar

Kloha, P., Weissert, C. S., & Kleine, R. (2005a). Developing and testing a composite model to predict local fiscal distress. Public Administration Review, 65 (3), 313–23.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00456.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kloha, P., Weissert, C. S., & Kleine, R. (2005b). Someone to watch over me: State monitoring of local fiscal conditions. American Review of Public Administration, 35 (3), 236–55.10.1177/0275074005277435Search in Google Scholar

Knox, C. (2012). The reform of public administration in Northern Ireland: A squandered opportunity? Administration, 60 (1), 117–38.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, S., & Jäkel, T. (2013). Competing, collaborating or controlling? Comparing benchmarking in European local government. Public Money and Management, 33 (4), 269–76.10.1080/09540962.2013.799815Search in Google Scholar

Local Government Audit Service. (2014). Activity report. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Local Government Efficiency Review Implementation Group. (2013). Further report to the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government. Dublin: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Magd, H., & Curry, A. (2003). Benchmarking: Achieving best value in public-sector organisations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10 (3), 261–86.10.1108/14635770310477780Search in Google Scholar

Malsch, B., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Re-theorizing change: Institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (5), 870–99.10.1111/joms.12006Search in Google Scholar

Martin, S., Downe, J., Grace, C., & Nutley, S. (2013). New development: All change? Performance assessment regimes in UK local government. Public Money & Management, 33 (4), 277–80.10.1080/09540962.2013.799816Search in Google Scholar

McAteer, M., & Stephens, A. (2013). New development: The role of benchmarking in supporting improvement in local government – Scottish and Welsh practitioners’ perspectives. Public Money & Management, 33 (4), 281–4.10.1080/09540962.2013.799833Search in Google Scholar

Mercer, T., & Gilbert, M. (1996). A financial condition index for Nova Scotia municipalities. Government Finance Review, 12 (5), 36–8.Search in Google Scholar

Modell, S. (2004). Performance measurement myths in the public sector: A research note. Financial Accountability & Management, 20 (1), 39–57.10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00185.xSearch in Google Scholar

Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20 (4), 849–66.10.1093/jopart/muq004Search in Google Scholar

Northcott, D., & Llewellyn, S. (2005). Benchmarking in UK health: A gap between policy and practice? Benchmarking, 12 (5), 419–35.10.1108/14635770510619357Search in Google Scholar

Nutley, S., Downe, J., Martin, S., & Grace, C. (2012). Policy transfer and convergence within the UK: The case of local government performance improvement regimes. Policy and Politics, 40 (2), 193–209.10.1332/147084411X581880Search in Google Scholar

Pidd, M. (2012). Measuring the performance of public services: Principles and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791550Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (1), 25–44.10.1093/jopart/mui045Search in Google Scholar

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform – a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Putting People First – a summary. (2012, Autumn/Winter). Local Authority Times, 16 (3 & 4), 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Robbins, G., & Lapsley, I. (2005). NPM and the Irish public sector – From reluctant reformer to statutory codification. In J. Guthrie, C. Humphrey, O. Olson & L. Jones (Eds), International public financial management reform: Progress, contradictions and challenges. Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Robbins, G., & Lapsley, I. (2014). The success story of the Eurozone crisis? Ireland’s austerity measures. Public Money & Management, 34 (2), 91–8.10.1080/09540962.2014.887515Search in Google Scholar

Robbins, G., Turley, G., & McNena, S. (2014). From boom to bust? The financial performance of city and county councils. Administration, 62 (1), 119–51.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1937). Comparative statistics and the measurement of efficiency. National Municipal Review, 26, 524–7.10.1002/ncr.4110261107Search in Google Scholar

Trosa, S., & Williams, S. (1996). Performance measurement in government. Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

Turley, G., & Flannery, D. (2013). The impact of the economic boom and bust on local government budgets in Ireland. Administration, 61 (2), 33–56.Search in Google Scholar

Turley, G., Robbins, G., & McNena, S. (2015). A framework to measure the financial performance of local governments. Local Government Studies, 41 (3), 401–20.10.1080/03003930.2014.991865Search in Google Scholar

Wynn-Williams, K. L. H. (2005). Performance assessment and benchmarking in the public sector: An example from New Zealand. Benchmarking, 12 (5), 482–92.10.1108/14635770510619393Search in Google Scholar

Yasin, M. M. (2002). The theory and practice of benchmarking: Then and now. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9 (3), 217–43.10.1108/14635770210428992Search in Google Scholar

Yetano, A. (2013). What drives the institutionalization of performance measurement and management in local government. Public Performance and Management Review, 37 (1), 59–86.10.2753/PMR1530-9576370103Search in Google Scholar

Zafra-Gómez, J. L., López-Hernández, A. M., & Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009a). Developing an alert system for local governments in financial crisis. Public Money & Management, 29 (3), 175–81.10.1080/09540960902891731Search in Google Scholar

Zafra-Gómez, J. L., López-Hernández, A. M., & Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009b). Evaluating financial performance in local government: Maximizing the benchmarking value. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75 (1), 151–67.10.1177/0020852308099510Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo